11/28/2016 1:56 PM
Hi Arkadiusz,
On 11/28/2016 Arkadiusz Gawlik wrote:
AG> Hello Jack,
AG> On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 5:35:21 PM, you wrote in subject of "Best
spam filter for TB!":
JSL>> Anyway, the long and short of this message is a request to learn what
this
Hello Jack,
On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 5:35:21 PM, you wrote in subject of "Best spam
filter for TB!":
JSL> Anyway, the long and short of this message is a request to learn what this
group
JSL> thinks is a good spam filter for TB! today. We are both running v6.xx and
JSL
little too cautious about it since K9 hasn't been upgraded in years and never
acted like malware in the past.
Anyway, the long and short of this message is a request to learn what this group
thinks is a good spam filter for TB! today. We are both running v6.xx and
Windows 10.
Much thanks for any a
Jeff,
If the TB4 plug-ins are compatible with TB5, you might want
to take a look at the Regula Anti-spam plug-in. I've been
using it ever since my mail server went to STARTLS (which
broke POPfile) about six months ago. After a bit of training
Regula seems to be doing a good job of catching the
Hello Jeff,
On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 you wrote:
JG> Hello Group
JG> I've been away from Windows for a while but I'm now back home with XP
JG> x64 and TheBat v 5.0.34.
JG> I see we no longer have the BayesIT (? spelling) plug in for a variety
JG> of reasons.
JG> What do people use/rec
Hello Group
I've been away from Windows for a while but I'm now back home with XP
x64 and TheBat v 5.0.34.
I see we no longer have the BayesIT (? spelling) plug in for a variety
of reasons.
What do people use/recommend in its place? It's useful to be able to
identify SPAM and have it moved to
Hallo Carren,
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:18:07 +1200GMT (26-7-2009, 9:18 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
CS> I'm using the built in BayesIT spam filter which works pretty
CS> well, but is there some way of setting it to filter incoming mail AFTER my
other filters have run?
No there i
Hello Carren,
Sunday, July 26, 2009, 9:18:07 AM, among other things, you wrote:
CS> I'm using the built in BayesIT spam filter which works pretty well, but
CS> is there some way of setting it to filter incoming mail AFTER my other
CS> filters have run?
I don't think so.
Hi
I'm using the built in BayesIT spam filter which works pretty well, but is
there some way of setting it to filter incoming mail AFTER my other filters
have run? In spite of me attempting to train it to recognise TBDUL mail as "not
junk" - much of my list mail is still ending
Hi
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 at 11:50:34 PM, in
, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
> you can de-select the show this window automatically check box. This
> will cause TB to ignore HTML pictures and act like TB used to.
Brilliant. I saw this window rarely enough that it was only a minor
irritation. Now you
Hi
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 at 10:04:47 PM, in
, Dwight Corrin wrote:
> you can always just allow everything
How? (Just curious.)
--
Best regards,
MFPA
Yellow snow is not lemon flavoured
Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
__
Hi
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 at 4:28:04 AM, in
, Jens Franik wrote:
> Mittwoch, 28. Januar 2009 at 01:05, Lynn wrote:
>> I'm not seeing an earth icon. Perhaps I have an
>> alternate skin or toolbox option?
> More likely, that you have to view a HTML Mail to make
> it appear.
It only appea
Mittwoch, 28. Januar 2009 at 01:05, Lynn wrote:
> I'm not seeing an earth icon.
> Perhaps I have an alternate skin or toolbox option?
More likely, that you have to view a HTML Mail to make it appear.
The other way is to customize the Toolbar and set up the Icon
yourself.
It is in All_A
Hello Lynn,
Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 6:05:21 PM, you wrote:
L> I discovered this accidentally a few minutes after I answered the last
L> mail. At least I found the checkbox; I'm not seeing an earth icon.
L> Perhaps I have an alternate skin or toolbox option?
It only appears when you are viewing
1/27/2009
SC> If you are referring to the URL manager then you can disable it entirely or
call
SC> it up as needed.
I was, yes.
SC> To open it click on the earth icon on the header bar and select
Show URL
SC> Manager. There you can de-select the show this window automatically check
Hello Lynn,
Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 3:03:21 PM, you wrote:
L> If the thing can't be disabled altogether, is it at least possible to
L> tell it to block or permit domain names? This business of
L> allowing/blocking each individual gif or jpg is totally insane! They
L> change with every mailing o
1/27/2009
DC> you can always just allow everything
I am thinking that will have to be it, and I'm sure I won't have to wait
long before I see it again. I haven't even been able to find a
way to bring the wretched thing up independently! I didn't think I was
any stupider than usual, but I've real
On Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 3:56:27 PM, Lynn wrote:
> Many have several roots, as many as 5 on the worst. And it is evident
> that they change the content from mailing to mailing, so that one
> determination is not enough. EBay notices frequently have several; since
> various items/vendors are i
1/27/2009
RO> You're talking about the Download URL manager, that isn't a spam
RO> filter, but gives you the possibility to configure from what sites you
RO> want to see the pictures and from what sites not.
RO> Don't select the individual messages, but their root when choosing to
RO> allo
jpg is totally insane! They
L> change with every mailing on much of this stuff, and filtering on those
L> defeats the purpose entirely!
You're talking about the Download URL manager, that isn't a spam
filter, but gives you the possibility to configure from what sites you
want to
Hi -
Since I upgraded the last time, this spam device has driven me bonkers.
I have just scanned over 800 messages here, and haven't found a fix, and
can only hope I haven't missed it. Thanks be that Batters are so good
about subject lines!
If the thing can't be disabled altogether, is it at le
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:25:06 +0200, Roelof Otten
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Well, you do that with selective download filters, those download the
>message headers and can kill the message from server before the full
>message will be downloaded.
>However, I've never used them myself as they length
Hallo Chris,
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:05:17 +1000GMT (10-6-2008, 10:05 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
C> I have misunderstood that option in the first place - I thought
C> that it looked at the from address while the message was still on
C> the server, and then would delete it without needing to
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 07:15:36 +0200, Roelof Otten
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hallo Chris,
>
>On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:00:08 +1000GMT (9-6-2008, 19:00 +0200, where I
>live), you wrote:
>
>C> Today I received an email from "Neco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>". The
>C> filter was triggered (the account log says
Hallo Chris,
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:00:08 +1000GMT (9-6-2008, 19:00 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
C> Today I received an email from "Neco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>". The
C> filter was triggered (the account log says that the email was
C> processed by "Spam (Known)".
That's good, isn't it? ;-)
C> P
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:00:08 +1000, Grumpy Gamer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Today I received an email from "Neco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>". The
>
Oops, list has munged the email. Let's try expanding it out a little:
"Neco less than sign newsletter at @ neco dot com dot au greater than
sign"
--
Re
Hi,
I have a filter thus:
Name: Spam (Known)
Condition: Sender Contains @neco.com.au
Action: Delete the Message from the Server
Today I received an email from "Neco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>". The
filter was triggered (the account log says that the email was
processed by "Spam (Known)". Problem is, the
Saturday, January 26, 2008, 6:03:14 PM, you wrote:
> I would ideally like to isolate spam for inspection rather
> than have it automatically deleted.
Mailwasher does not automatically delete on the server. Instead you
run it as a separate program and it shows you all incoming email
before you
Hi
On Saturday 26 January 2008 at 6:03:35 AM, in
, Costas Papadopoulos
wrote:
> One of my email addresses has recently started being flooded by
> spam. I wonder which spam filtering program you would recommend
> for me to use with The Bat.
I just use The Bat!'s own filters system. Needs only oc
Hello Robin,
Saturday, January 26, 2008, 10:08:50 AM, you wrote (possibly edited):
> I have used Popfile for several years very satisfactorily, but I use
> it for more than just classifying spam/not spam, I use it to classify
> mail into multiple work and personal categories.
I decided to try out
Hello Costas,
> I wonder which spam filtering program you would recommend for me to
> use with The Bat.
Yet another vote for AntispamSniper. Here are my current statistics:
Received messages: 46324
Error rate:0.28%
False negatives: 0.25%
False positives: 0.04%
--
Dave Goodman
The
I use Agava licensed version. But completely unsatisfied. Above all, their set
up file always setting up adware.They claim that it is auto removabl by license
key input, but exactly not!
If you have huge numbers of spam , i use MailWasher for business emails! It
works just great.
As a add-in
Hi Costas,
> One of my email addresses has recently started being flooded by
> spam. I wonder which spam filtering program you would recommend for
> me to use with The Bat.
Like Henk, I use AntiSpam Sniper, too. Only on rare occasions will a
previous version not work with an Alpha or Beta test ve
Yasus Costas,
-->> Samstag, 26. Januar 2008, 08:03:35:
> One of my email addresses has recently started being flooded by
> spam. I wonder which spam filtering program you would recommend for
> me to use with The Bat.
I am also using Antispamsniper (ASS). A the beginning of last year
I've made
Hi Costas,
on Saturday, January 26, 2008 at 07:03 you wrote in message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
among others:
> Hello,
> One of my email addresses has recently started being flooded by
> spam. I wonder which spam filtering program you would recommend for me to use
> with The Bat.
I use MailWash
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 at 08:03:35 +0200, Costas wrote:
> One of my email addresses has recently started being flooded by
> spam. I wonder which spam filtering program you would recommend for me to use
> with The Bat.
I have used Popfile for several years very satisfactorily, but I use
it for more t
I use K9 (http://keir.net/k9.html) as an external program and am fully
satisfied with it. An exerpt from my stats :
- Time period : 380 days
- Number of mails processed : 4618
- percentage of good mail : 26.94%
- percentage of spam : 73.06%
- false positive : 10
- false negative : 8
It is an aban
Hello Ian and Henk,
Saturday, January 26, 2008, 8:39:19 AM, you wrote (possibly edited):
> I am using the free version of Antispamsniper for the Bat! plugin and am very
> pleased with it!
I know people who use Mailwasher Pro and they also say it's very good.
In my case I don't have any serious
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, at 08:03:35 [GMT +0200] (which was 7:03 where I
live) Costas Papadopoulos wrote:
> One of my email addresses has recently started being flooded by spam.
> I wonder which spam filtering program you would recommend for me to use with
> The Bat.
I am using the free version of A
Hello,
One of my email addresses has recently started being flooded by spam. I wonder
which spam filtering program you would recommend for me to use with The Bat.
Thanks for any advice.
--
Best regards,
Costas
Current version is 3.99.27.2 |
Hello Roelof,
Saturday, September 30, 2006, 11:33:34 AM, you wrote:
Roelof> Hallo Granville,
Roelof> On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:41:55 +0100GMT (30-9-2006, 11:41 , where I
Roelof> live), you wrote:
GC>> Can you tell me where I can view the "X-Text-Classification: spam"
GC>> marker in emails that hav
Hallo Granville,
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:41:55 +0100GMT (30-9-2006, 11:41 , where I
live), you wrote:
GC> Can you tell me where I can view the "X-Text-Classification: spam"
GC> marker in emails that have been designated as Spam by The Bat!?
GC> This is just to see that it is working correctly.
Pr
Hi Granville,
on Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:41:55 +0100GMT (30.09.2006, 11:41 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
GC> Thursday, September 28, 2006, 8:02:14 PM, you wrote:
GC> Can you tell me where I can view the "X-Text-Classification: spam"
GC> marker in emails that have been designated as Spam by The Bat!?
GC
Hello Peter,
Thursday, September 28, 2006, 8:02:14 PM, you wrote:
Peter> Hello Granville Cousins,
Peter> on Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:41:26 +0100 (2006-09-28 15:41:26 in .nl) in the
Peter> message with reference
Peter> you [GC]
Peter> wrote (at least in part):
>>>> I am
Hello Peter,
Thursday, September 28, 2006, 8:02:14 PM, you wrote:
Peter> Hello Granville Cousins,
Peter> on Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:41:26 +0100 (2006-09-28 15:41:26 in .nl) in the
Peter> message with reference
Peter> you [GC]
Peter> wrote (at least in part):
>>>> I am
Hello Granville Cousins & everyone else,
on 28-Sep-2006 at 15:41 you (Granville Cousins) wrote:
> Where can I find this configuration in The Bat! filters section? I have
> looked in there and cannot see any place where I can request The Bat!
> to filter my email using the header classification.
On 26 Sep 2006, at 11:09, Marten Gallagher wrote:
Hello TBUDL,
I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it
possible to configure The Bat! to "Filter my email by adding:
X-Text-Classification: - to the Header line.
Yes
I have ticked this option
in Configurati
Hello Roelof Otten & everyone else,
on 26-Sep-2006 at 17:21 you (Roelof Otten) wrote:
> The first step to follow Peter's instructions would be to upgrade to
> v3, what Peter suggested can't be done with your 1.62r
But only the part with the common filters.
He doesn't need to upgrade to v3 to fi
Hello Roelof,
Tuesday, September 26, 2006, 4:21:33 PM, you wrote:
Roelof> Hallo Granville,
Roelof> On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:09:03 +0100GMT (26-9-2006, 12:09 , where I
Roelof> live), you wrote:
GC>> Can't quite figure out how to do that in The Bat!. Could you give me a
GC>> littel more step by ste
Hallo Granville,
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:09:03 +0100GMT (26-9-2006, 12:09 , where I
live), you wrote:
GC> Can't quite figure out how to do that in The Bat!. Could you give me a
GC> littel more step by step help please?
The first step to follow Peter's instructions would be to upgrade to
v3, what
> Can't quite figure out how to do that in The Bat!. Could you give me a
> littel more step by step help please?
Click > Account > Sorting Office/Filters
Account Drop Down Box: click on Common Filters
Click on the funnel top left
Right hand side: Name > change 'new filter' to 'K9 Junk' or somet
Hi Granville,
on Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:44:50 +0100GMT (26.09.2006, 10:44 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
GC> I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it
GC> possible to configure The Bat! to "Filter my email by adding:
GC> X-Text-Classification: - to the Heade
Hello Peter,
Tuesday, September 26, 2006, 10:55:31 AM, you wrote:
Peter> Hi Granville,
Peter> on Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:44:50 +0100GMT (26.09.2006, 10:44 +0200GMT here),
Peter> you wrote:
GC>> I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it
GC>> possible
> Hello TBUDL,
> I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it
> possible to configure The Bat! to "Filter my email by adding:
> X-Text-Classification: - to the Header line.
Yes
> I have ticked this option
> in Configuration/K9 but then am lost a
Hello TBUDL,
I am using K9 Spam filter on my machine running Windows 2000. Is it
possible to configure The Bat! to "Filter my email by adding:
X-Text-Classification: - to the Header line. I have ticked this option
in Configuration/K9 but then am lost as to how to get this to work
with Th
Hello Robin,
Thursday, February 2, 2006, 11:54:19 PM, you wrote:
> I thought the wireless hot spots (i.e. the ones around the city in Sydney
> and Melbourne, occasionally free in coffee shops, otherwise pay by credit
> card) only allowed http connections.
> I could be wrong, I only looked at it
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 at 18:05:13 +1100, John wrote:
> Unable to get mail using wireless hot spots with Bat & K9, although I can
> send mail.
I thought the wireless hot spots (i.e. the ones around the city in Sydney
and Melbourne, occasionally free in coffee shops, otherwise pay by credit
card) only
Hi Alexander,
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, at 19:29:59 [GMT+0100] (which was Fri, 5:29:59
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:
> y default, K9 listens on port , and not 110 (pop3 default).
Thanks, that is set up correctly.
On ADSL in Holiday Inn right now; all working fine.
Any other clues?
--
Joh
Hi Roelof,
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, at 13:34:13 [GMT+0100] (which was 23:34:13 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
> First thing that comes to mind is that it's a K9 issue. After all it
> doesn't matter to TB as it's always downloading from localhost.
Thinking about it, it may be the wireless provider
Hello John Phillips & everyone else,
on 02-Feb-2006 at 08:05 you (John Phillips) wrote:
> POP Server 127.0.0.1
By default, K9 listens on port , and not 110 (pop3 default). That may
be the culprit. I forget it each time I install K9 for someone. :-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.n
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 13:34:13 +0100
Roelof Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hallo John,
>
>On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:05:13 +1100GMT (2-2-2006, 8:05
>+0100, where I
>live), you wrote:
>
>JP> Unable to get mail using wireless hot spots with Bat &
>K9, although I can
>JP> send mail.
>
>First thing that co
Hallo John,
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:05:13 +1100GMT (2-2-2006, 8:05 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
JP> Unable to get mail using wireless hot spots with Bat & K9, although I can
JP> send mail.
First thing that comes to mind is that it's a K9 issue. After all it
doesn't matter to TB as it's always
Hi Bat! Fans,
Unable to get mail using wireless hot spots with Bat & K9, although I can
send mail.
No problems with dial up or broadband.
My settings are:-
POP Server 127.0.0.1
log in mail.bigpond.com/110/jp88
password x
Am I missing some reason why I cannot download with wireless?
I al
Hello Watcher & everyone else,
on 17-Dez-2004 at 21:10 you (Watcher) wrote:
>> I don't know of any "desktop" spam filter with Bayes analysis that comes
> Wow, that is strange to hear, it worked the instant I installed it, I
> trained it very little and it has
Hello Andrew,
A reminder of what Andrew on TBUDL typed on:
17 December 2004 at 22:15:37 GMT +0100
A> You know, I think I'll e-mail Firetrust about it. Wouldn't that be
A> cool?
His name is Nick Bolton, I have Mailwasher Pro as well and I totally agree with
you, it's by far the best spam k
Hello Alexander,
Friday, December 17, 2004, 1:25:25 PM, you wrote and sent the following:
> Having used
> SpamPal + Bayesian plugin, PopFile & lately K9, they all performed a lot
> better even after the shortest training periods.
It's why I use Malwasher Pro. Can include multiple e-mail accounts
Hello Watcher & everyone else,
on 17-Dez-2004 at 18:03 you (Watcher) wrote:
[ BayesIt ]
> It starts out with it's basic knowlege about spam
I don't know of any "desktop" spam filter with Bayes analysis that comes
with a pre-defined dictionary. You have to teach
ASK>> Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a
ASK>> day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh*
RHS> They usually get past k9 and BayesIt here also, but frankly I don't
RHS> mind. Some of them are quite funny, and once in awhile I'll "bite" on
R
Alexander,
Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 9:58:20 PM, you wrote:
ASK> Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a
ASK> day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh*
They usually get past k9 and BayesIt here also, but frankly I don't
mind. Some of them
Hello Thorvald,
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 4:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TN> My filter looks like this:
TN> TB! Message Filter
TN> beginFilter
TN> UID: [564C1620.01C4B05E.1A441C3F.7FE14B3D]
TN> Name: SPAM
TN> Filter: {\0D\0A\20`5`0`X-Text-Classification:\20junk\0D\0A}
TN> MoveMe
Hi Alexander,
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 4:48 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I've set up two separate filters for the two accounts, using two slightly
>> different conditions. And, neither works consistently. It seems strange
>> that some mail classified as spam would be moved to the correct f
Hello Jernej,
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004 at 22:18:06 GMT +0100 (which was
22:18:06 where I live), Jernej Simoncic wrote and made these valuable
points on the subject of "K9 spam filter":
JS> On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 22:02:04, Dick H. wrote:
>> That's why I sto
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 22:02:04, Dick H. wrote:
> That's why I stopped using a Bayes based filter. The spammers are
> getting very smart and know their ways to "cheat" these filters. I
> installed a challenge/response based spam filter and not a single spam
>
Hello Gerard,
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004 at 19:44:25 GMT +0100 (which was
19:44:25 where I live), Gerard wrote and made these valuable points on
the subject of "K9 spam filter":
G> ON Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 5:58:20 PM, you wrote:
ASK>> Except for the nigeria conne
Hello P.Johnson & everyone else,
on 30-Nov-2004 at 18:51 you (P.Johnson) wrote:
ASK>> Is it a common filter? Maybe you've just forgotten to share it with your
ASK>> accounts.
> I've set up two separate filters for the two accounts, using two slightly
> different conditions. And, neither works co
ON Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 8:35:09 PM, you wrote:
ASK> now it seems to me it is better to let the
ASK> whitelisted mails not go to the database since the english language 419
ASK> mails get thru, maybe there'se too little difference...
That is how I have set it up.
--
Best regards,
Gerard
Hello Gerard & everyone else,
on 30-Nov-2004 at 19:44 you (Gerard) wrote:
ASK>> Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a
ASK>> day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh*
> BayesFilter catches these for me nicely.
> It is weak on other mails th
ON Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 5:58:20 PM, you wrote:
ASK> Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a
ASK> day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh*
Hi Alexander,
I usually alert the company which email is being abused by sending a mail to
[EMA
Hæ!
Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 19:24, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
> You altered the default header from "spam" to "junk". Unless Pat did that,
> it won't work for her. :-)
Ah, yes. I thought my old PopFile-filters would work with K9 when I
just changed the header-addition. And guess what, the filte
ON Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 5:58:20 PM, you wrote:
ASK> Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a
ASK> day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh*
BayesFilter catches these for me nicely.
It is weak on other mails though :(
--
Best regards,
Hello Thorvald Neumann & everyone else,
on 30-Nov-2004 at 19:00 you (Thorvald Neumann) wrote:
> Filter: {\0D\0A\20`5`0`X-Text-Classification:\20junk\0D\0A}
You altered the default header from "spam" to "junk". Unless Pat did that,
it won't work for her. :-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://
Hello Code 2 & everyone else,
on 30-Nov-2004 at 19:06 you (Code 2) wrote:
ASK>> Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a
ASK>> day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh*
> They're troublesome for my filter, too. I figure it's because except fo
>> K9 learns and works very quickly
ASK> Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a
ASK> day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh*
They're troublesome for my filter, too. I figure it's because except
for spam words like Nigeria, Togo and Centra
Hæ!
My filter looks like this:
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [564C1620.01C4B05E.1A441C3F.7FE14B3D]
Name: SPAM
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`5`0`X-Text-Classification:\20junk\0D\0A}
MoveMessage folder \5C\5C\5C$JUNK$
MarkRead
SetColour 226723330
IsActive
Ignore
IsSendQueue
endFilter
and it
Hi Alexander,
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 11:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> K9 learns and works very quickly
ASK> Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a
ASK> day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh*
I've received a couple lately and
Hello P.Johnson & everyone else,
on 30-Nov-2004 at 17:11 you (P.Johnson) wrote:
> K9 learns and works very quickly
Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a
day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh*
> so this is frustrating; don't know wheth
Hi Alexander,
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 10:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I've set up K9 anti-spam and the TB filters to move spam to a junk
>> folder, but for some reason the filter isn't working. K9 allows you
>> to use the message header X-Text-Classification to identify spam for
>> th
Hello Mark,
On Monday, November 29, 2004, 9:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PJ>> The filter is as follows:
PJ>> TB! Message Filter
PJ>> beginFilter
PJ>> UID: [97E80840.01C492FE.7689AE34.682BBB08]
PJ>> Name: K9\20Anti-Spam
PJ>> Filter: {\0D\0A\20`7`X-Text-Classification`0`\20spam\0D\0A}
Hello P.Johnson,
Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 4:55:58 AM, you wrote:
> I've set up K9 anti-spam and the TB filters to move spam to a junk
> folder, but for some reason the filter isn't working. K9 allows you
> to use the message header X-Text-Classification to identify spam for
> the purpose of fi
Hello P.Johnson,
Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 4:55:58 AM, you wrote:
PJ> The filter is as follows:
PJ> TB! Message Filter
PJ> beginFilter
PJ> UID: [97E80840.01C492FE.7689AE34.682BBB08]
PJ> Name: K9\20Anti-Spam
PJ> Filter: {\0D\0A\20`7`X-Text-Classification`0`\20spam\0D\0A}
PJ> MoveMess
age Filter
beginFilter
UID: [97E80840.01C492FE.7689AE34.682BBB08]
Name: K9\20Anti-Spam
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`7`X-Text-Classification`0`\20spam\0D\0A}
MoveMessage folder \5C\5Cpatnet\5C$JUNK$
IsActive
endFilter
Email marked as spam stays resolutely in the inbox. Any ideas?
Thank you in advance.
--
B
I've been using the BayesIT! Spam filter for over a week, long enough
to tag quite a few messages as Spam and several as Not Spam. I'm still
having a problem with one set of messages.
I support several servers. That includes getting messages from the
server notifying that a virus wa
Hello Jernej,
03.09.2003, U wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 18:06:20, DG Raftery Sr. wrote:
>> Sorry moderators. I hate those that subscribe to lists yet have not a
>> clue about the contents.
> I think he meant the subject of his post - "Tha Bat 2:
On Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 18:06:20, DG Raftery Sr. wrote:
> Sorry moderators. I hate those that subscribe to lists yet have not a
> clue about the contents.
I think he meant the subject of his post - "Tha Bat 2: Spam filter where is it ?"
--
Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wednesday, September 03, 2003
11:47:38 AM (GMT -05:00)
RE: "Tha Bat 2: Spam filter where is it ?"
Greetings Alexander,
On Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 1:08:35 AM, you wrote:
Alexander> Hello, Batmans.
Alexander> Please forgive me
Hello, Batmans.
Please forgive me for my stupidity, but would U explain subject ?
Regards,
AG
Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Apsey, [MA] wrote:
>> The era of 28k modems are over. Get on with it! I could not care less
>> if a message is 1 kb or 10 kb, or God forbid 1 Mb.
MA> If your logic continues, very soon even the present internet
MA> infrastructure will be inadeq
Hello Mike,
Friday, June 13, 2003, 1:40:52 PM, you wrote:
> Sorry Dave. I view dictionaries, as the late lexicographer David P.
> Guralnick said " Dictionaries are historical documents, recording
> where a language was at the time it went to print" (or words to that
> effect.
> The great Ambrose
> I have stated that while in general I do not like HTML email, but
> am willing to make specific exceptions. I have stated that for
> that reason, for my purposes I would consider a rejection of
> *all* HTML email as draconian. I have stated that classifying all
> HTML email as spam does not fit
Hello,
Friday, June 13, 2003, 8:10:43 PM, you wrote:
nwd> Whilst I'm not a moderator of this list, may I remind the majority of you
nwd> who are chatting in this thread that this list is about an email program
nwd> called "The Bat!", and not Spam filtering, the internet and privacy, and
nwd> wha
1 - 100 of 264 matches
Mail list logo
