Re: attachements can only be dragged

2006-09-08 Thread A . Translator

Henk M. de Bruijn wrote :

Henk M. de Bruijn formuleerde op donderdag :

If you do a complete re-install don't forget about the registry.



What do you mean? Can you be more specific?



The Bat! makes entries in the registry:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER
SOFTWARE
RIT


So I should delete that? the folder Rit?

--
Regards,
Adriana.
[ put out the rubbish if you need to reach me by e-mail ]
www.spinsister.nl





Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Insert Smile caused Canvas Redrawing alert box, cascading

2006-09-08 Thread Mark Partous

Hello Mary,

Friday, September 8, 2006, 1:37:50 AM, you wrote:

MB This was confirmed fixed in beta 3.81.17, by the reporter, and the
MB issue went from Resolved to Closed.

Not by me...

I thought it had something to do with Objectdock Plus  Copernic Desktop
Search.

I have spent many an hour to transfer all shortcuts from Objectdock Plus to
Jetstart only to find out that, after all, the problem still occured...

-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 3.85.02





Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Editing pop up addresses

2006-09-08 Thread John Phillips
Hi,

I need to edit pop up addresses in Bat! which come up when I compose a
message and start to type the address into the To: field.

Remember (but now forgotten) something about this on the list when I
previously subscribed.

Thanks for advice if available!

(And apologies for the footer text - automatically placed by mail
server at work and cannot be deleted.)


-- 
Regards,
John Phillips
Bat 3.85.02 XP Pro SP2



   *** Confidentiality, Privilege Notice, and Warning ***

This e-mail is intended only to be read or used by the addressee. It
is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for 
delivery of the message to such person), you must not copy or deliver 
this message to anyone, and you must destroy this message and notify 
the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail and attachments, if any, have not been scanned for virus 
threats, worms, trojan horse attacks, or any other electronic form of 
disruption.  It is your responsibility to scan for same, and take 
appropriate action where necessary.  Fashion Fair will not, under any 
circumstances whatsoever, accept any responsibility for such computer 
born problems.

Details of our privacy policy can be viewed at www.fashionfair.com.au

Fashion Fair Pty Ltd (and associated companies)  Established 1981
PO Box 274 (2 Mark Street) Lidcombe 1825, Australia
Telephone +61 2 9749 1933  Fax +61 2 9749 2727






Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Editing pop up addresses

2006-09-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo John,

On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 17:12:21 +1000GMT (8-9-2006, 9:12 , where I live),
you wrote:

JP I need to edit pop up addresses in Bat! which come up when I compose a
JP message and start to type the address into the To: field.

You can pick the addresses you'd like to pop-up with:

  Options - Preferences - Message Headers - To: (you've got to
  select the header whose behaviour you want to alter) - Edit -
  'Editing' tab - While you type actions 

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

The Babylon Project was our last, best hope for peace.  It failed.
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 3.85.02
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM


pgpTAcqwpWBln.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Editing pop up addresses

2006-09-08 Thread John Phillips
Roelof,

On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, at 10:39:10 [GMT +0200] (18:39:10 08/09/2006
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:

 You can pick the addresses you'd like to pop-up with:

   Options - Preferences - Message Headers - To: (you've got to
   select the header whose behaviour you want to alter) - Edit -
   'Editing' tab - While you type actions 

Thanks, but how can I delete old' (changed) addresses that pop up?
Is there a file somewhere of these?

-- 
Regards,
John Phillips   



   *** Confidentiality, Privilege Notice, and Warning ***

This e-mail is intended only to be read or used by the addressee. It
is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for 
delivery of the message to such person), you must not copy or deliver 
this message to anyone, and you must destroy this message and notify 
the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail and attachments, if any, have not been scanned for virus 
threats, worms, trojan horse attacks, or any other electronic form of 
disruption.  It is your responsibility to scan for same, and take 
appropriate action where necessary.  Fashion Fair will not, under any 
circumstances whatsoever, accept any responsibility for such computer 
born problems.

Details of our privacy policy can be viewed at www.fashionfair.com.au

Fashion Fair Pty Ltd (and associated companies)  Established 1981
PO Box 274 (2 Mark Street) Lidcombe 1825, Australia
Telephone +61 2 9749 1933  Fax +61 2 9749 2727






Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Insert Smile caused Canvas Redrawing alert box, cascading

2006-09-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Mark!

On Friday, September 08, 2006, 2:05 AM, you wrote:

MB This was confirmed fixed in beta 3.81.17, by the reporter, and the
MB issue went from Resolved to Closed.

 Not by me...

No, by Charlene, before your post to TBBETA appeared.

 I thought it had something to do with Objectdock Plus  Copernic Desktop
 Search.

I remember.

 I have spent many an hour to transfer all shortcuts from Objectdock Plus to
 Jetstart only to find out that, after all, the problem still occured...

Bad scene.

If I don't hear back from Marek in a few hours about re-opening
Charlene's closed thread, I shall put a new BT report up. Will post
the link here.

Probably be best to do that (make a new report) anyway. Start fresh
delineating the bugs in v 3.85.xx.

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat! 3.85.02 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2








Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Insert Smile caused Canvas Redrawing alert box, cascading

2006-09-08 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all,
Friday, September 8, 2006, Mary Bull wrote:

 Hello Marek!

 I have just now experienced a series of cascading Alert boxes, while
 using the Insert Smile dialogue window. Boxes said, approximately,
 Cannot allow canvas redrawing. They were very rapid, filling the
 screen, and I had to close The Bat! with the Windows Task Manager.

 This was one of the bug behaviors reported in a BT issue report at
 http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5956

 This was confirmed fixed in beta 3.81.17, by the reporter, and the
 issue went from Resolved to Closed.

 Do you want to re-open this issue report, so that I can put a note
 that the buggy behavior has appeared again in v. 3.85.2?

 Or shall I write a new issue report?

write a new one, because it is different than previous report.

-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz

Using the best The Bat! 3.85.02
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, NOD32 Antivirus plugin and AntispamSniper v 
1.6.5

Notebook Acer, Pentium4-M 2.2 GHz, 512 MB RAM


 




Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: No message loaded

2006-09-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Tom,

On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 13:48:18 +1000GMT (8-9-2006, 5:48 , where I live),
you wrote:

TL I am a bit frantic as I just noticed that many of my existing emails
TL seem to have gone.

Well, as long as you can see them in your preview pane, they're still
there.

TL I upgraded yesterday to the latest version and everything seemed fine.
TL I first noticed that when using the search function and then trying to
TL double click on one of the results to open the email, it does not
TL work.
TL Now I get the same result when doubleclicking in the main panel : No
TL message loaded.

I can't reproduce that behaviour over here.
You wouldn't per chance have changed the double click speed of your
mouse, so that you can't double click fast enough, would you?

What happens when press enter when you've selected a message?

Is it happening with all messages or just with some messages in one
folder or from one (group of) sender(s)?

BTW You say 'no message loaded', is that the message you get or is
that what happens?

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

The characters in this message are recyclable
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 3.85.02
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM


pgpMk8jyyd5kK.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Editing pop up addresses

2006-09-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo John,

On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 18:39:16 +1000GMT (8-9-2006, 10:39 , where I live),
you wrote:

JP Thanks, but how can I delete old' (changed) addresses that pop up?
JP Is there a file somewhere of these?

Depends on the addresses you want to delete. When they're popping up
from the history, you can move to it with the cursor keys and press
Delete, when they're popping up from the address book then you've got
to delete/correct them in the AB.
In the account directory there is an account.his file that's remembering
the 40  most recent recipients, subjects, etc for the account. You can
delete that (preferably when TB is closed).

But you can also configure TB to only show addresses from your A and
you should keep your AB current, that's why I pointed you to that
option.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

'95 - The number of calls to tech support before you can get it to run
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 3.85.02
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM


pgpGzkRo3N832.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Insert Smile caused Canvas Redrawing alert box, cascading

2006-09-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Marek!

On Friday, September 08, 2006, 3:47 AM, you wrote:

 shall I write a new issue report?

 write a new one, because it is different than previous report.

Will do. Thanks a lot for the reply, Marek.

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat! 3.85.02 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2








Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Insert Smile caused Canvas Redrawing alert box, cascading

2006-09-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Mark!

On Friday, September 08, 2006, 2:05 AM, you wrote:

MB This was confirmed fixed in beta 3.81.17, by the reporter, and the
MB issue went from Resolved to Closed.

 Not by me...

 I thought it had something to do with Objectdock Plus  Copernic Desktop
 Search.

 I have spent many an hour to transfer all shortcuts from Objectdock Plus to
 Jetstart only to find out that, after all, the problem still occured...

I have put a BT issue report. Please add your note to it.

https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6020

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat! 3.85.02 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2








Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Insert Smile caused Canvas Redrawing alert box, cascading

2006-09-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Marek!

On Friday, September 08, 2006, 3:47 AM, you wrote:

 ... shall I write a new issue report?

 write a new one, because it is different than previous report.

Done. Thanks a mil, again, for the reply. And see:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6020

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat! 3.85.02 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2








Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: attachements can only be dragged

2006-09-08 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 08:56:20 +0200GMT (8-9-2006, 8:56 +0200, where I
live), A.Translator wrote:

 Henk M. de Bruijn wrote :
 Henk M. de Bruijn formuleerde op donderdag :
 If you do a complete re-install don't forget about the registry.

 What do you mean? Can you be more specific?

 The Bat! makes entries in the registry:
 HKEY_CURRENT_USER
 SOFTWARE
 RIT

 So I should delete that? the folder Rit?


I do that when I do/make a new/clean install. This way you don't use
old settings..

-- 
Henk
__
The Bat! E-Mail System version 3.85.02 Pro on Windows XP SP2
PGPkey at: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0X11EECBEEB464DD0F
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://www.gswot.org
A progressive and innovative Web of Trust

pgpE72xbOHTFy.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: No message loaded

2006-09-08 Thread Tom
Friday, September 8, 2006, 6:49:29 PM, you wrote:


TL I upgraded yesterday to the latest version and everything seemed fine.
TL I first noticed that when using the search function and then trying to
TL double click on one of the results to open the email, it does not
TL work.
TL Now I get the same result when doubleclicking in the main panel : No
TL message loaded.

 I can't reproduce that behaviour over here.
 You wouldn't per chance have changed the double click speed of your
 mouse, so that you can't double click fast enough, would you?

 What happens when press enter when you've selected a message?

Double clicking, pressing enter or right click / open all lead to the
same outcome: a grey screen with the message no message loaded and
the header  view folder and folder name.

 Is it happening with all messages or just with some messages in one
 folder or from one (group of) sender(s)?

It seems to affect all emails older than today, ie prior to my
upgrade. All new messages received after the upgrade do not show this
behaviour.

 BTW You say 'no message loaded', is that the message you get or is
 that what happens?

Yes, unfortunately this is the case but as you said, the messages must
still be there as I can see them in the preview pane and when trying
to forward.

-- 
Tom
using TB 3.65.03 on XP



Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: attachements can only be dragged

2006-09-08 Thread A . Translator

Het is zò dat Henk M. de Bruijn formuleerde :

So I should delete that? the folder Rit?




I do that when I do/make a new/clean install. This way you don't use
old settings..


Ok, when I reinstall, I'll try and remember ;-)

--
Regards,
Adriana.
[ put out the rubbish if you need to reach me by e-mail ]
www.spinsister.nl





Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: attachements can only be dragged

2006-09-08 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 12:28:24 +0200GMT (8-9-2006, 12:28 +0200, where I
live), A.Translator wrote:

 Het is zò dat Henk M. de Bruijn formuleerde :
 So I should delete that? the folder Rit?

 I do that when I do/make a new/clean install. This way you don't use
 old settings..

 Ok, when I reinstall, I'll try and remember ;-)

Don't forget to backup ;-)

-- 
Henk
__
The Bat! E-Mail System version 3.85.02 Pro on Windows XP SP2
PGPkey at: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0X11EECBEEB464DD0F
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://www.gswot.org
A progressive and innovative Web of Trust

pgp4mMqGgeTtk.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: No message loaded

2006-09-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Tom,

On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 20:23:04 +1000GMT (8-9-2006, 12:23 , where I live),
you wrote:

TL Yes, unfortunately this is the case but as you said, the messages must
TL still be there as I can see them in the preview pane and when trying
TL to forward.

I noticed that you've moved back to 3.65.03, Are you still
encountering the same problem? Was that the version you were using
before?

What happens when you select all messages in a folder, export them to
unix mailbox, import them again to another (new) folder and try to
open them then?
What happens when you copy all messages to another (new) folder and
double click the copies afterwards?
Did you try  folder maintenance? (Create a copy of your message base
first)

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

(A)bort (R)etry (I)nfluence with a large hammer
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 3.85.02
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM


pgpipoI8SKD2w.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

.MSG files

2006-09-08 Thread Steven P Vallière
I seem to be collecting more and more .MSG files
in my default attachments folder.  I've searched TB's help
system and none of the hits for MSG seem to have anything
to do with these files.  They seem to contain email message
bodies, and therefore that are, by definition, *NOT
ATTACHMENTS* ! ! !  So I must ask:

1. Why are they collecting in my attachments folder?

2. How do I stop TB from doing this silly thing?

3. If I delete these .MSG files, will I lose access to
   the body of the message from inside TB, or does it
   save another copy somewhere else (as it should be
   doing)?

   (The messages.tbb files seem to have not only all of
   the message bodies, but attachments as well, so one
   would assume the neither the body NOR the attachment
   is lost if these stupid .MSG files are removed.)

Please help, a directory with many thousands of files in
it is nearly unusable in Windows XP (too [EMAIL PROTECTED]$ SLOW!).

Thanks! ?

-- 
Steve Vallière | tb3.82.05 | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: No message loaded

2006-09-08 Thread Tom
Hallo Roelof,

Friday, September 8, 2006, 9:01:47 PM, you wrote:

 I noticed that you've moved back to 3.65.03, Are you still
 encountering the same problem? Was that the version you were using
 before?

You are very observant, certainly more observant than I am. My
signature was wrong, I had only amended the sig in new messages but
not updated the reply function. I am still using 3.85.02.

 What happens when you select all messages in a folder, export them to
 unix mailbox, import them again to another (new) folder and try to
 open them then?

Never done that before. Tried to export, reimported to new folder as
suggested. Only one message was successfully imported and this message
then showed the same symptoms.

 What happens when you copy all messages to another (new) folder and
 double click the copies afterwards?

same effect - no message loaded

??? Just before sending this reply, I went back into the problem
emails to fiddle once again with the settings. As the emails were
still shown in preview I thought I might have inadvertently changed a
setting. I don't know what I did, just went through the options under
view and looked at character settings and global view. I don't think I
actually changed anything but all of a sudden, everything works as it
should including the emails in the test folder that I had just checked
5 minutes ago.  Now I am totally baffled.

-- 
Tom
using TB 3.85.02 on XP



Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: No message loaded

2006-09-08 Thread Tom
Hi Dean

Friday, September 8, 2006, 11:15:37 PM, you wrote:

 I ran into the same problem. I reloaded the MSI file, went  back a
 version and still had grey messages.  I eventually went back to the
 latest 385.01 version and after about 30 minutes all of sudden the
 emails just started to show up on the preview screen.  Weird, yes I
 know.  The messages I received today have not had that problem so I
 don't know what to attribute this strange behavior.

My problem is also gone (hopefully) and as far as I can tell not
because I did anything. Let's hope this issue won't pop up again. It's
interesting to know though that I am not the only one with this
experience.

-- 
Tom
using TB 3.85.02 on XP



Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: No message loaded

2006-09-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Tom,

On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 23:03:31 +1000GMT (8-9-2006, 15:03 , where I live),
you wrote:

TL You are very observant, certainly more observant than I am. My
TL signature was wrong, I had only amended the sig in new messages but
TL not updated the reply function. I am still using 3.85.02.

You could change your sig to: The Bat! %TheBatVersion
That will keep your sig up to date without changing it with every
upgrade.

TL actually changed anything but all of a sudden, everything works as it
TL should including the emails in the test folder that I had just checked
TL 5 minutes ago.  Now I am totally baffled.

All's well that ends well. Consider me baffled too.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

The shortest distance between two Points is a BossNode.
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 3.85.02
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM


pgpITaM1m9NJS.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: .MSG files

2006-09-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Steven,

On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 08:07:03 -0400 GMT (08/09/2006, 19:07 +0700 GMT),
Steven P Vallière wrote:

SPV I seem to be collecting more and more .MSG files
SPV in my default attachments folder.  I've searched TB's help
SPV system and none of the hits for MSG seem to have anything
SPV to do with these files.  They seem to contain email message
SPV bodies, and therefore that are, by definition, *NOT
SPV ATTACHMENTS* ! ! !  So I must ask:

SPV 1. Why are they collecting in my attachments folder?

This would usually only happen if these .msg files are attachments to
messages you received. If you are sure you didn't receive
MIME-attached messages this would be weird. Do you receive a lot of
look at this forwards?

SPV 2. How do I stop TB from doing this silly thing?

Account / Properties / Options / Keep attachments in Message Body.
(If these files are attachments, that is.)

SPV 3. If I delete these .MSG files, will I lose access to
SPVthe body of the message from inside TB, or does it
SPVsave another copy somewhere else (as it should be
SPVdoing)?

The message body is stored in the .tbb file, but it may be an empty
message, if my theory about those being forwards is correct.

SPV(The messages.tbb files seem to have not only all of
SPVthe message bodies, but attachments as well, so one
SPVwould assume the neither the body NOR the attachment
SPVis lost if these stupid .MSG files are removed.)

You seem to be storing the attachments in the Attachments directory,
so those will be lost if you delete the files.

SPV Please help, a directory with many thousands of files in
SPV it is nearly unusable in Windows XP (too [EMAIL PROTECTED]$ SLOW!).

Try moving these .msg files (all of them) to a temporary directory you
create for this purpose, while TB is closed. Then reopen TB and see
whether you have problems reading the message bodies.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Rechnen Sie mit robotron! Unsere Mikroelektronik ist einfach nicht
klein zu kriegen!
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.85.02
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2






Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Handling of Attachments

2006-09-08 Thread Tom
Hello Everyone,

I am wondering about the best way to deal with attachments?  I am
getting quite a few reports with attachments sent on a weekly basis
and I tend to file many of the attached files on my HD anyway.
Usually it's good to know that if I cannot find something later on my
HD but remember where it came from, it's probably still somewhere in
TB and I can save the relevant file again. However this obviously
means that my inbox or rather the relevant subfolders is growing
rapidly not only by messages but also mb.
Any tips from a working environment on how to best organise files with
attachments using TB?

-- 
Best regards,
Tom  
using TB 3.85.02 on XP  



Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: .MSG files

2006-09-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Steven,

On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 08:07:03 -0400GMT (8-9-2006, 14:07 , where I live),
you wrote:

SPV(The messages.tbb files seem to have not only all of
SPVthe message bodies, but attachments as well, so one
SPVwould assume the neither the body NOR the attachment
SPVis lost if these stupid .MSG files are removed.)

This implies that you're not storing your attachments in an attachment
folder. Are you putting your attachments in that directory with a
filter? If so could that filter (or maybe another one) export your
messages to that directory too?

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Love is chemistry; sex is mechanical engineering.
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 3.85.02
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM


pgpaIbmDy6Bza.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: attachements can only be dragged

2006-09-08 Thread A . Translator

Henk M. de Bruijn stelde de volgende uitleg voor :

Don't forget to backup


I'didn't.

I uninstalled TB! the proper way (add/remove)
I unchecked the option to keep settings and data
I deleted the folder Rit in the registry (current_user)

I re-installed the Bat! (admittedly opting for 'restore backup'),I had to put 
in my registration key, but my old accounts were still there. Data too. There 
were only some minor changes in font type.


The attachment problem is still there too: I cannot attach anything either 
trough the button, nor through keyboard short cuts, for the browse window does 
not show my files (it does show folders). I can only attach by dragging the 
attachment into the editor.


So where does TheBat! store the settings that control this browser window 
explorer type function?


I know I should try a acomplete reinstall without putting back a back up, but 
at the moment I do not have the time.


Jim Kyle suggested earlier in this thread This information is usually stored,
invisibly to the user, as part of the EXE file but by uninstalling and 
reinstalling sureley that .exe file has been repaired?


Any more ideas?

--
Regards,
Adriana.
[ put out the rubbish if you need to reach me by e-mail ]
www.spinsister.nl





Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: attachements can only be dragged

2006-09-08 Thread Luc
Good afternoon A.Translator,
  
It was foretold that on 8/09/2006 @ 15:48:19 GMT+0200 (which was
15:48:19 where I live) A.Translator would write:
  
snipped a bit

AT Jim Kyle suggested earlier in this thread This information is usually 
stored,
AT invisibly to the user, as part of the EXE file but by uninstalling and
AT reinstalling sureley that .exe file has been repaired?  

erhm... maybe a DOH question: did you download a fresh exe?
 
-- 
Best regards,
 Luc
 http://www.dzinelabs.com
 
---
Powered by The Bat! version 3.85.02 with Windows XP (build 2600),
version 5.1 Service Pack 2 and using the best browser: Opera.

Computers in the future may weigh no more than one ton. -  Popular
Mechanics,1949.




Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: attachements can only be dragged

2006-09-08 Thread A . Translator

Luc gebruikte zijn klavier om te schrijven :

did you download a fresh exe?


Yes, I did. But you have a point ;-)

--
Regards,
Adriana.
[ put out the rubbish if you need to reach me by e-mail ]
www.spinsister.nl





Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Smiley

2006-09-08 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Tom  everyone else,

on 08-Sep-2006 at 00:41 you (Tom) wrote:

 I must be particularly slow today but I cannot figure out how to use
 the insert smile function in the new version that I just downloaded.

The smileys are not embedded in the message, if thats what you mean.

Its TB's own implementation. The smileys are kept locally with each
installation and only an identifier is sent in the message, in the style
of :smileyhandle: - TB runs its own interpreter over the message and
shows the local image (if its there!) instead of the handle.

While it does that, it still does'n show *bold* _underline_ or /italics/
which is a pity if you ask me...

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de)

Equations are more important to me, because politics is for the
present, but an equation is something for eternity. -- Albert Einstein



Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: attachements can only be dragged

2006-09-08 Thread A . Translator

A.Translator had uiteengezet :
The attachment problem is still there too: I cannot attach anything either 
trough the button, nor through keyboard short cuts, for the browse window 
does not show my files (it does show folders).


After de-installing and re-installing TB! I did not see the plugin voor the 
AntiSpamSniper, so I hit the ADD button and browsed to the sniper.exe: no 
problem. This browse window does show all file types, so it is just the 
editor's browse window that does not function properly. (I use the Micro-Ed 
editor, but just to check tried the Windows editor just now: same problem).


--
Regards,
Adriana.
[ put out the rubbish if you need to reach me by e-mail ]
www.spinsister.nl





Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: .MSG files

2006-09-08 Thread Steven P Vallière
Roelof,

Friday, September 8, 2006, 9:33:13 AM, you wrote:

RO Hallo Steven,

RO On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 08:07:03 -0400GMT (8-9-2006, 14:07 , where I live),
RO you wrote:

SPV(The messages.tbb files seem to have not only all of
SPVthe message bodies, but attachments as well, so one
SPVwould assume the neither the body NOR the attachment
SPVis lost if these stupid .MSG files are removed.)

RO This implies that you're not storing your attachments in an attachment
RO folder. Are you putting your attachments in that directory with a
RO filter? If so could that filter (or maybe another one) export your
RO messages to that directory too?

I was storing all attachments to the same folder
(C:\Download\Attachments).  The .MSG files appear to be
plain printable ASCII and contain an entire message
BODY, plus all HEADERS.

I'd really like to find out why TB thinks it should save
all my email message bodies in my attachments folder.

-- 
Steve Vallière | tb3.82.05 | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: .MSG files

2006-09-08 Thread Steven P Vallière
Thomas,

Friday, September 8, 2006, 9:27:15 AM, you wrote:

TF This would usually only happen if these .msg files are
TF attachments to messages you received. If you are sure you
TF didn't receive MIME-attached messages this would be weird.

The files look like plain printable ASCII of the complete
message header and body -- minus any attachment(s).

TF Do you receive a lot of look at this forwards?

Not that I'm aware of.

TF Account / Properties / Options / Keep attachments
TF in Message Body. (If these files are attachments, that is.)

I didn't find that setting under Options.  In my version it
has moved to 'Files  directories' ... but I changed it
anyway, to see what happens.

TF Try moving these .msg files (all of them) to a temporary
TF directory you create for this purpose, while TB is closed.
TF Then reopen TB and see whether you have problems reading
TF the message bodies.

Good idea.  Don't know why I didn't think of it.  I'll give it
a try.

-- 
Steve Vallière | tb3.82.05 | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[3]: .MSG files

2006-09-08 Thread Steven P Vallière
SPV Thomas,

SPV Friday, September 8, 2006, 9:27:15 AM, you wrote:

TF This would usually only happen if these .msg files are
TF attachments to messages you received. If you are sure you
TF didn't receive MIME-attached messages this would be weird.

SPV The files look like plain printable ASCII of the complete
SPV message header and body -- minus any attachment(s).

TF Do you receive a lot of look at this forwards?

SPV Not that I'm aware of.

TF Account / Properties / Options / Keep attachments
TF in Message Body. (If these files are attachments, that is.)

SPV I didn't find that setting under Options.  In my version it
SPV has moved to 'Files  directories' ... but I changed it
SPV anyway, to see what happens.

TF Try moving these .msg files (all of them) to a temporary
TF directory you create for this purpose, while TB is closed.
TF Then reopen TB and see whether you have problems reading
TF the message bodies.

SPV Good idea.  Don't know why I didn't think of it.  I'll give it
SPV a try.

I tried a few things:  moving the .MSG files does not seem to
have affected my ability to read the bodies of recent messages
that I didn't want to lose.  GOOD

I changed the 'Keep attachments' setting to 'in message bodies'
and send myself a message from my RoadRunner account using their
web mail.  No .MSG file appeared.

I changed the 'Keep attachments' setting back to 'in a separate
directory' and sent myself another message from my RoadRunner
account.  Still no .MSG file.

Apparently, these must be some sort of unnamed attachment or
something (since TB names them all using an 8 digit sequential
number.MSG) that is coming in with some (or most?) of the SPAM
I am receiving.

If the TB developers are reading this, it sure would be nice if
I could define my own list of attachment types to save or NOT
save.  Better yet, have both options and allow the user to choose
which way to go:  list the only extension types to be saved OR
save all EXCEPT the listed extension types.

Heck, maybe even a file type table allowing different extensions
to be saved (or not) to different folders!

I know, I'm probably asking too much, but what the heck, the
worst they can do is nothing, right?  smile

Thanks for the ideas.  I guess I'll just manually delete all the
stupid .MSG as often as I notice them.

-- 
Steve Vallière | tb3.82.05 | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Handling of Attachments

2006-09-08 Thread Richard H. Stoddard
Tom,

Friday, September 8, 2006, 6:29:44 PM, you wrote:

T Any tips from a working environment on how to best organise files with
T attachments using TB?

I store attachments in external directories as a rule. Sometimes I'll
copy or move an attachment to a different directory depending on its
content. (That I have to do manually, unless someone can tell me how to
automate it somehow.) This way I can either look for an attachment
within TB! by sender or just go to the attachment directory and sort by
name or search for it.

-- 
Rick




Current version is 3.85.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: OT: account properties and connection center

2006-09-08 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi M,

on Wed, 6 Sep 2006 10:11:26 +0700GMT (06.09.2006, 05:11 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:

SD 1.  It's  much easier if you can add a dropdown menu or something else
MSD in  account properties for changing different account quickly/directly 
without
MSD having  to  close  the  account properties first.

You're so right! Thank you for bringing it up. I put it on the
wishlist to get the developers' attention.
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6023

-- 
Cheers
Peter

Don't humanize computers. They hate that!



Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Upgrade?

2006-09-08 Thread MFPA

Hi

On Friday 8 September 2006 at 4:36:50 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mary Bull wrote:

 Anybody's guess. This is v. 3.85. Two years ago in September, we got
 3.xx.

 If you're being watchful of the price, I'd wait another three months,
 anyway. However, when 3.xx came along, and some people got caught in
 the situation you describe, IIRC correctly, those who had bought
 within the last few days were given refunds for the upgrade. Within
 the last few weeks, an even more substantial discount than the one
 being given to others who were upgrading.

YMMV but I bought v2 *twelve days* before v3 was released. Several
emails to RITlabs elicited the following standard reply:-

 You are not obliged to upgrade to the 3.xx version. The
 Bat! version that you purchased is fully functional and has no time
 limit in using. Upgrading is optional.

-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPA

You're only young once; you can be immature forever

Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Upgrade?

2006-09-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello MFPA!

On Friday, September 08, 2006, 5:15 PM, you wrote:

 Anybody's guess. This is v. 3.85. Two years ago in September, we got
 3.xx.

 If you're being watchful of the price, I'd wait another three months,
 anyway. However, when 3.xx came along, and some people got caught in
 the situation you describe, IIRC correctly, those who had bought
 within the last few days were given refunds for the upgrade. Within
 the last few weeks, an even more substantial discount than the one
 being given to others who were upgrading.

 YMMV but I bought v2 *twelve days* before v3 was released. Several
 emails to RITlabs elicited the following standard reply:-

 You are not obliged to upgrade to the 3.xx version. The
 Bat! version that you purchased is fully functional and has no time
 limit in using. Upgrading is optional.

Maybe my memory is confused and only wishful thinking.

Buyer Beware, I reckon, should be the watchword.

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat! 3.85.03 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2








Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Upgrade?

2006-09-08 Thread MFPA

Hi

On Friday 8 September 2006 at 11:49:34 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mary Bull wrote:

 Maybe my memory is confused and only wishful thinking.

It was said on this list at the time that some people who had only
just purchased v1 a few days before the release of v2 were sent a
new key free when they contacted RIT.

 Buyer Beware, I reckon, should be the watchword.

Indeed.

-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPA

Always borrow money from a pessimist - they don't expect it back

Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: .MSG files

2006-09-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Steven,

On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:02:41 -0400 GMT (08/09/2006, 23:02 +0700 GMT),
Steven P Vallière wrote:

TF This would usually only happen if these .msg files are
TF attachments to messages you received. If you are sure you
TF didn't receive MIME-attached messages this would be weird.

SPV The files look like plain printable ASCII of the complete
SPV message header and body -- minus any attachment(s).

With what you say below, I think my assumption was right that these
were MIME-attached messages.

TF Do you receive a lot of look at this forwards?

SPV Not that I'm aware of.

You mention spam later on - this may be the source of the
MIME-attached messages.

TF Account / Properties / Options / Keep attachments
TF in Message Body. (If these files are attachments, that is.)

SPV I didn't find that setting under Options.  In my version it
SPV has moved to 'Files  directories' ...

Yes, sorry, my bad.

SPV but I changed it anyway, to see what happens.

TF Try moving these .msg files (all of them) to a temporary
TF directory you create for this purpose, while TB is closed.
TF Then reopen TB and see whether you have problems reading
TF the message bodies.

SPV Good idea.  Don't know why I didn't think of it.  I'll give it
SPV a try.

SPV I tried a few things:  moving the .MSG files does not seem to
SPV have affected my ability to read the bodies of recent messages
SPV that I didn't want to lose.  GOOD

OK.

SPV I changed the 'Keep attachments' setting to 'in message bodies'
SPV and send myself a message from my RoadRunner account using their
SPV web mail.  No .MSG file appeared.

Good.

SPV I changed the 'Keep attachments' setting back to 'in a separate
SPV directory' and sent myself another message from my RoadRunner
SPV account.  Still no .MSG file.

Still good.

SPV Apparently, these must be some sort of unnamed attachment or
SPV something (since TB names them all using an 8 digit sequential
SPV number.MSG) that is coming in with some (or most?) of the SPAM
SPV I am receiving.

I would think so too.

SPV If the TB developers are reading this, it sure would be nice if
SPV I could define my own list of attachment types to save or NOT
SPV save.  Better yet, have both options and allow the user to choose
SPV which way to go:  list the only extension types to be saved OR
SPV save all EXCEPT the listed extension types.

This may be possible with Incoming filters, I didn't check.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

This 'telephone' has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered
as a means of communication. The device is inherently of no value to
us. -- Western Union internal memo, 1876.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.85.02
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2






Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Editing pop up addresses

2006-09-08 Thread John Phillips
Roelof,

On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, at 10:56:31 [GMT +0200] (18:56:31 08/09/2006
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:

 But you can also configure TB to only show addresses from your A and
 you should keep your AB current, that's why I pointed you to that
 option.

(rest snipped)

Thanks for the help.

-- 
Regards,
John Phillips   



   *** Confidentiality, Privilege Notice, and Warning ***

This e-mail is intended only to be read or used by the addressee. It
is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for 
delivery of the message to such person), you must not copy or deliver 
this message to anyone, and you must destroy this message and notify 
the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail and attachments, if any, have not been scanned for virus 
threats, worms, trojan horse attacks, or any other electronic form of 
disruption.  It is your responsibility to scan for same, and take 
appropriate action where necessary.  Fashion Fair will not, under any 
circumstances whatsoever, accept any responsibility for such computer 
born problems.

Details of our privacy policy can be viewed at www.fashionfair.com.au

Fashion Fair Pty Ltd (and associated companies)  Established 1981
PO Box 274 (2 Mark Street) Lidcombe 1825, Australia
Telephone +61 2 9749 1933  Fax +61 2 9749 2727






Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Editing pop up addresses

2006-09-08 Thread John Phillips
Ian,

On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, at 19:08:25 [GMT +1000] (19:08:25 08/09/2006
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:

 If this is an address in the history rather than the address book,
 pick the arrow to bring up the list, then press the down arrow on the
 keyboard to bring you to the list. Scroll down to the appropriate one
 and press the Delete key on the keyboard.


Thanks Ian.  Simple if you know how!

-- 
Regards,
John Phillips   



   *** Confidentiality, Privilege Notice, and Warning ***

This e-mail is intended only to be read or used by the addressee. It
is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for 
delivery of the message to such person), you must not copy or deliver 
this message to anyone, and you must destroy this message and notify 
the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail and attachments, if any, have not been scanned for virus 
threats, worms, trojan horse attacks, or any other electronic form of 
disruption.  It is your responsibility to scan for same, and take 
appropriate action where necessary.  Fashion Fair will not, under any 
circumstances whatsoever, accept any responsibility for such computer 
born problems.

Details of our privacy policy can be viewed at www.fashionfair.com.au

Fashion Fair Pty Ltd (and associated companies)  Established 1981
PO Box 274 (2 Mark Street) Lidcombe 1825, Australia
Telephone +61 2 9749 1933  Fax +61 2 9749 2727






Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: .MSG files

2006-09-08 Thread Robin Anson
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 at 12:02:41 -0400, Steven wrote:

 Apparently, these must be some sort of unnamed attachment or
 something (since TB names them all using an 8 digit sequential
 number.MSG) that is coming in with some (or most?) of the SPAM
 I am receiving.

You didn't at some stage export a folder of messages in .msg format
into that directory, perhaps unintentionally? That would leave you
with a directory full of files like that. If you did, the files would
all have the same creation date.

-- 
Robin

Using The Bat! v3.85.01
  Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
  Popfile v0.22.4




Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html