Re: tB! v 3.0?

2002-01-06 Thread Konstantin Volenbovsky
Merry Christmas to all and especially daveiw! When it was Sat, 5 Jan 2002, and your watches showed 09:39:55 [GMT +]and time in Kiev, Ukraine was 11:39:55[GMT +02.00] --- you wrote: dcn Any ideas when version 3 will be released, and what extras it will dcn have please? For all

Re[2]: tB! v 3.0?

2002-01-06 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, 6 Jan 2002, Konstantin Volenbovsky wrote: dcn Any ideas when version 3 will be released, and what extras it will dcn have please? KV For all newbies I will give some statements, that were made by Maxim KV Masiutin on TB forum in Cologne on 3-4 December, 2001 and I will KV

tB! v 3.0?

2002-01-05 Thread daveiw
Hi all and happy New Year! Any ideas when version 3 will be released, and what extras it will have please? Best regards, Dave Wilson. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (E-mail me subject: 'public key' and I will send it to you) --

Re: tB! v 3.0?

2002-01-05 Thread Marc van Breemen
Hello daveiw, 5 Jan 2002, 10:39:55, you wrote: dcn Hi all and happy New Year! dcn Any ideas when version 3 will be released, and what extras it will dcn have please? Maybe it's better to wait for version 2.0 first. -- Best regards, Marcmailto:[EMAIL

Re: tB! v 3.0?

2002-01-05 Thread Lars Geiger
Hi Dave, On 5 Jan 2002 at 09:39:55 [GMT +], you wrote: dcn Any ideas when version 3 will be released, and what extras it will dcn have please? Well, I guess that v.3 will have to wait till after the release of v.2. :-) SCNR I visited the site of the German distributor yesterday, and in the

Re[2]: tB! v 3.0?

2002-01-05 Thread daveiw
Hi Marc, Saturday, January 05, 2002, 9:52:17 AM, you wrote: MvB Maybe it's better to wait for version 2.0 first. Sorry, meant 2.0 :-( -- Best regards, Dave Wilson. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (E-mail me subject: 'public key' and I will send it to you) --

Re: tB! v 3.0?

2002-01-05 Thread Alastair Scott
On 5 January 2002 at 9:39 am daveiw wrote: Hi all and happy New Year! Any ideas when version 3 will be released, and what extras it will have please? The current betas (eventually leading up to version 2.00) have covered a huge distance; the best way to see this is to download and

Re: tB! v 3.0?

2002-01-05 Thread Ottar Grimstad
Hello Alastair, Saturday, January 05, 2002, 11:55:00 AM, you wrote to TBUDL: AS (The current betas are sound; there are some glitches, but nothing AS that has a serious effect on emailing). You beta-folks? Do you just install the beta in your message base and continue using the program. OK

Re: tB! v 3.0?

2002-01-05 Thread Allie C Martin
@ 10:55:00 + [ Sat, 5 Jan 2002], Alastair Scott [AS] thoughtfully wrote the following: ... AS TB!'s version numbering is conservative; the change from 1.49 AS (when I started) to 1.54 beta would've resulted in 2 or 3 major AS releases from most other companies. (Compare, for example, Outlook

Re: tB! v 3.0?

2002-01-05 Thread Alastair Scott
On 5 January 2002 at 11:52 am Ottar wrote: Hello Alastair, Saturday, January 05, 2002, 11:55:00 AM, you wrote to TBUDL: AS (The current betas are sound; there are some glitches, but nothing AS that has a serious effect on emailing). You beta-folks? Do you just install the beta in your

Re: tB! v 3.0?

2002-01-05 Thread Allie C Martin
@ 12:52:14 +0100 [ Sat, 5 Jan 2002], Ottar Grimstad [OG] thoughtfully wrote the following: ... OG You beta-folks? Do you just install the beta in your message base OG and continue using the program All that you receive when you download the beta, is a single compressed file to replace thebat.exe

Re: tB! v 3.0?

2002-01-05 Thread Alastair Scott
On 5 January 2002 at 11:54 am Allie wrote: @ 10:55:00 + [ Sat, 5 Jan 2002], Alastair Scott [AS] thoughtfully wrote the following: ... AS TB!'s version numbering is conservative; the change from 1.49 AS (when I started) to 1.54 beta would've resulted in 2 or 3 major AS releases from most