Hello Roelof,
> I'm not as interested in beers as Miguel.
I'd ask for coffee also, I love it. But if I drink coffee after lunch
time I will not sleep that night. And with beer, the more you drink,
the better you will sleep ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The B
Hello Allie,
> If you want my true opinion, I'd suggest using SpamPal with the Bayesian
> plug-in and then filter on the specific header it inserts when it
> detects a message as being spam. It's really easy to setup and it works
> really well.
I agree with you. A Bayesian filter is the best I h
Hallo Gerard,
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 20:34:47 +0100GMT (3-2-03, 20:34 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
G> Thanks for looking after my tread while I was out :-) Your
G> solution is mine exactly.
G> Are there any charges ;-)
On computer issues my most asked tariff is a cup of coffee and a gl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Miguel A. Urech [MAU] wrote:'
MAU> And what about X-Envelope-To:? All the spam that I have received
MAU> today include it :)
Yup. All my mail has that header which is inserted by MDaemon, my
lo
ON Tuesday, January 28, 2003, 8:27:52 AM, you wrote:
Hi Roelof,
Thanks for looking after my tread while I was out :-)
Your solution is mine exactly.
Are there any charges ;-)
--
Best regards,
Gerard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Your financia
Hello Allie,
MAU>> As you say, it is unlikely. But it could appear in Reply-To and
MAU>> In-Reply-To headers.
>
> I hadn't thought of those, but it may not matter when thinking of
> spam which doesn't have a To: header since those headers will very
> likely be missing as well.
And
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Miguel A. Urech [MAU] wrote:'
MAU> As you say, it is unlikely. But it could appear in Reply-To and
MAU> In-Reply-To headers.
I hadn't thought of those, but it may not matter when thinking of
sp
Hello Allie,
> It's unlikely that the string 'To: ' will appear anywhere else in
> the headers except in the To header.
As you say, it is unlikely. But it could appear in Reply-To and
In-Reply-To headers.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Michael Stepuchev [MS] wrote:'
AM>> String: ^To: Location: Kludges Presence: No
AM>> Enable 'regular expressions' in the filter options.
MS> Doesn't work. :-(
I wondered why it shouldn't and then
On Monday, February 3, 2003, 11:15:39 AM, Michael Stepuchev wrote:
AM>> String: ^To: Location: Kludges Presence: No
AM>> Enable 'regular expressions' in the filter options.
> Doesn't work. :-(
The selective download filter is not as powerful as the other TB!
filters, so you may have to play ar
Good afternoon, Allie.
Sometimes, 28.01.2003, 2:32, you wrote us about
"how do i filter out mails without a TO: in the selective download":
AM> String: ^To: Location: Kludges Presence: No
AM> Enable 'regular expressions' in the filter options.
Doesn't work. :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jurgen Haug [JH] wrote:'
JH> I really have an understanding problem, I think. I can't use regular
JH> expressions in this selective download, no?
Yes you can.
JH> I once tried a word list filter for
Hello Allie,
Monday, January 27, 2003, 10:32:52 PM, you wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Jurgen Haug [JH] wrote:'
JH>> I keep getting spam that has no TO: in the header. I mean it's not
JH>> just empty, there is no TO:
Hallo Jurgen,
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 07:50:28 +0100GMT (28-1-03, 7:50 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
>> This might not solve your missing TO: but most Spam is not directly
>> addressed to you but done via a BCC. You could therefore consider
>> filtering on TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] presence NO.
JH
Hello Gerard,
Monday, January 27, 2003, 11:02:05 PM, you wrote:
> This might not solve your missing TO: but most Spam is not directly
> addressed to you but done via a BCC. You could therefore consider
> filtering on TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] presence NO.
Hi Gerard,
*grin* that I did very eagerly
ON Monday, January 27, 2003, 9:33:44 PM, you wrote:
JH> I keep getting spam that has no TO: in the header. I mean it's not
JH> just empty, there is no TO: at all. How can I look for not existing in
JH> the selective download? I think I cannot use one of those cryptic
JH> 'regular expressions' in t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jurgen Haug [JH] wrote:'
JH> I keep getting spam that has no TO: in the header. I mean it's not
JH> just empty, there is no TO: at all. How can I look for not
JH> existing in the selective download? I thi
Hallo Jurgen,
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 21:33:44 +0100GMT (27-1-03, 21:33 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
JH> I keep getting spam that has no TO: in the header. I mean it's not
JH> just empty, there is no TO: at all. How can I look for not
JH> existing in the selective download?
Use To: as signal
Hi folks,
I keep getting spam that has no TO: in the header. I mean it's not
just empty, there is no TO: at all. How can I look for not existing in
the selective download? I think I cannot use one of those cryptic
'regular expressions' in the selective download? (not that I would
know then what to
19 matches
Mail list logo
