Re[2]: A Question about Distribution Lists

2000-10-30 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
not a MDP real address. Actually Marck nospam *is* a registered domain .com .co.uk .net .org.uk and .org are all registered. -- Charlie (ceejay) Wales (UK) PGP key ID:0xFCCC248C -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.d

Re[2]: Acting on message text strings

2000-11-25 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
KT generates a forward email to the client. I then manually pick out the There may be something of a misunderstanding here Kevin. To clarify, are you saying that the formmail.cgi (or whichever) is sending the form data to *your* email address? -- Charlie (ceejay) Wales (UK) PGP key ID:0xFCCC248C

slow spell check

2001-01-06 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
to ignore. Charlie (ceejay) TB ver:1.49 | On Windows 98 4.10 1998 Pll 350Mhz (128MB Ram) -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL

Re[2]: slow spell check

2001-01-06 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi Jan, On Sun, 07 Jan 2001, at 00:32:50 [GMT +] you wrote: JR Hi Charlie, JR On Saturday, January 06, 2001 00:13:57 + you wrote the JR following in regards to "slow spell check": Charlie [..] has anyone else noticed that the wait after initial Charlie selection of spell

Re[2]: slow spell check

2001-01-06 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi Nick, On Sun, 07 Jan 2001, at 01:26:31 [GMT +] you wrote: NA At 04:13 PM 06/01/01, Charlie (ceejay) wrote: Is it just me, or has anyone else noticed that the wait after initial selection of spell checking is becoming longer with each new version. I can almost brew up while v1.49

Re[3]: slow spell check

2001-01-06 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi George, On Sun, 07 Jan 2001, at 01:37:40 [GMT +] you wrote: GFS Hello Jan, GFS Saturday, January 06, 2001, 4:31:10 PM, you wrote: Charlie [..] has anyone else noticed that the wait after initial Charlie selection of spell checking is becoming longer with each Charlie new version.

Re[2]: slow spell check

2001-01-07 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi A, On Sun, 07 Jan 2001, at 03:39:00 [GMT +] you wrote: ACM On Sun, 7 Jan 2001 00:13:57 +, Charlie wrote these words of ACM wisdom: Cc Is it just me, or has anyone else noticed that the wait after Cc initial selection of spell checking is becoming longer with each Cc new version.

Re[2]: slow spell check

2001-01-07 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi Fred, On Sun, 07 Jan 2001, at 03:19:39 [GMT +] you wrote: NA If I'm not mistaken, TB!'s spell checker has 3 settings, with the 3rd being NA the most comprehensive, but also taking the longest time. Perhaps you have NA inadvertently chosen door #3. ;o) I have it set at: Moderately

Re[5]: slow spell check

2001-01-07 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi George, On Sun, 07 Jan 2001, at 02:37:01 [GMT +] you wrote: Cc Right clicking the suggestion list does have unpredictable results for Cc me too. How do you find the initial firing up of the checker George? GFS 5 to 10 very long seconds depending on the word and how far I am into

Re[2]: slow spell check

2001-01-07 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi Marck, On Sun, 07 Jan 2001, at 10:28:14 [GMT +] you wrote: MDP British English, language pack installed, automatic checking = 1 MDP second to do a manual check. I haven't noticed any degradation in MDP spell check speeds. PIII 750 128mb OS as below. Charlie, you don't MDP say

Re[2]: slow spell check

2001-01-07 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi Tony, On Sun, 07 Jan 2001, at 10:57:44 [GMT +] you wrote: TB This message: 07/01/2001 09:56 GMT. TB Hello Charlie, TB A reminder of what Charlie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on: TB 07 January 2001 at 01:15:41 GMT + Cc Does the checker load and as quickly when entering it's

Re[4]: slow spell check

2001-01-07 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi Tony, On Sun, 07 Jan 2001, at 13:46:21 [GMT +] you wrote: TB It could be that the spelling mistakes you make are so big that TB has to TB first decide what language you using before coming up with a suggestion TB :-) HEY! Just as well you're out of arms reach :^) -- ceejay

Re[7]: TB! v1.49 - bypassing the group to a folder

2001-02-13 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi TBUDL, On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, at 00:53:54 [GMT +] you wrote: JR In A Curtis Martin's case, I have "Allie" as a handle. Therefore, if JR I get email from A Curtis Martin, the above regexp returns "Allie" JR in the greeting. JR Then there is: JR

cursor position

2001-02-19 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
ave the TB! place the cursor in the message body of a new message, as per the reply default? Charlie (ceejay) PGP key ID:0xFCCC248C TB ver:1.49 | On Windows 98 4.10 1998 Pll 350Mhz (128MB Ram) -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com

Re[2]: cursor position

2001-02-19 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi Allie, On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, at 20:34:56 [GMT +] you wrote: Cc When selecting 'create a new message' TB! places the cursor in Cc 'To:' header field, even when the default template includes Cc %TO="address". This is in contrast to 'reply to message' which Cc places the cursor in the

Re[2]: mailto: magic

2001-05-27 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi Karin, On Sun, 27 May 2001, at 14:54:15 [GMT +0100] you wrote: KS On 27-05-2001 at 15:29, Maurice Snellen kindly wrote: I saw some mails on how to automatically get text into the body of the message using the mailto: URL; is it also possible to add custom headers to a message this

Re[2]: mailto: magic

2001-05-27 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi TBUDL, On Sun, 27 May 2001, at 15:35:37 [GMT +0100] you wrote: KS On 27-05-2001 at 16:09, Charlie (ceejay) kindly wrote: Hi Karin, KS mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=X%20Ybody=Z KS will create a mail addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] KS with the subject: X Y KS and in the body: Z KS

Re[2]: mailto: magic

2001-05-29 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi Maurice, On Mon, 28 May 2001, at 23:31:53 [GMT +0100] you wrote: MS OK, I was already aware of the 'subject' trick. Before this goes MS further astray into a discussion on whether or not to use this method MS for mailto: links at all, I'd like to point out that this will MS probably need

mail ticker

2001-09-18 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
would now like the Ticker to display new messages again. I've checked the Show unread messages in the MailTicker box, but for some reason the MailTicker isn't displaying new messages ?? Charlie (ceejay) PGP key ID:0xFCCC248C TB ver:1.53d | On Windows 98 4.10 1998 Pll 350Mhz (128MB Ram

Re[2]: mail ticker

2001-09-19 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi Thomas, On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, at 08:08:06 [GMT +0100] you wrote: TF Hello Charlie, TF On Wed, 19 Sep 2001 07:58:28 +0100 GMT (19/09/2001, 14:58 +0800 GMT), TF Charlie (ceejay) wrote: Cc Yep, that option is set to Auto. To be honest, I'm rather puzzled as Cc to why the MailTicker now

Re[2]: mail ticker

2001-09-19 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi Marck, On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, at 10:07:57 [GMT +0100] you wrote: MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP Hash: SHA1 MDP Hi Thomas, MDP On 19 September 2001 at 15:05:27 +0800 (which was 08:05 where I live) MDP Thomas F wrote to Charlie (ceejay) on TBUDL and made these points: Cc Yep

Re[2]: mail ticker

2001-09-20 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi Marck, On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, at 20:30:20 [GMT +0100] you wrote: MDP Okay - get the static one up, right click and check the Age limits MDP settings. It may be a problem there. Tinkered with priority and age settings and eventually got the ticker going again Marck. Thanks for your help.

WinGate and The Bat

2002-01-30 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
concern is that I should remain able to continue to use The Bat on my PC, which is the system I intend to run WinGate from. I do not need (or for preference want) to set The Bat up in server mode. Charlie (ceejay) TB ver:1.53d | Windows XP Home, Build 2600, Plll 650Mhz (320MB Ram

Re[2]: WinGate and The Bat

2002-01-30 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi Jernej, On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, at 21:41:20 [GMT +] you wrote: JS 30. januar 2002, 22:10:20, you wrote: Cc Has anyone on the list any experience of using WinGate with The Bat? I Cc would like to share my (anytime) dial up account with the other Cc systems on my peer to peer network.

Re[2]: WinGate and The Bat

2002-02-01 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi David, On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, at 09:54:44 [GMT +] you wrote: DvZ On Wednesday, January 30, 2002 at 21:10:20 +, Charlie (ceejay) [C] DvZ wrote concerning 'WinGate and The Bat': DvZ ... Cc Has anyone on the list any experience of using WinGate with The Cc Bat? DvZ I've used Winroute

Re: suggestion for WinGate

2002-02-03 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi Can, On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, at 18:49:59 [GMT +] you wrote: JS Problems with WinGate: CBC i used WinGate for some months (if we are talking about DeerField's). CBC the best way is to use no proxies.. Install it on the server and CBC install Wingate Internet Connection Client to other

Re[2]: WinGate and The Bat

2002-02-03 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi David, On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, at 09:54:44 [GMT +] you wrote: Cc Has anyone on the list any experience of using WinGate with The Cc Bat? DvZ I've used Winroute for a while but it had problems with my local mail DvZ server. So now I have Microsoft Internet Connection Sharing (ICS) DvZ

Re[4]: WinGate and The Bat

2002-02-03 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi Dave, On Fri, 01 Feb 2002, at 23:28:15 [GMT +] you wrote: DC Hi Charlie, DC I'm using Workgroupmail as a mail server and PPPShar as proxy server DC for small Win2000 network. Very simple, searched around for a while DC and tried lots of different stuff. This is the best combo I

Re[2]: WinGate and The Bat

2002-02-03 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi David, On Sun, 03 Feb 2002, at 11:51:59 [GMT +] you wrote: Cc As it happens that is the option I've now chosen to use David, as Cc you'd expect it is also working flawlessly with TB! on my system. Cc A fully operational and effective firewall is another matter Cc though, I've still

Re[6]: WinGate and The Bat

2002-02-03 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi Dave, On Sun, 03 Feb 2002, at 12:27:48 [GMT +] you wrote: DC Regarding your first point, I have no idea as I don't require that DC feature and have no interest in messing around with what works. Ok. DC Regarding point two, I had WGM already and had been using it for 18 DC months or

Re[3]: suggestion for WinGate

2002-02-03 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi Dave, On Sun, 03 Feb 2002, at 12:42:48 [GMT +] you wrote: DC This has got to be a daft question ... but why not just use DC ZoneAlarm/Pro? It does exactly what it says on the tin ;-) It's a long and involved story Dave, the short version is this: I had been using ZAP on my Win98

Re[2]: SOT: which off line news reader?

2002-02-06 Thread Charlie (ceejay)
Hi Dierk, On Wed, 06 Feb 2002, at 09:13:42 [GMT +] you wrote: DH On Wednesday, February 6, 2002 at 1:21:39 AM you wrote: I used in the past Agent for both E-mail and News-group reader. Now that I am switching to BAT for E-mail I need on offline Newsreader. DH Go on using Agent. The