Re: Problem with %HDR macro

2009-06-13 Thread Arjan de Groot
On Saturday June 13 2009, 9:57:51 PM Marek Mikus wrote, > it is known that %HDR macro doesn't allow special chars and this > note is included in help. I've been wondering about that. What is meant by "special characters"? Does there exist A Definition Of "special characters"? I don't know. Perso

Re: Problem with %HDR macro

2009-06-13 Thread Arjan de Groot
On zaterdag 13 juni 2009, 9:54:10 PM Marek Mikus wrote, > You can not change Message-ID and there is no need to change > In-Reply-To header which includes Message-ID of replied message. Let's not go nit-picking over which headers need changing or not. (X-Rogue is a header that doesn't need adding

Re: Problem with %HDR macro

2009-06-13 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Saturday, June 13, 2009, Arjan de Groot wrote: >>My guess is that the %HDR macros were the first attempt to allow this >>capabiity, but when it was discovered that the parser couldn't handle an >>embedded "-" the %ADDHEADER and %SETHEADER macros were created which used a >>quoted string

Re: Problem with %HDR macro

2009-06-13 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Saturday, June 13, 2009, Arjan de Groot wrote: > I have re-examined the help file but I still fail to see the > relevance of the %HDR macro's. Lots of regular RFC headers have a > "-" in them (Like Message-ID and In-Reply-To) and a macro that > can't handle it seems to be a bit superflu

Re: Problem with %HDR macro

2009-06-13 Thread Arjan de Groot
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 09:07:42 -0700, Bill McQuillan wrote: >My guess is that the %HDR macros were the first attempt to allow this >capabiity, but when it was discovered that the parser couldn't handle an >embedded "-" the %ADDHEADER and %SETHEADER macros were created which used a >quoted string for

Re: Quick Template: No wordwrap

2009-06-13 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello simbabque, On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 16:30:10 +0200 GMT (06/Jun/09, 21:30 +0700 GMT), simbabque wrote: s> Another question about the quick templates: s> I need a line of words, beginning with "Tags: " and followed by a list s> of tags for a photo upload to flickr. The line must not wrap or break

Re: HTML formatting problem

2009-06-13 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Lawrence, On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:09:29 -0500 GMT (03/Jun/09, 22:09 +0700 GMT), Lawrence Johnson wrote: LJ> The monthly newsletter I receive from my township has some formatting LJ> problem's in TB! I verified that the HTML displays perfectly in a real LJ> browser. I also imported the email m

Re: Recipient receives red x instead of image

2009-06-13 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Regina, On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:05:58 -0500 GMT (01/Jun/09, 23:05 +0700 GMT), Regina King wrote: >> Who do you mean by "recipients"? People you send messages to, or >> you >> (and others) receiving messages? RK> Recipients, meaning people I send messages to. Thanks They wi

Re: Problem with %HDR macro

2009-06-13 Thread Bill McQuillan
On Sat, 2009-06-13, Arjan de Groot wrote: > I have re-examined the help file but I still fail to see the > relevance of the %HDR macro's. Lots of regular RFC headers have a > "-" in them (Like Message-ID and In-Reply-To) and a macro that > can't handle it seems to be a bit superfluous. My guess

Re: Problem with %HDR macro

2009-06-13 Thread Arjan de Groot
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:15:38 +0200, Marek Mikus wrote: >>>What wonders me is why there are three different macro's (two of which >>>don't seem to work properly) that arguably serve the same purpose. >>Typical known redundancy :-) >%HDRheader returns current message header >%HDRheader="text" and