Hi Thomas Fernandez,
On Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 1999 at 7:10:43 you wrote:
TF My opinion is, allow variable width fonts - and those who don't want
TF to use them, shouldn't.
That's what I'll support, too. I'm not against the idea of using
variable width fonts (although that's where
Hello Januk Aggarwal,
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999 23:07:07 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 2:07:07 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Januk Aggarwal wrote:
Januk Read all your new mail, or go to Options and check out that menu.
Januk Really, how much did you look around
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 16:04:39 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 3:04:39 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Thomas Hi Steve,
Thomas welcome back. :-)
Thomas on Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 3:42:46 PM GMT+0800, Steve Lamb
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 13:20:10 +0700, Frank Farance wrote:
In Win98, my date/time preferences are set to ISO format:
-MM-DD HH:MM:SS
Why don't they appear that way in the received/created columns?
Is this a TB! setting or a windows setting? The Bat! shows message
dates in a
Wednesday, December 22, 1999
Hello Bat-users,
I suddenly seem to get duplicated msgs on the bat mailings lists.
Am I the only one
Best regards,
tracer
Using theBAT 1.38e
NO MICROSOFT VIRUS INFECTIONS
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Hello Everyone
I seem a problem with one of my e-mails.
The problem I am having is with Webreference-Update *html* format each time I
click on a link I get the error No Application is Associated with
the Specified file for this operation.
The links work fine in other E-mail Clients.
Can
Hello Everyone
I seem to be having a problem with one of my e-mails.
The problem I am having is with Webreference-Update *html* format each time I
click on a link I get the error No Application is Associated with
the Specified file for this operation.
The links work fine in other E-mail
Hello Danny,
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:09:36 + you told us :
D The problem I am having is with Webreference-Update *html* format each time I
D click on a link I get the error No Application is Associated with
D the Specified file for this operation.
Can you give an example ?
How about this
Hi there!
On 22 Dec 99, at 12:41, Oliver Sturm wrote
about "Re[6]: Fonts Available with Editor ":
That's what I'll support, too. I'm not against the idea of using
variable width fonts (although that's where any email formatting is
killed instantly. Ever sent a formatted,
can i suppress the s/n in the field x-mailer?
'cause i don't want the possibility to identify all my mails!
chris
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double
Hallo C.,
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 21:38:02 +0700 GMT (22.12.1999, 22:38 +0800 GMT),
C. Raskob wrote:
CR can i suppress the s/n in the field x-mailer?
CR 'cause i don't want the possibility to identify all my mails!
probably because your S/N is a duplicate. Nice organisation you have
filled in, as
Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 4:49:47 AM, tracer wrote:
He said he took all of one hour to try and use the bat...
That doesn't describe how long he took looking for any particular item
before giving up. Personally nearly everything on his list I found and
configured to my liking (or at
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Tuesday, December 21, 1999, Januk Aggarwal wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about
Opening links in the Bat!:
JA I was just wondering, is there a setting I can choose in the Bat so
JA that when I click a link it opens in a NEW browser window? Thanks.
It always
Hi there!
On 22 Dec 99, at 22:41, Thomas Fernandez wrote
about "Re: privacy":
CR can i suppress the s/n in the field x-mailer?
CR 'cause i don't want the possibility to identify all my mails!
probably because your S/N is a duplicate. Nice organisation you have
filled in, as well.
Hi Thomas Fernandez,
On Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 1999 at 15:41:35 you wrote:
CR can i suppress the s/n in the field x-mailer?
CR 'cause i don't want the possibility to identify all my mails!
TF probably because your S/N is a duplicate. Nice organisation you have
TF filled in, as well.
Well,
Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 7:40:25 AM, Oliver wrote:
When using variable-width fonts in The Bat! becomes possible, half the
messages on this list will be unreadable, IMHO.
The other half, of course, will be coming from me. As we all know, they
are practically unreadable as it is. At
Hallo Oliver,
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 16:42:56 +0100 GMT (22.12.1999, 23:42 +0800 GMT),
Oliver Sturm wrote:
OS Well, my s/n is no duplicate, but I didn't ever like it to appear in
OS the header, either. That's one step on our way to the transparent
OS internet user, IMHO.
The serial number
Hallo Erik,
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 17:09:02 +0100 GMT (23.12.1999, 00:09 +0800 GMT),
Erik Ommundsen wrote:
EO I experienced the same problem after i upgraded from 1.36 to 1.38, but
EO for some reason the problem disappeared after 2-3 days... (?) I am
EO running TB on a standalone Win98SE...
EO My
Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 8:12:54 AM, Thomas wrote:
The serial number of your email client is? What about your email
address? Should that be suppressed too? ;-)
Ah, but we can have multiple accounts on TB!. Just because my personal
account is [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I don't mind people
Hallo Syafril,
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 23:39:16 +0700 GMT (23.12.1999, 00:39 +0800 GMT),
Syafril Hermansyah wrote:
TF There must have been some bugs in 1.38. I don't know exactly which
TF ones, but they have fixed them, and a new version called 1.38e is now
TF on the website.
SH AFAIK for win98,
Hello TBUDL!
Reas about the MSID and the HWID at the following web page:
http://www.macintouch.com/msprivresponse.html
This is about Mac, and I use an IBM compatible. But I have no reason
to think that I'm not effected. Worrisome
--
Ciao,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL
Hallo Steve,
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:02:39 -0800 GMT (23.12.1999, 01:02 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
If you send emails to people from different accounts, yes. How likely
is that? And if you send to someone from two of your accounts, don't
you want them to know that you are the same
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:02:39 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[]
I don't have a scenario in my way of life that would require me to hide my
identity when sending a mail to someone. To the contrary.
That is *you*. *You* are not the totality of humanity. How about a
political person in
Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 9:15:27 AM, Thomas wrote:
I did visit www.m-w.com for "echelon", but still don't get your
meaning. You want to go left and right of the other guys? Or of
yourself? -- ?
From another message I sent out on another list, pardon the tone, it was
in a heated and
Hi Steve Lamb,
On Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 1999 at 18:02:39 you wrote:
Another thing is the serial number of the Pentium-III. This can be
checked while you're web browsing (I was told), and that *is* an
invasion of privacy. Actually a reason for me not to stick with
Intel.
That's
Hi Ali Martin,
On Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 1999 at 18:37:08 you wrote:
AM On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:02:39 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
AM []
I don't have a scenario in my way of life that would require me to hide my
identity when sending a mail to someone. To the contrary.
That is *you*.
Hi Thomas Fernandez,
On Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 1999 at 17:09:18 you wrote:
TF As we will not have the power to change C-Win, we will have to
TF adapt. I don't know whether it would bloat the programme. If not,
TF just don't use variable width if you don't want to. ;-)
I already stated I
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 16:40:25 +0100, Oliver Sturm wrote:
[]
That might be some solution to the ever-present problem. But I still
have to see a single email message that looks better in variable-width
font. I have only ever seen that when two people communicating use
exactly the
Hello Fabrizio,
on Wed, 22 Dec 1999 13:18:25 +0700 GMT your local time you wrote:
FI I set up many of them but when I close the program they disappear
FI (i.e. I do not find them when opening it again). Did I miss any
FI "save" button somewhere?
I had the same problem when upgrading from 1.36
Hello List Members,
on Wednesday, December 22, 1999 at 18:37, Ali Martin wrote:
So, after all this. Is there a way to suppress the serial number?
Yep! I use the outgoing filter section... it's not such a big problem
:-)
Regards
Dieter Hummel
Running TheBat! 1.38e [reg] on
Windows NT
Hello List Members,
on Wednesday, December 22, 1999 at 20:01, Oliver Sturm wrote:
I asked that some time ago and was told there wasn't.
Wasn't? Really?
Regards
Dieter Hummel
Running TheBat! 1.38e [reg] on
Windows NT v4 Build 1381 Service Pack 6
on a PPro200, 256MB EDO-RAM, UW-SCSI Disk
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Dieter,
DH Hello List Members,
DH on Wednesday, December 22, 1999 at 20:01, Oliver Sturm wrote:
I asked that some time ago and was told
Hi Oliver,
...
I already stated I would. But the problem I see is not me staying with
fixed-width fonts, but many others not doing so.
You do not know *which* variable font they used - so you will
never be able to see the message exactly as it looked for them.
Regards,
Wolfgang
Co-moderator
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 18:37:07 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
CR can i suppress the s/n in the field x-mailer?
CR 'cause i don't want the possibility to identify all my mails!
probably because your S/N is a duplicate. Nice organisation you have
filled in, as well.
Actually, if he
Wednesday, December 22, 1999, 1:22:46 PM, Ali wrote:
Would you be so kind as to expand on your knowledge on this?
He uses an outgoing filter to call an external script which modifies the
headers.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
Hello Listmembers,
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 at 16:22:46 [GMT -0500] Ali Martin wrote:
Wasn't? Really?
Yeah who speaks in riddles.
Would you be so kind as to expand on your knowledge on this?
It's quite easy and you may say 'this could have been my idea' :-). But
I only can tell about my
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 21:30:26 +0100, Oliver Sturm wrote:
[]
My experience is simply that users don't care to be informed. That's
why so many of them use Microsoft software, that doesn't comply to any
standards at all.
So, what I say is just the following: If a user has (in my eyes)
Hi there!
On 22 Dec 99, at 14:39, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: privacy":
SL He uses an outgoing filter to call an external script which modifies the
SL headers.
Now that's what I call a mailer feature :-)
*shrug* PMMail2000 PMMail/2 have been doing it for years with Rexx
Hi Oliver,
on Thursday, December 23, 1999, 8:39:57 AM GMT+0800, Oliver Sturm wrote:
OS I'm against the concept of denying features, too. But a feature is
OS only a feature in the right place. To say it the hard way: You don't
OS need variable width fonts to work with a system
Hi Oliver,
on Thursday, December 23, 1999, 2:58:43 AM GMT+0800, Oliver Sturm wrote:
TF As we will not have the power to change C-Win, we will have to
TF adapt. I don't know whether it would bloat the programme. If not,
TF just don't use variable width if you don't want to. ;-)
OS I
Hi Roel,
on Thursday, December 23, 1999, 11:10:08 AM GMT+0800, Roel wrote:
TF on Thursday, December 23, 1999, 11:20:43 AM GMT+0800, Deryk Lister wrote:
... and I received it at 09:57 GMT+0800. And this is confirmed by my
wrist watch! (good ol' Swiss mechanics)
TF And it's even faster (by
Hello Howard and Bat Buddies,
I have been having difficulty sending images to people who are on AOL.
You're not the only one.
I have relatives on AOL who are never able to open attached images sent
to them from me. I've tried UUencoding and MIME, both from TB, and
they've never been able to
42 matches
Mail list logo
