The Bat! v4 Font Question

2008-02-10 Thread Mike
Hello, The Bat! v3 used to display plain text messages with a different font than HTML messages but v4 seems to use the same font for both. Is there any way to get v4 to use separate font settings like it used to work in v3? Thanks! --

Re: Best 3.x Version?

2008-02-10 Thread Michael
I use Imap with TB 3.99.29 without any problems. Several accounts on different servers. E-mail is stable during the whole day. I know several people do complain about TBs Imap implementation but this is something I cannot confirm with this version. -- Greetings

Re[2]: Best 3.x Version?

2008-02-10 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Guten Morgen, If you want to use IMAP the last usable version is v3.0.1.33. PF I don't agree. I don't have more problems with IMAP in the version PF mentioned below... Well, all I can say is that I do. Concerning v4, this went right out of the window about an hour after install. Big surprise

Re: The Bat! v4 Font Question

2008-02-10 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Mike, On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 23:58:08 -0800 GMT (10/02/2008, 14:58 +0700 GMT), Mike wrote: M The Bat! v3 used to display plain text messages with a different M font than HTML messages but v4 seems to use the same font for both. M Is there any way to get v4 to use separate font settings like it

Re[2]: Upgrade to v4.0.11?

2008-02-10 Thread Mean Drake
Hello Greg, Sunday, February 10, 2008, 9:23:06 AM, you wrote: Hello Robin, On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:30:48 +1100 GMT(2/9/2008, 8:30 PM -0600 GMT), per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Robin Anson wrote: RA If you had a licensed copy of v3.x, it is still good for V4.0.x. There RA is no need for a separate

Re: Best 3.x Version?

2008-02-10 Thread MAU
Hello Alto, About a year ago I called RIT incompetents. Not everybody agrees with you, are you aware of that? Normaly, after an assault like that I would expect anyone to work very hard on proving me wrong. An assault like that from Mr. Alto Speckhardt. I'm with you, I wonder why they

Re[2]: Best 3.x Version?

2008-02-10 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Guten Morgen, M Not everybody agrees with you, are you aware of that? I don't know how you use the program. To be frank, I'm not all that interested either. However, when I use it I would like to get work done with it. When I can't do this than I have fair reason to call it what I see it. And,

Re: Best 3.x Version?

2008-02-10 Thread Michael
Hi, would be interesting to know what your problems are. With earlier versions I had some problems also, but these have disappeared in the meantime. Maybe I do not cover all the issues that might exist but it's running quite well here. -- Greetings Michael

Font almost invisible

2008-02-10 Thread Lawrence Johnson
Something happened to the fonts when I upgraded to TB! 4.0.7. The text after my signature line (and sometimes on other mail) is just barely visible, very light grey on white. How do I get it back? -- Best regards, Lawrence Johnson mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Font almost invisible

2008-02-10 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Sunday, February 10, 2008, Lawrence Johnson wrote: Something happened to the fonts when I upgraded to TB! 4.0.7. The text after my signature line (and sometimes on other mail) is just barely visible, very light grey on white. How do I get it back? this is different font and

Re: Best 3.x Version?

2008-02-10 Thread MAU
Hello Alto, M And, excuse my ingenuity, but if you are so unsatisfied with TB and M seems you have been so for years [...] So now I have to defend myself for even using the program I paied for? What kind of world are you living in? I guess we both live in the same world, the difference may be

Re[2]: Best 3.x Version?

2008-02-10 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Hi, M If I was as unsatisfied as you seem, I would have moved to another M client years ago and stop suffering. That's just the problem. I can't find another decent email program. Mulberry - bad editor. Thunderbird - too much fidgeting. Pegasus - nah, just not me. ClawMail, Eudora, Incredimail,

Re: Whats new in 4.x ?

2008-02-10 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Sunday, February 10, 2008, Tony wrote: I'm using a v4 demo to see if it's worth upgrading. I see some cosmetic changes but no real differences. The editor should be improved. I see some changes there but unfortunately the ugly blue bars in HTML mode are still there. Also it still

Whats new in 4.x ?

2008-02-10 Thread Tony
Hi all, I'm using a v4 demo to see if it's worth upgrading. I see some cosmetic changes but no real differences. The editor should be improved. I see some changes there but unfortunately the ugly blue bars in HTML mode are still there. Also it still messes up some Outlook mails when replying to a

Re[2]: Best 3.x Version?

2008-02-10 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Hi Michael, M would be interesting to know what your problems are. They are just the same that they have been for years. Mostly IMAP; to tell you the truth, the rest I can live with. But I simply can't restart TheBat every other hour to get the mail check running again - for example. M With

Re: Best 3.x Version?

2008-02-10 Thread MAU
Hello Alto, I can't find another decent email program. Heyyy! I'm going to frame this statement and hang it on the wall. Alto Speckhardt admits that TB is a decent email program :-)) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.0.12

Re[2]: Best 3.x Version?

2008-02-10 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Guten Morgen, I can't find another decent email program. M Heyyy! I'm going to frame this statement and hang it on the wall. Alto M Speckhardt admits that TB is a decent email program :-)) Any day of the week. Since TheBat was about my first email program (not counting several command line and

Re: view modes

2008-02-10 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Terry, On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:16:38 -0600GMT (9-2-2008, 18:16 +0100, where I live), you wrote: TGM Does anyone know what file view modes are saved in? My guess would be the account.cdb file in the mail directory (config.edb for otfe) and I would advise against deleting that file because of

Re: Selective restore?

2008-02-10 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Maggie, On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 08:46:41 -0500GMT (9-2-2008, 14:46 +0100, where I live), you wrote: MM I would like to try to retrieve a folder of mail on an old backup MM (even just to view its contents) but I don't want my present MM folders to be overwritten. Can't be done. Only solution

Re[2]: Selective restore?

2008-02-10 Thread Maggie Meister
Hi Roelof, On Sunday, February 10, 2008 at 5:32:54 PM you wrote: MM I would like to try to retrieve a folder of mail on an old backup MM (even just to view its contents) but I don't want my present MM folders to be overwritten. RO Can't be done. Only solution would an install on a different RO

Re: Selective restore?

2008-02-10 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo MFPA, On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:12:28 +GMT (11-2-2008, 0:12 +0100, where I live), you wrote: M Run another copy on the same machine using something like M Sandboxie? I don't know the program you're mentioning, but a TB backup needs to restore to the same directory as it was made of, so

Re: Selective restore?

2008-02-10 Thread MFPA
Hi On Sunday 10 February 2008 at 10:48:35 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Maggie Meister wrote: Someday, it would be nice to have that ability. Run another copy on the same machine using something like Sandboxie? -- Best regards, MFPA Was time invented by an

Re: Selective restore?

2008-02-10 Thread MAU
Hello Maggie, M Run another copy on the same machine using something like M Sandboxie? Brilliant looking program. I had no idea something like this existed. Off to try it now. Thanks a million! I run Send Copy (http://www.secondcopy.com/) every night and I never have any problem

Re[2]: Selective restore?

2008-02-10 Thread Maggie Meister
Hi MFPA, On Sunday, February 10, 2008 at 6:12:28 PM you wrote: M Run another copy on the same machine using something like M Sandboxie? Brilliant looking program. I had no idea something like this existed. Off to try it now. Thanks a million! -- Regards, Maggie We are

Re[2]: Selective restore?

2008-02-10 Thread Maggie Meister
Hi Roelof, On Sunday, February 10, 2008 at 6:28:57 PM Roelof and MFPA wrote: MFPA Run another copy on the same machine using something like MFPA Sandboxie? RO so unless sandboxie RO remaps directories and such you're out of luck. RO That's why I didn't suggest running TB with another registry

Re[2]: Selective restore?

2008-02-10 Thread Maggie Meister
Hi MAU, On Sunday, February 10, 2008 at 6:52:04 PM you wrote: M I run Send Copy (http://www.secondcopy.com/) every night and I never M have any problem restoring any file I may need. The story without the details of the switchover, the free Vaio laptop, the horror of Vista, and the incomplete

Associations problems in Vista

2008-02-10 Thread Fredrik Bergström
Hello The Bat! UserList, I started running the 4.0.11 version yesterday, upgrading from the latest non-beta 3.0 version. After installing yesterday the e-mail icon on The Start Menu have become white and if i click on it i get the message box: [Window Title] Explorer.EXE [Content]