Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression
Hello Paul On Thursday, June 11, 2009, 1:51:00 PM, you wrote: > Hello tb...@thebat., > Thursday, June 11, 2009, 3:31:11 PM, you wrote: CYL>> Hello CYL>> Is there a method in The Bat! which allows one to send the same e-mail CYL>> to a group of people, but the e-mail addresses are suppressed in each CYL>> of the e-mail received? CYL>> I had for many years used Pegasus Mail, and it has what is known as CYL>> distribution lists, in which one can enter e-mail addresses either CYL>> directly or selected from the address book, but the e-mail sent out CYL>> does not have the e-mail addresses of the recipients; it will show an CYL>> e-mail address invented by the sender when creating the distribution CYL>> list, in an e-mail address format, e.g., recipi...@group.org, which CYL>> address, I believe, is linked to the addresses entered into the CYL>> distribution list. CYL>> I have checked the help files of The Bat! but could not find anything CYL>> pertaining to this. Have I overlooked anything? > Maybe I do not understand your problem clearly, but when I send to > people without showing their email addresses, I just put them in BCC: > blind copy instead of in To: If I have to send e-mail to the same group of people, such as members of a society of which I am a member, very often, is there a way of NOT having to insert their addresses each time I send them an e-mail, but pick up all the addresses from a "distribution list" I only have to create once? I have not used BCCs in The Bat!, so I don't know if by doing so, the recipients' addresses are suppressed. But some other e-mail clients, the BCCs still show up in the e-mail in the header line BCC. -- Best regards, Chew Yoke Limmailto:ylche...@gmail.com Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression
Hello tb...@thebat., Thursday, June 11, 2009, 3:31:11 PM, you wrote: CYL> Hello CYL> Is there a method in The Bat! which allows one to send the same e-mail CYL> to a group of people, but the e-mail addresses are suppressed in each CYL> of the e-mail received? CYL> I had for many years used Pegasus Mail, and it has what is known as CYL> distribution lists, in which one can enter e-mail addresses either CYL> directly or selected from the address book, but the e-mail sent out CYL> does not have the e-mail addresses of the recipients; it will show an CYL> e-mail address invented by the sender when creating the distribution CYL> list, in an e-mail address format, e.g., recipi...@group.org, which CYL> address, I believe, is linked to the addresses entered into the CYL> distribution list. CYL> I have checked the help files of The Bat! but could not find anything CYL> pertaining to this. Have I overlooked anything? Maybe I do not understand your problem clearly, but when I send to people without showing their email addresses, I just put them in BCC: blind copy instead of in To: -- Paul - Using The Bat! v4.1.11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ...Back Up My Hard Drive? I Can't Find The Reverse Switch! Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Recipients' Addresses Suppression
Hello Is there a method in The Bat! which allows one to send the same e-mail to a group of people, but the e-mail addresses are suppressed in each of the e-mail received? I had for many years used Pegasus Mail, and it has what is known as distribution lists, in which one can enter e-mail addresses either directly or selected from the address book, but the e-mail sent out does not have the e-mail addresses of the recipients; it will show an e-mail address invented by the sender when creating the distribution list, in an e-mail address format, e.g., recipi...@group.org, which address, I believe, is linked to the addresses entered into the distribution list. I have checked the help files of The Bat! but could not find anything pertaining to this. Have I overlooked anything? -- Best regards, Chew Yoke Lim mailto:ylche...@gmail.com Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TheBat 4.2
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Paul Berger wrote: > Hello tb...@thebat., > > Thursday, June 11, 2009, 8:11:44 AM, you wrote: > > LB> I use TheBat 4.0 Pro (but I am not using it to create this message -- > LB> long story and not relevant to my question). > > LB> How do I determine whether upgrading to 4.2 is free? I have no record > LB> of a registration code for 4.0, and I am normally very careful about > LB> keeping a record of registation codes. I can find a serial number in > TheBat's Help>>About. I also have a longer serial number that must be > LB> for 3.0. > > LB> The download web site states, "The Bat! version 3 registration keys > LB> purchased before November, 20, 2007 are valid for The Bat! 4.0 but not > LB> for 4.2, according to the upgrade policy published on November 7, > LB> 2007." The 4.0 .msi file on my computer has a date of August 25, 2008, > LB> if that helps. > > LB> Thanks, > > > > I use the Home edition with the same rules. I had paid for the Version > 3, so had to pay the upgrade when going from 4.0 to 4.1. > > > -- > > > > Paul > > - > Using The Bat! v4.1.11 on Windows XP > 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 > > ...I'm not nearly as think as you confused I am. > > > > Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: > http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html > So, I guess that's about the size of it. I like TheBat very much, but I do not like paying for upgrades. Leonard -- Leonard S. Berkowitz Reply to leonard.s.berkowitz@alumni.upenn.edu Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: How to kill a zombie identity in the from field
Hello Tom, Thursday, June 11, 2009, 8:21:10 AM, you wrote: > Hello Everyone, > I disabled one of my accounts as it received too much spam. The > account still exists for the history but will not be used anymore for > sending or receiving emails. > I cannot find a way to stop the auto-suggestion to come up with my > now deleted address on top. I went to my address book and took out the > offending email but no luck, it still happens. > Clicking on the from field to use the down arrows on the side and then > going down to the offending address to delete it, does not work > either. I believe this works in the To: field but not here. > How else can I get rid of this remnant. At present with the account no > longer configured to have a server address, no emails will be sent > (which is good) but it is annoying that the account is chosen by the > system without good reason and I have to manually override this each > time. Consider the irritation for spam senders to get their own stuff back as undelivered... Anyway I think to have spotted a 'preferences' setting which can be used to add/remove accounts to track... -- Best regards, tracermailto:0tra...@gmail.com Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: How to kill a zombie identity in the from field
Hallo Tom, On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:21:10 +1000GMT (11-6-2009, 3:21 +0200, where I live), you wrote: T> How else can I get rid of this remnant. At present with the account no T> longer configured to have a server address, no emails will be sent T> (which is good) but it is annoying that the account is chosen by the T> system without good reason and I have to manually override this each T> time. TB uses the From address for the selected account, the only time it's using something else is when you override that or when you're mailing from a common folder. Probably the default has been selected in the account properties as "Use this account as the default for mailto URLs" (Account -> Properties -> General) Try to disable that. You also might try ti configure the account to use the smtp server and e-mail address for one of your other accounts. The last solution would be to move all of the folders belonging to the disposed account to a common folder (or a folder belonging to another account) and delete the empty account. -- Groetjes, Roelof I can resist everything except temptation. http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 4.2.4 Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6001 Service Pack 1 6 pop3 accounts, 1 imap account OTFE enabled Quad Core 2.4GHz 4 GB RAM pgpotBxCQqhzG.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: How to kill a zombie identity in the from field
> Hello Everyone, > I disabled one of my accounts as it received too much spam. The > account still exists for the history but will not be used anymore for > sending or receiving emails. > I cannot find a way to stop the auto-suggestion to come up with my > now deleted address on top. I went to my address book and took out the > offending email but no luck, it still happens. > Clicking on the from field to use the down arrows on the side and then > going down to the offending address to delete it, does not work > either. I believe this works in the To: field but not here. > How else can I get rid of this remnant. At present with the account no > longer configured to have a server address, no emails will be sent > (which is good) but it is annoying that the account is chosen by the > system without good reason and I have to manually override this each > time. Have you gone to OPTIONS / PREFERENCES / ADDRESS HISTORY ? -- Rick Help bring to a close, the Age of Greed v4.2.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
How to kill a zombie identity in the from field
Hello Everyone, I disabled one of my accounts as it received too much spam. The account still exists for the history but will not be used anymore for sending or receiving emails. I cannot find a way to stop the auto-suggestion to come up with my now deleted address on top. I went to my address book and took out the offending email but no luck, it still happens. Clicking on the from field to use the down arrows on the side and then going down to the offending address to delete it, does not work either. I believe this works in the To: field but not here. How else can I get rid of this remnant. At present with the account no longer configured to have a server address, no emails will be sent (which is good) but it is annoying that the account is chosen by the system without good reason and I have to manually override this each time. -- Best regards, Tom using TheBat! 4.0.28.3 on XP Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TheBat 4.2
Hello tb...@thebat., Thursday, June 11, 2009, 8:11:44 AM, you wrote: LB> I use TheBat 4.0 Pro (but I am not using it to create this message -- LB> long story and not relevant to my question). LB> How do I determine whether upgrading to 4.2 is free? I have no record LB> of a registration code for 4.0, and I am normally very careful about LB> keeping a record of registation codes. I can find a serial number in TheBat's Help>>About. I also have a longer serial number that must be LB> for 3.0. LB> The download web site states, "The Bat! version 3 registration keys LB> purchased before November, 20, 2007 are valid for The Bat! 4.0 but not LB> for 4.2, according to the upgrade policy published on November 7, LB> 2007." The 4.0 .msi file on my computer has a date of August 25, 2008, LB> if that helps. LB> Thanks, I use the Home edition with the same rules. I had paid for the Version 3, so had to pay the upgrade when going from 4.0 to 4.1. -- Paul - Using The Bat! v4.1.11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ...I'm not nearly as think as you confused I am. Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TheBat 4.2
2009/6/10 Jernej Simončič : > On Thursday, June 11, 2009, 0:11:44, Leonard Berkowitz wrote: > >> How do I determine whether upgrading to 4.2 is free? I have no record >> of a registration code for 4.0, and I am normally very careful about >> keeping a record of registation codes. I can find a serial number in >> TheBat's Help>About. I also have a longer serial number that must be >> for 3.0. > > The long serial number is the actual code you use for registering. > Check the date on the message with that code, if it's November 20th > 2007 or newer, the code should work with The Bat 4.1 and newer. > > -- > < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ > > > An ounce of application is worth a ton of abstraction. > -- Booker's Law > > > > Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: > http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html Thanks for the response. The longer serial number is on an undated piece of paper. This warning gives me pause: "We do recommend you to download or install The Bat! 4.2 only if you have a registration key valid for The Bat! 4.2, because this version has got a new format of the message base indices and backup file. If you downgrade from The Bat! 4.2 to The Bat! 4.0 or earlier version, you will be unable to restore from a backup file made by The Bat! 4.2, and the message base indices will be lost." -- Leonard S. Berkowitz Reply to leonard.s.berkowitz@alumni.upenn.edu Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TheBat 4.2
On Thursday, June 11, 2009, 0:11:44, Leonard Berkowitz wrote: > How do I determine whether upgrading to 4.2 is free? I have no record > of a registration code for 4.0, and I am normally very careful about > keeping a record of registation codes. I can find a serial number in > TheBat's Help>About. I also have a longer serial number that must be > for 3.0. The long serial number is the actual code you use for registering. Check the date on the message with that code, if it's November 20th 2007 or newer, the code should work with The Bat 4.1 and newer. -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ > An ounce of application is worth a ton of abstraction. -- Booker's Law Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
TheBat 4.2
I use TheBat 4.0 Pro (but I am not using it to create this message -- long story and not relevant to my question). How do I determine whether upgrading to 4.2 is free? I have no record of a registration code for 4.0, and I am normally very careful about keeping a record of registation codes. I can find a serial number in TheBat's Help>About. I also have a longer serial number that must be for 3.0. The download web site states, "The Bat! version 3 registration keys purchased before November, 20, 2007 are valid for The Bat! 4.0 but not for 4.2, according to the upgrade policy published on November 7, 2007." The 4.0 .msi file on my computer has a date of August 25, 2008, if that helps. Thanks, -- Leonard S. Berkowitz Reply to leonard.s.berkowitz@alumni.upenn.edu Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
