Hi Thomas,
on Fri, 11 Jun 2004 23:01:58 +0700GMT, you wrote:
PM>> [Total Commander]
TF> No, TC can change file dates but not the dates of the messages in a
TF> .tbb file.
Yes, I see. Good thing the problem could be solved anyway. *S*
TF> It's a good tool though, it can do many things. I bought
Hello Peter,
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:07:08 +0200 GMT (11/06/2004, 02:07 +0700 GMT),
Peter Meyns wrote:
SM>> Is there anyway from within The Bat that I can change these dates
SM>> (using an appropriate offset)? Failing this, is there an obvious
SM>> and safe way to do this to the files outside of T
Hi Marck,
Friday, June 11, 2004, 10:56:05 AM, you wrote:
MDP> Dear Stuart,
MDP> just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
MDP> instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Stuart.
I don't. Apologies to all. My signature is set correctly in my templates. I must hav
Hi MAU,
Friday, June 11, 2004, 12:07:56 AM, you wrote:
M> You may Tools/Export theses messages as .MSG, then delete them from
M> whatever folder you have them in and then do a Tools/import. The received
M> date and time will be that of when you do the import.
That cracked it. I set the clock back
On Thu 10 June 2004, 21:30:52 +1000, Stuart Moore wrote:
> The cmos battery failed on my computer and my computer date was set
> back a few years. A whole load of messages have been downloaded with a
> receive date set to a few years back. This is highly incovenient for
> message managenment purpos
Hello Stuart,
> The cmos battery failed on my computer and my computer date was set
> back a few years. A whole load of messages have been downloaded with a
> receive date set to a few years back. This is highly incovenient for
> message managenment purposes. Is there anyway from within The Bat th
Hi Peter,
Thursday, June 10, 2004, 8:07:08 PM, you wrote:
PM> Hi Stuart,
PM> on Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:30:52 +0100GMT, you wrote:
PM> I believe that you can do it with Total Commander. It is shareware, so
PM> try to get it done during the trial period. You might want to buy it
PM> anyhow... ;-) htt
Hi Stuart,
on Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:30:52 +0100GMT, you wrote:
SM> The cmos battery failed on my computer and my computer date
SM> was set back a few years. A whole load of messages have been
SM> downloaded with a receive date set to a few years back. This is
SM> highly incovenient for message mana
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\
~~( __ _"o Was Thu, 10 Jun 2004, at 12:30:52 +0100,
@ @ when Stuart Moore wrote:
> The cmos battery failed on my computer and my computer date was set
> back a few years. A whole load of messages have been downloaded with a
> re
The cmos battery failed on my computer and my computer date was set back a few years.
A whole load of messages have been downloaded with a receive date set to a few years
back. This is highly incovenient for message managenment purposes. Is there anyway
from within The Bat that I can change thes
Hallo znark,
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 08:11:27 +1000GMT (19-9-03, 0:11 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
z> What is the point to send an e-mail with only a subject header and
z> absolutely no other information?
It has no point. It's probably a mutilated message that's gotten to
you or a fragment that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
G'day Roelof,
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, at 01:24:28 [GMT +0200] (09:24 here) you wrote:
z>> How is it possible for this e-mail to get anywhere with only a
z>> subject header?
RO> Because the To: header isn't (shouldn't be) used for routing. You can
RO> p
Hallo Gerard,
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:35:42 +0200GMT (17-9-03, 13:35 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
G> It is that the TB! will not let you send an email without a To: address.
Yes, it does. TB doesn't whether you enter something in the To field.
Enter something in the BCC field and TB will send
ON Wednesday, September 17, 2003, 11:52:38 AM, you wrote:
RO> Sure. Create a message without a To: header, but with a BCC: Actually
RO> that's something that's recently being discussed and done on TBOT.
RO> Apart from that, there's no reason at all for messages to be sent from
RO> the address men
Hallo Gerard,
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 09:31:36 +0200GMT (17-9-03, 9:31 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO>> Because the To: header isn't (shouldn't be) used for routing. You can
RO>> put in your To: header what you like or don't use it at all. The
RO>> destination for a message gets transferred via
ON Wednesday, September 17, 2003, 1:24:28 AM, you wrote:
RO> Because the To: header isn't (shouldn't be) used for routing. You can
RO> put in your To: header what you like or don't use it at all. The
RO> destination for a message gets transferred via the so called 'smtp
RO> envelope' and it doesn'
Hallo znark,
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:09:49 +1000GMT (17-9-03, 0:09 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
z> How is it possible for this e-mail to get anywhere with only a
z> subject header?
Because the To: header isn't (shouldn't be) used for routing. You can
put in your To: header what you like or do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
G'day TBUDL,
I received this blank e-mail via my hotmail account.
All the e-mail contains is:
,--
| X-Hotpop-Folder: bulk
| Subject:
| X-Text-Classification: spam
`--
X-Hotpop-Folder: bulk
is added by hotmail popper and
X-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bat! people,
With the current almost script like macros of TB!, would it be
possible to somehow extract the fingerprint from a pgp key in a
message to later be able to send it to the person with the key in
order to confirm that the finger print is t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
G> It is logged as an official bug.
That's a shame. Let's hope it gets fixed soon.
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com
... The gene pool could use a lit
Hello Gerard,
> Hi MAU,
> This is a known bug. It also applies to flags.
Thanks for the info. I hope Stuart sees your message.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL
ON Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 5:23:18 PM, you wrote:
M> It could be. It could also be that you are running a beta.
Hi MAU,
This is a known bug. It also applies to flags.
It looks like the data from the msg is stored in a buffer and then
compared to the filter condition.
If there is an action, like
Hello Stuart,
> It's almost like the action to set the color group doesn't 'take'
> until all the filter processing has finished.
It could be. It could also be that you are running a beta.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
M> I do this with a number of addresses. Let's call them A, B, C,...
M> I have a number of filters, one next to the other, and all the same:
I tried something similar with color groups:
Each filter was set up like this:
If Recipient = X then
Hello Stuart,
> Just lately I have found myself mailing 2 or 3 of these people at the
> same time. Is there a way I can set up the filers so that if there are
> multiple addressees a copy goes to each folder without me ending up
> with the original being left in my inbox?
I do this with a number
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>> Do you SWIM?
TF> Perfectly. I think.
Indeed you do. Nice one.
TVM.
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com
... IAM 666 License plate number of the Beast
Hello Stuart,
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 10:33:55 +0100 GMT (15/07/03, 16:33 +0700 GMT),
Stuart Hemming wrote:
> Just lately I have found myself mailing 2 or 3 of these people at the
> same time. Is there a way I can set up the filers so that if there are
> multiple addressees a copy goes to each folder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a number of folders that I keep mail from specific individuals
in. I also have filters set up to move messages to/from those
individuals in to the appropriate box.
Just lately I have found myself mailing 2 or 3 of these people at the
same time.
Sorry, I should have put the comments I was responding to in front in
this case. Here they are:
D>> Is it possible to have auto cmplete for a nickname too. I used to be
D>> able to do this on the various Amiga EMailers and I kind of miss this.
ST> Try 1.60c - it should search for nicknames to
Yes but that is almost useless when you can't restrict it to the
nicknames only or at least cause it to search that field completely
prior to any others. If it finds a real name that matches the first
few characters of the nickname before it finds the nickname then it
stops. And YOU CAN'T MAK
Hello reclutamiento!
On Thursday, March 28, 2002 at 2:00:49 PM you wrote:
> The 1.60a
You'll only need this small fix if you use CryptoAPI.
> And how do I do the updating to the 1.60?
You already are on 1.6 ... to update to a later version: for betas and
small fixes there usually is a packed
Hello reclutamiento,
On the 28/03/2002, you babbled on about "Is this possible"
rsn> Try 1.60c - it should search for nicknames too...
rsn> -
rsn> Where can I get that 1.60c?
yes I`d like to know that too. on the site there only seem to be
download l
Try 1.60c - it should search for nicknames too...
-
Where can I get that 1.60c?
And how I install? Over the 1.60? or must be installed
indenpendentely.
Current Ver: 1.60 / 1.60a
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.c
Where can I get changes for thebat beta ?
The 1.60a
And how do I do the updating to the 1.60?
or the 1.60a must be run independentely of 1.60?
Current Ver: 1.60 / 1.60a
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EM
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, 12:03, you wrote:
> where can i get changes for thebat beta ? or subcribe to beta
> mailling list?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ Marcus
Current Ver: 1.60 / 1.60a
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscrib
Hello Stefan,
Thursday, March 28, 2002, 1:54:34 PM, you wrote:
ST> Hello Databug,
D>> Is it possible to have auto cmplete for a nickname too. I used to be
D>> able to do this on the various Amiga EMailers and I kind of miss this.
ST> Try 1.60c - it should search for nicknames too...
where can
Hello Databug,
D> Is it possible to have auto cmplete for a nickname too. I used to be
D> able to do this on the various Amiga EMailers and I kind of miss this.
Try 1.60c - it should search for nicknames too...
--
Sincerely,
Stefan
...You can tune a guitar, but you cant tuna fish.
Hello Databug,
On Tuesday, March 26, 2002 at 11:18:38 PM you wrote (at least in
part):
D> I would just prefer to search/autocomlete on nicknames as I
D> have severall Friends called Steve and the Bat always chooses the
D> first one
Have you already tried using ++ when you typed in the first
nam
PM, you wrote:
D> Hello Gene,
D> On the 26/03/2002, you babbled on about "Is this possible"
GG>> Every e-mail client I have used has that feature except BAT. I
GG>> requested it about two weeks ago and while they didn't say yes, they
GG>> also didn&#
Hello Gene,
On the 26/03/2002, you babbled on about "Is this possible"
GG> Every e-mail client I have used has that feature except BAT. I
GG> requested it about two weeks ago and while they didn't say yes, they
GG> also didn't say no. There was some private e-
No, what he means and I meant was the ability to auto complete the
nickname and also to restrict the search to the nickname. Current
implementation will stop if it finds a partial match in the name field
and may never reach the nickname that you were trying to use.
Tuesday, March 26, 2002,
Every e-mail client I have used has that feature except BAT. I
requested it about two weeks ago and while they didn't say yes, they
also didn't say no. There was some private e-mail back and forth as
to what I would expect, etc. so I think it was taken seriously.
Tuesday, March 26, 2002,
> Is it possible to have auto cmplete for a nickname too.
If you're asking whether TB! can complete a mailing address when you
type in the name of an individual or group recipient, the answer is
Yes. Add the nickname to the address book record under "Nickname
(Handle)," then type that nickname on
Hello all,
Is it possible to have auto cmplete for a nickname too. I used to be
able to do this on the various Amiga EMailers and I kind of miss this.
That`s all for now
--
__ _ _ __ _ _ __ __ _ _
_ //\/ _ /\/_ __/\/ _ /\/ __ /\/ // /\/ ___/\_
_/ // / / _ /
44 matches
Mail list logo
