Sorry about several Duplicate postings: settings problem in TB

2012-09-27 Thread Robert D.
Hello TBUDL, I believe it has to do something with how I re-map the imap folders to TB. Account Properties/ Mail Management/ then Outbox and a pulldown, or write-in, on the right of that. 'For pre-defined mailboxes use these ... Outbox ... ??? So, on the iMap server, I have 'Sent

Re: Sorry: a test

2009-07-05 Thread MFPA
Hi On Saturday 4 July 2009 at 10:59:11 PM, in mid:439697726.20090704225...@privateofcourse.co.uk, Privateofcourse wrote: I'm recieving mail from the list but mail I send isn't getting to the list. Of course if this gets to the list it'll be luck. Luck was with you (-: -- Best regards,

Re: Sorry: a test

2009-07-05 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello Privateofcourse, P Hi, P This is what you said on Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:36:10 -0400 your time: My hosting service reports no problems after I enquired. This arrived on the list P Thanks. P After more problems I opted to move my domain elsewhere, and not it's hosted P in a different

Re: Sorry: a test

2009-07-05 Thread Privateofcourse
Hello Jack, This is what you said on Sun, 5 Jul 2009 11:25:52 -0500 your time: You might have to go on the web to your TBUDL mailing list membership configuration page and enable the Mail delivery option to get your postings sent to you as well as the rest of the list members. That's

Re: Sorry: a test

2009-07-05 Thread Bill McQuillan
On Sun, 2009-07-05, Privateofcourse wrote: This is what you said on Sun, 5 Jul 2009 11:25:52 -0500 your time: You might have to go on the web to your TBUDL mailing list membership configuration page and enable the Mail delivery option to get your postings sent to you as well as the rest of

Re: Sorry: a test

2009-07-04 Thread Privateofcourse
Hi, This is what you said on Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:36:10 -0400 your time: My hosting service reports no problems after I enquired. This arrived on the list Thanks. After more problems I opted to move my domain elsewhere, and not it's hosted in a different part of the world to where it was.

Re: Sorry: a test

2009-06-28 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Privateofcourse, Saturday, June 27, 2009, 10:37:34 PM, you wrote: P This is a test. List mail has not been reaching me. Checked the TBUDL P archive and replies have been made to my posts...but I haven't had them. P Started happening a couple of weeks back. TBUDL mailing list membership

Sorry: a test

2009-06-27 Thread Privateofcourse
Hello TBUDL, This is a test. List mail has not been reaching me. Checked the TBUDL archive and replies have been made to my posts...but I haven't had them. Started happening a couple of weeks back. TBUDL mailing list membership configuration page shows a bounce level of 1.0. My hosting

Re: Sorry: a test

2009-06-27 Thread Rick
Hello TBUDL, This is a test. List mail has not been reaching me. Checked the TBUDL archive and replies have been made to my posts...but I haven't had them. Started happening a couple of weeks back. TBUDL mailing list membership configuration page shows a bounce level of 1.0. My

Forgot to trim reply. Sorry. [Was: Re: Common filters]

2007-08-02 Thread MFPA
Hi On Thursday 2 August 2007 at 8:17:43 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], MFPA wrote: After you log in, the page has a big box called add note above the existing notes. Sorry, Moderators. I realised after sending that I had not trimmed. -- Best regards, MFPA

Re: Forgot to trim reply. Sorry.

2007-08-02 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Mfpa, @2-Aug-2007, 20:25 MFPA [M] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to MFPA: After you log in, the page has a big box called add note above the existing notes. M Sorry, Moderators. I realised after sending that I had not M trimmed. Hey... self trouting! Could this start a trend

Re: OT: I am sorry for your loss [Re: Hero is gone]

2006-12-14 Thread Sandy
Mary Bull wrote: Thank you so much Mary. Yes, it was an accident to send it to the Bat. Sandy Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Ooops - the files. Sorry (Re: Wrap text problem ?)

2006-02-24 Thread Robin Anson
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 at 21:05:46 +0200, Shahar wrote: Still no attachments. I think attachments are not allowed on TBUDL. Can you upload them somewhere? Sure. Editor gonfig: http://www.geocities.com/savlist/Editor_config.jpg Text: http://www.geocities.com/savlist/Wrap.jpg It is hard to

Re: Ooops - the files. Sorry (Re: Wrap text problem ?)

2006-02-24 Thread Shahar
Hello Thomas On 2/23/06, Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Shahar, On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:05:46 +0200 GMT (23/02/2006, 02:05 +0700 GMT), Shahar wrote: As can see in the attached files the text in the incoming message is shrieked and is not as the sender sent it. My

Re: Ooops - the files. Sorry (Re: Wrap text problem ?)

2006-02-24 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Shahar, On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 19:33:03 +0200 GMT (24/02/2006, 00:33 +0700 GMT), Shahar wrote: Thanks. I'm at a loss, though. Maybe someone else can help. S Problem solved. S I uninstalled and reinstalled. S Work like a $1000K :-) S Thank you. Don't thank me - but I'm glad the problem is

Re: Ooops - the files. Sorry (Re: Wrap text problem ?)

2006-02-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Shahar, On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:05:46 +0200 GMT (23/02/2006, 02:05 +0700 GMT), Shahar wrote: As can see in the attached files the text in the incoming message is shrieked and is not as the sender sent it. My editor configuration is attached in the second file. Still no attachments.

Ooops - the files. Sorry (Re: Wrap text problem ?)

2006-02-22 Thread Shahar
On 2/22/06, Shahar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all. I have a problem. I'm using ver 3.0.1.33 on Win Xp home SP2 As can see in the attached files the text in the incoming message is shrieked and is not as the sender sent it. My editor configuration is attached in the second file. Any

Re: Ooops - the files. Sorry (Re: Wrap text problem ?)

2006-02-22 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Shahar, On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:02:50 +0200 GMT (22/02/2006, 22:02 +0700 GMT), Shahar wrote: As can see in the attached files the text in the incoming message is shrieked and is not as the sender sent it. My editor configuration is attached in the second file. Still no attachments. I

Re: Ooops - the files. Sorry (Re: Wrap text problem ?)

2006-02-22 Thread Shahar
Hello Thomas. Great to see you here as well. On 2/22/06, Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Shahar, On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:02:50 +0200 GMT (22/02/2006, 22:02 +0700 GMT), Shahar wrote: As can see in the attached files the text in the incoming message is shrieked and is not

Re: Test - sorry

2005-03-30 Thread Nick Dutton
Hello Mica, MM For me one jar of black, and one jar of green olives, for a snack, and a MM small bottle of olive oil, for sipping. Thank you! (-: Sorry - no can do. These form the bulk of my strategic snack-cache, in readiness for when the skies darken as the forces of evil take to the air

Re: Test - sorry

2005-03-30 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Nick Dutton everyone else, on 30-Mrz-2005 at 11:08 you (Nick Dutton) wrote: MM For me one jar of black, and one jar of green olives, for a snack, and MM a small bottle of olive oil, for sipping. Thank you! (-: Sorry - no can do. These form the bulk of my strategic snack-cache

Re: Test - sorry

2005-03-30 Thread Mica Mijatovic
, for sipping. Thank you! (-: Sorry - no can do. These form the bulk of my strategic snack-cache, in readiness for when the skies darken as the forces of evil take to the air... You intend shooting TB beta versions with olives? Interesting strategy... Might be he has in mind olive pits/stones

Test - sorry

2005-03-29 Thread Nick Dutton
Like it says in the subject - Sorry. -- N. Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Test - sorry

2005-03-29 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Nick Dutton everyone else, on 29-Mrz-2005 at 12:59 you (Nick Dutton) wrote: Like it says in the subject - Sorry. This can't be toleranted. Either you send every list member a bottle of beer right now (for those that don't want beer, a bar of chocolate), or each list member will send you

Re: Test - sorry

2005-03-29 Thread Mica Mijatovic
in the subject - Sorry. This can't be toleranted. Either you send every list member a bottle of beer right now (for those that don't want beer, a bar of chocolate), or each list member will send you a private test mail. Deal? :-) Deal! Deal! I have charged my mass mailer already. And am caressing

Sorry...correction about filter

2004-09-17 Thread Mean Drake
Sorry...I checked my inbox again and found that the large mail of 3.7 MB had been downloaded and was lying in my inbox. So the filter did not work at all. Filter is setup as: Message size Greater than 800KB Action Delete Message from server, and play a sound I got the sound and still

Re: Sorry...correction about filter

2004-09-17 Thread Joe
Hello Mean, -- Friday, September 17, 2004, 3:28:39 PM, you wrote: Sorry...I checked my inbox again and found that the large mail of 3.7 MB had been downloaded and was lying in my inbox. So the filter did not work at all. Filter is setup as: Message size

Re[2]: Sorry...correction about filter

2004-09-17 Thread Mean Drake
Saturday, September 18, 2004, 1:18:08 AM, you wrote: Hello Mean, -- Friday, September 17, 2004, 3:28:39 PM, you wrote: Sorry...I checked my inbox again and found that the large mail of 3.7 MB had been downloaded and was lying in my inbox. So the filter

NFS test. Please disregard and sorry to bother

2004-09-03 Thread MAU
Hello all, -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.123 Beta/Umpteen Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Sorry folks - trying again for the rogueicon

2004-07-28 Thread Peter Ballantyne
Test message Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Sorry folks - trying again for the rogueicon

2004-07-28 Thread Zonnet
ON Wednesday, July 28, 2004, 11:44:23 AM, you wrote: PB Test message PB PB Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: PB http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html Hi Peter, We can see you now :-) But as you can see, you

Sorry, you have some errors ???

2004-07-17 Thread Bill McCarthy
Hello TB User Discussion List, I'm no longer able to define new shortcuts. If I open the shortcut list (Alt-F12) and click on OK, I get Sorry, you have some errors. If I click on Conflicts, I can see I have none. For Warnings, I have plenty - but that's normal. Is there any way I can see

Re: Sorry, you have some errors ???

2004-07-17 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Bill, On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 17:10:54 -0500GMT (18-7-2004, 0:10 +0200, where I live), you wrote: BM One other question. Is there a way to save the shortcut list to a BM text file? Not that I'm aware of. The shortcuts file is saved as shortcut.cfg (IIRC?), but that's not really readable by

Re: Sorry, you have some errors ???

2004-07-17 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Sat 17-Jul-04 5:10pm -0400, Bill McCarthy wrote: I'm no longer able to define new shortcuts. If I open the shortcut list (Alt-F12) and click on OK, I get Sorry, you have some errors. That's solved. I found that I kept a SmartBat note of every shortcut I've added. Refilter was Shirt-Ctrl-R

Sorry guys (was Re: 1 Text file attached as per TBUDL)

2003-10-25 Thread Anne
On Saturday, October 25, 2003, 4:58:22 AM, Pixie wrote in message: mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P Sorry mods, didn't realize the reply-to was for the list until too P late.. Ooops entirely my fault Pixie and Mods... for some reason there was a wayward folder reply to still set on the folder I sent

I'm sorry for the dupes...

2003-02-18 Thread Markus Varpula
Hello TBUDL, Something happened with my ISP's smtp server.. it did send the mail, but told me that it didn't. Again, I'm sorry.. //Markus -- Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62

Digest command ... oops, sorry, wrong address

2003-01-23 Thread Homesick Mac
2003-01-24 , 00:09 , Sorry folks, instead of to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've sent this to the list :- -- Kind regards, Homesick Mac www.homesickmac.com Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Sorry for the OT but ....

2002-11-03 Thread DG Raftery Sr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sunday, November 03, 2002 8:17:31 AM RE: Sorry for the OT but Greetings, All of a sudden I am receiving nothing from TBOT. Anyone else experiencing this problem? Sorry Mr./Mrs. Moderators however I can't post to TBOT to ask this question

Re: Sorry for the OT but ....

2002-11-03 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi DG, on Sun, 3 Nov 2002 08:19:56 -0500GMT (03.11.02, 14:19 +0100GMT here), you wrote in mid:145772801.20021103081956;myrealbox.com : DRS All of a sudden I am receiving nothing from TBOT. Anyone else DRS experiencing this problem? DRS Sorry Mr./Mrs. Moderators however I can't post to TBOT

Re: Sorry for the OT but ....

2002-11-03 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In mid:145772801.20021103081956;myrealbox.com, Dg Raftery Sr. [DRS] wrote:' DRS All of a sudden I am receiving nothing from TBOT. Anyone else DRS experiencing this problem? DRS Sorry Mr./Mrs. Moderators however I can't post to TBOT to ask DRS

Re: Sorry for the OT but ....

2002-11-03 Thread Andre Wichartz
On Sunday, November 3, 2002, 08:19:56 -0500 GMT (which was 14:19 local time), DG Raftery Sr. wrote: DRS All of a sudden I am receiving nothing from TBOT. Anyone else DRS experiencing this problem? The last message I received from tbot is dated Sun, 3 Nov 2002 03:03:59 +0700. DRS Sorry Mr./Mrs

Re[2]: sorry about the top-post

2002-11-03 Thread David R. Austen
Hello, Thomas: Thank you very much. Your instructions were very clear -- and I broke new ground today creating a special TBUDL Reply template that guards against inadvertent top-posting. Here it is, from TBUDL in my address book: Hello, %OFromFName: Best regards, %FromFName Best wishes,

Re: sorry about the top-post

2002-11-03 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello David! On Sunday, November 3, 2002 at 5:39:09 PM you wrote: the template below Let`s refine that a little bit ((comments in double breaks)): Hello, %OFromFName: ((^ Why that?)) %QUOTES ((that puts the message you reply to in your reply)) %CURSOR ((putting you

Re[2]: sorry about the top-post

2002-11-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Dierk, Sunday, November 3, 2002, 10:52:24 AM, you wrote: DH Hello David! DH the template below DH Let`s refine that a little bit ((comments in double breaks)): Hello, %OFromFName: DH ((^ Why that?)) DH %QUOTES ((that puts the message you reply to in your reply))

Re: sorry about the top-post

2002-11-03 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mary, 3-Nov-2002, 12:38 -0600 (18:38 UK time) Mary Bull [MB] in mid:16337465292.20021103123801;premiernet.net said: MB This is a big help to me, too, Dierk. And so much more concisely MB done than my long Reply post to David. Which really didn't

Re[2]: sorry about the top-post

2002-11-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Marck, Sunday, November 3, 2002, 5:16:48 PM, you wrote: MDP Here's another tip (and your cut mark works beautifully BTW)... Thanks. Best regards, Marymailto:xxx MDP I recommend that you remove the mailto link for all public postings. MDP

Re[2]: Sorry for the OT but ....

2002-11-03 Thread Barry2
Hello Andre, Sunday, November 3, 2002, 1:46:19 PM, you wrote: AW Why can't you post to tbot? If you're subscribed you should also be AW able to post.. Maybe he means it's possible to post but since he doesn't get mail from TBOT he doesn't know if it gets there ?? Hopefully Allie will be able

Re[3]: sorry about the top-post

2002-11-02 Thread David R. Austen
Friday, November 01, 2002, 7:07:06 PM, you wrote: TM The one you want to watch out for is the 'Cut' mark. I think that is TM part of the list rules... :-] (snip) Hello, all: This suggests I might want to create a special procedure for all replies to messages on this list. Please, where do I

Re[4]: sorry about the top-post

2002-11-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello David, Saturday, November 2, 2002, 6:30:20 AM, you wrote: TM The one you want to watch out for is the 'Cut' mark. I think that is TM part of the list rules... :-] DRA (snip) DRA This suggests I might want to create a special procedure for all DRA replies to messages on this list. DRA

Re: sorry about the top-post

2002-11-02 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello David, On Sat, 2 Nov 2002 07:30:20 -0500 GMT (02/11/02, 19:30 +0700 GMT), David R. Austen wrote: This suggests I might want to create a special procedure for all replies to messages on this list. If you do not use any special AB templates (and do not create folder templates, which

Re: sorry about the top-post

2002-11-01 Thread Tim Musson
Hey Vishal, My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.61) Personal' was used to write mid:15311707113.20021031184640;myrealbox.com on Thursday, October 31, 2002 at 9:46:40 PM. 8 snip MAU No dessert for you tonight! ;-) VN I know. I'm badd :) find me a hole so i can lie down and

Re[2]: sorry about the top-post

2002-11-01 Thread Vishal Nakra
TM The one you want to watch out for is the 'Cut' mark. I think that is TM part of the list rules... :-] TM ,- [People on this list are much happier if you use a Cut Mark] TM | This is a special sequence that starts on a new line and consists of TM | two dashes (minus signs) and a space

sorry about the top-post

2002-10-31 Thread Vishal Nakra
I mistakenly top-posted while replying to someone today. Sorry moderators! -Vishal Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: sorry about the top-post

2002-10-31 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Vishal, On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 18:12:41 -0800GMT (1-11-02, 3:12 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: VN I mistakenly top-posted while replying to someone today. Yeah. And though I edited my reply, I forgot to complain about it. ;-) -- Groetjes, Roelof

Re: sorry about the top-post

2002-10-31 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Vishal, I mistakenly top-posted while replying to someone today. Oh my goodness! How could you do something like that! Aren't you ashamed of yourself? No dessert for you tonight! ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61

Re[2]: sorry about the top-post

2002-10-31 Thread Vishal Nakra
Thursday, October 31, 2002, 3:37:05 PM, you wrote: MAU Hello Vishal, I mistakenly top-posted while replying to someone today. MAU Oh my goodness! How could you do something like that! Aren't you MAU ashamed of yourself? MAU No dessert for you tonight! ;-) I know. I'm badd :) find

Newbie questions......sorry!!

2002-07-03 Thread pOoTer
Hi All, Just joined the list and just started using this awesome mail client after 'sacking' Outlook 2000. I have two newbie questions if you could oblige me 1. I am using Kaspersky AV v4.0.5 with the Bat! plug-in and have set up a template to send to people who infect me, trouble is it does

Re: Newbie questions......sorry!!

2002-07-03 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hi pOoTer, On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 00:32:12 +0100, you wrote: 1. I am using Kaspersky AV v4.0.5 with the Bat! plug-in and have set up a template to send to people who infect me, trouble is it does not seem to trigger, any ideas what I am doing wrong please? The template I am using is the one in

OT testing. please ignore. sorry.

2002-06-24 Thread Rick Reumann
-- Rick Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug

Sorry

2002-06-12 Thread Frank D. Hubeny
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello tbudl, Sorry about the lack of trim in my last message. I really am working on this problem! - -- Best regards, Frank D. Hubeny mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQA/AwUBPQeqiDTXvbjmKKD/EQIObACgl43c3bxerVOKwK

Sorry, just a test!!

2002-06-03 Thread Dirk Dörr
Hi tbudl, Kind regards -- Dirk Dörr Using TheBat!1.60g Current Ver: 1.60m FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators :

A problem using Opera at First Union Online -- I'm sorry ---

2002-05-11 Thread Daniel Maier
TB uses two standard threading headers to maintain thread integrity; References and In-Reply-To. Some clients use one or t'other. Some clients don't use *any*. Messages from the latter group of clients will always break a thread. Hallo Marck, just saw your message in TBDUL and wanted to

Re: A problem using Opera at First Union Online -- I'm sorry ---

2002-05-05 Thread Mike Smith
At Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 4:44:30 AM, Marck wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Daniel, @30 April 2002, 14:32:20 -0400 (19:32 UK time) Daniel Grunberg wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm sorry, I thought I was sending the message from

Re: A problem using Opera at First Union Online -- I'm sorry ---

2002-05-05 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Mike Smith wrote: Hmmm. Is there an explanation for why this seems to be the only list where threading (mostly) works? I've tried turning it on on other list folders and its a disaster. Could be possibly related to headers that TB! puts into the email, or something

Re: A problem using Opera at First Union Online -- I'm sorry ---

2002-05-05 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mike, @05 May 2002, 20:54:31 +1000 (11:54 UK time) Mike Smith wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hmmm. Is there an explanation for why this seems to be the only list where threading (mostly) works? I've tried turning it on on

Re: A problem using Opera at First Union Online -- I'm sorry ---

2002-05-05 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, May 05, 2002, at 4:59:57 AM PST, Jonathan Angliss wrote: I don't personally use threading on most emails, but might try it on this list. Eek! Threading - especially with the variety of threading options provided by TB! - is one of the

sorry: *ignore* my previous mail about s/mime!!

2002-05-01 Thread Haico
Hi, I don't know if my previous mail comes through.. I haven't seen it yet.. but maybe the connection isn't good right now.. Or I used a wrong address. What I said in that mail is not true. :-( Excuse me/ignore Haico Current Ver: 1.60h

Re: [Opera-users] A problem using Opera at First Union Online -- I'm sorry ---

2002-04-30 Thread Daniel Grunberg
QUOTE I share your frustration with some sites not allowing Opera to browse them but what has this to do with TB, exactly? Wrong mailing list, perhaps? I'm sorry, I thought I was sending the message from my Opera folder. Using The Bat! v1.60c on Windows 95 4.0 Build B

Re: A problem using Opera at First Union Online -- I'm sorry ---

2002-04-30 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Daniel, @30 April 2002, 14:32:20 -0400 (19:32 UK time) Daniel Grunberg wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm sorry, I thought I was sending the message from my Opera folder. That can mean only one thing: You're

Re: A problem using Opera at First Union Online -- I'm sorry ---

2002-04-30 Thread Eddie Castelli
Good morning Marck, --- Marck D Pearlstone / Thursday, 30.04.2002, 20:44:30 A problem using Opera at First Union Online -- I'm sorry --- ... Back to the lecture: every time I say this, someone takes exception to something I've said with comments like 'danger' is a bit harsh

Bugs and fixes - sorry if you received it twice

2002-04-24 Thread Vlad
I've mentioned some strange behaviors of the v.1.61c 1) When you write new message and attach a file, this file is copied to Attach folder. This is bad, baut even worse because 2) when you delete a message with attachments, these attachments are not deleted from the attach folder. (even after

Re: Bugs and fixes - sorry if you received it twice

2002-04-24 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Vlad! On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 11:18:53 AM you wrote: 1) When you write new message and attach a file, this file is copied to Attach folder. This is bad, baut even worse because Have a look under Account/Properties/Files Directories ... Most people here seem to leave

Re: Bugs and fixes - sorry if you received it twice

2002-04-24 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dierk Haasis [DH] wrote: ... DH Be advised to *not* use the Bind attachments while sending DH together with Delete attachment when message is deleted from DH Trash as then you'll lose files. Wow! I would count that as a show-stopper problem. :-( The

Testing message sent from Becky (sorry for the new thread)

2002-03-24 Thread Melissa Rese
Hello, This test is in regards to the Peculiar HTML display (v1.60) thread I started. I'm sending this message from Becky email client. I'm not going to sign this mesasge, so that I can see if the message below (the one that showed up with all of the message missing except for the first two

Re: Testing message sent from Becky (sorry for the new thread)

2002-03-24 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, March 24, 2002, at 12:09:08 PM PST, Melissa Rese wrote: The original mystery test message to myself: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Okay... the plot thickens... I sent that message from Becky, and again, all of the

Re: Testing message sent from Becky (sorry for the new thread)

2002-03-24 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, March 24, 2002, at 12:31:07 PM PST, Walt Newcomb wrote: MR -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MR Hash: SHA1 MR ÿþ Except for the List trailer this is everything that arrive at this end. This is becoming *very* interesting (albeit

Re: Testing message sent from Becky (sorry for the new thread)

2002-03-24 Thread Walt Newcomb
Hello Melissa Sunday, March 24, 2002, 1:09:08 PM, you wrote: MR Hello, MR This test is in regards to the Peculiar HTML display (v1.60) thread MR I started. I'm sending this message from Becky email client. MR I'm not going to sign this mesasge, so that I can see if the message MR below (the

Re: Testing message sent from Becky (sorry for the new thread)

2002-03-24 Thread Nick Andriash
Hello Melissa, On Sunday, March 24, 2002, at 12:46:54 PM -0700, you wrote the following in regards to Testing message sent from Becky (sorry for the new thread): In the message that came back to me, the two peculiar characters were missing completely - but I see that you got them

Re: Testing message sent from Becky (sorry for the new thread)

2002-03-24 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 @ 13:54:29 -0800 [ Sun, 24 Mar 2002], Nick Andriash [NA] contributed this to our collective wisdom: ... NA Seems TB inherits the character set of the Senders message when NA creating a reply. Yes, this is what it does unless you over ride this with

oops - Sorry (WAS: %INSERTPGPKEY)

2002-01-17 Thread Eddie Castelli
Dear readers from 'TB!udl List', Sorry for this it went out by mistake Have a nice day :-) -- best regards Eddie Powered by The Bat! v1.54 Beta/30 under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 PGP (public) is available: www.EddieCastelli.com/pgpkey

Re: Moderator Team [ was Re: Sorry, mistaken message]

2001-09-16 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello Syafril Hermansyah, On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 at 00:45:59 GMT +0700 (which was 9/16/2001 12:45 AM where you think I live) you told to the list : [ oh my God, why another portion comes to the list... I am sorry to moderators and all list, I meant only this portion goes to the list

Re: Moderator Team [ was Re: Sorry, mistaken message]

2001-09-16 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello Dierk Haasis, On Sat, 15 Sep 2001 at 21:28:10 GMT +0200 (which was 9/16/2001 2:28 AM where you think I live) you told to the list : Or was it another instance of a folder template gone bad? No, not Folder Template (I am not using Folder Template on my TB! at home, I am using

Moderator Team [ was Re: Sorry, mistaken message]

2001-09-15 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
), no slang, easy for us (non native English Speaker) to understand what he is saying/write. Marck, Allie and you speak English fluently, but sometimes non native speaker as me can not follow you (sorry, no offense please) because your words sometimes not covers in my dictionary

Re: Moderator Team [ was Re: Sorry, mistaken message]

2001-09-15 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 00:45:59 +0700GMT (which was 19:45 +0200GMT the day before where I live), Syafril Hermansyah presented us with these thoughts about Moderator Team [ was Re: Sorry, mistaken message]: SH Hello Leif Gregory, SH I pray and believe

Re: Sorry, mistaken message

2001-09-09 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, On 09 September 2001 at 12:50:19 +0800 (which was 05:50 where I live) Thomas F wrote to Syafril Hermansyah on TBUDL and made these points: Don't worry, they're still asleep. That's why I call us here in Asia the night shift. ;-) SH

Re: Sorry, mistaken message

2001-09-09 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Raj, On 09 September 2001 at 09:58:21 +0530 (which was 05:28 where I live) Raj wrote to Marck D Pearlstone on tbudl and made these points: MDP Here's the problem. The base template itself has to have the MDP '-- ' cut marker in to give the

Re[2]: Sorry, mistaken message

2001-09-09 Thread Raj
Marck, On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, at 11:27:06 [GMT +0100] (which was 3:57 PM where I live) you wrote: From where I'm sitting no QT adds the '-- ' without including it as MDP hard coded text. Check this out at your end. Create a test QT Just have the %ISSIGNATURE macro with some text. Then open a

Re: Sorry, mistaken message

2001-09-09 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Raj, On 09 September 2001 at 17:35:21 +0530 (which was 13:05 where I live) Raj wrote to Marck D Pearlstone on tbudl and made these points: R Check this out at your end. Create a test QT Just have the R %ISSIGNATURE macro with some text. Then

Re: Sorry, mistaken message

2001-09-09 Thread Leif Gregory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Syafril, On Sun, 9 Sep 2001 at 11:31:24 [GMT +0700], you wrote: Don't worry, they're still asleep. That's why I call us here in Asia the night shift. ;-) SH LOL :-) SH How did you know Leif still not coming back to Japan ? grin That may

Re: Sorry, mistaken message

2001-09-08 Thread Thomas F
Hello Yuki, On Sat, 8 Sep 2001 15:14:54 +0900 GMT (08/09/2001, 14:14 +0800 GMT), Yuki Taga wrote: YT Sorry, but a personal message of mine was accidently sent to this YT list. Let me guess: Folder template? ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste

Re: Sorry, mistaken message

2001-09-08 Thread Raj
Yuki, On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, at 15:14:54 [GMT +0900] (which was 11:44 AM where I live) you wrote: YT Sorry, but a personal message of mine was accidently sent to this YT list. I guess this is why Januk mentioned about having AB level templates rather than Folder level. Point awarded to you

Re: Sorry, mistaken message

2001-09-08 Thread Thomas F
Hello Raj, On Sat, 8 Sep 2001 12:09:07 +0530 GMT (08/09/2001, 14:39 +0800 GMT), Raj wrote: YT Sorry, but a personal message of mine was accidently sent to this YT list. R I guess this is why Januk mentioned about having AB level templates R rather than Folder level. Actually, it's Marck's

Re[2]: Sorry, mistaken message

2001-09-08 Thread Raj
Thomas, On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, at 14:51:50 [GMT +0800] (which was 12:21 PM where I live) you wrote: TF Actually, it's Marck's pet which some of us have adopted. Yuki just TF made his day. ;-) Not having been involved earlier did not know that it was Marck's pet. So have a great day Marck. --

Re: Sorry, mistaken message

2001-09-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Raj, On 08 September 2001 at 13:30:02 +0530 (which was 09:00 where I live) Raj wrote to Thomas F on tbudl and made these points: TF Actually, it's Marck's pet which some of us have adopted. Yuki TF just made his day. ;-) R Not having been

Re[2]: Sorry, mistaken message

2001-09-08 Thread Raj
Marck, On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, at 11:47:07 [GMT +0100] (which was 4:17 PM where I live) you wrote: R Not having been involved earlier did not know that it was Marck's R pet. So have a great day Marck. MDP :-) Potted lecture already sent in - not just for Yuki, but it's good MDP to rehash the

Re: Sorry, mistaken message

2001-09-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Raj, On 08 September 2001 at 16:37:58 +0530 (which was 12:07 where I live) Raj wrote to Marck D Pearlstone on tbudl and made these points: R Thanks for the 'Lecture'. My pleasure (that's just to show how small minded I can be, deriving

Re: Sorry, mistaken message

2001-09-08 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Raj, On Sat, 8 Sep 2001 16:37:58 +0530, you thoughtfully wrote the following: ... R Just for info - This folder template become dangerous only when one R uses the '%to' Macro or are there any other Macro pitfalls. Any macro that addresses the

Re[2]: Sorry, mistaken message

2001-09-08 Thread Raj
Marck, On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, at 12:28:47 [GMT +0100] (which was 4:58 PM where I live) you wrote: MDP My pleasure (that's just to show how small minded I can be, deriving MDP pleasure from the delivery of a lecture!). Life is all about small pleasures. Little drops of water... MDP The

Re: Sorry, mistaken message

2001-09-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Raj, On 08 September 2001 at 17:54:34 +0530 (which was 13:24 where I live) Raj wrote to Marck D Pearlstone on tbudl and made these points: R Life is all about small pleasures. Little drops of water... :-) Indeed. R Just curious - If

Re[2]: Sorry, mistaken message

2001-09-08 Thread Raj
Marck, On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, at 14:36:10 [GMT +0100] (which was 7:06 PM where I live) you wrote: MDP :-) all of my sign offs contain the %ISSIGNATURE macro. When you use MDP that, the replacement is auto-magical. Thanks and will get back to the you ( forum) after I have done my bit of

  1   2   >