-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Deborah,
@18 July 2002, 11:03 +0100 Deborah W [DW] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
DW> With the "hide items..." option selected, they too are hidden -
DW> ... Or am I missing something blindingly obvious to everyone else?
Yes
On Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 12:19:34 PM, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
MO> Not necessarily. Right click on your address group, select Properties
MO> and mark "Hide items if not explicitly selected". If I'm not
MO> misinterpreting your intentions this should do the trick.
ButI don't want *all* of t
Hi Marck,
on Wed, 17 Jul 2002 20:52:20 +0100GMT (17.07.02, 21:52 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
PM>> I looked at the message's headers. Some servers seem to have
PM>> received it with a wrong dateline.
MDP> No - the message has crossed the dateline and c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Peter,
@17 July 2002, 21:20 +0200 (20:20 UK time) Peter Meyns [PM] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Peter Meyns on
TBUDL:
PM> I looked at the message's headers. Some servers seem to have
PM> received it with a wrong dateline.
Hello Peter,
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002 21:28:30 +0200 GMT (18/07/02, 02:28 +0700 GMT),
Peter Meyns wrote:
PM> So you suggest it's in kundenserver's responsibility? I'll
PM> complain to them! *S*
I don't suggest. I *know*. ;-)
PM> Have a good night, Thomas :-)
Thanks. I'll be hitting the sack soon.
Hi Thomas,
on Thu, 18 Jul 2002 02:13:22 +0700GMT (17.07.02, 21:13 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
PM>> Is this on DutaInt's behalf or somewhere else?
TF> Looking at the headers of that "missing" message:
PM>> Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.2
Hi Peter,
on Wed, 17 Jul 2002 20:59:59 +0200GMT (17.07.02, 20:59 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
PM> Wow, great! my message of yesterday has arrived! ;o) I wonder where it
PM> spent the time in between. *G* Now there's only one more missing...
PM> Is this
Hello Peter,
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002 20:59:59 +0200 GMT (18/07/02, 01:59 +0700 GMT),
Peter Meyns wrote:
PM> Is this on DutaInt's behalf or somewhere else?
Looking at the headers of that "missing" message:
PM> Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.176]
helo=moutng2.kundenserver.de)
P
Hi Peter,
on Tue, 16 Jul 2002 21:04:31 +0200GMT (16.07.02, 21:04 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
PM> There is a mass mailing feature in TB!, but I haven't used it yet. You need
PM> an address book group for it, so much I followed the threads. :-)
Wow, gre
Hi Deborah,
on Tue, 16 Jul 2002 18:01:39 +0100GMT (16.07.02, 19:01 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
DW> You know that junk-mail you get?
Oh yeah... *sigh*
DW> I need to do that with emails.
Oh heavens! ;-)
There is a mass mailing feature in TB!, but I h
Hello Marck,
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002 12:26:06 +0100 GMT (17/07/02, 18:26 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
DW>> Is there a time wheen you *would* recommend the use of more than
DW>> one AB then?
MDP> Me? No. I don't bother. I suppose if I sat down and thought about it I
MDP> could come up with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Deborah,
@17 July 2002, 11:31 +0100 Deborah W [DW] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
DW> Is there a way to make TB use a specific AB in a macro? Something
DW> like %Ab*trekker*TOLastName, eg?
No :-(.
DW> That still leaves me wi
On Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 12:31, Deborah W wrote:
> That still leaves me with the extra entries in the main view of the
> personal AB though.
Not necessarily. Right click on your address group, select Properties
and mark "Hide items if not explicitly selected". If I'm not
misinterpreting you
On Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 9:54:00 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP> You have a default address book. That's what's used for
MDP> resolution of the macros.
Is there a way to make TB use a specific AB in a macro? Something like
%Ab*trekker*TOLastName, eg?
DW>> I suppose it would work better if
On Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 5:35:24 AM, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
JA> In your trekker group properties, select "Hide items if not explicitly
JA> selected." That will prevent the members of the trekker group from
JA> showing up in your main AB list.
Problems with that: I don't want all of them hidd
Hello Deborah,
On Tuesday, July 16, 2002 at 22:00 GMT +0100, aliens probed Deborah W
[DW] and found:
DW> Wellsome of the people who are in the Trekker AB are also in
DW> my personal AB, but most aren't, so it's more cluttered with them
DW> all in one place
In your trekker group properti
On Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 9:41:51 PM, Joseph N. wrote:
JN> What sort of drawbacks? I used to have a separate AB the way you
JN> describe it, and opted instead to make those entries a group
JN> within my personal AB. I've found no disadvantages, and several
JN> advantages, so I'm interested in yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Deborah,
@16 July 2002, 20:54 +0100 Deborah W [DW] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
DW> When I click on the icon for the AB, the AB window appears. In the
DW> left pane there are several book icons, the first of which is
DW> "Pe
On Tuesday, July 16, 2002, Deborah W wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
DW> I suppose it would work better if I had the people in the "Trekker"
DW> book in the same AB as everyone else, & then created a Trekker group,
DW> rather than a Trekker AB - but that has drawbacks of i
On Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 8:39:36 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP> This is a symptom of there being two address book entries for the
MDP> email address.
Hnow I'm getting confused. I understand what you're saying,
and it does indeed seem to be doing exactly what you say, in a
sense...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Deborah,
@16 July 2002, 20:32 +0100 Deborah W [DW] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
DW> ... There seems to be a problem with how the macros collect info
DW> from the AB - they're picking up old information, ... it doesn't
DW> pi
On Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 7:46:40 PM, Dierk Haasis wrote:
DH> Look for the %ABnnnPPP macro. With it you can put any information
DH> stored in any field of the AB into your mails just like %TO etc.
Okay, I've got that far, & my QT seems to be working - for *some* of
the recipients. There seems t
At 2:46 PM on Tuesday, July 16, 2002 Dierk Haasis wrote the
following about [personalised mass-mailing?]:
>> Can I do this without individually typing in information for each
>> recipient? I know I can do a Quick Template with First Name, Last
>> Name, Email Address - but
Hello Deborah,
On Tuesday, July 16, 2002 at 18:01 GMT +0100, clairvoyants were
mystified when Deborah W [DW] conjured:
DW> I need to do that with emails. I have about 30 people to send an email
DW> to, & I need to be able to put information from my address book in
DW> various "fields" in the ema
Hello Deborah!
On Tuesday, July 16, 2002 at 7:01:39 PM you wrote:
> Can I do this without individually typing in information for each
> recipient? I know I can do a Quick Template with First Name, Last
> Name, Email Address - but can I put in other information from the AB?
> If so, do I use a QT
You know that junk-mail you get (snail mail, not email) that has your
name etc inserted in various places in the information? Says stuff
like "You, Deborah, may have won a million pounds! Just fill in this
form, Deborah, & send it back" etc?
I need to do that with emails. I have about 30 peop
26 matches
Mail list logo
