Re: earlier versions of the Bat

2000-12-23 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Thomas, On Sun, 24 Dec 2000 at 13:58:54 GMT +0800 (which was 9:58 PM where I live) witnesses say Thomas Fernandez typed: > If you cannot got hold of v1.42, I would think the following could > work: > 1.) Export all of your messages from v1.41 to say, Unix format. No need to export, yo

Re: strange antivirus message issue

2000-12-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Jason, On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 17:52:16 -0600 GMT (24/12/2000, 07:52 +0800 GMT), Jason Ostrom wrote: JO> No, I have not turned on Email virus detection in NAV, Now, how would this error message come up then? I can assure you that TB does not issue warning under the NAV pseudonym. NAV is tell

Re: Default View: Unread Mail

2000-12-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo RAOUL, On Sun, 24 Dec 2000 07:29:38 +0200 GMT (24/12/2000, 13:29 +0800 GMT), RAOUL COMNINOS wrote: RC> How would I set my default view to "unread mail" in such a way that RC> the Bat starts up with that view. I find that if I set it to DEFAULT RC> VIEW and restart the program, it defaults

Re: earlier versions of the Bat

2000-12-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Don, On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 20:14:31 -0800 GMT (24/12/2000, 12:14 +0800 GMT), Don Rosenberg wrote: DR> I currently use 1.41. Can someone direct me to 1.42? I would then DR> upgrade, keep my mail and then be able to go to the most recent DR> version. I don't know whether there is an archive o

earlier versions of the Bat

2000-12-23 Thread Don Rosenberg
<<12/23/00, Saturday, 8:11 PM>> Hello TBUDL, I would like to try upgrading to the newest version of the Bat, but when I tried last it screwed up my email folders and I lost my old messages. I understand that there were some ways to treat the problem in the update, but the newer versions don't se

Re: default account column settings and threading mode

2000-12-23 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 16:27:07 -0800, Ming-Li graced us with these comments: ML> Sorry, I forgot to address the following argument in my previous ML> reply. I'll answer this one because you said in a single clear sentence what you expounded on in your

Re: OT: strange antivirus message issue

2000-12-23 Thread Nick Andriash
On December 23, 2000, at 4:01:55 PM, Jason Ostrom Wrote: JO> But this time around, I re-installed TB, and I'm not getting the errors. JO> Probably because I disabled Norton auto protect, in addition to JO> re-installing? Do you still have the infected message somewhere on your HDD? Why don't you

Re: OT: strange antivirus message issue

2000-12-23 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jason, On 24 December 2000 at 18:01:55 -0600 (which was 00:01 where I live) Jason Ostrom wrote and made these points: JO> But this time around, I re-installed TB, and I'm not getting the errors. JO> Probably because I disabled Norton auto protect

Re: default account column settings and threading mode

2000-12-23 Thread Ming-Li
On Saturday, December 23, 2000, 11:10:23 AM, A. wrote: Sorry, I forgot to address the following argument in my previous reply. > For me, my default folders are TRUE defaults. If I wish to change > the sorting view, I wish it to be done for all the folders. You mean "sorting view", or threading

Re[2]: strange antivirus message issue

2000-12-23 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Jason, Saturday, December 23, 2000, 3:52:16 PM, you wrote: JO> Now, I did attempt to disable the NAV auto JO> email virus protection, but I still get the errors. To disable this you must change your pop account settings from: user/pop.server.net pop.nortonantivirus to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OT: strange antivirus message issue

2000-12-23 Thread Jason Ostrom
Marc, My apologies for sending in HTML. Yes, I am using OE until I get this issue resolved. I neglected to mention that I am not having said problem with OE, probably for the reason you mentioned. Yes, I did try disabling Norton auto email protect, but it didn't do anything. But this time aro

Re: default account column settings and threading mode

2000-12-23 Thread Ming-Li
On Saturday, December 23, 2000, 11:10:23 AM, A. wrote: ML>> It shouldn't be hard to change the behavior, either. > It doesn't seem so straightforward to me, unless the business of > assigning each view their own column settings is avoided. I do know each threading view can have its own column s

Re: strange antivirus message issue

2000-12-23 Thread Jason Ostrom
Thank you very much for your reply, George. No, I have not turned on Email virus detection in NAV, nor did I make any other changes to my mail setttings. Actually, it appears as if the problem just appeared out of nowhere. Now, I did attempt to disable the NAV auto email virus protection, but I

Re: OT: strange antivirus message issue

2000-12-23 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jason, On 23 December 2000 at 16:50:14 -0600 (which was 22:50 where I live) Jason Ostrom wrote and made these points: Please do not write to this list in HTML. It is against the list rules. JO> popup applet and also makes a sound every tim

Re: strange antivirus message issue

2000-12-23 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Jason, Saturday, December 23, 2000, 2:50:14 PM, you wrote: JO> "Norton Antivirus has detected the virus in: Have you recently turned on E-mail virus detection in NAV or made some E-mail address or NAV settings that would cause a change? -- Best regards, George

strange antivirus message issue

2000-12-23 Thread Jason Ostrom
Hello list,   I was wondering if you could shed some light on an issue I have been having trouble with.   I have been running Bat 1.46 for almost a year without a problem until I started receiving the following error message every time I pop my mail.  It is a very annoying popup applet and

Season's Greetings

2000-12-23 Thread Manfred Ell
Create a dream, believe, and it is yours! Merry Christmas and a joyous New Year! Regards -- Manfred using TheBat 1.48f on Windows 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1, RC 1.1 "Bother!" said Pooh, as the writers killed off his character. -- -

Re: Dial-Up monitor occupies port still after abort?

2000-12-23 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 23 December, 2000, 4:39 PM, I saw Thomas's comments made on Sun, 24 Dec 2000 04:18:16 +0800, and thought I'd add my $0.02 worth: [] TF> However, sometimes I hit alt-F2, the dial-up monitor pops up, and I TF> change my mind. I hit Abo

Dial-Up monitor occupies port still after abort?

2000-12-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello TBUDL! I often check mail by hitting alt-F2 when not connected. The dial-up monitor pops up, the mail is being checked, the dial-up monitor closes down. Fine. When I later connect by manual DUN Connection (Windows), everything is fine. However, sometimes I hit alt-F2, the dial-up monitor

Import addresses in the Address book

2000-12-23 Thread syv
Hi TBUDL, I cannot find documentation on how to import addresses into the address book. 1. The format layout. [name, email ... which order?] 3. How to assign it to a group 4. Can I have a group with over 2500 names? [it's not spam, they have subscribed.] [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-

Re: default account column settings and threading mode

2000-12-23 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 08:38:35 -0800, Ming-Li contributed this to our collective wisdom: [] ML> Or let me put it this way: I'm thankful for the existence of default ML> column settings, for it allows me to adjust column arrangement and ML> the adj

Re[2]: Opinion: "Blind Copy" emails should warn / not allow reply to original recipient

2000-12-23 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hi Thomas, On Sunday, December 24, 2000, 1:28:55 AM, you wrote to the list: >>> I feel that there is a potential for problems with the current >>> process, in which a "Reply to all" includes the original/main >>> recipient of the email of which you received a Blind Copy MSG>> I really agree

Re: default account column settings and threading mode

2000-12-23 Thread Ming-Li
On Saturday, December 23, 2000, 6:24:07 AM, Jannik wrote: >> Just found out that checking the "use account default column >> settings" option in a folder's properties would not only do that, >> but also subject the folder to the "default threading mode", if >> there's such a thing. > Is it prope

Re: Opinion: "Blind Copy" emails should warn / not allow reply to original recipient

2000-12-23 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Mike, In a post time stamped re: "Opinion: "Blind Copy" emails should warn / not allow reply to original recipient" you wrote: Mike> I have noticed that many people in the typical office environment do Mike> not grasp some of the more subtle aspects of "email Mike> common-sense". [..

Re[4]: Opinion: "Blind Copy" emails should warn / not allow reply to original recipient

2000-12-23 Thread Michael S. Greenbaum
On Saturday, December 23, 2000, George F. Schoelles wrote: > But perhaps in a message scenario that kept copy > status as I described also forced the CC and BCC boxes to open for > review would work. And or as an added bonus the background color could > be emphasized. Either of these would work

Re[3]: Opinion: "Blind Copy" emails should warn / not allow reply to original recipient

2000-12-23 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Michael, Saturday, December 23, 2000, 7:37:29 AM, you wrote: MSG> All recipients keeping their copy status would not really remove the MSG> problem. There would still be people seeing the message who MSG> shouldn't. A warning would be a better way so that the replier could MSG> then make

Re[2]: Opinion: "Blind Copy" emails should warn / not allow reply to original recipient

2000-12-23 Thread Michael S. Greenbaum
On Saturday, December 23, 2000, George F. Schoelles wrote: > I concur that this would be a cool feature. Or at least that all > recipients kept their copy status. All recipients keeping their copy status would not really remove the problem. There would still be people seeing the message who sh

Re: Opinion: "Blind Copy" emails should warn / not allow reply to original recipient

2000-12-23 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Mike, Saturday, December 23, 2000, 6:32:47 AM, you wrote: MH> Caution! You have included [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a recipient MH> of this reply. You were sent a Blind Copy of an email sent MH> to him/her. Are you sure that you want to do this? I concur that this would be a cool f

Re: conversion from 1.41

2000-12-23 Thread SyP
Hello Don Rosenberg, You wrote on 12/23/2000, 6:26 PM: Don> Hello TBUDL, Don> I hear there is a ".bat" utility to allow me to keep my folders and Don> messages intact when I upgrade from 1.41. Can someone send me a copy?? This batch file you refer to is only a tool to back up TB's registry set

Re: Opinion: "Blind Copy" emails should warn / not allow reply to original recipient

2000-12-23 Thread Michael S. Greenbaum
On Saturday, December 23, 2000, Mike Harlos wrote: > I feel that there is a potential for problems with > the current process, in which a "Reply to all" includes the > original/main recipient of the email of which you received a Blind > Copy I really agree with this one. A friend of mine just ha

Opinion: "Blind Copy" emails should warn / not allow reply to original recipient

2000-12-23 Thread Mike Harlos
Hi, I have noticed that many people in the typical office environment do not grasp some of the more subtle aspects of "email common-sense". Here's an example that could be addressed by The Bat! (and other email clients): Suppose I sent an email to Mr. X that John, Steve, and Susan should be awa

conversion from 1.41

2000-12-23 Thread Don Rosenberg
<<12/23/2000, Saturday, 9:25 AM>> Hello TBUDL, I hear there is a ".bat" utility to allow me to keep my folders and messages intact when I upgrade from 1.41. Can someone send me a copy?? Best regards, Don Rosenberg, email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -

Re: default account column settings and threading mode

2000-12-23 Thread Jannik Lindquist
Hello Ming-Li, On Thursday, December 21, 2000 at 06:41:07 GMT -0800 you wrote on "default account column settings and threading mode": > Just found out that checking the "use account default column > settings" option in a folder's properties would not only do that, > but also subject the folder

Re: pgpi 6.5.1 and thebat

2000-12-23 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi David, On 22 December 2000 at 15:43:13 +0800 (which was 07:43 where I live) David Pascoe wrote and made these points: DP> Does anyone have an idea of why pgp is no longer happy ? I have DP> read the FAQs and the archives but there doesn't seem to

pgpi 6.5.1 and thebat

2000-12-23 Thread David Pascoe
Hi, Not strictly about thebat, but I hope you'll forgive me... I have started having some troubles with pgp decrypting emails. I could previously do this no problem. I uninstalled the CA pgp 6.5.1i that contained a couple of keys that were working. This was a mistake. So I reinstalled 6.5.1i fro