Re: Message filtering problem

Hi MAU, On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:36:40 PM you wrote: M> You don't need to quote his whole message just to ask that, do you? M> ;-) No, and thank you for the reminder. -- Regards, Maggie Haste makes waste. Running Windows 7, and emailing with The Bat! 7

Re: Message filtering problem

Hello MAU, On Friday, August 12, 2022 you wrote: M> Hello Jack, >> Have you tried any other options besides "sender"? M> You don't need to quote his whole message just to ask that, do you? M> ;-) My sincerest apologies to the list. I know better and simply was not thinking (again) when I repl

Re: Message filtering problem

Particularly annoying when the one line of actual new text is after the quote. Adrian Friday, August 12, 2022, 7:36:40 PM, MAU miguel.ur...@gmail.com wrote: > You don't need to quote his whole message just to ask that, do you? Current version

Re: Message filtering problem

Hello Jack, > Have you tried any other options besides "sender"? You don't need to quote his whole message just to ask that, do you? ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial (Madrid)- Spain) Using The Bat! Version 9.5.1 (64-bit) Cur

Re: Message filtering problem

Hello Chris, On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 you wrote: CW> 10 August 2022 CW> I am having filtering problems but do not understand why, as before CW> upgrading to v10. I saw no issues. Here are the headers for a message that CW> does not get filtered correctly, it is instead left placed in my new

Message filtering problem

10 August 2022 I am having filtering problems but do not understand why, as before upgrading to v10. I saw no issues. Here are the headers for a message that does not get filtered correctly, it is instead left placed in my new mail folder.   Return-Path:  Delivered-To: ch...@chriswilson.tv Rec

Re: Manual filtering problem

Hello Nick, Tuesday, February 22, 2005, 11:26:34 PM, you wrote: > Does that mean the discussion group doesn't deal > with questions involving earlier versions of TB!? Not at all. There are even some still around who use v2, take me for example. But you are using an old version even in terms of v

Re: Manual filtering problem

Hi On Tuesday 22 February 2005 at 10:26:34 PM, in , Nick OHare wrote: > Does that mean the discussion group doesn't deal with questions > involving earlier versions of TB!? As version 3 has a new filter system, potential helpers may be unable to test their advice before

Re: Manual filtering problem

At 17:26 [GMT-0500] on Tuesday February 22 (actual time - 6:26am on Wednesday in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote: Nick> Thanks for the info. Does that mean the discussion group doesn't deal Nick> with questions involving earlier versions of TB!? Not necessarily, but it does narrow the pool

Re[2]: Manual filtering problem

Hello Mic, Monday, February 21, 2005, 6:24:22 PM, you wrote: MC> At 18:04 [GMT-0500] on Monday February 21 (actual time - 7:04am on Tuesday in MC> Perth, Western Australia), you wrote: Hi Mic, Thanks for the info. Does that mean the discussion group doesn't deal with questions involving earli

Re: Manual filtering problem

At 18:04 [GMT-0500] on Monday February 21 (actual time - 7:04am on Tuesday in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote: Nick> Recently moved from TB v1.63 to 2.0 and now neither of my manual Nick> filters (hot keys) work. Is this a bug in the new version? Unless this is a message from LONG ago, v2 a

Manual filtering problem

Hi all, Recently moved from TB v1.63 to 2.0 and now neither of my manual filters (hot keys) work. Is this a bug in the new version? Thanks in advance for any suggestions, solutions. -- Best regards, Nick Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using T

Re[2]: filtering problem

Thanks Martin, The filter u suggested worked perfectly!! thanks Hello Martin, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 9:07:26 AM, you wrote: MW> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MW> Hash: SHA1 MW> Hello Vijay, MW> On 22 May 2004, 08:41 -0500 (14:41 local time) Vijay [V] in MW> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: filtering problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Vijay, On 22 May 2004, 08:41 -0500 (14:41 local time) Vijay [V] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: V> I am receiving a mailing list from PGP users and the "TO: address is V> [EMAIL PROTECTED], and i used this as the filtering string, V> location:

filtering problem

Hello, I am receiving a mailing list from PGP users and the "TO: address is [EMAIL PROTECTED], and i used this as the filtering string, location: recepient, but the filter does not seem to work. any help is appreciated -- Best regards, Vijay mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: IMAP filtering problem

Hi Allie, Thanks for the reply. AM> Where string matching and filter order is concerned, I've been AM> having no problems here when using read filters. I've been using AM> IMAP for some time now. I've seen that you and others have been using it. And the fact that I've not seen anyone else descri

Re: IMAP filtering problem

Hello John, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 7:42:39 AM, you wrote: > The message was from Michael to Randy, Susannah, and me -- but it > was sorted into my Randy folder. I'm assuming then that it was supposed to go into your Michael folder? Can you paste your Michael & Randy filters into a reply to

Re: IMAP filtering problem

Hi Dave, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 9:02:48 AM, you wrote: DG> I'm assuming then that it was supposed to go into your Michael DG> folder? Can you paste your Michael & Randy filters into a reply to DG> this email? Maybe that could shed some light on the problem. I thought this question had led

Re: IMAP filtering problem

Hi John, Thursday, February 26, 2004, 11:07:18 AM, you wrote: JR> When I filter the Known folder the program moves 218 messages into JR> Eddie's folder. 118 of them are from Eddie. It appears that all of JR> the others have Eddie's address in one of the recipient fields. I might add that the fil

Re: IMAP filtering problem

John Rakestraw, [JR] wrote: JR> A change of employment and recent developments in TB! have JR> led me to try out IMAP. I set up a new IMAP account in TB!, and JR> things are working pretty well, except JR> The filters are not working as expected. I understand that JR> automatic filtering

IMAP filtering problem

Hi, I've been using TB! for a couple of years now, using POP. I have a pretty extensive collection of filter/folder combinations set up in my POP accounts. A change of employment and recent developments in TB! have led me to try out IMAP. I set up a new IMAP account in TB!, and things ar

Re: horrible and retarded filtering problem...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Victor, On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 14:30:12 -0500 your time, you said: S>> ... choose the Alternatives tab, add a new set, and add S>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; complete with semi-colon.<..snip..> VBG> ... This worked but I was highly agains

Re[2]: horrible and retarded filtering problem...

Hello Simon, VBG>> The address I need to filter against is [EMAIL PROTECTED] S> As well as [EMAIL PROTECTED], choose the Alternatives tab, add a new S> set, and add [EMAIL PROTECTED]; complete with semi-colon. Set to S> filter anywhere. I just tried it and it works fine :-) Long time n

Re: horrible and retarded filtering problem...

Hello Victor, > The address I need to filter against is [EMAIL PROTECTED] I cannot > filter against anything else like keywords, strings, from, > Original-recipient, etc... I need to only kill this mail simply > because of one single email address. I need to kill it if it has > [EMAIL PR

Re: horrible and retarded filtering problem...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Victor, On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 01:59:27 -0500 your time, you said: <..snip..> VBG> The address I need to filter against is [EMAIL PROTECTED] As well as [EMAIL PROTECTED], choose the Alternatives tab, add a new set, and add [EMAIL PROTECTE

horrible and retarded filtering problem...

Hello tbudl, I have given away an address which has obviously fallen into the wrong hands. Now I am getting spam because of this address. The craziest thing which is killing me, is my address never makes it to the to, cc or bcc field. So I can never pinpoint trying to kill it by filterin

Re[2]: Filtering problem

On Saturday, August 23, 2003, Allie Martin wrote: KK>> Right. My problem was that I redid the filters twice, and didn't KK>> know what file to delete. Deleting the account.srx file seems to KK>> have done the trick so far. > Did you manually recreate the filters from scratch. Yes. > For the futu

Re: Filtering problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Karen Kay, [KK] wrote: KK> Right. My problem was that I redid the filters twice, and didn't KK> know what file to delete. Deleting the account.srx file seems to KK> have done the trick so far. Did you manually recreate the filters from scratch. For

Re[2]: Filtering problem

On Saturday, August 23, 2003, Allie Martin wrote: > In that case I'd have to agree with Roelof's impression that something > has been corrupted and you may have to start fresh with your filters, > i.e., actually deleting the accounts .srx file and recreating the > filters. Right. My problem was th

Re: Filtering problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Karen Kay, [KK] wrote: >> Before this started, did you make any changes to your filtering? KK> Nope. In that case I'd have to agree with Roelof's impression that something has been corrupted and you may have to start fresh with your filters, i.e., a

Re[2]: Filtering problem

On Saturday, August 23, 2003, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > What do you mean by "they will need something else to do." No! They > need to listen to me! (LOL) But you seem > to have experience with presentations... > But 111 slides is 19 pages. IMNSHO it *is* too much, even as a > handout. Probably.

Re: Filtering problem

Hello Karen, On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 12:12:47 -0500 GMT (24/08/2003, 00:12 +0700 GMT), Karen Kay wrote: >> Actually it is a 3-hour tutoring session. Somehow I have the >> feeling I need to cut down the number of slides to 25%, but >> concentration is waning. > Whatever number of slides you have, mak

Re[2]: Filtering problem

On Saturday, August 23, 2003, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > Hm. You seem to be sure that there is no filter that catches other > parts of the message and therefore moves it to trash. My filtering is all on sender, recipient, and subject. I went through and checked that. > I finished a paper on Wirele

Re[2]: Filtering problem

On Saturday, August 23, 2003, Roelof Otten wrote: > Does this happen on receiving them or on closing TB. If it's the > latter than maybe you've changed the properties of the inbox to remove > messages older than zero days. > You can check these properties by selecting the inbox in the account > tre

Re: Filtering problem

Hello Karen, On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 23:02:54 -0500 GMT (23/08/2003, 11:02 +0700 GMT), Karen Kay wrote: >> 1.) You have a folder that moves messages From [EMAIL PROTECTED] to >> trash. > No, I have a filter that moves messages addressed to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Trash. This is what I want to happen.

Re[2]: Filtering problem

On Saturday, August 23, 2003, Allie Martin wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > Karen Kay, [KK] wrote: KK>> It used to be that my filtering filtered mail into folders, and KK>> anything not already filtered would go to the Inbox. KK>> Now, for some reason, mail not affected

Re: Filtering problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Karen Kay, [KK] wrote: KK> It used to be that my filtering filtered mail into folders, and KK> anything not already filtered would go to the Inbox. KK> Now, for some reason, mail not affected by the filters (like this KK> mailing list e-mail) ends up

Re: Filtering problem

Hallo Karen, On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 18:43:56 -0500GMT (23-8-03, 1:43 +0200, where I live), you wrote: KK> Now, for some reason, mail not affected by the filters (like this KK> mailing list e-mail) ends up in Trash! Does this happen on receiving them or on closing TB. If it's the latter than maybe y

Re[2]: Filtering problem

On Friday, August 22, 2003, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > Hello Karen, > On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 22:37:15 -0500 GMT (23/08/2003, 10:37 +0700 GMT), > Karen Kay wrote: >>> Do you have any filter that moves messages to trash? It may be a >>> catch-all. >> Yes, I have several filters that move messages to t

Re: Filtering problem

Hello Karen, On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 22:37:15 -0500 GMT (23/08/2003, 10:37 +0700 GMT), Karen Kay wrote: >> Do you have any filter that moves messages to trash? It may be a >> catch-all. > Yes, I have several filters that move messages to trash. They all > specify a recipient that is some form of my

Re[2]: Filtering problem

On Friday, August 22, 2003, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > Do you have any filter that moves messages to trash? It may be a > catch-all. Yes, I have several filters that move messages to trash. They all specify a recipient that is some form of my domain name. Personal mail is addressed to [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Filtering problem

Hello Karen, On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 18:43:56 -0500 GMT (23/08/2003, 06:43 +0700 GMT), Karen Kay wrote: > Now, for some reason, mail not affected by the filters (like this > mailing list e-mail) ends up in Trash! Do you have any filter that moves messages to trash? It may be a catch-all. -- Cheer

Filtering problem

It used to be that my filtering filtered mail into folders, and anything not already filtered would go to the Inbox. Now, for some reason, mail not affected by the filters (like this mailing list e-mail) ends up in Trash! I've removed all the filters and started over twice, with the same result.

Re: filtering problem

Hello Jos Flachs, On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:59:26 +0700 GMT your local time, which was Friday, November 22, 2002, 4:59:26 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Jos Flachs wrote: > Hello Dierk, > Tuesday, November 19, 2002, 12:54:23 AM, you wrote: DH>> Hello Jos! DH>> On Monday, November 18, 2002 at 10

Re[2]: filtering problem

Hello Dierk, Tuesday, November 19, 2002, 12:54:23 AM, you wrote: DH> Hello Jos! DH> On Monday, November 18, 2002 at 10:37:00 AM you wrote: in: Krung Thep Mahanakhon Amon Rattanakosin Mahinthara Ayuthaya Mahadilok Phop Noppharat Ratchathani Burirom Udomratchaniwet Mahasathan Amon

Re: filtering problem

Hallo Jos, On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 09:58:39 +0700GMT (19-11-02, 3:58 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: JF> Here's my filter. JF> MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] JF> MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] JF> MainSet: 00Hendrik van de Wetering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> You're adding every address into the same set, thus

Re: filtering problem

Hi Roelof, and all the batpersons, Here's my filter. BeginFilter Name: Move to Jos Active: 1 Source: \\intern\Inbox Target: \\Jos\jos CopyFolder: none MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MainSet: 00Hendrik van de Wetering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MainSe

Re: filtering problem

Hello Jos! On Monday, November 18, 2002 at 10:37:00 AM you wrote: >>> in: Krung Thep Mahanakhon Amon Rattanakosin Mahinthara Ayuthaya >>> Mahadilok Phop Noppharat Ratchathani Burirom Udomratchaniwet >>> Mahasathan Amon Piman Awatan Sathit Sakkathattiya Witsanukam Prasit > The city of angels, the

Re[2]: filtering problem

Dear Thomas, Saturday, November 16, 2002,you wrote: > On Sat, 16 Nov 2002 12:08:08 +0700 GMT (16/11/02, 12:08 +0700 GMT), > Jos Flachs wrote: >> in: Krung Thep Mahanakhon Amon Rattanakosin Mahinthara Ayuthaya >> Mahadilok Phop Noppharat Ratchathani Burirom Udomratchaniwet >> Mahasathan Amon Pima

Re: filtering problem

Hallo Jos, On Sat, 16 Nov 2002 12:08:08 +0700GMT (16-11-02, 6:08 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: JF> Then I copied the settings for all the existing filters into that JF> rule. I'm stumped what to do. I checked al the settings for the JF> shortcutted filters, and copied them inside the moveto

Re: filtering problem

Hello Jos, On Sat, 16 Nov 2002 12:08:08 +0700 GMT (16/11/02, 12:08 +0700 GMT), Jos Flachs wrote: > in: Krung Thep Mahanakhon Amon Rattanakosin Mahinthara Ayuthaya > Mahadilok Phop Noppharat Ratchathani Burirom Udomratchaniwet > Mahasathan Amon Piman Awatan Sathit Sakkathattiya Witsanukam Prasit

Re[2]: filtering problem

Hello Roelof, Friday, November 15, 2002, 4:57:17 PM, you wrote: JF>> If I use the shortcut (ctrl+shift+F), it works fine. But if I copy those JF>> settings into the mail rule 'Moveto2' (in incoming mail) - no go. RO> Do you copy the new settings to the 'rule' tab on the moveto2 filter RO> or do

Re: filtering problem

Good night Roelof, It was foretold that on 16-11-2002 @ 00:24:02 GMT+0100 (which was 0:24:02 where I live) Roelof Otten would mumble: RO> Don't know whether that includes OE addressbooks. According to the wizard it does -- Best regards, Luc --

Re: filtering problem

Hallo Luc, On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:00:07 +0100GMT (15-11-02, 17:00 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: RO>> OE can export to vCard, TB can import from vCard. L> Maybe the import wizard is easier? (never used it before though) Don't know whether that includes OE addressbooks. -- Groetjes, Roel

Re: filtering problem

Good afternoon Roelof, It was foretold that on 15-11-2002 @ 10:57:17 GMT+0100 (which was 10:57:17 where I live) Roelof Otten would mumble: RO> OE can export to vCard, TB can import from vCard. Maybe the import wizard is easier? (never used it before though) -- Best regards, Luc

Re: filtering problem

Hallo Jos, On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:06:47 +0700GMT (15-11-02, 9:06 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: JF> If I use the shortcut (ctrl+shift+F), it works fine. But if I copy those JF> settings into the mail rule 'Moveto2' (in incoming mail) - no go. Do you copy the new settings to the 'rule' tab o

filtering problem

Hi tbudl, I set up a simple filtering rule, to transfer mail from account 1 to account 2. But it doesn't work. All mail for account 2 simply show up in no.1. If I use the shortcut (ctrl+shift+F), it works fine. But if I copy those settings into the mail rule 'Moveto2' (in incoming mail) - no go.

Re: Folder Re-Filtering Problem

AM> Anyone noticing a "Grid Index out of Range" error message when AM> re-filtering folders? No. I got an "List index out of bounds" error once I was creating some filters. AM> I filter TBUDL and TBBETA messages to a common folder. I then AM> periodically apply read filters whi

Folder Re-Filtering Problem

Hi, Anyone noticing a "Grid Index out of Range" error message when re-filtering folders? I filter TBUDL and TBBETA messages to a common folder. I then periodically apply read filters which filter messages older than a defined age to TBUDL and TBBETA specific folders. I sometimes

Re: Folder Re-Filtering Problem

Hallo Allie, On Sun, 11 Jun 2000 12:01:31 -0500 GMT (12/06/00, 01:01 +0800 GMT), Allie Martin wrote: AM> Anyone noticing a "Grid Index out of Range" error message when AM> re-filtering folders? Yep, and I don't think it's OT, so I cross-post to TBUDL. I haven't found a pattern yet, it

serious filtering problem

Welcome, Today I checked my mail, and while it should filter it, two of filters didn`t work, I got smth like . I made temp filter that filters mail that wasn`t filtered to another folder, and it worked. Why it doesn`t want to filter it to proper folder? any suggestions? /Adam +

Re[2]: filtering problem

Hello Ali, Wednesday, November 10, 1999, 9:57:47 AM, you wrote: AM> My only suggestion would be to change the location from AM> 'recipient' to 'Kludges' and that would surely work. That's a AM> filter that will place any message in the designated folder if it AM> has [EMAIL PRO

Re: filtering problem

Hi all, On Tuesday, November 09, 1999, 8:22:08 PM (-5 GMT), Larry scribbled: > Although my regular e-mail address is [EMAIL PROTECTED], I am able to > have several pseudo e-mail addresses that *appear* to be a USA > address, but loop back and arrive at my server here in Brazil. One of

filtering problem

Hello All, Although my regular e-mail address is [EMAIL PROTECTED], I am able to have several pseudo e-mail addresses that *appear* to be a USA address, but loop back and arrive at my server here in Brazil. One of them that I use is, [EMAIL PROTECTED] In other words, when I send a me