> Hi Michael,
> The status bar at the bottom of the eMail shows the
> account, which will be used for replying, right? (2nd item from the
> right at the bottom of the editing window.) If you have more than one
> account, you can right-click on that item, and it will allow you to
> change to anothe
Hi Michael,
MLW> Hi,
MLW> When I receive messages from this list, I use a filter to put the
MLW> messages in a common folder called TBUDL. I have tried to reply to a
MLW> few of these messages, yet the default "from" address that is chosen
MLW> is the top of my account list, sorted alphabeticall
Thursday, September 2, 2004, 10:24:30 PM, you wrote:
MLW> I mean ALWAYS choose the address that the message was
MLW> originally
MLW> addressed to?
I answered one post, checked the 'to' field, and it said
it was going to the poster, not to the list .. as it
wasn't a strictly on topic post, I let
Hallo Michael,
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 08:41:53 -0700GMT (3-9-2004, 17:41 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MLW>>> Should it not always, and I mean ALWAYS choose the address that
MLW>>> the message was originally addressed to?
>> You drag the messages out of the receiving account into a common
>> fold
Hello Roelof,
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Roelof mused about "Why do replys not go to the
same address the orginals are sent to?" (at least in part):
RO> However, there are several ways around this:
RO> 1) Set a folder identity for your common folder with the tbudl
RO> messages,
Hallo Alexander,
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 17:24:51 +0200GMT (3-9-2004, 17:24 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
>> Note that even though I'm using only one account I'm using 30+ addresses.
ASK> OIC! Many aliases you have, hm?
I'm skipping on them, honestly. ;-) It's considered bad behaviour for
a
Hello Roelof Otten,
03-Sep-2004 15:16, you wrote:
> Note that even though I'm using only one account I'm using 30+ addresses.
OIC! Many aliases you have, hm?
> Since I'm using only one account you can understand that common folders
> aren't very important for me, but just for you I teste
Hallo Alexander,
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 14:48:56 +0200GMT (3-9-2004, 14:48 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
>> It is. I've st a folder identity for my tbudl (and several others)
>> folder and when ever I reply or send a new message from it, my address
>> is being taken from the folder identity.
ASK>
Hello Roelof Otten,
03-Sep-2004 14:32, you wrote:
> It is. I've st a folder identity for my tbudl (and several others)
> folder and when ever I reply or send a new message from it, my address
> is being taken from the folder identity.
When I highlight the folder and start a new message, it alway
Hallo Alexander,
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 14:26:51 +0200GMT (3-9-2004, 14:26 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
>> 1) Set a folder identity for your common folder with the tbudl
>> messages, thus that identity will be picked when replying.
ASK> Idea... wouldn't it be nice if the folder identity was pick
Hello Roelof Otten,
03-Sep-2004 08:55, you wrote:
> 1) Set a folder identity for your common folder with the tbudl
> messages, thus that identity will be picked when replying.
Idea... wouldn't it be nice if the folder identity was picked up when
writing a new message? (given that the folder sele
Hallo Michael,
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 22:24:30 -0700GMT (3-9-2004, 7:24 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MLW> Should it not always, and I mean ALWAYS choose the address that
MLW> the message was originally addressed to?
You drag the messages out of the receiving account into a common
folder, thus th
Hallo Michael,
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 22:24:30 -0700GMT (3-9-2004, 7:24 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MLW> --
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled o
Hi,
When I receive messages from this list, I use a filter to put the
messages in a common folder called TBUDL. I have tried to reply to a
few of these messages, yet the default "from" address that is chosen
is the top of my account list, sorted alphabetically. Why does The
Bat!, 3.0, with no bu
This is what I am using on my "Reply Template" so that it
will clean up the message that I am replying too.(see below)
My question is What could I add to this so that it
would also "Wrap" the message that I'm replying too?
You know, so that the message is all together with no extra
lines?
- -
Mark Earl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I highlighted part of a message in Eudora and clicked Reply,
> only that part highlighted would be in the reply. Can I do the same
> thing with the Bat?
As an alternative to the F4 that others have sugggested, just hold
down the shift key while you clic
Hi Mark,
On Monday, October 21, 2002, 6:23 PM, you put forth, in part, about "Replys":
M> highlighted part of a message in Eudora and clicked Reply, only that
M> part highlighted would be in the reply. Can I do the same thing
Yep, highlight text, and hit F4, just like I did her
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
@21-Oct-2002, 19:23 -0400 (00:23 UK time) Mark Earl [ME] in
mid:199261706964.20021021192341@;encode.com said:
ME> Hello. Just wondering about reply text. When I highlighted
ME> part of a message in Eudora and clicked Reply, only that part
On 10/21/2002, Mark Earl wrote:
> Hello. Just wondering about reply text. When I highlighted part of a
> message in Eudora and clicked Reply, only that part highlighted would be
> in the reply. Can I do the same thing with the Bat?
Hit .
--
Regards,
Don Zeigler
* bringing you boring sigfiles f
Hello. Just wondering about reply text. When I highlighted part of a
message in Eudora and clicked Reply, only that part highlighted would
be in the reply. Can I do the same thing with the Bat?
--
Cheers
Mark
Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
Service Pack 3
I've found an acceptable solution to my problem. I changed the the
quoted message to a super small font, this separates the quoted
message enough that the e-mail no longer confuses me.
__
Best Regards,
~John
- - - Roelof Otten wrote on Tuesday, August 13, 2002 - - -
> That would be rather tric
Yes, this makes sense. That is way to much trouble. Thanks for your
time.
__
Best Regards,
~John
- - - Roelof Otten wrote on Tuesday, August 13, 2002 - - -
> That would be rather tricky. The point is that TB doesn't change
> incoming messages. So to do this, you'd need to forward all messages
> t
Hallo ~John,
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:38:33 -0500GMT (13-8-02, 20:38 +0200GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
~> How can I go about setting up "thebat" to place the persons reply
~> above the "quoted message" For example, when someone replies to this
That would be rather tricky. The point is that
On Tuesday, August 13, 2002, 7:38:33 PM, ~John wrote:
~> How can I go about setting up "thebat" to place the persons reply
~> above the "quoted message" For example, when someone replies to this
~> message, my message is going to be the first thing I see when I open
~> the e-mail, then I w
Hey TBUDL,
How can I go about setting up "thebat" to place the persons reply
above the "quoted message" For example, when someone replies to this
message, my message is going to be the first thing I see when I open
the e-mail, then I will have to scroll down to see the person reply
to m
On 26-09-2000 at 22:28, Dierk Haasis kindly wrote:
> On Monday, September 25, 2000 at 11:09:09 PM Karin wrote:
>>> What I want is that all headers are shown in a special window/pane
>>> like the main headers are in the view window (between message list
>>> and message).
>> Let me make you happy:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Karin!
On Monday, September 25, 2000 at 11:09:09 PM you wrote:
>> What I want is that all headers are shown in a special window/pane
>> like the main headers are in the view window (between message list
>> and message).
> Let me make you hap
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000 10:22:31 -0400, Gary Mort wrote:
KS>> X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.46d) Personal
GM> I like to know what mailler my correspondents use at times.
This is already possible: it's the Header 'Mailer'
KS>> Organization: Marcab Inc.
GM> You spent the time to fill it in, I'd like to see
Hello Karin,
Monday, September 25, 2000, 5:09:09 PM, you wrote:
KS> On 25-09-2000 at 20:50, Dierk Haasis kindly wrote:
>> On Sunday, September 24, 2000 at 4:39:37 PM Karin wrote:
>>> Perhaps you have switched "View --> RFC-822" on in that
>>> window?
>> Quite right. I would like to see all RF
Hello Dierk,
Monday, September 25, 2000, 2:53:22 PM, you wrote:
DH> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
DH> Hash: SHA1
DH> Hello Nick!
DH> On Sunday, September 24, 2000 at 5:17:11 PM you wrote:
>>> Now, what I would prefer is that all headers I want to see are shown in
>>> separate "window"
On 25-09-2000 at 20:50, Dierk Haasis kindly wrote:
> On Sunday, September 24, 2000 at 4:39:37 PM Karin wrote:
>> Perhaps you have switched "View --> RFC-822" on in that
>> window?
> Quite right. I would like to see all RFC-822 headers in the preview and
> only the main ones in the view messag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Karin!
On Sunday, September 24, 2000 at 4:39:37 PM you wrote:
> Perhaps you have switched "View --> RFC-822" on in that
> window?
Quite right. I would like to see all RFC-822 headers in the preview and
only the main ones in the view messa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick!
On Sunday, September 24, 2000 at 5:17:11 PM you wrote:
>> Now, what I would prefer is that all headers I want to see are shown in
>> separate "window" like the normal headers are shown in the gray area
>> between panes. And then I don'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On September 24, 2000, at 1:53:46 AM, Dierk Haasis Wrote:
> Now, what I would prefer is that all headers I want to see are shown in
> separate "window" like the normal headers are shown in the gray area
> between panes. And then I don't ever want the
On 24-09-2000 at 10:53, Dierk Haasis kindly wrote:
> Now sometimes I just scroll through the message in the preview,
> hit "Reply" and have all the headers to be cut out in my reply.
> Replying from the "normal" message window (RFC headers off) gives
> me just the text.
Perhaps y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello TBUDL!
Something I was wondering for some time now (over a year):
I do use both the Message preview pane (with all headers viewed)
and the "reading message view" (I should know by now what it is
called, but I was changing langu
Greetings Tom!
On Monday, May 15, 2000 at 15:01:48 GMT -0700 (which was 3:01 PM where you think I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
p>> You know, sometimes, I write mail with no subject. And I know in
p>> "other mailers" there is an "Yo, You got No Subject" Button Warning
p>> /Ok.
TP> Ever
p> You know, sometimes, I write mail with no subject. And I know in
p> "other mailers" there is an "Yo, You got No Subject" Button Warning
p> /Ok.
Ever seen message boxes with a "do not show this warning again"
checkbox? That adds a little more "bloat" but doesn't slow you down
any more.
p>
Morning Dierk Haasis,
> Another thing: I like having a warning to include a subject line.
> Can't actually see why one wants *not* to add a subject -- just to
> make it more difficult to assess the worth of the message?
Just for example, list server commands usually don't need a subject. And
g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Januk!
Monday, May 15, 2000, 5:27:17 AM, you wrote:
> The n represents how deep in the thread the message is.
> Unfortunately, it doesn't really work on this list because many
> people (yourself and myself included) have the %SINGLERE macro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
*/Reply
Sunday, May 14, 2000, 6:24:11 PM, you wrote:
DH> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
DH> Hash: SHA1
DH> Hello TBUDL!
DH> I am just registered about a half week to this list, which
DH> sometimes seems to have some nice advice. Well,
Greetings Tom!
You know, sometimes, I write mail with no subject. And I know in
"other mailers" there is an "Yo, You got No Subject" Button Warning
/Ok.
I never liked it. I'd rather have "no warning" "No pop-up" It's just
another pop-up screen to slow you down. I been fighting to get rid of
Hi Marck,
On Monday, May 15, 2000 at 08:58:27 GMT +0100 (which was 12:58 AM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
>> Now that TB supports full back references, it seems to me that it
>> would be better if TB counted how many references exist in a message
>> and use this to indicate how dee
Hi Januk,
On 15 May 2000 at 20:27:17 GMT -0700 (which was 04:27 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Numbering of Replys "(RE:[2])"":
> Now that TB supports full back references, it seems to me that it
> would be better if TB c
JA> Although others disagree, I would love it if TB did something similar
JA> to Netscape for this one. In Netscape, if you leave the Subject: line
JA> blank, a little dialogue box comes up and confirms that you want a
JA> blank subject line. Some others on this list have suggested that this
Hello Januk,
It seems that on Monday, May 15, 2000, at 5:27:17 AM, you wrote:
>> 2. Sometimes users seem to forget what the subject field is for;
>> well, just fill in the subject of your message.
JA> Although others disagree, I would love it if TB did something similar
JA> to Netscap
mailers make this system very prone
to empty subject lines.
> After re-reading my message, wouldn't it be nice if the default
> for replys with TB! would be "single referenced"?
As I stated above, it is a matter of preference. Besides, if the
default was s
template we would get rid
of those stupid "RE:[n]" -- where "n" stands for any number.
2. Sometimes users seem to forget what the subject field is for;
well, just fill in the subject of your message.
After re-reading my message, wouldn't it be nice if the defau
48 matches
Mail list logo
