Re: Future of TB* mailing lists

2020-05-10 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Marck, On Sun, 10 May 2020 09:52:20 +0100 GMT (10-May-20, 15:52 +0700 GMT), Marck Pearlstone wrote: AS>> Things that come to mind, in no particular order: AS>> * Increase size limits for attachments. > TBBETA has a 75kb limit and TBUDL 25kb. > I suggest 150 for TBBETA and 100 for TBUDL.

Re: Backup with Errors

2020-05-10 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Saturday, May 9, 2020, 20:13:08, David Elliott wrote: > Stream read error "E:\Users\Administrator\The > Bat\Mail\Elliott\Inbox\MESSAGES.TBB" Data error (cyclic redundancy check) Try copying (not moving) this file to another directory; if you're successful, delete the original file, then move

Re: Future of TB* mailing lists

2020-05-10 Thread Gunivortus Goos
Hello Maggie, > When I look around and see everyone doing mail (poorly) on their > iThings, I do wonder if we aren't all dinosaurs because we write > in full sentences with a proper email program. Yes, for me it is also long ago when I started with The Bat! Actually, it is so long ago, I really

Re: Future of TB* mailing lists

2020-05-10 Thread Maggie Meister
Hi Marck, On Sunday, May 10, 2020 at 4:52:20 AM you wrote: MP> ... we have done this multiple times in the 20+ years that we have run MP> these lists.T Thank you for everything, Marck - even the trouts. Looking back, I can't believe it's more than 20 years, While it doesn't feel like

Re[2]: Future of TB* mailing lists

2020-05-10 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hello MFPA, Sunday, May 10, 2020, 9:49:05 PM, you wrote: > Would that lead to more help for ordinary users' TB! issues? Or would > their messages simply get lost among all the beta testers' messages? > It would certainly be massively increased traffic compared to the > current TBUDL, and most

Re: Future of TB* mailing lists

2020-05-10 Thread MFPA
Hi On Sunday 10 May 2020 at 3:06:11 AM, in , Andrew Savchenko wrote:- > * Increase size limits for attachments. Sounds sensible. > * Remove or, at very least, update "current version" > footer. I would vote to keep a footer informing of the current version and linking to info about the

Re: Future of TB* mailing lists

2020-05-10 Thread Marck Pearlstone
On 10 May 2020 at 10:18 MAU wrote and made these points >> I suggest 150 for TBBETA and 100 for TBUDL. Thoughts? M> I can agree to that, Done. Now to test attaching a small image... To avoid extra confusion I will deliberately leave this post unsigned. -- Cheers -- Marck D Pearlstone --

Re: Reply all quoting selected text

2020-05-10 Thread MAU
Hello Andrew, > Here we go: https://i.imgur.com/YoFRdGV.png Thank you. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (Zarzalejo (Madrid)- Spain) Using The Bat! v9.1.18.3 (BETA) Current version is 8.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:

Re: Future of TB* mailing lists

2020-05-10 Thread MAU
Hello Marck, > I suggest 150 for TBBETA and 100 for TBUDL. Thoughts? I can agree to that, -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (Zarzalejo (Madrid)- Spain) Using The Bat! v9.1.18.3 (BETA) Current version is 8.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:

Re[2]: Reply all quoting selected text

2020-05-10 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hello Gunivortus, Sunday, May 10, 2020, 5:16:43 PM, you wrote: > I don't have that option between 'Reply to All' and 'Forward'. I wonder why... Perhaps try messaging RitLabs support directly? It is available by default. -- Regards, A Current

Re: Future of TB* mailing lists

2020-05-10 Thread Marck Pearlstone
On 10 May 2020 at 03:06 Andrew Savchenko wrote and made these points AS> It is 2020 out there and TB mailing lists seem to be a little outdated. AS> Screenshots being stripped from the messages unless it all fits in 25Kb, In the case of TBUDL, this seems to be happening regardless of size. I

Re: Reply all quoting selected text

2020-05-10 Thread Gunivortus Goos
Hello Andrew Savchenko, > Here we go: https://i.imgur.com/YoFRdGV.png I don't have that option between 'Reply to All' and 'Forward'. -- Kind regards, Gunivortus Goos The Bat! Professional 64 bit, version 9.1.18.3 (BETA) Windows Pro 64 bit version 10, build nr. 18363 NordVPN vs. 6.27.11.0