Sunday, February 2, 2003, 9:18:44 AM, Marck wrote:
MDP Aha! You are talking about S/MIME! That's completely different
In which case you are talking about PGP/MIME. Either way, you're not
talking about MIME, which TB handles perfectly
Umm, in all honesty, are you trying to split hairs or just
I've read enough information in the archives to know TB! does not
support automatic bursting of MIME digests. But that it's possible
using filters as a work-around. First, I'd like to officially request
that MIME digest bursting be added to the program. This is a pretty
basic feature for a
Anyone else having trouble posting to the list today? After getting
around he fact that digests of these lists lack a reply-to address I'm
finding that mail sent to the list is not going through due to some
server authentication error with the list's address. Hrmpph.
I suppose this message is
The new 1.63 beta introduces an experimental Windows style editor
that uses soft formatting. You won't catch me using it - I like to
know that what I see in the message edit window is what will be
sent :-), but it may suit some newcomers
I'm just trying the new version now (1.63b4). Once
Monday, December 30, 2002, 1:31:45 AM, Thomas wrote:
So, whichever address he uses to write to me, the reply will always go
to his private GMX address.
Your friend could also use the Reply-To header field - that's what
it's for. :)
Bruno
--
Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows
Saturday, December 28, 2002, 4:03:03 AM, Victor wrote:
Anyone know of a good text editor like that?
Textpad. Http://www.textpad.com
I have yet to find anything for Windows to match both its
functionality and interface design.
When I first started using Windows as my primary OS, I searched
Is there any way to have TB automatically expand *all* threads in a
folder each time TB is launched? ie. Never collapse threads
automatically. Or a way to have it automatically expand threads
currently being read and collapse others?
Searching the menus and help file threads section I also
Saturday, December 28, 2002, 1:12:02 PM, Gavin wrote:
This has struck me as well. I know the moderators discourage me too
remarks, but both paragraphs hit the nail on the head for me.
Of course, after Allie wrote that reply, I saw that the navigation
commands were also in the context menu
It does seem like a heated political debate has begun. Right now,
I'll step out on a limb and define the sides I see:
1. Those willing to accept the features TB provides while also
wanting the option to do things in a way they consider more
standardized and intuitive
2. Those firmly entrenched
I would just hope that people would come away with the most important
part of the debate portion of the model/view suggestion is that it
could (fundamentally speaking) have a feature set to satisfy everyone.
A mimic of the current editor with the added options some of us
want (and would make the
10 matches
Mail list logo