Hi
On Friday 28 November 2014 at 1:05:50 PM, in
mid:827739595.20141128130550@my_localhost, MFPA wrote:
Hi
On Monday 24 November 2014 at 1:20:45 AM, in
mid:378235854.20141124012045@my_localhost, MFPA
wrote:
When sending a GnuPG-encrypted message that has BCC
recipients, my TB! version
the account log contains
entries like:-
FETCH - Root: generated by avast! antivirus for SSL
scanning, avast! Mail Scanner, avast! Mail Scanner Root
But my question in the current thread was about (GnuPG) encrypting
messages that have BCC recipients. My TB
Hi
On Monday 24 November 2014 at 1:20:45 AM, in
mid:378235854.20141124012045@my_localhost, MFPA wrote:
When sending a GnuPG-encrypted message that has BCC
recipients, my TB! version (4.0.38) simply includes all
recipients, including those on the BCC line, in the
encryption list of a single
, 28 Nov 2014 13:05:50 + GMT (28-Nov-14, 20:05 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
Hi
On Monday 24 November 2014 at 1:20:45 AM, in
mid:378235854.20141124012045@my_localhost, MFPA wrote:
When sending a GnuPG-encrypted message that has BCC
recipients, my TB! version (4.0.38) simply includes all
Hi
When sending a GnuPG-encrypted message that has BCC recipients, my TB!
version (4.0.38) simply includes all recipients, including those on
the BCC line, in the encryption list of a single outgoing message. The
identity of the BCCs is potentially leaked to each other and to the
other
Hi
On Sunday 9 March 2014 at 3:19:08 PM, in
mid:891435328.20140309111...@gmail.com, Leonard S. Berkowitz wrote:
The reason I use the Bcc pane is to protect the
addresses of the recipients.
Yes, it's generally best to BCC.
There are specific exceptions, such as at work we put addressees
! version it
does.
However, Miguel's method is more elegant.
The reason I use the Bcc pane is to protect the addresses of the
recipients. In the most recent instance, it happens that all of the
recipients know one another, and their addresses. However, I feel that
it is a good habit to develop
The reason I use the Bcc pane is to protect the addresses of the
recipients. [...] I feel that it is a good habit to develop.
Indeed !!!
I get pretty annoyed at receiving group messages with everyone's email
address listed for everyone (possibly including spammers) to see.
I wish everyone I
the members,
then clicking the New Message icon. You can then cut
them from the To field of your new message and paste
into the BCC field.
Thanks. That is exactly what I do.
Oh. In your original post I thought you meant you tapped the new
message button directly after selecting the group name
into the BCC field.
Thanks. That is exactly what I do. The problem is that when I go back
into my Sent Mail and turn the RFC-822 headers on all I see is the
group name, not the names of the people who were in the group at the
time I had sent the e-mail.
--
Leonard S. Berkowitz
Using The Bat
On Thursday, March 6, 2014, 7:52:02 PM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote:
Or, although basically the same, open editor, select BCC field, click on
the right most icon (Address book), select group, select any name of the
group and hit Ctrl+A to select all, then click on the '' icon
. I then cut the name of the group from
the To: pane and paste it into the Bcc: pane. Simple enough.
However, people come and go from the various groups, and occasionally,
I need to check who did receive a particular message. Since this is a
Bcc, all I can see is the name of the group
the group name,
then highlighting all the members, then clicking the New Message icon.
You can then cut them from the To field of your new message and paste
into the BCC field.
I'm sure there must be a better way using macros and templates, but in
a few minutes thought I only came up with a couple
the To field of your new message and paste
into the BCC field.
Or, although basically the same, open editor, select BCC field, click on
the right most icon (Address book), select group, select any name of the
group and hit Ctrl+A to select all, then click on the '' icon and there
you have them
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo Fledermäuse,
is there a way to make groups in the address book where all the recipients are
getting it as BCC? or a macro that can do that?
- --
regards,
Jürgen
:eu-flag3: :de-bw: :safaribears:
In Europe you have watches but in Africa we
Hello Jurgen Haug everyone else,
on 29-Apr-2005 at 18:14 you (Jurgen Haug) wrote:
is there a way to make groups in the address book where all the
recipients are getting it as BCC? or a macro that can do that?
I don't know if I understand that correctly...
You can use the %BCC=grouphandle
Batlovers,
There is an option in each address book entry under the Other tab to
automatically add secondary addresses to the BCC field.
It doesn't seem to work for me. Can anyone else confirm this?
Robin
--
Robin
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Hi Robin,
On Sunday, March 06, 2005 at 9:08:48 PM you wrote:
RA There is an option in each address book entry under the Other tab to
RA automatically add secondary addresses to the BCC field.
RA It doesn't seem to work for me. Can anyone else confirm this?
Confirmed here.
--
Regards
I want to set up the BCC template and the filter for receiving emails
BCC'd from another machine.
I know someone out there has done it and hoped that they ight jut be
able to cut and paste the template and the filter to save me having to
're-invent the wheel'.
--
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln
Hello admin,
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:06:20 +0100 GMT (30/10/2004, 01:06 +0700 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
aacu I want to set up the BCC template and the filter for receiving emails
aacu BCC'd from another machine.
I'm not sure what template you mean. In order to BCC to yourself, just
used
Hello Roelof,
Friday, July 9, 2004, 8:14:21 PM, Roelof Otten wrote:
J I recently messed up and sent out a newsletter using a group list in cc versus bcc.
J Took _so_ much care in preparing and testing, only to screw-up with the final
J version. Feel REALLY stupid.
RO Next time use the mass
On Sunday, July 11, 2004, 11:43:39 AM, Greg Strong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GS Hello Roelof,
GS Friday, July 9, 2004, 8:14:21 PM, Roelof Otten wrote:
GS J I recently messed up and sent out a newsletter using a group list in cc
versus bcc.
GS J Took _so_ much care in preparing and testing, only
Hallo jwayne,
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:51:25 -0400GMT (11-7-2004, 19:51 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
GS RO Next time use the mass mailing feature.
GS Yes I think this is best solution.
J Doesn't this send out a separate email from one's computer to each recipient?
Yep it does, that's why
On Friday, July 9, 2004, 9:11:27 PM, Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RO Hallo Ian,
RO On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 07:47:44 +1000GMT (9-7-2004, 23:47 +0200, where I
RO live), you wrote:
RO j I recently messed up and sent out a newsletter using a group list in cc
versus bcc.
RO IAW It can't
I recently messed up and sent out a newsletter using a group list in cc versus bcc.
Took _so_ much care in preparing and testing, only to screw-up with the final
version. Feel REALLY stupid.
Any suggestions or tricks (besides BE MORE CAREFUL IDIOT) that can help prevent this
in the future
Hello TBUDL,
on Fri, 9. Jul 2004 at 17:02:47 -0400 jwayne wrote:
Any suggestions or tricks (besides BE MORE CAREFUL IDIOT) that can help prevent this
in the future?
what about using a template to bind the recipients to BCC?
like:
%BCC=your list goes here%-
--
:dAniel_hAhler: shinE!
GnuPG
On Friday, July 9, 2004, 5:47:44 PM, Ian A. White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IAW jwayne,
IAW On Saturday, July 10, 2004, 7:02:47 AM, you (jwayne) wrote:
IAW j I recently messed up and sent out a newsletter using a group list in cc
versus bcc.
(snip)
IAW I have had this request from others I
Hallo Ian,
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 07:47:44 +1000GMT (9-7-2004, 23:47 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
j I recently messed up and sent out a newsletter using a group list in cc versus bcc.
IAW It can't be turned off, but the best solution I have found is to move
IAW it to the top of the header list
Hallo jwayne,
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 17:02:47 -0400GMT (9-7-2004, 23:02 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
J I recently messed up and sent out a newsletter using a group list in cc versus bcc.
J Took _so_ much care in preparing and testing, only to screw-up with the final
J version. Feel REALLY stupid
thanks for yr suggestion..
some further clarifications required :
what does macro CC= (Additional CC recipient)
mean..
how to put to use ?
i hope my name figures at the bottom of the mail..
as gmail account is not config in bat so name cannot be customised ..
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 19:28:26 -0700,
Dear Anubhav,
@8-Jul-2004, 12:44 +0530 (08-Jul 08:14 UK time) Anubhav Roy said:
what does macro CC= (Additional CC recipient)
mean..
how to put to use ?
It has two uses. The one you illustrate is used to add addresses to
a CC list. The format you really need is %CC on its own, which will
can anyone help..
new to forum
thanks in advance
Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hi Anubhav Roy
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 07:41:30 [GMT +0530] (which was 7:11 PM where I
live) you wrote:
can anyone help..
new to forum
thanks in advance
Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL'
Hi Everyone,
Is there a key-combination to highlight any of the To: Cc: Bcc:
Subject: header lines without having to tab forward and backward?
For instance, suppose I am typing an address and then want to erase
the whole thing quickly. Is there a keyboard command for delete line
in that part
Wednesday, June 9, 2004, Arthur Tan wrote:
For instance, suppose I am typing an address and then want to erase
the whole thing quickly. Is there a keyboard command for delete line
in that part of the window?
There are the standard Windows ones: Ctrl+Shift+RightArrow for select to
end of
Hi Urban,
On Wednesday, June 9, 2004, 12:29:40 PM, you wrote:
Wednesday, June 9, 2004, Arthur Tan wrote:
For instance, suppose I am typing an address and then want to erase
the whole thing quickly. Is there a keyboard command for delete line
in that part of the window?
There are the
Aside from using BCC, which is stripped by the server, in what other
instances might there be no To: header in a delivered e-mail message?
Can anyone think of anything?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL
Hallo tb,
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:09:38 -0600GMT (28-1-04, 23:09 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
tko Aside from using BCC, which is stripped by the server, in what other
tko instances might there be no To: header in a delivered e-mail message?
You could use a CC:, that'll show in the delivered
-- Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 5:01:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:09:38 -0600GMT (28-1-04, 23:09 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
tko Aside from using BCC, which is stripped by the server, in what other
tko instances might there be no To: header in a delivered e-mail
Hallo tb,
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:22:25 -0600GMT (29-1-04, 0:22 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
tko Telnet to port 25, or whatever you like, and send me a message without a
tko To/CC/BCC header. I want to see what the headers of this message look like.
Okay, I'll try it telnetting
On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 at 5:09:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
the message To, BCC, basics
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Aside from using BCC, which is stripped by the server, in what other
instances might there be no To: header in a delivered e-mail message?
Using telnet to access the SMTP
On Wednesday, January 28, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote...
Telnet to port 25, or whatever you like, and send me a message
without a To/CC/BCC header. I want to see what the headers of this
message look like.
As a note... if you're seeing emails with a BCC header appearing, then
the sending
On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 at 6:22:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
the message To, BCC, basics
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I could send you a message without a To: header and it'll still be
delivered. Nor would I need a CC or a BCC, I couldn't do it with
TB, but that's not the issue here
Hello all,
I have just noticed, I think it is something new but I don't know when
or in which version this was introduced.
If on the Editor window I hover the mouse over the To:, CC: or BBC: text
(the text on the left of the corresponding fields) it changes colour to
white to indicate it is a
Picker window is opened.
Only works for CC and BCC for me. To changes color in the same way but clicking
does nothing. Nice touch.
Cheers,
--
Vishal
Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat
Hi all,
Can I place a particular address from TheBat's address book in the bcc
field of a message via a keystroke?
I have encountered a feature in Eudora and Outlook where if I have
highlighted a particular address I can hit alt+b to transfer it to the bcc
field. How is this done in TheBat
Hello Coyle306,
Saturday, September 6, 2003, 5:48:02 AM, you wrote:
C You have to delete the bcc field immediately before hitting send.
C It's annoying.
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
Hi Keith,
Now, with V2, I can delete the entry in the BCC field, but when I move
down into the message body, the BCC field is repopulated as per my
template, and I can't get rid of it. I realize that I could work
around it by setting up an alternative template, but perhaps I'm
missing
Hello Thomas,
Saturday, September 6, 2003, 2:24:32 AM, you wrote:
Now, with V2, I can delete the entry in the BCC field, but when I move
down into the message body, the BCC field is repopulated as per my
template, and I can't get rid of it. I realize that I could work
around it by setting up
You have to delete the bcc field immediately before hitting send.
It's annoying.
KK Thanks for the tip. It does work, but clicking in the body isn't
KK enough. I have to actually type a character in the body, then go back
KK up to the header and delete the field there. It's no big deal, just
I'm not sure if this is a bug or a feature.
In 1.x I always BCC'ed myself in my template, using
%bcc=[EMAIL PROTECTED]. When actually writing a message I could click
in the BCC header and delete it, if I chose to not copy myself.
Now, with V2, I can delete the entry in the BCC field, but when I
Hello Bill,
Friday, July 18, 2003, Bill McCarthy wrote:
The BCC approach will work fine but is a bit impersonal. Why not just
use the mass mailing feature to individually address each email?
I agree, but Mary stated:
I was trying to do it with a Quick Template. Actually I spent ages
looking
I want to send a message to all my clients with my holiday dates.
I've set up two groups, so I can send the message in two different
languages to various clients.
However, I want all the addresses to appear in the BCC field so that
the clients don't see each other's addresses.
I can't find
On Friday, July 18, 2003, Mary Cassidy wrote...
I want to send a message to all my clients with my holiday dates.
I've set up two groups, so I can send the message in two different
languages to various clients.
However, I want all the addresses to appear in the BCC field so
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
Well, you have half the steps done by the looks of it. You created
them as groups, which will probably save you a fair bit of time. Start
a new message, make sure the bcc field is visible. If it is not, go to
View, and check the BCC option. You now should have two
On Fri 18-Jul-03 1:00pm -0400, Mary Cassidy wrote:
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
Well, you have half the steps done by the looks of it. ...
Now why didn't I think of that?
The BCC approach will work fine but is a bit impersonal. Why not just
use the mass mailing feature to individually address
Thomas,
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, at 01:46:58 [GMT +0700] tbudl wrote:
TF If you use only one computer, you will have no need to BCC to
TF yourself.
OH I SEE!!! silly me - thank you for taking the time to explain it,
in that case BCC'ing is an excellent idea.
I have a similar problem but I don't
Hello kristina,
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, at 09:41:06 GMT +0100 (7/1/2003, 3:41 AM -0500 GMT
here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I realise its not TB! that is causing these problems, I just wondered
if TB! could go someway to fixing it. I prefer to view using
references, but is it possible
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, at 12:19:34 [GMT +0700] tbudl wrote:
TF On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 10:35:44 -0500 GMT (28/06/03, 22:35 +0700 GMT),
TF Greg Strong wrote:
I want to keep running dialog of all email correspondence. I think
having incorporated into the interface would make it more user
friendly.
, you need to actually download the messages you sent out
with the office computer onto your home computer, and this is only
possible if they are in the inbox of your ISP account. This is
achieved by BCC'ing yourself.
If you use only one computer, you will have no need to BCC to
yourself
Hello Greg,
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 10:35:44 -0500 GMT (28/06/03, 22:35 +0700 GMT),
Greg Strong wrote:
I want to keep running dialog of all email correspondence. I think
having incorporated into the interface would make it more user
friendly.
I have a seconder! :-)
Now let me find this wishlist
Hello Jonathan,
Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 4:52:58 PM, you wrote:
JA (if you're interested, I can give you all the technical docs on this).
My problems with BCC's are over, but I'm still interested though, if
it's not too difficult and as far as you're talking about digital docs
:-)
--
Best
Hello Peter,
Friday, February 14, 2003, 10:17:09 AM, you wrote:
PP As bad as the result is to you, I'm somehow glad to know:
PP there seems not to be a bug in The Bat! regarding this issue
PP :-)
I now no longer have any problem with the BCC's, so I can close this
thread completely.
I do have
ago, when I sent a message to myself with a BCC to the
MP kids my wife, (same account, two mailboxes, each with 3 aliasses (1
MP alias not used in this example)) everyone received at least one
MP message. At that time I used OE (and Pocomail).
MP That doesn't work anymore but it seems this has
to myself with a BCC to the
kids my wife, (same account, two mailboxes, each with 3 aliasses (1
alias not used in this example)) everyone received at least one
message. At that time I used OE (and Pocomail).
That doesn't work anymore but it seems this has nothing to do with The
Bat, but rather
.
That clarifies it then. Thanks for the feedback.
It's not a major problem, it's only BCC's to our own addresses that do
not work.
I do think that is a problem, I BCC to myself often.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.
This being Easter Sunday, we will ask Mrs
Hello Bats,
While trying to test BCC in The Bat I send:
A message to myself (f.i. [EMAIL PROTECTED])
with a BCC to
my kids (f.i. [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]),
my wife ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
and myself again,
but now to an external address ([EMAIL PROTECTED
Dear Mark,
--- Mark Partous / Mittwoch, 05.02.2003, 12:28:52
BCC
While trying to test BCC in The Bat I send:
[...]
Result:
I receive one message [...]
When send such an Email (to myself, BCC to the same group) there is
no problem.
Any idea what's going on?
have you
Hallo Mark,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 12:28:52 +0100GMT (5-2-03, 12:28 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
MP While trying to test BCC in The Bat I send:
MP I receive one message, the one to myself, I suppose.
That would be logical.
MP When I look on the server, I find 2 more messages, both to f.i.
MP
Hello Roelof,
Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 1:47:42 PM, you wrote:
MP When send such an Email (to myself, BCC to the same group) there
MP is no problem.
RO I don't understand what you're trying to say with this.
You should try harder! Anyone can see I meant: :-) (1)
When I send
Hi Eddie,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:16:00 +0100
Eddie Castelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
have you tried with an other Version such as v1.63b5 or so?
Is there any reason why somebody who requests on TBUDL should give the
current Beta a try _before_ anybody has stated it could have that
problem
Hi Mark,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:01:55 +0100
Mark Partous [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MP When send such an Email (to myself, BCC to the same group) there
MP is no problem.
RO I don't understand what you're trying to say with this.
You should try harder! Anyone can see I meant: :-) (1)
When I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003, Mark Partous wrote...
While trying to test BCC in The Bat I send:
A message to myself (f.i. [EMAIL PROTECTED])
with a BCC to my kids (f.i. [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]), my wife
Help : (
Multiple (cc: or bcc:) email addresses in the template don't
work, and
if I insert several email addresses separated by commas, etc.
in the
box for "Forward to" in the Sorting Office actions tab, that
doesn't work.
So how is anyone able toforward an email to multiple C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Loan,
@24-Jan-2003, 06:11 -0800 (14:11 UK time) Loan Officer said:
Multiple (cc: or bcc:) email addresses in the template don't work,
Actually they do. Perhaps you can share with us the syntax you have
been trying and we can then help
Dear Victor,
On 18:18 15.12.2002, you [Victor B. Gonzalez
([EMAIL PROTECTED])] wrote...
I expect to get all sorts of bounces soon but would like to never
see one of them.
Why?
Cheers,
Johannesmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Manche sind nur tolerant, weil sie zu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Johannes,
I expect to get all sorts of bounces soon but would like to never
see one of them.
JP Why?
Repercussions of fighting spam.
- --
Best regards,
Victor B. Gonzalez
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello tbudl,
I tried several times to test the mass mailing feature of
the bat. I did as mentioned in the help files and put an
address in the to: field as not to reveal others addresses
but no one in the BCC field gets a message...
How
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Victor Gonzalez [VG] wrote:'
VG I tried several times to test the mass mailing feature of the
VG bat. I did as mentioned in the help files and put an address in
VG the to: field as not to reveal others addresses but no one in
VG the BCC fi
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, 04:08, Raj wrote:
PP IIRC this option only takes effect if you write a message to this
PP contact using the 'New message' function in the address book.
It does not work for new messages as well :(
What Peter is talking about is not the regular new message
Hello Marcus,
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 09:22:05 +0200 GMT (25/09/02, 14:22 +0700 GMT),
Marcus Ohlström wrote:
It does not work for new messages as well :(
MO What Peter is talking about is not the regular new message but the
MO new message function inside the address book.
Why does this make a
add . BCC field, doesn't work
when new message in invoked using the regular methods. New message
*must* be created from within the address book for this feature to
work. And, don't ask me why - I'm equally puzzled !
--
be well,
Sudip Pokhrel |/\
PM: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, 10:01, Thomas F. wrote:
MO What Peter is talking about is not the regular new message but the
MO new message function inside the address book.
Why does this make a difference?
By design. I have no idea why, either Ritlabs forgot to implement it for
both ways
Hello Marcus,
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 11:04:17 +0200 GMT (25/09/02, 16:04 +0700 GMT),
Marcus Ohlström wrote:
Why does this make a difference?
MO By design. I have no idea why, either Ritlabs forgot to implement
MO it for both ways of creating messages or they had a reason.
As I caznnot fathom a
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, 11:26, Thomas F. wrote:
MO My guess is that it is in some way related to the design problems
MO which is the reason they have choosen to rewrite the entire code
MO before releasing 2.0.
You are probably right. They are rewriting the whole code because of
Fellow TB users,
In the address book entry, under Other we have three options, one of them being
the following
Automatically add the secondary addresses to the BCC field
However this does not seem to work for me.
In the address field I have entered the address as follows
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 20:24:46 +0530
Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the address book entry, under Other we have three options, one of
them being the following
Automatically add the secondary addresses to the BCC field
However this does not seem to work for me.
In the address field I
Peter,
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, at 19:00:43 [GMT +0200] (which was 10:30 PM where I live) you
wrote:
PP IIRC this option only takes effect if you write a message to this
PP contact using the 'New message' function in the address book.
It does not work for new messages as well :(
--
Warm regards,
Hello Clemens,
Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 8:19:53 AM, Clemens 'Gullevek' Schwaighofer wrote:
Hello The Bat! ML,
How can I make a rule, that filters out all mail with no to (emtpy
To: ) or CC, BCC ...
Would be another small victory in the Fight for SPAM ...
well ... it's as easy
enter on the
JN remote version of TB!?
Two possibilities:
1) Put %bcc=youraddress in all of your templates.
2) Create an outgoing filter, check for '@' in sender, action: forward
all messages to youraddress
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Current Ver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Roelof,
@11 May 2002, 08:47:27 +0200 (07:47 UK time) Roelof Otten wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Two possibilities:
1) Put %bcc=youraddress in all of your templates.
2) Create an outgoing filter, check for '@' i
Hello Marck,
On Sat, 11 May 2002 09:42:08 +0100GMT (11-5-02, 10:42 +0200GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
2) Create an outgoing filter, check for '@' in sender, action: forward
all messages to youraddress
MDP (and check that the outgoing message is not the forwarded message to
MDP you g ...
Thank you.
JN
Roelof Otten wrote on Saturday, May 11, 2002:
Two possibilities: 1) Put %bcc=youraddress in all of your
templates. 2) Create an outgoing filter, check for '@' in sender,
action: forward all messages to youraddress
How can I create a default address to be entered in one of the
recipient blocks? I would like all of my mail being sent from a
remote machine to be bcc'd to me. What/where can I enter on the
remote version of TB!?
--
JN
Current Ver:
Hello John,
On Monday, April 15, 2002 at 11:52:27 PM you wrote (at least in part):
JT Is it possible to create a filter that will BCC a message to somebody
JT as if the sender had originally BCC'd the message to them?
In short: No.
JT I need this because I have all e-mail at my domain
Is it possible to create a filter that will BCC a message to somebody
as if the sender had originally BCC'd the message to them?
I need this because I have all e-mail at my domain forwarded to a free
pop server account. I would like TheBat to forward my wife's e-mail to
another pop server
When I click on the down arrow that shows history in the above fields,
it shut TB! down with extreme prejudice. Has anyone else experienced
this? Is there a fix?
-Peter
Using The Bat! version 1.60c (www.ritlabs.com) on Windows XP Build 2600
Hi, TB! developers,
I'm using The Bat! Version 1.53t
Serial Number 3283B3AA
under Windows 2000 Pro SP2
I'd like to report a bug:
Description:
---
Under certain circumstances, the BCC macro is ignored if a new message
is created with the Favourites drop-down list.
Steps
Hello Allie,
Wednesday, October 03, 2001, 8:00:34 PM, you wrote:
ACM In the BCC field, what did you place as list?
ACM group name or group handle
ACM Be sure that it's the group handle name that you insert there.
Originatlly, I had the name of the AB and no groups were created. So based
is it's handle. I then updated
FW the %BCC to read %BCC=Members list .
If 'Members' is the handle name for the group, then your macro should
read: %BCC=Members Members
Is that what you're doing. The handle name is denoted by the enclosing
''.
- --
©Allie C Martin List Moderator (and fellow
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
