Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-11 Thread MFPA
Hi On Thursday 11 June 2009 at 7:30:25 PM, in , Bill McQuillan wrote: > The recommended way to handle this case is to put all > of the recipients in the BCC: header field, which will > be removed when the message is actually sent, and to > put "undisclosed recipients:;" in the TO: field. (Note >

Re: Problem with %HDR macro

2009-06-11 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Friday, June 12, 2009, Arjan de Groot wrote: > When trying to use this macro there is however a problem. If there is > a "-" in the header's RFC name (like in "User-Agent") it doesn't work. > For example, if I put %HDRUser-Agent='The Beta!' in a template, my > message-body (literally) s

Problem with %HDR macro

2009-06-11 Thread Arjan de Groot
Hello fellow TBUDlers, TB! has the possibility to add user-defined headers to messages. First you have to define these headers (Options -> Preferences -> Viewer/Editor -> Message Headers), then you can use these headers by inserting the associated macro into a template. The header definition wi

Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-11 Thread Bill McQuillan
On Thu, 2009-06-11, MFPA wrote: > On Thursday 11 June 2009 at 12:45:44 PM, in > , Roelof Otten wrote: >> I'm not aware of an option in TB that warns for an >> empty To header, but there are servers that don't >> accept those, is it TB passing through a server >> response? > I made a mis

Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-11 Thread MFPA
Hi On Thursday 11 June 2009 at 12:45:44 PM, in , Roelof Otten wrote: > I'm not aware of an option in TB that warns for an > empty To header, but there are servers that don't > accept those, is it TB passing through a server > response? I made a mistake earlier - this dialog box only a

Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-11 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo MFPA, On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:17:57 +0100GMT (11-6-2009, 13:17 +0200, where I live), you wrote: M> Here, TB! will not let me leave the TO field blank. A dialog box M> appears when I hit send saying "You cannot leave To: field blank" M> Maybe I have configured this in an option somewhere. (Th

Re: How to kill a zombie identity in the from field

2009-06-11 Thread MFPA
Hi On Thursday 11 June 2009 at 2:21:10 AM, in , Tom wrote: > I cannot find a way to stop the auto-suggestion to come up with my > now deleted address on top. I was going to suggest moving it to the bottom by putting a "Z" at the beginning of the account name but they are not listed in alphetic

Re: TheBat 4.2

2009-06-11 Thread MFPA
Hi On Thursday 11 June 2009 at 8:15:30 AM, in , Roelof Otten wrote: > You don't need to upgrade. The older versions keep on > working just like before. Same as you don't /need/ to "upgrade" from Windows XP to Vista; indeed, many people advocate not doing so - but that would take the discussion

Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-11 Thread MFPA
Hi On Thursday 11 June 2009 at 8:24:19 AM, in , Roelof Otten wrote: > It isn't necessary to place a recipient in the To field, though > placing your own address there means that message is less prone to > interception by spam filters. Here, TB! will not let me leave the TO field blank. A dial

Re[2]: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-11 Thread Paul Berger
Hello tb...@thebat., Thursday, June 11, 2009, 4:47:28 PM, you wrote: ... >> Maybe I do not understand your problem clearly, but when I send to >> people without showing their email addresses, I just put them in BCC: >> blind copy instead of in To: CYL> If I have to send e-mail to the same grou

Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-11 Thread Julian Beach (Lists)
On Thursday, June 11, 2009, 7:47:28 AM, Chew Yoke Lim wrote: > If I have to send e-mail to the same group of people, such as members > of a society of which I am a member, very often, is there a way of NOT > having to insert their addresses each time I send them an e-mail, but > pick up all t

Re: How to kill a zombie identity in the from field

2009-06-11 Thread Tom
Thursday, June 11, 2009, 11:41:45 AM, you wrote: >> Hello Everyone, >> I disabled one of my accounts as it received too much spam. The >> account still exists for the history but will not be used anymore for >> sending or receiving emails. >> I cannot find a way to stop the auto-suggestion to c

Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-11 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Chew, On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:47:28 +0800GMT (11-6-2009, 8:47 +0200, where I live), you wrote: CYL> I have not used BCCs in The Bat!, so I don't know if by doing so, CYL> the recipients' addresses are suppressed. But some other e-mail CYL> clients, the BCCs still show up in the e

Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-11 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Chew, On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:31:11 +0800GMT (11-6-2009, 7:31 +0200, where I live), you wrote: CYL> Is there a method in The Bat! which allows one to send the same e-mail CYL> to a group of people, but the e-mail addresses are suppressed in each CYL> of the e-mail received? Basically TB of

Re: Re: Recipients' Addresses Suppression

2009-06-11 Thread MONSELL
Hello Lim, >> Maybe I do not understand your problem clearly, but when I send to >> people without showing their email addresses, I just put them in BCC: >> blind copy instead of in To: >If I have to send e-mail to the same group of people, such as members >of a society of which I am a member, v

Mod: Untrimmed reply (was: TheBat 4.2)

2009-06-11 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Leonard, On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:20:37 -0400GMT (11-6-2009, 5:20, where I live), you wrote: >> >> Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: >> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html >> Note: This moderator's interjecti

Re: TheBat 4.2

2009-06-11 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Leonard, On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:20:37 -0400GMT (11-6-2009, 5:20 +0200, where I live), you wrote: LB> So, I guess that's about the size of it. I like TheBat very much, but LB> I do not like paying for upgrades. You don't need to upgrade. The older versions keep on working just like before.