Re: (OT): VMware (Was: OS's)

2000-04-11 Thread Tony Boom
This message: 11/04/2000 08:07 GMT. Sorry it took so long to reply but thanks for the dummies guide Steve. As soon as I get a chance (And the kids finish their homework) I'll try it. -- _ Best regards, [EMAIL PROT

Re: (OT): VMWare (Was: OS's)

2000-04-09 Thread tracer
Hello Steve Lamb, On Sun, 9 Apr 2000 02:17:29 -0700 GMT your local time, which was Sunday, April 09, 2000, 4:17:29 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Steve Lamb wrote: > On Sat, Apr 08, 2000 at 08:52:10PM +0100, Tony Boom wrote: >>You should have no trouble with a PII 400. They recommend a minum

Re: (OT): VMware (Was: OS's)

2000-04-09 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Steve, On Sun, 9 Apr 2000 02:27:35 -0700 GMT (09.04.2000, 17:27 +0800 GMT), Steve Lamb wrote: >> Personal email obviously, not to the list. SL> Nah, just marked it off topic in case someone else wanted to know. I appreciate it. :-) -- Cheers, Thomas m

(OT): VMware (Was: OS's)

2000-04-09 Thread Steve Lamb
On Sat, Apr 08, 2000 at 09:00:40PM +0100, Tony Boom wrote: > OK chaps... Any chance of a complete idiots step by step guide as to > Howto please. Whenever I've installed VMWare it refused to boot till I > installed an OS. I'm using Red Hat 6.1. OK, it is somewhat simple. Mind you I do

(OT): VMWare (Was: OS's)

2000-04-09 Thread Steve Lamb
On Sat, Apr 08, 2000 at 08:52:10PM +0100, Tony Boom wrote: >You should have no trouble with a PII 400. They recommend a minumum >P266. Mine is a P233MMX so I would notice the difference in speed >more than you Make sure you got plenty of Ram. I've run it on my P5-100 and

Re: OS's

2000-04-09 Thread Tony Boom
This message: 08/04/2000 20:50 GMT. Saturday, April 08, 2000, 3:01:24 PM, Gary wrote: G> Can you tell me by how much, and what type of machine are you G> running? I have a PII 400, and would love to move over to Linux, G> except like you for a few apps which are needed for W2K

Re: OS's

2000-04-09 Thread Tony Boom
This message: 08/04/2000 20:53 GMT. Saturday, April 08, 2000, 2:41:06 PM, Steve wrote: SL> This is not needed. Have VMware boot the raw device, not a particular SL> partition. Then in Windows have to different profiles, one for VMWare, one SL> for native. Once that is done you can u

Re: OS's

2000-04-08 Thread tracer
Hello Allie Martin, On Sat, 8 Apr 2000 12:07:23 -0500 GMT your local time, which was Sunday, April 09, 2000, 12:07:23 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Allie Martin wrote: > On Sat, 8 Apr 2000 09:01:24 -0500, Gary wrote: >> I am going to put VMWare on my W2K this weekend, and guest Linux. >> You me

Re: OS's

2000-04-08 Thread tracer
Hello Tony Boom, On Sat, 8 Apr 2000 10:04:38 +0100 GMT your local time, which was Saturday, April 08, 2000, 4:04:38 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Tony Boom wrote: > This message: 08/04/2000 09:48 GMT. > Saturday, April 08, 2000, 9:14:57 AM, Marck wrote: MDP>> Yes. VMWare (mentioned by St

Re: OS's

2000-04-08 Thread Allie Martin
On Sat, 8 Apr 2000 09:01:24 -0500, Gary wrote: > I am going to put VMWare on my W2K this weekend, and guest Linux. > You mention above speed is greatly reduced. Can you tell me by how > much, and what type of machine are you running? I have a PII 400, > and would love to move over to Linux, exc

Re[2]: OS's

2000-04-08 Thread Gary
Hi Tracer, On Friday, April 07, 2000, 8:12:56 PM, you wrote in part about "OS's": t> As Corel has or probably will have Inprise (g) I would asume that t> there is a real good chance that Corel will push it since they are t> in the Linux market. Getting that compiler out

Re[2]: OS's

2000-04-08 Thread Gary
Hi Tony, On Saturday, April 08, 2000, 4:04:38 AM, you wrote in part about "OS's": T> It is in fact Windows in a window. Personally I think if you T> want to run Windows applications you should run Windows. The only T> reason I run Windows is because of two p

Re: OS's

2000-04-08 Thread Steve Lamb
On Sat, Apr 08, 2000 at 10:04:38AM +0100, Tony Boom wrote: > VMWare isn't really a Windows emulator. It's a virtual hard drive and > for it to work you have to install Windows or whatever OS you want. It is not a virtual hard drive, it is a virtual machine. > So in fact I have two i

Re: OS's

2000-04-08 Thread Tony Boom
This message: 08/04/2000 09:48 GMT. Saturday, April 08, 2000, 9:14:57 AM, Marck wrote: MDP> Yes. VMWare (mentioned by Steve Lamb) is a Virtual Machine which will MDP> run on both Windows and Linux allowing one to be "booted" within the MDP> other. To run VMware on both Linux and Win

Re: OS's

2000-04-08 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 8 Apr 00, at 11:03, Thomas Fernandez wrote about "Re: OS's": > AVK> OS/2 port will probably become available in the due time, too, since > AVK> Win32/OS2 project has been incorporated into the Wine one about a year > AVK> ago... > &

Re: OS's

2000-04-08 Thread Steve Lamb
On Sat, Apr 08, 2000 at 09:14:57AM +0100, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: > Yes. VMWare (mentioned by Steve Lamb) is a Virtual Machine which will > run on both Windows and Linux allowing one to be "booted" within the > other. Yup. Allows for some fun tricks. For example, when I tried VMWare i

Re: OS's

2000-04-08 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi Thomas, On 08 April 2000 at 11:03:33 GMT +0800 (which was 04:03 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "OS's": > Speaking of Wine, which I have seen mentioned on this list a couple > of times... I understand it is a Win

Re: OS's

2000-04-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Steve, On Fri, 7 Apr 2000 23:18:46 -0700GMT (08/04/2000, 14:18 +0800GMT), Steve Lamb wrote: >> www.winlinux.net/ SL> It isn't a Linux emulator that runs under Windows, it is just a version of SL> Linux which is easy to install for Windows users. I read the page and it looks like my RAM

Re: OS's

2000-04-07 Thread Steve Lamb
Friday, April 07, 2000, 8:20:14 PM, Chris wrote: > I know that there is a Linnux emulator that runs under > windows. www.winlinux.net/ Uhm, no. Read the page. "WinLinux 2000 is the only Linux system that installs as easily as any Windows application automatically detecting and configuring m

Re: OS's

2000-04-07 Thread tracer
Hello Chris VanHonk, On Fri, 7 Apr 2000 23:20:14 -0400 GMT your local time, which was Saturday, April 08, 2000, 10:20:14 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Chris VanHonk wrote: > Hello Bat-sters > I know that there is a Linnux emulator that runs under > windows. www.winlinux.net/ If its the one post

Re: OS's

2000-04-07 Thread tracer
Hello Gary, On Fri, 7 Apr 2000 12:55:41 -0500 GMT your local time, which was Saturday, April 08, 2000, 12:55:41 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Gary wrote: > Hi Marek, > On Friday, April 07, 2000, 12:20:47 PM, you wrote in part about "OS's": M>> Hello, Friday, April 0

Re[2]: OS's

2000-04-07 Thread Chris VanHonk
Hello Bat-sters I know that there is a Linnux emulator that runs under windows. www.winlinux.net/ -- guano, :-) Chris VanHonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=PGPKeyRequest Or go to http://www.vanhonk.com/key/ <> "Love is a perky elf dan

Re: OS's

2000-04-07 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Alexander, On Sat, 8 Apr 2000 01:15:15 +0400GMT (08/04/2000, 05:15 +0800GMT), Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: AVK> OS/2 port will probably become available in the due time, too, since AVK> Win32/OS2 project has been incorporated into the Wine one about a year AVK> ago... Speaking of Wine, whi

Re: OS's

2000-04-07 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 8 Apr 00, at 0:47, Thomas Fernandez wrote about "Re: OS's": > CV> What operating systems will TB run on? > > M$ products. A Linux/unix version has been requested repeatedly. I > don't know anything about OS/2. OS/2 port will probably be

Re: OS's

2000-04-07 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 7 Apr 00, at 12:55, Gary wrote about "Re[4]: OS's": > M> It will possible to do it, when Inprise create Delphi for Linux :-) > > I thought Borland had Delphi (shows you how far I have been out of > it). There must be some compiler that would work

Re[4]: OS's

2000-04-07 Thread Gary
Hi Marek, On Friday, April 07, 2000, 12:20:47 PM, you wrote in part about "OS's": M> Hello, Friday, April 07, 2000, You wrote: >> Hi Thomas, >> On Friday, April 07, 2000, 11:47:08 AM, you wrote in part about "OS's": T>>> M$ products. A

Re[3]: OS's

2000-04-07 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello, Friday, April 07, 2000, You wrote: > Hi Thomas, > On Friday, April 07, 2000, 11:47:08 AM, you wrote in part about "OS's": T>> M$ products. A Linux/unix version has been requested repeatedly. I T>> don't know anything about OS/2. > I also want

Re[2]: OS's

2000-04-07 Thread Gary Luther
Hello Thomas, Friday, April 07, 2000, 10:47:08 AM, you wrote: TF> Hallo Chris, TF> On Fri, 7 Apr 2000 12:23:49 -0400 GMT (08.04.2000, 00:23 +0800 GMT), TF> Chris VanHonk wrote: CV>> What operating systems will TB run on? TF> M$ products. A Linux/unix version has been requested repeatedly. I T

Re[2]: OS's

2000-04-07 Thread Gary
Hi Thomas, On Friday, April 07, 2000, 11:47:08 AM, you wrote in part about "OS's": T> M$ products. A Linux/unix version has been requested repeatedly. I T> don't know anything about OS/2. I also want to put my 2 cents in for a Linux version. I would love to see th

Re: OS's

2000-04-07 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Chris, On Fri, 7 Apr 2000 12:23:49 -0400 GMT (08.04.2000, 00:23 +0800 GMT), Chris VanHonk wrote: CV> What operating systems will TB run on? M$ products. A Linux/unix version has been requested repeatedly. I don't know anything about OS/2. BTW can someone tell me why I read "UNIX is a tra

OS's

2000-04-07 Thread Chris VanHonk
Hello Bat-sters What operating systems will TB run on? -- guano, :-) Chris VanHonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=PGPKeyRequest Or go to http://www.vanhonk.com/key/ <> "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from med