Guten Morgen,
MJS> Let me bite on this one!
You're very welcome.
MJS> Now I really hope someone in the list can confirm or otherwise that
MJS> RITLAbs is working on full IMAP support for v4.1
There are mails from the beta-list where RIT promises just that. Like
they did for v4.0. And 3.5. An
Hello Alto,
See my notes, interspersed, below
Friday, March 28, 2008, 5:55:27 PM, you wrote:
SA>> As a long time user of The Bat, I have never found it necessary to
SA>> upgrade. However, I no longer have tolerance for ver. 1.62r's lack of
SA>> formatting functionality, and would also like to h
On Saturday, March 29, 2008, 5:02:37 PM, Michael J. Sharp wrote:
> At present (some issues have to be solved) The Bat! does not
> work with Gmail via IMAP4-protocol, but successfully does with
> POP3.
that must have been some time ago, because it is very serviceable with
gmail now.
On Saturday, March 29, 2008, 3:30:22 PM, Alto Speckhardt wrote:
> It's rather absurd that it took three major versions to _not_ get it
> working, wouldn't you agree?
well, it could certainly have improved more. but I still prefer it to
any of the other IMAP clients I tried.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
AS> Guten Morgen,
>>> Are you using IMAP? If so, you should be aware that IMAP doesn't
>>> work in v4.
DAC>> I don't think it did in version 1 [...]
AS> Yes, you're right of course.
DAC>> but I it is aburd to say it doesn't work in 4.
AS> It's rather absurd that it took three major version
Guten Morgen,
>> Are you using IMAP? If so, you should be aware that IMAP doesn't
>> work in v4.
DAC> I don't think it did in version 1 [...]
Yes, you're right of course.
DAC> but I it is aburd to say it doesn't work in 4.
It's rather absurd that it took three major versions to _not_ get it
w
Hello Avram,
Friday, March 28, 2008, 8:06:48 PM, among other things, you wrote:
SA> As a long time user of The Bat, I have never found it necessary to
SA> upgrade. However, I no longer have tolerance for ver. 1.62r's lack of
SA> formatting functionality, and would also like to have more tagging
On Friday, March 28, 2008, 5:55:27 PM, Alto Speckhardt wrote:
> Are you using IMAP? If so, you should be aware that IMAP doesn't
> work in v4.
I don't think it did in version 1, but I it is aburd to say it doesn't
work in 4.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastm
Guten Morgen,
SA> As a long time user of The Bat, I have never found it necessary to
SA> upgrade. However, I no longer have tolerance for ver. 1.62r's lack of
SA> formatting functionality, and would also like to have more tagging
SA> options, so, its time to upgrade.
Please refresh my memory, w
Hallo Avram,
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:06:48 -0500GMT (28-3-2008, 19:06 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
SA> What should I do to insure as smooth a transition to the current
SA> version?
Simply install the new version on top of the old one.
And just to be sure you could make a backup of the old ma
Hello fellow listmates,
As a long time user of The Bat, I have never found it necessary to
upgrade. However, I no longer have tolerance for ver. 1.62r's lack of
formatting functionality, and would also like to have more tagging
options, so, its time to upgrade. In my current set-up, I have ab
11 matches
Mail list logo
