On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 15:41:19, Mike email (The Bat!) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Saturday, August 7, 2004, 9:27:58 AM, Bill McQuillan wrote:
BM>> I had to insert the Sender: header field manually (as X-Sender!) and
BM>> I had to save the message into the Outbox to get the Bat! to let me
BM>> p
Hi
Saturday, August 7, 2004, 9:27:58 AM, Bill McQuillan wrote:
BM> On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 12:32:38, Zonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have never seen a msg with multiple address in the From: field.
>> Maybe you could send one to demonstrate?
BM> I had to insert the Sender: header field manu
Hallo Alexander,
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 17:15:44 +0200GMT (9-8-2004, 17:15 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
ASK> You and Allie are using 2.13beta - and the messages do not thread. HA! :-)
So am I and here they threaf.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
The Bat! 2.13 "Lucky" Beta/4
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Serv
Alexander S. Kunz, [ASK] wrote:
> Ungh, now this one doesn't thread at my end! :-/
> Anybody else?
Yes. That one lacked both In-Reply-To and Reference headers.
--
Allie Martin [List Moderator and fellow end-user]
The Bat! v2.13 "Lucky" Beta/3 on WinXP Pro (SP1)
. And the only thing the B
Hi Zonnet
-
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, at 19:34:16 [GMT +0200] (which was 10:34 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> Hi Allie,
> The answer is Xray. I remove everything that is not strictly needed. I am
> slightly paranoid. I left the msg id in and TB uses that to
ON Sunday, August 8, 2004, 8:31:18 PM, you wrote:
AM> I've noted that your messages are not threading. Upon checking, they
AM> seem to lack the In-Reply-To: header which should contain the id of
AM> the message that you're replying to.
AM> I wonder where that header is disappearing to?
AM> Are
Hello Jan Rifkinson,
08-Aug-2004 20:29, you wrote:
> Hi Pete. I assume all msgs have been read.
Ungh, now this one doesn't thread at my end! :-/
Anybody else?
--
Best regards,
Alexander
I like pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as
equals. -- Winston Churchill
__
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
> OIC. Just looked at the first message were you reported broken threading,
> and in that signature I saw 2.13...
Yes. I use v2.13 beta/3 at home and I use v2.12.00 at work. :)
--
-=[ Allie ]=- :acm:
List Moderator and fellow end-user
PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com
R
Hi Alexander and list,
On Monday, August 9, 2004 at 17:15:44 GMT +0200 (which was 17:15 where
I live) Alexander S. Kunz wrote (at least in parts) and made these
valuable points on the subject of "Messages lacking In-Reply-To:
header and not threading (Was:Re: Harvest Sender Email Addr
Hello Allie Martin,
09-Aug-2004 17:56, you wrote:
>> You and Allie are using 2.13beta - and the messages do not thread.
>> HA! :-)
> I thought you were on to something but I'm now here at work, using
> v2.12.00, and Gerard's messages are still not threading.
OIC. Just looked at the first messag
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
> Those messages do thread fine here at my end, too. I am using
> version 2.12.00 of TB, and those who report threadings works just
> fine are using, as far as the information is availabe, the 2.12.xx
> version ,too.
> You and Allie are using 2.13beta - and the messages d
Hello Kevin Amazon,
09-Aug-2004 00:53, you wrote:
> Strangely enough, I see the reference headers in Gerard's message but not
> In-Reply-To header and his messages do not thread on my system either.
Those messages do thread fine here at my end, too. I am using version
2.12.00 of TB, and those wh
Hi Roelof Otten
-
On Sun, 8 Aug 2004, at 23:49:11 [GMT +0200] (which was 2:49 PM where I
live) you wrote:
AM>> I've noted that your messages are not threading. Upon checking, they
AM>> seem to lack the In-Reply-To: header which should contain the id of
Hallo Allie,
On Sun, 8 Aug 2004 13:31:18 -0500GMT (8-8-2004, 20:31 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
AM> I've noted that your messages are not threading. Upon checking, they
AM> seem to lack the In-Reply-To: header which should contain the id of
AM> the message that you're replying to.
Gerard's m
On Saturday, August 07, 2004 it appears that Pete Holsberg
wrote the following in regards to "Harvest Sender Email Addresses??":
PH> Addressbook group did not get any additions.
PH> Seems like it should work but nothing happens.
PH> ???
Here's a copy of my filter whic
On Friday, August 06, 2004 it appears that Pete Holsberg
wrote the following in regards to "Harvest Sender Email Addresses??":
JR>> I may not understand what you want either but have you looked @
JR>> filters | actions | Add address(es) to Address Book
PH> I ha
Zonnet, [Z] wrote:
> You have proven it to be technically possible to do this but I do
> not see the value of multiple addresses in the From: field.
I've noted that your messages are not threading. Upon checking, they
seem to lack the In-Reply-To: header which should contain the id of
the message
ON Saturday, August 7, 2004, 10:27:58 AM, you wrote:
BM> I had to insert the Sender: header field manually (as X-Sender!) and
BM> I had to save the message into the Outbox to get the Bat! to let me
BM> put my address into the Sender: field.
Well Bill,
You have proven it to be technically possib
ON Saturday, August 7, 2004, 10:01:01 PM, you wrote:
PH> Cool! Where do I put this? It doesn't seem to fit the point-and-click
PH> filter creation in TB.
PH> Thanks.
Pete,
Copy the filter with CTRL-C from BeginFilter to EndFilter
Go to sorting office and select read messages.
Press CTRL-V and pr
Friday, August 6, 2004, 4:08:40 PM, you wrote:
Z> ON Friday, August 6, 2004, 9:45:10 PM, you wrote:
PH>> I have a folder full of email messages.
PH>> I would like to -- automagically, extract from each message the email address of
PH>> the sender and append it to a text file in a specified direc
Friday, August 6, 2004, 4:35:50 PM, you wrote:
JR> Hi Pete. I assume all msgs have been read.
JR> Open Sorting office
JR> Click on 'Read' Messages
JR> Click 'New'
JR> At strings add "@" w/o quotes
Changed this to \w
when the @ had no affect.
JR> Under Actions Tab select "Add addre
Hallo Bill,
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 01:27:58 -0700GMT (7-8-2004, 10:27 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
>> I have never seen a msg with multiple address in the From: field.
>> Maybe you could send one to demonstrate?
BM> I had to insert the Sender: header field manually (as X-Sender!) and
BM> I had t
On Sat, 2004-08-07 at 01:27:58, Bill McQuillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 12:32:38, Zonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have never seen a msg with multiple address in the From: field.
>> Maybe you could send one to demonstrate?
> I had to insert the Sender: header fiel
On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 12:32:38, Zonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have never seen a msg with multiple address in the From: field.
> Maybe you could send one to demonstrate?
I had to insert the Sender: header field manually (as X-Sender!) and
I had to save the message into the Outbox to get th
Hallo Bill,
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:38:43 -0700GMT (6-8-2004, 18:38 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
BM> It is quite easy for a message to have multiple authors. This is
BM> what the "From:" header field is intended to show. In fact, one of
BM> the uses of the "Sender:" header field is to show the
On Friday, August 06, 2004 it appears that Pete Holsberg
wrote the following in regards to "Harvest Sender Email Addresses??":
JR>> I may not understand what you want either but have you looked @
JR>> filters | actions | Add address(es) to Address Book
PH> I ha
ON Friday, August 6, 2004, 9:45:10 PM, you wrote:
PH> I have a folder full of email messages.
PH> I would like to -- automagically, extract from each message the email address of
PH> the sender and append it to a text file in a specified directory.
Hi Pete,
Try this filter. It is set to manual
Friday, August 6, 2004, 12:48:46 PM, you wrote:
JR> On Friday, August 06, 2004 it appears that Pete Holsberg wrote the
JR> following in regards to "Harvest Sender Email Addresses??":
>>>> One is to write a filter that add the name to an address book when they
>&
ON Friday, August 6, 2004, 6:38:43 PM, you wrote:
BM> It is quite easy for a message to have multiple authors. This is
BM> what the "From:" header field is intended to show. In fact, one of the
BM> uses of the "Sender:" header field is to show the actual, single
BM> sender of the message when ther
ON Friday, August 6, 2004, 5:27:55 PM, you wrote:
PH> Sorry to be ambiguous. What I want is to harvest each From address from
PH> a group of email messages.
Hi Pete,
I guessed as much, so all those options I gave you will work.
I have used them myself.
--
Best regards,
Gerard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
On Friday, August 06, 2004 it appears that Pete Holsberg wrote the
following in regards to "Harvest Sender Email Addresses??":
>>> One is to write a filter that add the name to an address book when they
>>> arrive. YOu can export these later to a CSV file which you can
On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 00:59:05, Zonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I assumed that the "multiple From addresses" was I typo.
> Think about it. How can I child have multiple fathers? oops
It is quite easy for a message to have multiple authors. This is what the "From:"
header field is intended to
Thursday, August 5, 2004, 7:04:38 PM, you wrote:
BM> On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 14:22:15, Zonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ON Thursday, August 5, 2004, 5:56:21 PM, you wrote:
PH>>> In TheBat 2.10, is there away to harvest all sender email
PH>>> addresses (i.e, the entire "From:" line)
PH>>> to an
ON Friday, August 6, 2004, 1:04:38 AM, you wrote:
BM> The question (IMHO) asks about multiple From addresses in a single message, not
BM> multiple messages in a folder.
Hi Bill,
I assumed that the "multiple From addresses" was I typo.
Think about it. How can I child have multiple fathers? oops
On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 14:22:15, Zonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ON Thursday, August 5, 2004, 5:56:21 PM, you wrote:
PH>> In TheBat 2.10, is there away to harvest all sender email
PH>> addresses (i.e, the entire "From:" line)
PH>> to an external file?
> Hi Pete,
> There are a few ways to do
Thu, 5 Aug 2004 12:06:00 -0400 (12:06 PM EDT here) Pete Holsberg wrote:
> Cool. Where do I learn about filters and macros?
TheBat! => Help
Help Topics
Index
[Filters]
Display
TheBat! => Help
Help Topics
I
ON Thursday, August 5, 2004, 5:56:21 PM, you wrote:
PH> In TheBat 2.10, is there away to harvest all sender email
PH> addresses (i.e, the entire "From:" line)
PH> to an external file?
Hi Pete,
There are a few ways to do this.
One is to write a filter that add the name to an address book when th
Dear Pete,
@5-Aug-2004, 12:06 -0400 (05-Aug 17:06 UK time) Pete Holsberg said
to Marck:
>>> In TheBat 2.10, is there away to harvest all sender email
>>> addresses (i.e, the entire "From:" line) to an external file?
MDP>> Yes, using a "manual" filter. You would export each message,
MDP>> appendi
Thursday, August 5, 2004, 11:59:28 AM, you wrote:
MDP> Dear Pete,
MDP> @5-Aug-2004, 11:56 -0400 (05-Aug 16:56 UK time) Pete Holsberg said
MDP> to tbudl:
>> In TheBat 2.10, is there away to harvest all sender email
>> addresses (i.e, the entire "From:" line) to an external file?
MDP> Yes, using
Thursday, August 5, 2004, 11:57:59 AM, you wrote:
MDP> Dear Pete,
MDP> @5-Aug-2004, 11:56 -0400 (05-Aug 16:56 UK time) Pete Holsberg said
MDP> to tbudl:
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
>> http://www.silve
Dear Pete,
@5-Aug-2004, 11:56 -0400 (05-Aug 16:56 UK time) Pete Holsberg said
to tbudl:
> In TheBat 2.10, is there away to harvest all sender email
> addresses (i.e, the entire "From:" line) to an external file?
Yes, using a "manual" filter. You would export each message,
appending to a file, us
Hi,
In TheBat 2.10, is there away to harvest all sender email addresses (i.e, the entire
"From:" line)
to an external file?
Thanks.
Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
42 matches
Mail list logo
