Re[2]: Oops!! Power Failure

2005-08-25 Thread Spike
Hello Anthony, > It worries me a bit that e-mail programs in general seem to make very > little provision for selectively archiving or restoring message base > content. Eventually you end up with tremendously large mailboxes, and > if there's no way to selectively archive and extract stuff and >

Re[2]: Oops!! Power Failure

2005-08-23 Thread Spike
Hello Anthony G. Atkielski, > Spike writes: 8< Snippage >> TB! told me the message bases were corrupted. The folder item >> 'maintenance' was greyed out, and TB! said to run chkdsk. > Just from a power failure? Yes, with the program continuing to run for TWO hours with no data drive. >> I ra

Re[2]: Oops!! Power Failure

2005-08-23 Thread Spike
Hello Roman, > Holy cr*p! Have you considered deleting some e-mails or storing > attachments in separate directories? How many messages is that? 425,345 as of two minutes ago. I'm doing a maximum mail index capacity test {gryns}. Every e-mail I have sent or received since 1995 +/- a month or

Re[2]: Oops!! Power Failure

2005-08-23 Thread Spike
Hello Nick Dutton, > Assuming that your bases were corrupted because Windows had not > written its cached image of your files to disk when the PC died, you > could perhaps disable "write caching" on the external drive? > It's under the disk's properties, then Hardware->Properties->Policies. > Thi

Re[2]: Oops!! Power Failure

2005-08-23 Thread Spike
Hello Jernej Simoncic, > Scandisk might have been the culprit - it's not a tool meant for NT/2k/XP > (though I have a hard time believing it ran at all - unless your disks use > FAT32). It was the 'tools' error checking under WinXP Pro. After exiting TB!, it allowed me to run the error checking.