Printing of quoted text in bold?

Hello all, Several people, on some of the mailing lists I'm on, have the "nasty habit" of inserting a space in front of the quote character. The result of this is that the text doesn't print in bold as I have chosen in the font layout in TB! My printer is a BW Laser, so the color options doesn't

Re-Sending Messages

Hello List, Can't find this on the FAQ, but how do I re-send a message I have already sent, if I want to edit it first. If I redirect I have to retype in the "to" address, is there not a "resend" which allows editing ? Also am I right that there is still no proper backup method, apart from

Re: Re-Sending Messages

Hello The Bat! users, Adam wrote at 4/22/2000, 7:56 PM SA Can't find this on the FAQ, but how do I re-send a message I SA have already sent, if I want to edit it first. If I redirect I have to SA retype in the "to" address, is there not a "resend" which allows SA editing ? Somewhat ugly, but

Re: Re-Sending Messages

Hello System, On Saturday, April 22, 2000 at 18:56:34 GMT +0100 (which was 10:56 AM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: Can't find this on the FAQ, but how do I re-send a message I have already sent, if I want to edit it first. If I redirect I have to retype in the "to" address, is

Re: Re-Sending Messages

Hello, On Saturday, April 22, 2000 at 20:08:23 GMT +0200 (which was 11:08 AM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: SA Also, lastly :) Is there a way to save an attachment with the SA message so that even if the attachment file is deleted off the pc, SA it stays within the body of a message

Re: Re-Sending Messages

Hi there! On 22 Apr 00, at 18:56, System Admin wrote about "Re-Sending Messages": Also am I right that there is still no proper backup method, apart from copying the whole directory and exporting the registry key ? If I am will there ever be a proper export/backup method ? Proper export

Re: Printing of quoted text in bold?

Hi there! On 22 Apr 00, at 19:08, Jan-Arild LÛkstad wrote about "Printing of quoted text in bold?": Several people, on some of the mailing lists I'm on, have the "nasty habit" of inserting a space in front of the quote character. The result of this is that the text doesn't print in bold

Re: Re-Sending Messages

Hello System, On Saturday, April 22, 2000 at 18:56:34 GMT +0100 (which was 10:56 AM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: Also am I right that there is still no proper backup method, apart from copying the whole directory and exporting the registry key ? If I am will there ever be a

Printing of quoted text in bold? - and other quoting issues

Hello The Bat! users, Jan-Arild Løkstad wrote at 4/22/2000, 7:08 PM This line is printed in bold, while... this line is not. JAL Anything I can do about this in TB!? I would add that C source code often looks silly in TB. Consider: dprintk("RPC: %4d exit() = %d\n", task-tk_pid,

Re: 1.42?

On Thursday, April 20, 2000, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: New features are great indeed;-) ... The number of betas is perfectly understandable: this gonna be a _major_ upgrade (to say nothing of the upcoming ver. 2;-)) ... So, stay tuned;-) It's a _different_ Bat;-) A "major upgrade" would

Re: Vote for The Bat!

On Wednesday, April 19, 2000, Mark R Harding wrote: I was joking. About the skins thing. Really. There are some folks on Opera browser news groups who claim skins are the biggest thing in computing since the GUI and thinks the Opera developers should put it high on their list of things to do.

Re: SOT OT Hmmmm.

What does GOT mean? -- Paula Ford The Bat! 1.41 (reg) Windows 95 4.0 Build 950 -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL

Re[2]: SOT OT Hmmmm.

Hello The Bat! users, Paula Ford wrote at 4/22/2000, 10:28 PM PF What does GOT mean? _Grossly_ off-topic? -- Cheers, SyP I can resist anything, except temptation. -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com

Re: 1.42?

Morning Paula, A "major upgrade" would seem to warrant releasing it as version 1.5? Quote from a TBBETA message from Stefan: PS with all this big improvements in the Beta 1.42 series (new message PS base, many long standing bugs corrected), there is perhaps the time PS for a major jump in

Re: 1.42?

On Saturday, April 22, 2000, Jast wrote: A "major upgrade" would seem to warrant releasing it as version 1.5? Quote from a TBBETA message from Stefan: PS with all this big improvements in the Beta 1.42 series (new message PS base, many long standing bugs corrected), there is perhaps the

Re: 1.42?

Morning Paula, No way! :-) 1.42 is a magic version number for our products. It should be read as "one of the best" :-) Is he serious? Sounds that way... Whether or not the magical character of the version number has something to do with The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy remains

Re: Corrupted message base?

Hello Marck, on Thu, 20 Apr 2000, at 18:09:06 sender's local time (timezone UTC+0100), Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: Stefan (Tanurkov) and Max (Masyutin): should you be reading this please advise if you wanna have the message base of this folder for bug fixing purposes - it's not very big

Re: 1.42?

On Sat, 22 Apr 2000 17:20:14 -0400, Paula Ford wrote: No way! :-) 1.42 is a magic version number for our products. It should be read as "one of the best" :-) Is he serious? I don't see why not. Remember that you're using an application called The Bat! (hey, don't forget the exclamation