I have come accross a strange problem that I hope someone can shed
some light on...
Many groups use identifiers in their subject line to help users filter
messages and otherwise identify messages coming from a particular
group.
For example, I am the moderator of a group called [DOpus] and well
Hello Wayne,
On Thursday, June 19, 2003, at 9:46:50 PM, you wrote
re: Filter Strings:
WH The problem is that the filter seems to ignore the brackets and any
WH messages in [D6] that also have the word DOpus in them go to the wrong
WH folder. Is there any way to make TB consider the brackets
Hello Fré,
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 19:52:39 +0200GMT (29-4-02, 19:52 +0200GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
I have just given up 'kludges' as location, I'll see what
happens.
FvL Well: nothing ... Messages keep being put in Inbox. What am i
FvL overseeing?
I'll give you my filter.
There are a few
Hello Roelof,
String: Reply-To: tbudl
Location: Kludges
Presence: Yes
I use:
String: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Location: Recipient
Presence: Yes
And it has never failed since I joined the list 4 months ago.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.60c
Hallo Roelof,
Op dinsdag 30-04-02 (12:06) schreef je me:
RO I'll give you my filter.
RO There are a few things important for the filter, those are:
RO Source: Your Inbox
RO Target: Your tbudl folder
RO String: Reply-To: tbudl
RO Location: Kludges
RO Presence: Yes
RO Active: Must be checked
ON Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 2:33:38 PM, you wrote:
FvL It still doesn't work ...
Hi Fré,
I have excatly the same filter like Reolof described and it has worked
for me. Some special interest point to re-check:
- Put it on top of you incoming mail sort list
- Check if it is looking in the
Hello Gerard!
On Tuesday 30-04-02 (15:37) you wrote:
G - Put it on top of you incoming mail sort list - Check if it
G is looking in the Kludges - Check presence is YES - Check
G Active Marked - check Manual only Un-Marked
--
In the meantime I had added a second filter (i.e. full
Hello Roelof!
It finally works. I combined your tips with the help of Gerard
and ...filtering is perfect now. I made a filter for outgoing
mail too, 'll see if it works as well.
Read you,
Fré.
Visit www.skripton.com
Reactions mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello David!
On Saturday 27-04-02 (23:03) you wrote:
DE May be the message is being caught by another filter first ?
--
I typed the wrong item in the 'location' box and will see
what's going to happen with 'kludges' instead ...
Read you,
Fré.
Visit
Hello Roelof,
Op Saturday 27-04-02 (22:54) you wrote:
RO Do these messages trigger another filter first? Unless it's
RO specifically checked, the first matching filter stops
RO comparing messages to the other filters. (See options in
RO the filter properties)
--
I had started (10
This is a forwarded message
From: Fré van Limpt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, April 29, 2002, 7:37:41 PM
Subject: Filter strings
===8==Original message text===
Hello Roelof,
I have just given up 'kludges' as location, I'll see what
Hello udlers,
To receive my TB!UDL messages in a separate folder i gave up
the Reply-To e-mail address in this message. Since yesterday i
receive them in my Inbox folder. Is my filter string incorrect?
Read you,
Fré.
Visit www.skripton.com
Reactions mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Fré
On 27 April 2002 at 21:19:04 +0200 (which was 20:19 where I live) Fré van
Limpt thoughtfully wrote the following
FvL To receive my TB!UDL messages in a separate folder i gave up
FvL the Reply-To e-mail address in this message. Since
Hello David!
On Saturday 27-04-02 (21:25) you wrote:
DE this is a cut of my filter. It works for me.
--
(SOT) My blood must be of bad quality (i ate garlic): bat still
doesn't fly the right direction...
You'll hear from me.
Visit www.skripton.com
Reactions mailto:[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings David
On 27 April 2002 at 20:25:04 +0100 (which was 20:25 where I live) David
Elliott rearranged electrons to get
DE this is a cut of my filter. It works for me.
...
I have just had a look at that filter. For some reason I have an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Fré
On 27 April 2002 at 21:58:12 +0200 (which was 20:58 where I live) Fré van
Limpt wrote
DE this is a cut of my filter. It works for me.
FvL (SOT) My blood must be of bad quality (i ate garlic): bat still
FvL doesn't fly the right direction...
Hello Fré,
On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 21:19:04 +0200GMT (27-4-02, 21:19 +0200GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
FvL To receive my TB!UDL messages in a separate folder i gave up
FvL the Reply-To e-mail address in this message. Since yesterday i
FvL receive them in my Inbox folder. Is my filter string
Hello ztrader,
On Sat, 26 Aug 2000 20:27:56 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, August 27, 2000, 10:27:56 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
ztrader wrote:
Saturday, August 26, 2000, 5:14:46 PM, you wrote:
MDP 1) Set up a filter which specifies a match string of '[X-SBClass:
MDP
Thanks for the examples of implementation. Actually, I was interested
in seeing the notation used in the strings placed in TB.
For a simple OR function, would we have:
'[str A]|[str B]'
is it OK to put spaces outside brackets as:
' [str A] | [str B] '
(I understand the ' chr is needed -
Hello ztrader,
On Monday, August 28, 2000 at 07:40:48 GMT -0700 (which was 7:40 AM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
For a simple OR function, would we have:
'[str A]|[str B]'
I think you may be getting confused here. You don't need the
apostrophes or the square brackets. Just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Januk,
On 28 August 2000 at 12:26:37 GMT -0700 (which was 20:26 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Spam filter strings?":
For a simple OR function, would we have:
'[str A]|[str B]'
JA I
Monday, August 28, 2000, 12:54:10 PM, you wrote:
For a simple OR function, would we have:
'[str A]|[str B]'
I've backed off from using the | for now, and have a more basic
question.
Let me give a specific example. I have a rule that has two strings in
two sets in the Alternatives section.
Saturday, August 26, 2000, 8:45:44 PM, you wrote:
JA I think your filter string is probably to blame here. I find using
JA the pipe symbol for OR is ambiguous.
Are you suggesting that it does not work as an OR, or is there
something wrong with the string I was using?
JA Try the following:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi ztrader,
On 27 August 2000 at 06:32:01 GMT -0700 (which was 14:32 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Spam filter strings?":
JA I think your filter string is probably to blame here.
Sunday, August 27, 2000, 6:50:08 AM, you wrote:
z Perhaps I was confused by reading help. I thought adding another set
z implied an AND function, as per the example in help. I note that there
z are two places to put in multiple strings, though. Is the
z 'Alternatives' section an implied OR for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi ztrader,
On 27 August 2000 at 07:44:08 GMT -0700 (which was 15:44 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Spam filter strings?":
MDP Exactly.
z OK - got that :-). Might be worth a mention in the
Hallo ztrader,
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000 07:44:08 -0700 GMT (27/08/2000, 22:44 +0800 GMT),
ztrader wrote:
z OK - got that :-). Might be worth a mention in the help file.
Yep.
z Still a bit of fog here. Are you suggesting that I can make a
z construct like:
z (A or B or (C and D and (E or F)))?
No
Hallo Marck,
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000 16:01:49 +0100 GMT (27/08/2000, 23:01 +0800 GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP Well, 'A' is a simple test on the main filter page, 'B' is the first
MDP Alternative set while the second alternative set is far more complex
MDP containing three match strings
Hi ztrader Marck,
z Still a bit of fog here. Are you suggesting that I can make a
z construct like:
z (A or B or (C and D and (E or F)))?
Well, 'A' is a simple test on the main filter page, 'B' is the
first Alternative set while the second alternative set is far
more complex containing
Now that we've established that it is possible to have complex
conditions in rules, it would be helpful to me to see exactly how it
is implemented in TB, with all the necessary extra characters in just
the right places. Sometimes a few good examples are worth a lot of
words and emails :-).
This
Hello ztrader,
On Sunday, August 27, 2000 at 18:38:27 GMT -0700 (which was 6:38 PM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Now that we've established that it is possible to have complex
conditions in rules, it would be helpful to me to see exactly how it
is implemented in TB, with all
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 27.08.00:
snip
If you really hate to use the '|' operator, or somehow '|' doesn't
work (it always works here, so I use it all the time), you may parse
the same condition to
I never got this '|' working properly. I tried everything what is described in the
I'm trying to set up some strings to filter spam. The actual filtering
will be done by a procmail receipe that will add header lines to allow
additional filtering by TB.
I'm a bit unsure of the exact syntax TB needs. An example string is:
[X-SBClass: Blocked | X-SBClass: Spam | X-SBClass: Bulk]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi ztrader,
On 27 August 2000 at 16:50:50 GMT -0700 (which was 00:50 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Spam filter strings?":
z I'm a bit unsure of the exact syntax TB needs. An exampl
Saturday, August 26, 2000, 5:14:46 PM, you wrote:
MDP 1) Set up a filter which specifies a match string of '[X-SBClass:
MDP Blocked]|[X-SBClass: Spam]|[X-SBClass: Bulk]' location "Kludges"
MDP presence "Yes".
Thanks for the tip. I set it up as you suggested. Here's a copy of the
string right
Hello ztrader,
On Saturday, August 26, 2000 at 20:27:56 GMT -0700 (which was 8:27 PM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Thanks for the tip. I set it up as you suggested. Here's a copy of the
string right out of the 'strings' box:
'[X-SBClass: Blocked]|[X-SBClass: Spam]|[X-SBClass:
36 matches
Mail list logo
