Hello Marck,
Saturday, February 23, 2008, 1:52:45 PM, you wrote:
MDP> Dear Scott,
MDP> @23-Feb-2008, 13:28 -0600 (23-Feb 19:28 here) Scott [S] in
MDP> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to MAU:
S>> Does v4 fix the issue where if you get an email addressed to
MDP> ...
S>> Tuesday, February 12, 2008,
Does v4 fix the issue where if you get an email addressed to multiple people
(everyone on my sports team) and you want to save the list of people,
highlighting the TO or CC field with all the names, right click --> add to
address book and you only add the 1st name in the list? This broke somewh
Hello Alto,
> So I stopped fiddling with the awkward system and rather reported to
> the mailing list. Developers are reading there, and they can't fail to
> notice the report. If they want to "manage" it further, they can do
> so themselves.
Whether awkard or not, the BT works and gets attentio
Hi John,
> Care to list them?
Ah yes, the gags of this morning:
- Came in to notice that some messages that I "sent" yesterday in fact
hadn't been sent. Instead, they were lingering in the "Outbox" -
several times each. I hit "send all", one less. Hit "send" again,
nothing more happened, though
Hello Dwight,
>> IMAP: Occasionally tasks will never finish. Sometimes they are
>> "benign", that is, their hanging at least doesn't block anything,
>> sometimes some or all folders can't be displayed any more (message
>> list empty)
> Have encountered this occasionally. Not really a show stopper
Hello Dwight,
>> IMAP: Occasionally tasks will never finish. Sometimes they are
>> "benign", that is, their hanging at least doesn't block anything,
>> sometimes some or all folders can't be displayed any more (message
>> list empty)
> Have encountered this occasionally. Not really a show stopper
On Monday, February 11, 2008, 11:02:57 AM, Alto Speckhardt wrote:
> It forces a restart of TheBat.
Usually of you focus on another folder, then return it takes care of
itself.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.c
Hi MAU,
> How many of those did you report in BT (Bug Tracker).
Over the years - three, if I remember correctly. The first should
have been some time 2005. Last time I checked, it was still listed as
"new" and "unassigned".
So I stopped fiddling with the awkward system and rather reported to
th
Hello Dwight,
>> IMAP: Occasionally tasks will never finish. Sometimes they are
>> "benign", that is, their hanging at least doesn't block anything,
>> sometimes some or all folders can't be displayed any more (message
>> list empty)
> Have encountered this occasionally. Not really a show stopper
Hi MAU,
> How many of those did you report in BT (Bug Tracker).
Over the years - three, if I remember correctly. The first should
have been some time 2005. Last time I checked, it was still listed as
"new" and "unassigned".
So I stopped fiddling with the awkward system and rather reported to
th
Hello Alto,
> Every one of those points has been reported to the betea list once or
> more often. None of them was ever acknowledged or reported to be
> worked on. Many are still unresolved in v4.
How many of those did you report in BT (Bug Tracker). If you did, it
would be good if you post the
On Monday, February 11, 2008, 10:02:08 AM, Alto Speckhardt wrote:
> IMAP: Occasionally tasks will never finish. Sometimes they are
> "benign", that is, their hanging at least doesn't block anything,
> sometimes some or all folders can't be displayed any more (message
> list empty)
Have encounter
Hello John,
> Care to list them?
Well, among others:
Tabs/View modes: Assign view mode with different column withs to tab.
Select tab. Select other folder, come back to first folder: Tab is
still selected, but default view mode is applied.
IMAP: Occasionally tasks will never finish. Sometimes
Hello Tbudl,
> Any opinions on which one to use? Which version proofed to contain the
> least number of bugs?
Thanks for all those opinions! As you can see I upgraded to 3.99.29
and hope this will be a good companion to me.
It was especially nice to see "Waldorf and Stettler" gnarling at each
ot
Alto
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, at 22:41:12 [GMT +0100] (08:41:12 11/02/2008
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:
> It's the parts that do _not_
> work that concern me, and those parts are getting more instead of less
> over time.
Care to list them?
--
Regards,
John Phillips
*** Con
Guten Morgen,
>> I can't find another decent email program.
M> Heyyy! I'm going to frame this statement and hang it on the wall. Alto
M> Speckhardt admits that TB is a "decent email program" :-))
Any day of the week. Since TheBat was about my first email program
(not counting several command line
Hello Alto,
> I can't find another decent email program.
Heyyy! I'm going to frame this statement and hang it on the wall. Alto
Speckhardt admits that TB is a "decent email program" :-))
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v4.0.12
_
Hi Michael,
M> would be interesting to know what your problems are.
They are just the same that they have been for years. Mostly IMAP; to
tell you the truth, the rest I can live with. But I simply can't
restart TheBat every other hour to get the mail check running again -
for example.
M> With
Hi,
M> If I was as unsatisfied as you seem, I would have moved to another
M> client years ago and stop "suffering".
That's just the problem. I can't find another decent email program.
Mulberry - bad editor. Thunderbird - too much fidgeting. Pegasus -
nah, just not "me". ClawMail, Eudora, Incredim
Hello Alto,
M>> And, excuse my ingenuity, but if you are so unsatisfied with TB and
M>> seems you have been so for years [...]
>
> So now I have to defend myself for even using the program I paied for?
> What kind of world are you living in?
I guess we both live in the same world, the difference
Hi,
would be interesting to know what your problems are. With earlier
versions I had some problems also, but these have disappeared in the
meantime. Maybe I do not cover all the issues that might exist but
it's running quite well here.
--
Greetings
Michael
_
Guten Morgen,
M> Not everybody agrees with you, are you aware of that?
I don't know how you use the program. To be frank, I'm not all that
interested either. However, when I use it I would like to get work
done with it. When I can't do this than I have fair reason to call it
what I see it.
And,
Hello Alto,
> About a year ago I called RIT incompetents.
Not everybody agrees with you, are you aware of that?
> Normaly, after an assault like that I would expect anyone to work very
> hard on proving me wrong.
An assault like that from Mr. Alto Speckhardt. I'm with you, I wonder
why they di
I use Imap with TB 3.99.29 without any problems. Several accounts on
different servers. E-mail is stable during the whole day.
I know several people do complain about TBs Imap implementation but
this is something I cannot confirm with this version.
--
Greetings
__
Guten Morgen,
>> If you want to use IMAP the last usable version is v3.0.1.33.
PF> I don't agree. I don't have more problems with IMAP in the version
PF> mentioned below...
Well, all I can say is that I do. Concerning v4, this went right out
of the window about an hour after install. Big surprise
Alto,
On 09-02-2008 18:36, you wrote in
:
> If you want to use IMAP the last usable version is v3.0.1.33.
I don't agree.
I don't have more problems with IMAP in the version
mentioned below...
--
Best regards
Peter Fjelsten
3.99.24 Pro MyGate, AVG
2 POP3, 14 IMAP (Courier) & 1 IMAP (
Guten Morgen,
MS> Any opinions on which one to use? Which version proofed to contain the
MS> least number of bugs?
If you want to use IMAP the last usable version is v3.0.1.33. Things
have deteriorated further from then on. If you only use POP3 you can
get the latest v3 version.
--
MfG,
Alto
Hello Tom,
Saturday, February 9, 2008, 8:31:35 AM, you wrote:
> Have not had any problems with 3.99.29
The *one* grouse I had with 3.99.29 was the compose message window where on
attaching files I could not see the panel on the left that showed attach files.
The promised they would fix it in n
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 at 12:51:52 +0100, Martin wrote:> Hello Tbudl,
> As I am currently not brave enough (and neither have the time nor the
> need to upgrade to 4.x) I would simply like to install the latest and
> best 3.x version and live happily with it for the next years.
I found 3
Friday, February 8, 2008, 10:51:52 PM, you wrote:
> As I am currently not brave enough (and neither have the time nor the
> need to upgrade to 4.x) I would simply like to install the latest and
> best 3.x version and live happily with it for the next years.
> Any opinions on whic
On Friday 8 februari 2008, 12:51 Martin Schuster wrote:
>I would simply like to install the latest and best 3.x version
>and live happily with it for the next years.
>Any opinions on which one to use? Which version proofed to
>contain the least number of bugs?
I would say v3.98.4.
Hi
On Friday 8 February 2008 at 11:51:52 AM, in
, Martin Schuster
wrote:
> As I am currently not brave enough (and neither have the time nor the
> need to upgrade to 4.x) I would simply like to install the latest and
> best 3.x version and live happily with it for the next year
d to upgrade to 4.x) I would simply like to install the latest and
MS> best 3.x version and live happily with it for the next years.
MS> Any opinions on which one to use? Which version proofed to contain the
MS> least number of bugs?
MS> Thanks a lot!
I use 3.99.25 and have no proble
Hello Tbudl,
Sorry, if I used the wrong keywords to search the forum...I just did
not find any relevant posts:
As I am currently not brave enough (and neither have the time nor the
need to upgrade to 4.x) I would simply like to install the latest and
best 3.x version and live happily with it for
34 matches
Mail list logo