Thomas F. [TF], on Thursday, August 15, 2002 at 23:38 (+0700) typed in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TF That's a bummer, because it works every time over here, using Win98
TF and a dial-up connection.
TF Do you have the same set-up?
No, I have different, I use w2k. But problem is:
Hello Brano,
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:42:51 +0200 GMT (16/08/02, 14:42 +0700 GMT),
Brano wrote:
B No, I have different, I use w2k. But problem is: try to full your
B inbox with mails, lets say - around 100. When bat is getting number of
B messages don't allow to connect to inet (with some
More information, as requested -
We have new broadband system to replace our old modem system. At
present both systems are available on separate computers. I am trying
to setup TheBat! on the broadband system for all of our future e-mail
so that I can ditch the old modem system.
The broadband
Thomas F. [TF], on Friday, August 16, 2002 at 15:17 (+0700) wrote the
following in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TF Ah... this is another thing. TB's connection cetner doesn't timeout. I
TF have reported this, and Max sent me a message recenlty, saying that
TF they are working on
Hey Deborah,
My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.60q) Educational' was used
to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, August 15, 2002 at 3:30:24 AM.
DW I'm going to be moving TB to a different computer in the next few
DW days, would like simple, step-by-step instructions on what
ON Friday, August 16, 2002, 10:53:29 AM, you wrote:
S More information, as requested -
S We have new broadband system to replace our old modem system. At
S present both systems are available on separate computers. I am trying
S to setup TheBat! on the broadband system for all of our future
Hello Brano,
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 12:30:33 +0200 GMT (16/08/02, 17:30 +0700 GMT),
Brano wrote:
TF Regardless, the Abort button should work in that case, too. I didn't
TF check it, but it appears to belong to the same category.
B doesn't work.
You'd better report it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] then.
No, sorry for the confusion.
I have TB and both OE installed on my Win2000 computer and that is attached
to the broadband system with btconnect as the ISP.
On a completely separate, independent, computer I have a modem and
compuserve is the ISP. I have been trying to test the setup by sending
Forgive me if this has been asked before:
Is there anyway to set TB! to not download any html mail, just convert
it to plain text?
Thank you,
--
Pete
9:58:22 AM
Ask about eScan Content-Security
and Anti-Virus Software.
We will meet ALL of your
Hello ScotWeave,
in 000801c2453e$0bdb1030$ee329fd9@demo">mid:000801c2453e$0bdb1030$ee329fd9@demo was written:
Back to the broadband system - I am able to fetch e-mail using either OE or
TB but can only send e-mail using OE.
I have just tried settting up TB with POP before SMTP but this
Hello Pete,
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:59:44 -0600 GMT (16/08/02, 22:59 +0700 GMT),
Pete Milne wrote:
PM Forgive me if this has been asked before:
AFAIK it hasn't been asked before. ;-)
PM Is there anyway to set TB! to not download any html mail, just
PM convert it to plain text?
No. With the
Well, since nobody else has answered this one, let me take a stab at
it. Have you checked the font settings in the Print setup dialog?
Mine by default is set to Courier New (ugh) 10-point font. It's
possible that your font file is corrupted, so you might try switching
to a different typeface and
On Friday, August 16, 2002, 12:43:31 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
I'm mystified about why reprinting works, though.
I had this problem some time back. I don't recall whether it just went
away or if I did something to fix it. I would get a postage stamp size
print of the whole page, or I would get
Hello Dwight!
On Friday, August 16, 2002 at 9:00:50 PM you wrote:
The one other thing which might have been a factor in my situation
which isn't mentioned here is that I was probably printing thru
fineprint.
Don't think so, at least I should remember. I had the same problem
some time, IIRC
Thomas F. [TF], on Friday, August 16, 2002 at 22:16 (+0700) wrote
about in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TF You'd better report it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] then.
I tried:
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(reason: 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL
Hello all
Friday, August 16, 2002, 10:46:32 PM, you wrote:
TM Hey Deborah,
TM My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.60q) Educational' was used
TM to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TM on Thursday, August 15, 2002 at 3:30:24 AM.
DW I'm going to be moving TB to a different computer in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tony [T] wrote:'
T I keep a large amount of mail on my Bat Program until I have enough
T to burn fill a CD. I have just done a data transfer from one old PC
T to new one,using a USB cable. Now,when I try
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Alexandros Cicovic [AC] wrote:'
AC I'm a Bat! newby (correct spelling?) and until now I had set some
AC filters to move e-mails to folders according to sender.
AC Today, I started experimenting with
Hello Luc,
Saturday, August 17, 2002, 3:05:55 AM, you wrote:
L Maybe a rule for each source folder and setting move to to the same
L folder?
Thanks Luc, but this was what I was really trying to avoid... :)
I've got many folders you see, and it doesn't really worth to do all
that process.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Alexandros Cicovic [AC] wrote:'
AC Ah, gosh... I had looked every possible option. However, I thought
AC I was missing something... I'm sorry I didn't.
I know what you mean.
It's this limitation that
Hello Allie,
Saturday, August 17, 2002, 3:15:58 AM, you wrote:
ACM I have a filter here that colours my own discussion list
ACM messages and another that colours list messages that are direct
ACM replies to my posts. I can ignore the colour of my own messages and
ACM immediately see the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tony [T] wrote:'
T I now can't open any of my registered version!
moderator
I forgot to mention that you should trim your posts appropriately.
There's no need to quote all of my previous message,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tony [T] wrote:'
T The problem is that I transfered all of the content of my old
T Pentium 1 to a new Pentium 4 including stored E-Mail messages.
Was it an exact mirroring of the old installation to the
Howdy TheBatUsers,
Is there any way to disable the little yellow status pop-up (# total
msgs, # unread msgs, # selected msgs) that appears when you first
move your mouse cursor over a message list? I find this really
annoying.
Thanks.
--
Chris Montgomery
Replying to your message of Friday, August 16, 2002, 10:44:05 AM:
TF No. With the POP protocol, can just download mails (or not). In any
TF case, a conversion could take place only after download.
Just a thought, it would save some bandwidth and maybe some
vulnerabilities.
--
Pete
Hi Allie,
Saturday, August 17, 2002, 11:33:29 AM, you wrote:
Hi Allie
You asked:
Is it that TB! opens and your previous
installations accounts aren't present?
That is it exactly!
--
Best regards,
Tony
Current version is 1.61
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tony [T] wrote:'
T Is it that TB! opens and your previous installations accounts
T aren't present?
If this is the case then very likely your paths have changed when
you moved TB! over to the new drive.
Fellow TB users,
Been lurking around. Did not have a reason to post and found that there were
quite a few experts who answered before me.
Now however I found something unique. To understand better you need to check the
screenshot which I have uploaded at
Hi Raj,
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002 10:57:57 +0530, you wrote:
I am giving below the headers recovered from each of the mails ?
Any ideas ???
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 27467 invoked by uid 0); 5 Aug 2002 17:55:00 -
Received: from
Jonathan,
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, at 00:47:27 [GMT -0500] (which was 11:17 AM where I live) you
wrote:
JA If these are the only headers, then yes... the idea is that there are no header
JA fields for TB! to use to put the From, To, and Subject in the correct boxes,
JA making it appear as if the
30 matches
Mail list logo
