Re[2]: IMAP rules ..

2004-05-04 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, May 3, 2004, 10:33:40 PM, you wrote: do FastMail and MailSnare actually forward the mail out? If so, why can't it be forwarded to a POP account in TB? CT Have a look at FastMail's features. Yes, I did that yesterday after I'd posted .. I often do things backwards :-) CT Go to

Re[2]: IMAP rules ..

2004-05-04 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, May 4, 2004, 7:57:28 AM, you wrote: PF TB! filtering engine is being rewritten as it PF does not work for IMAP at PF the moment. PF Watch coming releases... I will .. thanks Lynn TBv 2.04.7 Windowsv 5 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]* * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * *

Re[2]: IMAP rules ..

2004-05-04 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, May 4, 2004, 11:07:12 AM, you wrote: CT This is straight from FM's FAQ - it's a one-off set up.. Thank you! Apparently I didn't read far enough into the FAQ ... sorry ... So that might be workable .. I might have to do some tinkering here. Lynn TBv 2.04.7 Windowsv 5 -- [EMAIL

Re[2]: Best antispam approach I have found thus far for TB

2004-05-03 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, May 3, 2004, 6:37:38 AM, you wrote: TF Well, if your ISP decides to reject mails from domains that are in TF obscure blacklists for wrong reasons, I wouldn't call it your choice TF any more. This is a real irritant ... at least one isp blocks some comcast servers, and though I have

Re[2]: Best antispam approach I have found thus far for TB

2004-05-03 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, May 3, 2004, 8:24:21 AM, you wrote: This is a real irritant ... at least one isp blocks some comcast servers, and though I have other email options, J It sounds like the same mentality of the X-Mailer blocking admins. J Comcast limits SMTP use for it's -customers- pretty severely.

Re[2]: Best antispam approach I have found thus far for TB

2004-05-03 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, May 3, 2004, 8:16:32 AM, you wrote: LT I find it interesting that *their* servers don't LT seem to be blacklisted ... TF Not so. I have to manually insert each emnail contact TF with a Yahoo address into my whitelist on GMX. ;-) lol! Good news, and bad news :-) Since there is no way

Re[2]: Best antispam approach I have found thus far for TB

2004-05-03 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, May 3, 2004, 9:34:51 AM, you wrote: J I don't often use BCC but it might work for that. Ah .. I do use it, but it's a bit surprising that that would get through .. if it'll let me through, it'll let the spammers through, won't it .. tch J I came across some J 'mail list' widget on the

Re[3]: IMAP rules ..

2004-05-03 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, May 3, 2004, 9:52:21 AM, you wrote: JL I just recently set up an IMAP account with the smtp (outgoing) JL specified, and I forward the IMAP incoming to a JL POP3 account, and set up a JL filter to change the colo(u)r option for the mail from that account. JL So I read the mail via a pop3

Re[2]: IMAP rules ..

2004-05-03 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, May 3, 2004, 10:42:50 AM, you wrote: CT I've just mentioned to Jim that FastMail or CT Mailsnare offer extremely CT good POP, IMAP and forwarding facilities for external mail. well, I'm looking at Mulberry, but ... :-( I'm really not keen on web interfaces; do FastMail and MailSnare

Re[2]: Another IMAP Question

2004-04-23 Thread Lynn Turriff
Thursday, April 22, 2004, 10:52:24 PM, you wrote: CT I know this topic must be boring the pants off non IMAP users but I'm glad to see it ... I recently got a little Gentoo server up, with an IMAP mail server, and TB won't let me make any folders for that account .. I've been trying to

Re[2]: AB templates

2002-09-24 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 1:39:47 AM, you wrote: RO Hallo Lynn, RO On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 09:54:24 -0700GMT (23-9-02, 18:54 +0200GMT, where RO I live), you wrote: LT After reading so many posts about the AB templates (but LT without any real instructions), I decided to give them a LT shot.

Re[2]: AB templates

2002-09-24 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 3:48:06 AM, you wrote: ACM There's another thing that breaks the address book templates being ACM auto-applied as they should. This is when you have a single entry ACM but there are multiple addresses entered with duplication of one or ACM more of them. The even

AB templates

2002-09-23 Thread Lynn Turriff
Hi Batters .. After reading so many posts about the AB templates (but without any real instructions), I decided to give them a shot. However, I'm missing something, because I either get 2 sets of templates on a given mail (where I built the AB templates), or none at all ... (after dumping the

Re[2]: SpamPAl

2002-09-21 Thread Lynn Turriff
Friday, September 20, 2002, 12:51:59 PM, you wrote: [snip] KC There really is no need to use a 3rd party filter if you invest a KC little time setting up The Bats filters. The end result is effective KC spam filtering with only one program ... your e-mail program. The KC Bat's backup facility

Re: Mangled attachments

2002-09-12 Thread Lynn Turriff
Thursday, September 12, 2002, 4:47:51 AM, you wrote: BBTE For quite some time, I've seen a problem that I thought was a bug in BBTE TB, but now I'm not so sure. Maybe it's something that I should be BBTE blaming on NAV. BBTE When a message with multiple attachments arrives, if the attachments

Re[2]: In-Reply-To: Reference:

2002-09-04 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, September 3, 2002, 10:53:53 PM, you wrote: It's Office 97 Professional ... I'm too mean to upgrade him :-) DH Perhaps you should, at least Word 2K is a lot better in certain areas DH (like synonyms, which are now offered directly in the context menu). He's satisfied with it, and

Re[2]: small feature request

2002-09-04 Thread Lynn Turriff
Wednesday, September 4, 2002, 7:41:45 AM, you wrote: RR Maybe I'm the only one that feels this way though:) SP No :) There have been much talk regarding this; search the archives. SP IIRC, someone from Ritlabs has also pointed out why this feature was SP left out of TB! Clue us on the

Re[2]: small feature request

2002-09-04 Thread Lynn Turriff
Wednesday, September 4, 2002, 9:44:58 AM, you wrote: No :) There have been much talk regarding this; search the archives. IIRC, someone from Ritlabs has also pointed out why this feature was left out of TB! AdG Oh, but it _is_ there, though in the wrong place. Right-click on the AdG Message

Re[2]: In-Reply-To: Reference:

2002-09-03 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, September 3, 2002, 7:28:48 AM, you wrote: JA I don't think I can find any information in the MS help files about it JA storing information about your user details in their documents either, JA and I'm not just talking about the stuff you can change. Each JA document you create gets

Re[2]: In-Reply-To: Reference:

2002-09-03 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, September 3, 2002, 11:22:57 AM, you wrote: LT how about instructions to deactivate the code? Private mail is fine. G Hi Lynn, G I tried to find it again but couldn't. If I remember correctly it was a G small patch program. Maybe someone else on this list knows. Which G version

Re: digest and sig delimiter

2002-09-02 Thread Lynn Turriff
Saturday, August 31, 2002, 3:11:13 PM, you wrote: MSD dear people... MSD i'm subscribed to a yahoogroups and i use digest mode for the MSD group. The problem is when someone use the bat sig delimiter MSD (dash dash space enter) and there are more than 1 message sent in MSD the digest so the

Re[2]: Send-Display Discrepancy (WAS: Trasnfering/synching withoutlook)

2002-09-02 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, September 2, 2002, 12:41:06 PM, you wrote: MDP Rats! foiled and hoist by my own petard (whatever a petard is) It's the gizmo that lets you hoist the flag up the pole :-) Lynn 1.60m on Win2kPro SP2 -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed

Re[2]: Beginners List

2002-08-26 Thread Lynn Turriff
Friday, August 23, 2002, 1:16:46 PM, you wrote: That wasn't what got my attention, but I have been beginning to think there was something wrong with me. I thought it was as easy to get off the ground as anything I'd ever used, too. E Of course, it is easy to get off the ground. What it

Re[2]: Beginners List

2002-08-21 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, August 20, 2002, 10:07:49 AM, you wrote: E Yes, I think people are wonderful about answering the questions E that newcomers might pose, if the newcomers are willing to E surface. But many threads are way over their heads or of no E interest to a beginner who is attempting to learn

Re[2]: Beginners List

2002-08-21 Thread Lynn Turriff
Wednesday, August 21, 2002, 11:04:13 AM, you wrote: B IMHO, most anyone who bothers to find out about TB and B downloads it to give it a shot is, by definition, B probably NOT a beginner at e-mail. They are B specifically looking for something more advanced than B what they are currently using

Re[3]: Beginners List

2002-08-21 Thread Lynn Turriff
Wednesday, August 21, 2002, 6:10:03 PM, you wrote: R actually that's exactly how I found the bat!. I was looking for R something that functioned and was more advanced than what I was R using. Hi Razgo - Did you find it difficult to set up and use? I've been using TB for several years, but

Re[2]: Some fun with Notes

2002-08-20 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, August 19, 2002, 1:35:31 PM, you wrote: DH http://www.iarchitect.com/mshame.htm DH Seems the site sometimes has some trouble. Yesterday I DH couldn't access it, and now it takes forever. One has DH to try ... Ah .. I couldn't get there from the link, so I googled 'Interface Hall of

Re: Take the bat to linux (offical linux bat thread).

2002-08-20 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, August 20, 2002, 5:50:29 AM, you wrote: BH Ok the last time I asked if it could be done. It can BH so how many would like to see it on linux? I would .. when I get my box up again :-) I didn't find a really satisfactory client when I had it up before. They worked, but ... BH Also

Re[2]: [SAtalk] Another one for the RATWARE check?

2002-08-14 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, August 13, 2002, 6:58:16 PM, you wrote: [snip most of long, interesting discussion] TF Am I right in assuming that you won't block Outlook, because you TF can't do *that*! ? I'm butting in here, but ... I've been working on anti spam for the last few months, and well over half the

Re[4]: [SAtalk] Another one for the RATWARE check?

2002-08-14 Thread Lynn Turriff
Wednesday, August 14, 2002, 6:46:21 AM, you wrote: The highest percentage by far comes in labeled Outlook or OE... but I'll eat my trackball if anybody ever filters on Outlook. SH I did in my office server. I made Outlook Filtering SH since last 2-years for any of /outgoing/ messages from

Re[2]: [SAtalk] Another one for the RATWARE check?

2002-08-14 Thread Lynn Turriff
Wednesday, August 14, 2002, 12:13:15 PM, you wrote: LT Oh dear .. and it's an old trackball, and kind of grubby, LT too!lol! C Your trackball is still safe .. syafril is blocking OUTGOING C Outlook. C He is not filtering incoming. C Cheers Yall C -Cricket What a relief! It's a decidedly

Re[2]: anti-spam suggestions

2002-08-13 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, August 12, 2002, 10:20:45 PM, you wrote: LT I tried it for a while, too, but have found that TB LT filtering is more effective WM As an aside, a female friend was receiving unwanted WM emails from an admirer - not typical spam. I suggested WM she 'bounce' them using Mailwasher and

Re[2]: Sorting Office

2002-08-12 Thread Lynn Turriff
Sunday, August 11, 2002, 3:38:36 PM, you wrote: Come on Thomas, you have to be a bit more open minded. He's not asking to make it bigger, just re-sizeable. You could keep it as small as you wanted for yourself. DAC It is not the size which I find lacking, but the lack DAC of ability to

Re: OT: Double Negative (was: Sorting Office)

2002-08-12 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, August 12, 2002, 7:16:05 PM, you wrote: TF What I am saying is that the double negative should be avoided in TF English, as otherwise nobody won't understand nothing! ;-) That's about what they told me when I was in school .. but they put it considerably more strongly than that :-)

Re[2]: anti-spam suggestions

2002-08-12 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, August 12, 2002, 9:03:31 PM, you wrote: B FWIW, Mailwasher is not an AV program. It's like TB's B Mail Dispatcher on steroids. I gave up using it because B its bounce feature (which seems to make it attractive) B does nothing to reduce spam. I tried it for a while, too, but have found

Re: Reply editor?

2002-07-30 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, July 30, 2002, 12:45:15 AM, you wrote: JF I have a few friends who absolutely insist to work with OE 6.0, JF with the JF html editor on. :-( JF I don't mind, but replying is a horror: the quoted lines are JF over 160 JF characters wide! Is there anything I can do about that? I tried

Re: Firewalls that don't interfere with TB. Was: Question

2002-07-29 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, July 29, 2002, 12:01:25 PM, you wrote: On the subject of firewalls, I'm using the Wingate (v4.x) firewall (which doesn't interfere with TB), but I have no clue how reliable it is. Anybody know? I don't know any way to test it, other than Steve Gibsons port prober, which says it's cool

Re[3]: Norton Anti Virus 2001 and TheBat

2002-07-28 Thread Lynn Turriff
Saturday, July 27, 2002, 8:45:44 PM, you wrote: KLc Yep, that's what I was suggesting he do. Scanning KLc outbound mail is, to me, redundant, assuming NAV is KLc doing its job in the first place, and that stupid KLc splash/banner (which cannot be turned off if the KLc outbound scanning is on)

Re[2]: Norton Anti Virus 2001 and TheBat

2002-07-28 Thread Lynn Turriff
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 1:19:24 PM, you wrote: JBL On Sunday, July 28, 2002, 4:47:00 PM, Lynn Turriff wrote: One suspects that it does it so the recipient can see the 'scanned virus free by Norton' note that it puts in the email, but that's pointless too, since you have to open the mail

Re[5]: Norton Anti Virus 2001 and TheBat

2002-07-28 Thread Lynn Turriff
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 2:25:12 PM, you wrote: JR Sudip is right though - both 2000 and 2001 need manual JR configuration JR of The Bat to scan mail. I cannot see how email scanning JR will occur if JR this is not done. KLcAs I said, I *did* tell Nav that I was using an other email KLc

Re[2]: TheBat! filtered for spam

2002-07-27 Thread Lynn Turriff
Saturday, July 27, 2002, 4:02:54 AM, you wrote: TF Thanks to you and all the people that have given examples of how TF they TF use the mass mailing feature without being spammers. I've TF learned that TF there is quite a legitimate use for the feature. I might even TF look TF into it myself.

Re[3]: Need help with a Klez filter!

2002-07-27 Thread Lynn Turriff
Saturday, July 27, 2002, 2:47:34 PM, you wrote: JS Excuse me for jumping in, but I DO use NAV with TB!, and JS that IS JS exactly what NAV does! It squirrels the email *directly* JS to its JS quarantine directory and does *not* let come into the Inbox. JS And in JS fact, I

Re: Skipping parts not interesting

2002-07-27 Thread Lynn Turriff
Saturday, July 27, 2002, 5:31:46 PM, you wrote: A Speaking of which, what proportion of folks do skip A threads entirely on such basis? Versus reading all A mail. I do. A I'd be curious. And I wonder too what ya do with A threads with a bunch of Unread status indicators, sort A of glaring at

Re[2]: Skipping parts not interesting

2002-07-27 Thread Lynn Turriff
Saturday, July 27, 2002, 8:14:11 PM, you wrote: AdG I think it is the duty of every subscriber to read every message AdG that is being potsted on TBUDL. TF No. It is the right of every subscriber, but not the duty. I read the TF first and maybe second message of every thread, and if it

Re[2]: No Exit

2002-07-25 Thread Lynn Turriff
Thursday, July 25, 2002, 1:46:28 AM, you wrote: JP Hello Adam JP You wrote On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, at 22:54:57 [GMT -0230] (11:24:57 Thursday, 25 July 2002 where I live):- Some tasks are now active Do you want to exit when they are finished? Yes// No // JP IMO this is an annoying bug.

Re[4]: Filters again

2002-07-23 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, July 22, 2002, 5:29:50 PM, you wrote: TM All you would need to do is highlight the msg and TM Ctrl-W to add the new spamer to the AB Group and TM away you go... LT I'd rather not do this, if it can be avoided, but anyway JN Lynn, JN I'm interested in why you would rather not pursue

Re[2]: Filters again

2002-07-23 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, July 22, 2002, 5:24:16 PM, you wrote: [snip] Hi Allie - ACM Sounds like you need to invest in one of those ACM specialist spam filtering tools that have been ACM mentioned on this list now and then, like Spam Weasel ACM or SpamCop. I may resort to that, but looking at some of the

Re[2]: Filters again

2002-07-23 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, July 22, 2002, 3:28:25 PM, you wrote: so do I list this as 'sender', or as 'kludges', or what? DAC I'm using sender for those. Hmmm .. then I think my current problems must be mostly the order. Thanks, Lynn -- 1.60q on Win2kPro SP2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun

Re[2]: Filters again

2002-07-23 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, July 23, 2002, 10:13:11 AM, you wrote: RO Hallo Lynn, RO On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 09:01:08 -0700GMT (23-7-02, 18:01 +0200GMT, where RO I live), you wrote: LT Because, as I mentioned in a previous mail, either I have LT to put them in my 'personal' AB, where I don't want them, LT even as

Re[2]: Filters again

2002-07-23 Thread Lynn Turriff
Hi all - I just want to thank everybody who helped out with this filtering. I think it's working fairly well now, though it could use some tweaking. I'm hoping to do that without hollering help, though :-) Lynn -- 1.60q on Win2kPro SP2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo I'd

Filters again

2002-07-22 Thread Lynn Turriff
Hi all - I've been building spam filters lately, as some of you are aware, and it seemed like I ought to be able to use the 'add' button on the 'general' tab of the filters page to make a list of addresses that ought to go into a particular folder. But for some reason those filters are being

Re[2]: Filters again

2002-07-22 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, July 22, 2002, 8:49:10 AM, you wrote: [snip] TM I would suggest a little different approach. Put all your spam TM addresses in a 'spamers' AB group, then have your filter process TM against that AB group. That way you don't need to modify your filter TM each time you want to add a

Re[2]: Filters again

2002-07-22 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, July 22, 2002, 8:11:39 AM, you wrote: JA Yes... I think you're making a long AND query... so ALL the JA addresses JA would have to be listed. Move all but the first one to the JA alternatives page, and try running the filter again. I did that - moved all but the first address to the

Re[2]: Filters again

2002-07-22 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, July 22, 2002, 1:03:51 PM, you wrote: [snip] LG It has, I'm sure about that. This setting has been there for quite a LG while now (as far back as my TB experience goes, which must be 1.47 LG Halloween Edition, IIRC). There is also a scroll bar on this tab which LG allows one to scroll

Re[2]: Filters again

2002-07-22 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, July 22, 2002, 1:04:51 PM, you wrote: MDP Completely. In build 'q' of 1.60. 1.61 was 100% stable and 1.62 MDP is MDP now in beta. Keep up!! ;-) MDP - -- MDP Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator Honey, if I could reduce this damn spam to a sensible level, I might be able

Re[2]: Filters again

2002-07-22 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, July 22, 2002, 1:14:55 PM, you wrote: [snip] JA You use Add Set. I think alt-ins adds an AND to the OR statement. JA So it'd be like this: JA A or B AND C OK, I thought that might be the way it worked. JA Hrm... no idea. I'll go over them again .. who knows what I might have

Re[2]: Filters again

2002-07-22 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, July 22, 2002, 1:36:41 PM, you wrote: [snip] DAC First, is there some advantage to having one filter with all the DAC alternative spam items, instead of a number of filters. I don't know .. but my filter list is so long that if I want to find one for some reason, it's an awful pain,

Re[3]: TheBat! filtered for spam (again)

2002-07-21 Thread Lynn Turriff
Sunday, July 21, 2002, 6:34:34 PM, you wrote: DH Only six of the 21 spam messages lack X-MSMail-Priority and none DH of DH them are hard core spam. They're spam for insurance or vacations DH or DH something equally innocuous. The nastiest ones all have the DH X-MSMail-Priority or

Re[2]: OT: Sharing after marriage

2002-07-17 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 10:56:35 AM, you wrote: [snip] TF I believe for dual boot you need seperate partitions anyway. TF (Partition Magic comes to mind.) If you have programs or data on the TF NTFS partition (and you will have), I have no idea whether it is TF possible to recover these when

Re[3]: [OT] I hate HTML mail

2002-07-17 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 4:35:03 PM, you wrote: [snip] BK NOOO! Why do you use Opera? It isn't properly CSS or HTML compliant! BK Please please please use a browser based on the Gecko engine (like BK Mozilla or K-Meleon) to give web site designers (such as me) an actual BK standard that we can

Re[2]: OT: Sharing after marriage

2002-07-17 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 8:47:11 AM, you wrote: [snip] JA Although they found the plain text switch... try looking at the JA headers. If I remember correctly, (at least the version I saw JA anyway), put in a whole load of X- headers for other incredimail JA users, which can create a

Re[2]: OT: Sharing after marriage

2002-07-17 Thread Lynn Turriff
Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 8:32:20 AM, you wrote: [snip] JA I personally cannot stand emails flying into my inbox JA with size 50 purple font, on yellow backgrounds (which JA is always the case from a friend). That is something I JA like about TB!, the ability to turn off the HTML when JA it

Re[2]: Well off topics

2002-07-17 Thread Lynn Turriff
Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 10:34:24 AM, you wrote: JA -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- JA Hash: SHA1 JA On Wednesday, July 17, 2002, Michael Thompson wrote... I am using WinXP Professional and every once in a while I am unable to delete some directorys, rename them etc. I get the Message

Re[2]: Well off topics

2002-07-17 Thread Lynn Turriff
Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 12:11:42 PM, you wrote: [snip] sometimes a drive refresh will do it. Sometimes not. MO Ehrr? What is a drive refresh? Sorry .. just do view/refresh in the explorer on whatever drive had the stuck folder in it .. *Sometimes* that works .. Lynn 1.60h on

Re[4]: Sliding screen

2002-07-16 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 6:22:01 AM, you wrote: DvRC Ehm, I just noticed that Internet Explorer does the same thing DvRC when DvRC you just miss the vertical scroll bar and drag the mouse DvRC sideways. I've been reading this thread with interest, because I've noticed the same thing .. or at

Re: OT: Sharing after marriage

2002-07-16 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 12:06:15 AM, you wrote: SP Hi Batpeople, SPHow do you, married folks, manage to share the same computer with SPyour wife err.. spouse to be gender sensitive, specially if she/he SPis of IncrediMail genus, without loosing your cool ?? !! I was going to

Re[2]: OT: Sharing after marriage

2002-07-16 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 8:16:26 AM, you wrote: SP Everytime she gets mail (which is one every minute!!), her SP animated SP cute doggy notifier pops up and announces new mail with most SP irritating of barks ! If she'd only agree to learn TB! sigh.. Would make me crazy .. I support a friend

Re[4]: OT: Sharing after marriage

2002-07-16 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 9:02:35 AM, you wrote: JB Computers are designed to entertain and I say if people *want* to send JB e-mail as html by god let 'em. So far, so good, but a lot of the html mail I get is nearly unreadable ... if they'd compose for readability instead of animated gifs and

Re[2]: Filter question

2002-07-14 Thread Lynn Turriff
Sunday, July 14, 2002, 2:49:42 AM, you wrote: [snip] TF This is absolutely correct. Sorry, I didn't point it out. You need to TF copy the file account.srx from the account with the filters to the TF account where you want the filters to be copied to. It is a good idea TF to back up (rename)

Re[2]: Filter question

2002-07-13 Thread Lynn Turriff
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 8:40:00 PM, you wrote: JA Hi Lynn, JA On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:52:49 -0700, you wrote: In my quest for spam reduction options, I've decided to filter on the ip's of spam mails which apparently have forged 'from' addresses. If I make a list of these and use the 'add'

Re[2]: OT - samba stuff

2002-07-13 Thread Lynn Turriff
Saturday, July 13, 2002, 10:01:12 AM, you wrote: JA Hi Lynn, JA On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 08:57:44 -0700, you wrote: JA Did you install swat? It's a nice samba configuration generator in a web JA browser.. makes things a lot easier :) Oh yes ... it may have been a hardware thing, I couldn't

Re[4]: Filter question

2002-07-13 Thread Lynn Turriff
Saturday, July 13, 2002, 10:06:00 AM, you wrote: JA Hi Lynn, JA On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 09:17:43 -0700, you wrote: I'm not doing them all, but there are a few obvious troublemakers .. JA Most or .kr and those kind of areas? ;) The ones I'm actually trying to block this way are forged 'froms'

Re[2]: Filter question

2002-07-13 Thread Lynn Turriff
Saturday, July 13, 2002, 10:09:24 PM, you wrote: JA Hi Thomas, JA On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 11:38:56 +0700, you wrote: ..for example copying the account.srx file over. ;-) JA Wouldn't know what the file was... but I'm sure you're probably right... I would JA peek, but work is a little far away ;)

Filter question

2002-07-11 Thread Lynn Turriff
Hi guys .. In my quest for spam reduction options, I've decided to filter on the ip's of spam mails which apparently have forged 'from' addresses. If I make a list of these and use the 'add' button to add a rule, will these rules be applied as 'or', or as 'and' .. ? If the latter, can I make a

Re[2]: Filter question

2002-07-11 Thread Lynn Turriff
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 12:18:00 PM, you wrote: TF Hello Robert, TF On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:25:02 -0400 GMT (12/07/02, 01:25 +0700 GMT), TF Robert D. wrote: Copy everything between beginfilter endfilter Go to sorting office incoming mail filter and press Ctr-V RD I like this idea ---so

Re[2]: Filter question

2002-07-11 Thread Lynn Turriff
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 6:59:10 AM, you wrote: G Hi Lynn, G Copy everything between beginfilter endfilter G Go to sorting office incoming mail filter and press Ctr-V G You have now copied a filter. G String1astring2a are AND functions G String2bstring2b are AND functions G String1(ab) and

Re[2]: Filter question

2002-07-11 Thread Lynn Turriff
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 7:30:04 AM, you wrote: MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP Hash: SHA1 MDP Hi Lynn, MDP @11 July 2002, 06:52 -0700 (14:52 UK time) Lynn Turriff [LT] in MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: LT If I make a list of these and use the 'add

Re: Mailto from Opera doesn't work

2002-07-10 Thread Lynn Turriff
Wednesday, July 10, 2002, 5:19:01 AM, you wrote: EC Dear readers from 'TB!udl List', EC When clicking on a 'Send me a mail' button from Opera v6.03 TB! does EC not start an empty editor. I've declared the following in the Opera EC Preference table: /theBat.exe %1/ (without slashes). EC Does

Re[2]: Emoticons

2002-07-09 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, July 8, 2002, 11:04:42 PM, you wrote: TF Hello Lynn, TF On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 07:59:49 -0700 GMT (08/07/02, 21:59 +0700 GMT), TF Lynn Turriff wrote: LT Only until I can find a way to run my proprietary and LT industrial software packages in LINUX ... TF Have you checked out Micheal

Re[3]: Emoticons

2002-07-08 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, July 8, 2002, 7:11:08 AM, you wrote: [snip] Windoze has a character map .. I probably ran a search to find it, put a shortcut on my desktop. It's called charmap.exe in W2kPro. The character in question has to be in the font you are using ... Lynn R Yeah sort of... Only I am not

Re[2]: Emoticons

2002-07-08 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, July 8, 2002, 7:32:29 AM, you wrote: NA Hello Lynn Turriff, NA In Reference to your Posting on Monday, July 08 2002 at 07:28 AM PDT, Windoze has a character map .. NA ^^^ NA Must be a spelling mistake, right? You wouldn't NA purposely slag a superb Operating System... I

Re[3]: Emoticons

2002-07-08 Thread Lynn Turriff
Monday, July 8, 2002, 7:54:14 AM, you wrote: JU Nick, JU Monday, July 8, 2002, 9:32:29 AM, you typed: NA Must be a spelling mistake, right? You wouldn't purposely slag a superb NA Operating System... in fact you are using it yourself, correct? JU Just because you use it doesn't mean you

Re[2]: Please release BatNews!

2002-06-30 Thread Lynn Turriff
Sunday, June 30, 2002, 3:04:23 AM, you wrote: MAU Hello Lynn, Reading Miquel's handy instructions (thanks Miguel) for NewsTraq,... MAU What do you mean thanks Miguel? You owe me a beer ;-) You got it .. next time I'm in your neighbourhood! Lynn -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *

Re[3]: Please release BatNews!

2002-06-25 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, June 25, 2002, 1:25:51 AM, you wrote: [snip] DvRC Anyway, the Ritlabs people say that TB2 will support newsgroups, so DvRC this whole pro/con debate is really quite useless. DvRC Regards, DvRC -Daan- I've been reading this thread with interest and some puzzlement .. seems to me

Re[4]: question - how can email be sent from me that I didn't send

2002-06-24 Thread Lynn Turriff
Sunday, June 23, 2002, 9:05:22 PM, you wrote: JA Try looking at the Full headers for the email... The JA From: header is easily forged, as you can tell, and JA can also be guessed from the recent Klez virus (or 99% JA of spam) ;) Yeah, I see a lot of those too. JA By tracing down the

Re[4]: question - how can email be sent from me that I didn't send

2002-06-24 Thread Lynn Turriff
Sunday, June 23, 2002, 9:11:06 PM, you wrote: JA Hi Lynn, JA On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 21:00:08 -0700, you wrote: Thanks .. Is there any way, apart from intuitive deduction, to identify which information is forged, and which genuine? JA Take a quick look at the headers... some (helpful) mail

Re: question - how can email be sent from me that I didn't send

2002-06-23 Thread Lynn Turriff
Sunday, June 23, 2002, 8:17:33 AM, you wrote: awc Hello Listbuds, awc I've been reading about the spamcop and filtering, I periodically awc receive email from me that is not sent from me. If I look at awc the view headers, it says it came from me! How can this be? Now, awc I've submitted this

Re[2]: question - how can email be sent from me that I didn't send

2002-06-23 Thread Lynn Turriff
Sunday, June 23, 2002, 10:50:29 AM, you wrote: JA Hi Lynn, JA On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 10:27:26 -0700, you wrote: I gather that only someone with SpamCop's resources has any chance of figuring out where the thing really came from ..? JA Depends on how easy you find it to type a command, or JA

Re[2]: question - how can email be sent from me that I didn't send

2002-06-23 Thread Lynn Turriff
Sunday, June 23, 2002, 8:42:50 PM, you wrote: TF Hello Lynn, TF On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 20:39:20 -0700 GMT (24/06/02, 10:39 +0700 GMT), TF Lynn Turriff wrote: LT I thought the last routing (closest to the body of the LT mail) was the originator ... no? TF Yes. But some spammers put fill in some

Re: Filter question

2002-06-21 Thread Lynn Turriff
Thursday, June 20, 2002, 8:19:11 AM, you wrote: JEB Right now I have a Selective Download filter set up, where any JEB messages containing particular header strings are deleted before JEB downloading. The header strings are in a text file; I have put a JEB shortcut on my desktop to this text

Re[2]: Strange thing when replying

2002-06-16 Thread Lynn Turriff
Sunday, June 16, 2002, 5:47:16 AM, you wrote: ACM Currently, no. ACM You could create a quick template with the handle name 'fa', ACM containing: %To=%To='%OFROMNAME %OFROMADDR' ACM You could then use F4 to generate the message with only the ACM selected ACM text, and then type qt handle

Re[2]: Strange thing when replying

2002-06-16 Thread Lynn Turriff
Sunday, June 16, 2002, 9:43:56 AM, you wrote: ACM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- ACM Hash: SHA1 ACM In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], ACM Lynn Turriff [LT] wrote: LT Allie, I hit F4 to bring in just your bit of comment here, LT (no Cont key) which I

Re[4]: Flying tray icon

2002-06-15 Thread Lynn Turriff
Saturday, June 15, 2002, 7:18:50 AM, you wrote: DW Since I upgraded to 1.6q I think.I've noticed this doesn't DW always work any more. Sometimes, instead of the last message I DW viewed DW being highlighted, the highlighting moves back to the first DW message in DW the list. Anyone

Re[5]: SOT: POP3 lock out - alternatives?

2002-06-14 Thread Lynn Turriff
Thursday, June 13, 2002, 1:03:15 PM, you wrote: BM Dear Joseph, BM Thursday, June 13, 2002 at 9:35:11 PM you wrote: JN I haven't met an IT person yet who's heard of The Bat! [snip] BM I am sorry - I thought this was the case everywhere, except in BM Denmark, where The Bat! is only

Re[2]: Mouse variant of F4?

2002-06-14 Thread Lynn Turriff
Thursday, June 13, 2002, 1:34:06 PM, you wrote: A Hello Joseph, A Thursday, June 13, 2002, 4:12:06 PM, you wrote: JN Is there a quick and easy mouse/menu way to reply with only a JN selection quoted, i.e., the same result as making a selection and then JN pressing F4? A Download the lastest

Re[2]: HTML MailTo, Recipient Name + Address Insertion

2002-06-14 Thread Lynn Turriff
Thursday, June 13, 2002, 9:41:04 AM, you wrote: PL Hello Peter, PL Thursday, June 13, 2002, 2:41:40 AM, you wrote: PP As you can see in Paddys request there seem to be something left. Or Paddy PP 's using an unfixed 6.0. PP In the latter case Paddy should update Opera and give it another try

Re[2]: Mouse variant of F4?

2002-06-14 Thread Lynn Turriff
Absolutely! Lynn Thursday, June 13, 2002, 7:00:20 PM, you wrote: DAC On Thursday, June 13, 2002, 3:18:02 PM, Chris Weaven wrote: Here here, get's my vote too. DAC not wanting to feel left out, add my voice as well, for reply, reply DAC to all and reply to sender. Haven't thought this

Re[2]: euro sign

2002-06-11 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, June 11, 2002, 2:56:32 AM, you wrote: DvRC Hoi Ochrid, O may not always see the euro sign (¤) as it is meant. DvRC Well, it shows fine here. DvRC And you can always send me Euros :-) DvRC Regards, DvRC -Daan- Got the circle with the little tentacles here .. probably the font

Re[3]: New HTML engine?

2002-06-11 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, June 11, 2002, 3:17:31 AM, you wrote: MP Hello Marck, It will never be there in that form. It's just too dangerous. I understand that support for retrieving non-sent images will be added at some point *BUT* it will only get one image at a time and prompt for permission for

Re[5]: euro sign

2002-06-11 Thread Lynn Turriff
Tuesday, June 11, 2002, 5:14:16 AM, you wrote: MP Hello, MP I have checked my font and found the € euro symbol, so it is available MP on my computer. When I received the message however I got this ¤ MP (sun). I am using the 1.60q. Should not this work correctly then? MP -- MP Best regards,

  1   2   >