Re: I have returned

Hi Dave, The original quoted text below was written on 20/01/2005 17:08 my local time; I'm using TBird's filtering, and while there are things I miss about TB!'s more advanced filtering, at least TBird's filtering works smoothly with IMAP, which last I tried TB!, the filtering with IMAP was ver

Re: I have returned

Peter Fjelsten @ 2005-Jan-20 2:37:52 PM "I have returned" <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Finally, most developers consider it either bad taste or a violation >> of open-source licenses to look at code and then re-implement the >> same functionality. > May

Re: I have returned

Friday, January 21, 2005, 1:13:29 PM, Gerard wrote: > I believe on of the changes in version 3 was that they have re-written TB! in > C+ Nope, PEid says it's Borland Delphi 6.0-7.0 -- Best regards, Buiculescu Virgil mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __

Re: I have returned

ON Thursday, January 20, 2005, 8:30:10 PM, you wrote: C> Also, Thunderbird is written in C++; The Bat! is written in Delphi. Chris, I believe on of the changes in version 3 was that they have re-written TB! in C+ -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: I have returned

On Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 5:14:52 PM [GMT -0500], Peter Fjelsten wrote: > I think you may misunderstand (I must have been unclear). I have set > the key <'> to move to the next unread message (PowerPro translates > this to the different keystrokes I have set in TB!). This does not > interfe

Re: I have returned

Allie, On 20-01-2005 22:09, you [A] wrote in : >> Do as I do. Use PowerPro to get all the different keyboard shortcuts >> to respond to '. A> That works well until I wish to really do a quick search and instead of A> 'n' appearing as it should in the quick search string ent

Re: I have returned

Hi Peter Fjelsten, On 20/01/2005 12:17 PM, you wrote: > Do as I do. Use PowerPro to get all the different keyboard shortcuts to > respond to '. That works well until I wish to really do a quick search and instead of 'n' appearing as it should in the quick search string entry field, I keep going

Re: I have returned

Chris, On 20-01-2005 20:30, you [C] wrote in : C> Finally, most developers consider it either bad taste or a violation C> of open-source licenses to look at code and then re-implement the C> same functionality. Maybe they could have a small sneak peek... :) -- Best regar

Re: Re: I have returned

Peter Fjelsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 2005-Jan-20 at Thu PM 12:17:51 EST, wrote: > Yes. But it should be pretty easy for RitLabs to look at the source for > Thunderbird (it being open) and pore over what _they_ have done to get > it all to work as well (?) as it does. :) It may be possible for

Re: I have returned

Allie, On 20-01-2005 17:24, you [A] wrote in : A> Keyboard navigation is nice and easy. I hit 'n' to move to the next A> unread message. It's very awkward leaving the letter 'n' to hit A> 'CTRL+]'. Do as I do. Use PowerPro to get all the different keyboard shortcuts to resp

Re: I have returned

Chris Weaven said the following on 01/20/2005 10:52: If I were to be totally honest here, the only thing I'm really missing from TB! is templates. Working with Thunderbird and IMAP with server side filtering for a few months now has made me realise that I'm not as reliant on TB! as I thought I w

Re: I have returned

Hi Allie, The original quoted text below was written on 20/01/2005 16:32 my local time; ThunderBird's filter matching and actions options aren't as numerous as with TB!. However, ThunderBird's works while TB!'s is problematic and often doesn't work. As a result despite all of TB!'s fancy filterin

Re: I have returned

Hi Chris Weaven, On 20/01/2005 04:29 AM, you wrote: > Obviously I miss lots of features within TB!, especially templates and > certain aspects of filtering, but I'm able to carry out server side > filtering which has cushioned the blow somewhat. I forgot about filtering. How could I?! :) The

Re: I have returned

Hi Roman Katzer, On 19/01/2005 11:13 PM, you wrote: > I'm curious. What do you see as the most important advantages and > disadvantages of both clients? What do you like most and least about both? My sentiments are based on my being a full IMAP user: ThunderBird is simpler so more attention is

Re: I have returned

Hi, The original quoted text below was written on 19/01/2005 22:33 my local time; I tried Thunderbird for about two months. I am back to the bat. Great program. I must confess, I've been using Thunderbird for about 2-3 months now. The main reason for this is that I personally find IMAP support

Re: I have returned

Hi Allie, On Wednesday, January 19, 2005, 19:49:19, Allie Martin wrote: > One things for sure. My fluent use of ThunderBird has opened up my > eyes to a lot of problems with TB! and the reverse certainly/obviously > applies as well. I'm curious. What do you see as the most important advantages an

Re: I have returned

On Wednesday, January 19, 2005 at 5:33:42 PM [GMT -0500], Michael L. Wilson wrote: > I tried Thunderbird for about two months. I am back to the bat. > Great program. I was using ThunderBird pretty much exclusively for a couple months myself. I've since started using TB! at home and ThunderBird at

Re: I have returned

Hello Michael, Wednesday, January 19, 2005, 2:33:42 PM, you wrote: > I am back to the bat. Missed your long signatures. ;-) -- Thanks, Terry Using the Bat! 3.0.1 RC4 under Windows XP Service Pack 2 2600 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using T

Re: I have returned

Hello Michael, on Wednesday, 19. January 2005, at 14:33:42 [GMT -0800] you wrote regarding "I have returned": > I tried Thunderbird for about two months. I am back to the bat. > Great program. Nice to have you back. Back to the roots :) -- Ciao Thomas Using: TheBat!

I have returned

TB UDL ERS, I tried Thunderbird for about two months. I am back to the bat. Great program. -- Michael L. Wilson The Bat: 3.0.1.33 Windows XP version:5.1 [Build:2600] Service Pack 2 Link to my public key: http://snipurl.com/bevn Current versi