-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
on Saturday, February 10, 2001 17:05:33, our bat friend ArekG typed:
A Maybe this is a very stupid question, but... Why do you need to use
A Regular Expression to filter messages with given subject?.
U, well, there was a discussion on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bat! people!
Well i've experimented a bit with the filter and now it seems to
trigger again, so if anyone who previously have tried to get my pgp
keys want to, they can now try again, and it *should* work this time,
i think...
- --
/Krister
Senin, Subuh (was Evening in my town),
[..in milis thebat!..], Jan Rif... typed the following:
Jan's The Bat! (v1.49) Personal rip
I have a situation in which TB! is bypassing a group reply template
using the default folder template. Can't figure it out. Any
thoughts?
Jan's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001 20:07:40 +0100, Krister wrote these words of
wisdom:
A Maybe this is a very stupid question, but... Why do you need to
A use Regular Expression to filter messages with given subject?.
KE U, well, there was a discussion on
Hello SS,
On Monday, February 12, 2001 18:19:21 [ +0700 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'TB! v1.49 - bypassing the group to a folder':
SS May be you're using reply to sender ?
SS or maybe themail isn't in your group address anymore.
Good thoughts but not the case. Using "F4"
Hello Jan and other TBUDLS,
On Sunday, February 11, 2001 at 16:17:50 -0500 Jan wrote on "TB! v1.49 -
bypassing the group to a folder":
JRI have a situation in which TB! is bypassing a group reply template
JRusing the default folder template. Can't figure it out. Any thoughts?
One way
Hello Jannik,
On Monday, February 12, 2001 08:58:24 [ +0100 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'TB! v1.49 - bypassing the group to a folder':
JRI have a situation in which TB! is bypassing a group reply template
JRusing the default folder template. Can't figure it out. Any
Hello Jan and other TBUDLS,
On Monday, February 12, 2001 at 08:09:18 -0500 Jan wrote on "TB! v1.49 -
bypassing the group to a folder":
JR I think I understood your example. I checked all the entries in this
JR small group , unfortunately, have not discovered what you suggest
JR as a
Hello Jannik,
On Monday, February 12, 2001 14:50:07 [ +0100 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'TB! v1.49 - bypassing the group to a folder':
Jannik [...]it is not possible to have an entry for "Jan Rifkinson"
Jannik and one for "Jannik Lindquist" if they both contain the same
Jannik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On February 12, 2001, at 2:10:11 AM, Krister Ekstrom Wrote:
KE Well i've experimented a bit with the filter and now it seems to
KE trigger again, so if anyone who previously have tried to get my pgp
KE keys want to, they can now try again, and it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick!
On Monday, February 12, 2001 at 4:56:42 PM you wrote:
Ok, I've just sent a request in to see if it works, although I already
have your Key on my Public Key Ring. BTW Krister, all of your PGP
signatures are failing verification:
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On February 12, 2001, at 8:42:40 AM, Dierk Haasis Wrote:
DH I can't confirm that. when Krister posted his (signed) message
DH regarding his working filters I checked if I already had his keys by
DH just verifying his signature - and it came out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick!
On Monday, February 12, 2001 at 5:49:13 PM you wrote:
using Key ID: 0x8313390B. Does he have a newer Key or something? If I show
his signature as bad, you should also. shrug.
Same key ID, works good. It is his DH/DSS key. I also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On February 12, 2001, at 9:37:08 AM, Dierk Haasis Wrote:
DH Same key ID, works good. It is his DH/DSS key. I also own his RSA
DH key. His DH/DSS si created on 19/04/98, does not expire and uses
DH CAST. Complete ID (64b): 0x3839497A8313390B.
So
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick Andriash !
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:36:35 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was 12.02.2001, 18:36 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
[...]
So you are saying that you checked his message and the signature verified
as "Good"? If so, then
Hello
Monday, February 12, 2001, 11:27:49 PM, someone claiming to be [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Good thoughts but not the case. Using "F4" select return name is
in address group.
What is the difference between "F4" "Ctrl F5", which I use?
--
Regards
John Phillips Sydney,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello John,
Monday, February 12, 2001, 2:13:48 PM, you wrote:
JP What is the difference between "F4" "Ctrl F5", which I use?
I believe the difference is that if you use "Shift + F5" you reply
quoting the entire text of the message whereas with
Hi John,
@ 2:13:48 PM on 2/12/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
Brian Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Architect, Designer, and Programmer
PGP is spoken here: 0xE4D0C7C8
[TB! 1.49e, Windows 98 (SE) 4.10 Build A]
--
__
Archives :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On February 12, 2001, at 10:19:28 AM, Gerd Ewald Wrote:
GE Nick, the funny thing is that I get a GOOD signature when I use
GE TB-plugin and a BAD when I use PGPTray. The key was downloaded by PGP;
GE ID: 0x8313390B Fingerprint:D554 FB2E 50A7 AB9B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On February 12, 2001, at 11:45:18 AM, Gerry Doyon Wrote:
GD So, you can block just a portion of the incoming message, hit F4, and
GD the new message will be created quoting JUST the text you blocked.
Yes, that is the difference between the two. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On February 12, 2001, at 11:49:04 AM, Nick Andriash Wrote:
NA Well isn't that strange. Yes, I confirm that the Key Fingerprint you
NA sent is the same as the one on my Key Ring. Well, I will have to
NA report that to NAI, because that is
Hello Jan and other TBUDLS,
On Monday, February 12, 2001 at 09:25:13 -0500 Jan wrote on "TB! v1.49 -
bypassing the group to a folder":
Jannik [...]it is not possible to have an entry for "Jan Rifkinson" and one
Jannik for "Jannik Lindquist" if they both contain the same address, say
Jannik
Getting barraged by all these AnnaKournikova.jpg.vbs files today from all the
nuts I know using Outlook and clueless about viruses I can't help but think how
much nicer the world would be if everyone used The Bat!
Let's all sit back and have a drink in honor of those Outlook users getting
wacked
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, at 09:36:35 [GMT -0800], Nick Andriash wrote:
NA So you are saying that you checked his message and the signature verified
NA as "Good"? If so, then I don't understand why it shows "Bad" on my
NA machine, and can think no reason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, at 19:19:28 [GMT +0100], Gerd Ewald wrote:
GE Nick, the funny thing is that I get a GOOD signature when I use TB-plugin
GE and a BAD when I use PGPTray. The key was downloaded by PGP; ID: 0x8313390B
GE Fingerprint:D554 FB2E 50A7
Hello Jannik,
On Monday, February 12, 2001 21:36:19 [ +0100 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'TB! v1.49 - bypassing the group to a folder':
Jannik What I mean is this: Some people - like our own good Allie - uses initials in
Jannik their address-name. And so, using a
I cannot access the RIT Labs web site:
http://www.ritlabs.com
http://198.78.172.135
by Host Name and IP address.
Is anyone else experiencing a problem?
--
Mark Knipfer
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows 98 4.10 Build A
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On February 12, 2001, at 3:31:01 PM, Mike Yetto Wrote:
GE Nick, the funny thing is that I get a GOOD signature when I use TB-plugin
GE and a BAD when I use PGPTray. The key was downloaded by PGP; ID: 0x8313390B
GE Fingerprint:D554 FB2E 50A7 AB9B
Hi Mark,
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 21:11:21 -0500GMT (13/02/2001, 10:11 +0800GMT),
Mark Knipfer wrote:
MK I cannot access the RIT Labs web site:
MK by Host Name and IP address.
MK Is anyone else experiencing a problem?
Both work fine here.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat!
Monday, February 12, 2001, 9:11:21 PM, you wrote:
MK I cannot access the RIT Labs web site:
MK http://www.ritlabs.com
MK http://198.78.172.135
MK by Host Name and IP address.
MK Is anyone else experiencing a problem?
It's must be down. I get no response on cablemodem.
--
Ben
MK I cannot access the RIT Labs web site:
MK http://www.ritlabs.com
MK http://198.78.172.135
MK by Host Name and IP address.
MK Is anyone else experiencing a problem?
Same here... no joy.
/^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^\
Where do forest rangers go to 'get away from it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
On 13 February 2001 at 21:11:21 -0500 (which was 02:11 where I live)
Mark Knipfer wrote and made these points:
MK I cannot access the RIT Labs web site:
snip
MK Is anyone else experiencing a problem?
Ack. I wonder what's up?
- --
Thomas wrote:
MK Is anyone else experiencing a problem?
Both work fine here.
There must be a network problem somewhere then. Because I cannot
access RIT Labs Web site from two different ISP's.
Thanks.
--
Mark Knipfer
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows 98 4.10 Build
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 21:11:21 -0500, Mark contributed this to our
collective wisdom:
MK I cannot access the RIT Labs web site:
MK http://www.ritlabs.com
MK Is anyone else experiencing a problem?
I was unable to reach the site as well. Perhaps the
Hi Mark,
@ 9:35:39 PM on 2/12/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both work fine here.
There must be a network problem somewhere then. Because I cannot
access RIT Labs Web site from two different ISP's.
My mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] a few days ago bounced back, as well. The
forward someone has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, at 18:18:43 [GMT -0800], Nick Andriash wrote:
NA Ok, now we have to figure out why you are getting differing results with
NA PGPTray, and why just Krister's messages. There has to be a common
NA denominator there somewhere.
NA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, at 21:11:21 [GMT -0500], Mark Knipfer wrote:
MK I cannot access the RIT Labs web site:
MK http://www.ritlabs.com
MK http://198.78.172.135
MK by Host Name and IP address.
MK Is anyone else experiencing a problem?
I can't get
Monday, February 12, 2001, 10:37:34 PM, you wrote:
MY -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MY Hash: SHA1
MY On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, at 21:11:21 [GMT -0500], Mark Knipfer wrote:
MK I cannot access the RIT Labs web site:
MK http://www.ritlabs.com
MK http://198.78.172.135
MK by Host Name and IP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, at 18:18:43 [GMT -0800], Nick Andriash wrote:
NA Ok, now we have to figure out why you are getting differing results with
NA PGPTray, and why just Krister's messages. There has to be a common
NA denominator there somewhere.
Ah
Hi Ben,
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 22:47:52 -0500GMT (13/02/2001, 11:47 +0800GMT),
Ben Mills wrote:
BM I have no idea where Ritlabs'server is located.
I think it is in Chicago, if I am not mistaken.
BM But I tried a few proxies, a couple in Europe and a couple in
BM Asia, and ritlabs is unreachable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On February 12, 2001, at 7:51:04 PM, Mike Yetto Wrote:
MY Ah ha! I saved Krister's message as a text file and it verified as
MY 'good' with PGPTray. I think the problem is with this line.
Good find Mike!
MY I'd be hard-pressed to say that either
Hi Thomas,
Tuesday, February 13, 2001, 4:02:17 AM, you wrote:
I can still reach them from Asia. I checked, and I am not going via
any proxy or cache or whatever. A DNS lookup resulted in:
No access from London UK
Pinging www.ritlabs.com [198.78.172.135] with 32 bytes of data:
Request
Hi Mark,
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 07:10:10 +GMT (13/02/2001, 15:10 +0800GMT),
Mark Aston wrote:
MA Pinging www.ritlabs.com [198.78.172.135] with 32 bytes of data:
Funny; I get the same ping results as you. And yet (now I tried it
with Netscape 4.7 instead of IE 5.5), I can open the web page. It
Hi Thomas,
Tuesday, February 13, 2001, 7:23:59 AM, you wrote:
Funny; I get the same ping results as you. And yet (now I tried it
with Netscape 4.7 instead of IE 5.5), I can open the web page. It even
wants to set a cookie!
Maybe it's a cached copy? If you can't ping the site the server
No access from London UK
Nor from Tel Aviv, Israel
--
__
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You are subscribed as
Hello Everybofy
Tuesday, February 13, 2001, 8:42:20 AM, you wrote:
No problem to access the site from Italy
--
Best regards,
Danilomailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
__
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Hi Mark,
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 07:42:20 +GMT (13/02/2001, 15:42 +0800GMT),
Mark Aston wrote:
MA Maybe it's a cached copy? If you can't ping the site the server is
MA down.
I would have thought so, but I hit Relaod and crtl-Reload in both IE
and NS. How else can you force the browser to
Hi Danilo,
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:50:29 +0100GMT (13/02/2001, 15:50 +0800GMT),
Danilo Barbuio wrote:
DB No problem to access the site from Italy
Can you ping it?
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Anmeldung unter:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message reply created
48 matches
Mail list logo
