Jacopo Ognibene, [JO] wrote:
JO> More than this, i've noticed that you can add many text after the URL
JO> and TB doesn't wrap. See at the end of the line here:
Yes. What you see in the editor before sending is what is sent,
without any additional wrapping. Technically, this isn't true for long
l
Allie, on Tue, 25 May 2004, at 21:40:28 [GMT -0500] (which was 4.40 here in
Italy) you wrote to Rich Gregory:
AM> I'll give you a long URL:
AM>
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1880418592/ref=pd_ts_coop/104-7943297-2153543?v=glance&s=books&n=549066
AM> I really don't expect TB! to w
Hello John,
On Thu, 27 May 2004 12:39:59 +0100 GMT (27/05/2004, 18:39 +0700 GMT),
John Cunnane wrote:
JC> If the original mail was sent in HTML format and you reply in a plain
JC> text format such as MicroEd, then The Bat! seems to have a big problem
JC> with certain characters in a URL, e.g. the
TF> No, TB doesn't do that. I know that other email clients break URLs
TF> when displaying and cause problems, but not TB. That's one of the
TF> beauties of TB.
If the original mail was sent in HTML format and you reply in a plain
text format such as MicroEd, then The Bat! seems to have a big prob
Hello rich,
On Tue, 25 May 2004 20:17:36 -0400 GMT (26/05/2004, 07:17 +0700 GMT),
rich gregory wrote:
rg> TB! will wrap long links and not "know" that it has truncated a URL.
No, TB doesn't do that. I know that other email clients break URLs
when displaying and cause problems, but not TB. That's
Rich Gregory, [RG] wrote:
RG> TB! will wrap long links and not "know" that it has truncated a URL.
Is this while viewing a received message?
If so, then this isn't TB!'s fault but the sending client's fault.
Most clients will wrap upon sending and many do not care if a long URL
is one of the thi
6 matches
Mail list logo
