Hello Mark,
Tuesday, July 8, 2003, 9:25:46 AM, you wrote:
MP Hello Lawrence,
MP Tuesday, July 8, 2003, 3:33:28 PM, you wrote:
LJ Whats the latest on the oft requested ability to format outgoing mail
LJ messages?
LJ It would be great to even just embolden, underline or italicize.
MP Do you
Wednesday, October 30, 2002, 3:32:26 AM, Sudip wrote in message
mid:1063625593.20021030091726;ntc.net.np
SP Anything that comes to me like that is not read at all !
g Sudip, your friends must be 'better-trained' than mine - they
*will* insist on using stuff like Incredimail! joking
--
Cheers,
Monday, October 28, 2002, 7:43:54 PM, Jonathan wrote in message
mid:19517308906.20021028134354;certiflexdimension.com
JA There has been rumours that HTML will be supported in version 2
JA though, so RTF might just be pointless as HTML is probably supported
JA in a lot more clients than RTF.
Monday, October 28, 2002, 8:13:04 PM, Mark wrote in message
mid:6813457140.20021028121304;ahsoftware.net
MW Most of the styled text messages I receive from people are simply
MW the a text message using a different font, i.e., the sender preferred
MW that the recipient see the message in 10-point
Monday, October 28, 2002, 9:40:54 PM, pmf wrote in message
mid:11621038062.20021028164054;sprintmail.com
p my guess is that TB v.2 will support sending emails in HTML,
p so you'll have the features you want. I only hope it also has the
p ability not only to render a text only version, but also to
Monday, October 28, 2002, 11:16:38 PM, Miguel wrote in message
mid:1834822594.20021029001638;ermspain.com
MAU Specially when TB already
MAU includes a Rich Text Viewer? I wonder how many of the ones who have
MAU participated in this thread do use the RTV. And if they do, why? :-)
It does? I've
Bonjour Jonathan,
May I enter this thread just to mention that :
* HTML is not primarily a cosmetic format, but a semantic format : it is
a subset of XML and thus carry inherent qualities that goes far above
rtf.
* rtf itself is a thing of the past, since M$ itself is switching to
XML
* to
Bonjour Roelof,
Le mardi 29 octobre 2002 à 22:58:47, vous écriviez :
RO Hallo François,
RO On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 22:14:19 +0100GMT (29-10-02, 22:14 +0100GMT, where
RO I live), you wrote:
FP * rtf itself is a thing of the past, since M$ itself is switching
FP to XML
RO Why are you both bashing
Bonjour Roelof,
Le mardi 29 octobre 2002 à 22:58:47, vous écriviez :
RO Hallo François,
RO On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 22:14:19 +0100GMT (29-10-02, 22:14 +0100GMT, where
RO I live), you wrote:
FP * rtf itself is a thing of the past, since M$ itself is switching
FP to XML
RO Why are you both bashing
Roelof-
Tuesday, October 29, 2002, 1:58:47 PM, you wrote:
RO Why are you both bashing Microsoft and stating that they're the
RO standard everyone should adhere too?
Now, now, Roelof...just because M$ is switching over to xml doesn't
mean that it's a M$ standard. RTF *is* becoming a thing of the
On Monday, October 28, 2002, Pete Milne wrote in
mid:92276533584.20021028124303;milneweb.com:
JN from allowing bullets, italics, underlines, and bold?
PM Isn't that better served by Word or such? Send it as an attached file.
Pete,
Sometimes an attached file is fine, and the current design
On Monday, October 28, 2002, Jonathan Angliss wrote in
mid:19517308906.20021028134354;certiflexdimension.com:
JA Would you mean like the enchanced-text/rich text mode?
Yes.
--
JN
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
Mark,
On Monday, October 28, 2002, Mark Wieder wrote in
mid:6813457140.20021028121304;ahsoftware.net:
MW There are several centuries worth of literature that prove the point
MW that not only does text mode not need RTF or HTML formatting, but that
MW often simple text can get the point across
On Monday, October 28, 2002, Jonathan Angliss wrote in
mid:6020249812.20021028143255;certiflexdimension.com:
JA I've seen some people specifying fonts that look 'cool' on their
JA computer, but just didn't have the same desired affect on mine.
I agree. That's one reason to restrict any
Richard-
Monday, October 28, 2002, 2:03:29 PM, you wrote:
RW Yes but, if Joseph's wishes were acceded to, your *emphasize* would
RW actually show as bold font. No colours or anything fancy needed, just
RW the capability to have bold, italic etc as my newsreader Ameol already
RW does.
Ah... so
Hello Richard,
Monday, October 28, 2002, 10:03:29 PM, you wrote:
MW * I can also even *emphasize* certain words, or quote them.
MW If necessary, I can even SHOUT.
RW Yes but, if Joseph's wishes were acceded to, your *emphasize*
RW would actually show as bold font. No colours or anything fancy
On Mon, 28-Oct-2002 17:54 [GMT-0500]
myob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Richard,
Monday, October 28, 2002, 10:03:29 PM, you wrote:
* I can also even *emphasize* certain words, or quote them.
If necessary, I can even SHOUT.
Yes but, if Joseph's wishes were acceded to, your *emphasize*
On Monday, October 28, 2002, Allie C Martin wrote in
mid:122307102960.20021028211108;landscreek.net:
JN I don't know if you misunderstood my intent or if I misstated
JN the subject. I really should not have mentioned RTF, which is a
JN MS format. What I did mean is what, I believe, is
18 matches
Mail list logo