Hallo WilWilWil,
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:57:36 +0100GMT (18-11-2004, 11:57 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
W Since this morning, when I go to filters of my accounts, in
W Incoming rules, I can see my 10 rules like yesterday, but more,
W there is now a sub-folder created named Moving in Hooks !
RO I've got no idea what you mean. Could you make a screenshot and place
RO it somewhere on line?
RO When you've got no means of placing things on line, send it via PM to
RO me. Attached pictures are discouraged on this list.
Thank you for you offer. I send you a capture now in PM.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello TBUDL,
Dad, are we there yet?
- --
Best regards,Tony.
_
Message composed on 19/11/2004 at 12:04 UTC 2004 - AWB
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.7 on Windows XP 5. 1 Build 2600
Hi Bat Users,
I have some strange non repeatable problems with the filtering of emails.
I get mails that normally filter to a folder being left in my inbox. That the
filters work is proven by the fact that if I re-filter the inbox with the
incoming filters they do get sorted to their correct
On Fri 19-Nov-04 6:32am -0600, Gerard wrote:
I have some strange non repeatable problems with the filtering of emails.
I get mails that normally filter to a folder being
left in my inbox.
Confirmed here. It doesn't happen often, but it's an
annoyance. Yesterday, it happened while I was
Hi,
For some reason, the little yellow smilie faces that are part of TB!
don't seem to be working.
I have the option enabled in editor preferences but still nothing.
Any ideas?
--
Regards,
Chris
Created using The Bat! v3.0.2.7 IMAP
OS of Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Hello Chris!
On Friday, November 19, 2004, 7:23 AM, you wrote:
CW For some reason, the little yellow smilie faces that are part of
CW TB! don't seem to be working.
CW I have the option enabled in editor preferences but still nothing.
Are you using Rich Text View? Right-click in the View Folder
Hello,
How can I say that I want the message has high priority in a template ? I can't
find a macro for this...
Same question to uncheck read confirm set by default in the account setting.
I want to keep redconfirm set for the global account setting, but just want
to unchek the readconfirm
Hello MFPA,
Thursday, November 18, 2004, 7:59:35 PM, you wrote:
Secondly, your reply to me does not contain a reference header. Is
this by design?
M I would hope it was not by design as it prevents threading.
M Perhaps something to do with the particular webmail being used?
Ah yes, I hadn't
Hello WilWilWil!
On Friday, November 19, 2004, 8:20 AM, you wrote:
W How can I say that I want the message has high priority in a
W template ? I can't find a macro for this...
From the Help File:
===
PRIORITY = H/N/L set the
Hi Mary,
On Friday, November 19, 2004 08:06 your local time, which was 14:06 my
local time, Mary Bull [MB] wrote;
MB Are you using Rich Text View? Right-click in the View Folder menu when
MB you're reading this message. There's a choice on the context menu.
MB Uncheck Use plain text viewer if it
Hello Chris!
On Friday, November 19, 2004, 8:43 AM, you wrote:
MB Also, look in The Bat!/Images and be sure that you have both Default
MB and default.msl files there. Hope this helps. If not, please let us
MB know and we can explore further with you. :)
CW Ah ha, we could have a winner. No
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello TBUDL,
I'm new to this list so I thought I'd introduce myself. My names Tony and
I hope I'm in the right place to learn about using Outlook Express.
I look forward to reading all the tips you have.
- --
Best regards,Tony.
Hello Tony!
On Friday, November 19, 2004, 9:03 AM, you wrote:
TB I'm new to this list so I thought I'd introduce myself. My names
TB Tony and I hope I'm in the right place to learn about using
TB Outlook Express.
Tony, you are a complete nut! OE indeed! But welcome aboard!
TB I look forward
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Gerard,
A reminder of what Gerard on TBUDL typed on:
19 November 2004 at 13:32:35 GMT +0100
Are these known problems and are they being worked on?
I just had a similar problem. I have a filter that colours unread
messages. I also have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Mary,
A reminder of what Mary Bull on TBUDL typed on:
19 November 2004 at 09:21:21 GMT -0600
What do you need tips about?
Nothing as yet but I heard there was a gmail discussion on here so I paid
my subscription fee and here I am :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Fri, 19 Nov 2004,
@ @ at 15:03:55 +, when Tony Boom wrote:
Hello TBUDL,
I'm new to this list so I thought I'd introduce myself. My names Tony
and I hope I'm in the right place
Hello Gerard everyone else
on 19-Nov-2004 at 13:43:02 (GMT +0100), you wrote:
I have some strange non repeatable problems with the filtering of emails.
Does it happen with account specific filters or with common filters?
Are these known problems and are they being worked on?
I believe so,
Hi Mary,
On Friday, November 19, 2004 08:51 your local time, which was 14:51 my
local time, Mary Bull [MB] wrote;
MB Except--if someone would send you the files by PM. Would you like for
MB me to try that? My files are not the originals from The Bat! but a
MB sanitized, edited version.
Ok,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Mica,
A reminder of what Mica Mijatovic on TBUDL typed on:
19 November 2004 at 16:34:25 GMT +0100
Hi Tony, we are nuts too. (:
Tip No 1: It's not curable but we always may pretend.
I don't want to be cured. As the saying goes, Nuts
ON Friday, November 19, 2004, 4:27:40 PM, you wrote:
TB What I'm trying to say is check the sequence the filters run in.
Hi Tony,
That is not the problem in this case.
The filters work fine 99.9% of the time
--
Best regards,
Gerard
Hello Chris!
On Friday, November 19, 2004, 10:26 AM, you wrote:
MB If you want what comes with TB! we shall have to advertise for
MB someone with an unedited version. :)
CW Does anyone have an unedited version of the files that they could
CW possibly send me?
I'm certain that someone does. If
Hi Gerard,
on Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:32:35 +0100GMT, you wrote:
G I have some strange non repeatable problems with the filtering of emails.
G I get mails that normally filter to a folder being left in my inbox. That the
G filters work is proven by the fact that if I re-filter the inbox with the
G
Hi Chris,
on Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:26:09 +GMT, you wrote:
MB If you want what comes with TB! we shall have to advertise for someone
MB with an unedited version. :)
CW Does anyone have an unedited version of the files that they could
CW possibly send me?
I don't remember to have edited mine,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Gerard,
A reminder of what Gerard on TBUDL typed on:
19 November 2004 at 17:37:36 GMT +0100
That is not the problem in this case.
The filters work fine 99.9% of the time
Best thing to do is send the filter to the list so the filter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Chris,
A reminder of what Chris Weaven on TBUDL typed on:
19 November 2004 at 16:26:09 GMT +
Does anyone have an unedited version of the files that they could
possibly send me?
I got one, it's on it's way.
- --
Best regards,
Hello Tony,
Friday, November 19, 2004, 12:04:55 PM, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello TBUDL,
Dad, are we there yet?
No son, we are not, just sit down and wait :)
Sean
--
Sean Rima [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 679813 YAHOO: thecivvie
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Chris,
Here's the msl file. I must get clarification on how to send the
folder Default. Do you want all the individual gifs? The folder
itself does not attach to the mail.
--
Regards,
Maggie
Learn from the mistakes of others. You can't live long enough to make them
Hi Mary,
11/19/2004 11:49:41 AM you wrote:
CW Does anyone have an unedited version of the files that they could
CW possibly send me?
MB I'm certain that someone does. If not, perhaps you could make-do with
MB mine. I took out only knifed and headshot, both of which are
MB offensive to me.
I
Hello Chris,
Why does the Bayesit plugin not work very well?
It will pick up an occasional spam but misses most.
It will still fall for the same messages even after I mark them as
spam.
--
~John
{Race Car spelled backwards is Race Car!}
The_Bat! Version 3.0.2.2 Rush
On Friday 19 November 2004 2:13 am, thn wrote:
You have to enable the POP-ability in your Gmail-webinterface (BTW, I
cannot get access in the mornings around 8:00 CET).
My settings are
well, I went into MY program and clicked the check what the ISP supports
for different POP/SMTP options,
On Friday 19 November 2004 7:04 am, Tony Boom wrote:
Dad, are we there yet?
no son, but go toward the light... the light is good :)
--
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux user#367800
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Hello John,
Friday, November 19, 2004, 9:02:30 PM, you wrote:
Hello Chris,
Why does the Bayesit plugin not work very well?
It will pick up an occasional spam but misses most.
It will still fall for the same messages even after I mark them as
spam.
I have started to notice
Hello Maggie,
A reminder of what Maggie on TBUDL typed on:
19 November 2004 at 15:23:18 GMT -0500
I have. I've sent the default.msl file to you by PM.
I bet she's got a dozen of them now, I sent her one too.
--
Best regards,Tony.
Hello John,
Friday, November 19, 2004, 4:02:30 PM, you wrote:
JM Why does the Bayesit plugin not work very well?
JM It will pick up an occasional spam but misses most.
JM It will still fall for the same messages even after I mark them as
JM spam.
JM
Spammers have gotten hip to how
Hello Paul,
A reminder of what Paul Cartwright on TBUDL typed on:
19 November 2004 at 16:11:41 GMT -0500
I think Tony mentioned that he had a problem with this :)
I didn't have a problem with it, in fact I didn't have any problems at all
setting up pop access. What I did say was even if
I want to export some messages contained in a folder, calling The Bat!
via command line, by another program that is running as a service.
If TB! is closed, the program who calls TB!, goes on stand-by and TB!
becomes a SYSTEM process (seen by Task Manager).
If TB! is open (so TB! runs as a user's
Hallo daRkSidE,
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 22:39:33 +0100GMT (19-11-2004, 22:39 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
D If TB! is open (so TB! runs as a user's process), it works fine.
D How can I solve it?
What comes to mind would be to keep TB running. And when your system
starts have TB started too,
On Friday 19 November 2004 4:24 pm, Tony Boom wrote:
I didn't have a problem with it, in fact I didn't have any problems at all
setting up pop access. What I did say was even if you tell TB! to delete
messages from the server they stay there, they don't get deleted.
so... you don't have a
Hello Paul,
A reminder of what Paul Cartwright on TBUDL typed on:
19 November 2004 at 16:58:09 GMT -0500
so... you don't have a problem when you tell it to delete messages and they
don't?? ( time for TBOT :)
,-
CC'd to TBOT
`-
Suppose it could be classed as a problem but I
Hello TBUDL,
Historians believe that on 19 November 2004, at 22:39:33 +0100 (which was
21:39 where I live) daRkSidE emanated these words of wisdom
I want to export some messages contained in a folder, calling The Bat!
via command line, by another program that is running as a service.
If TB!
Hi John and Group,
Why does the Bayesit plugin not work very well?
It will pick up an occasional spam but misses most.
It will still fall for the same messages even after I mark them as
spam.
I have have really good luck with Bayesit no that it and TBv3 are
stable. My Out of 100
In data Fri, 19 Nov 2004 22:04:55 +, David Elliott ha scritto:
How can I solve it?
What is your OS ?
XP.
Try setting up a short cut with 'Run as' and then calling that short cut.
Interesting work-around, even if I wanted to have the possibility to
change the parameter in order to get
Hi! I'm new to this list, and I apologize for the denseness that
brings forth such a question, and just so it gets covered, I am using
gmail on the web for this list, as I would rather maintain this lists'
messages on a server I can easily check from anywhere.
There is one particular thing that
Dear Henry,
@19-Nov-2004, 19:32 -0500 (20-Nov 00:32 UK time) Henry Lefkowitz [HL]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
... snip
HL I would like for all messages that come from me,
... snip
HL to have a to line that doesn't contain the name...only the email
HL address. I know that this can be done,
Hallo Henry,
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:32:53 -0500GMT (20-11-2004, 1:32 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
HL I would like for all messages that come from me, from any account, to
HL any person, whether it is a new message, a reply, a forward, or a
HL redirect, to have a to line that doesn't contain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello, Everyone! Saturday, November 20, 2004. 02:15:32
Is it possible to see rougeemoticons in this version of Bat? And if anyone knows
if this version will be developed in future is Bat 3.xx better than SecureBat?
10x.
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Everyone ! Saturday, November 20, 2004. 02:06:21
I'm pretty much new to this mailing list, and I don't know if you have already
discussed this topic, but...
I pretty much manage to do everything related to Bat! on my
Hallo WilWilWil,
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:57:36 +0100GMT (18-11-2004, 11:57 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
W Since this morning, when I go to filters of my accounts, in
W Incoming rules, I can see my 10 rules like yesterday, but more,
W there is now a sub-folder created named Moving in Hooks !
Hallo Milan,
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 02:17:39 +0100GMT (20-11-2004, 2:17 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
MG Is it possible to see rougeemoticons in this version of Bat?
It was possible with TB 2.12 (IIRC), so I guess it would be possible
with securebat too.
MG And if anyone knows if this version
Hallo Milan,
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 02:14:45 +0100GMT (20-11-2004, 2:14 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
MG I pretty much manage to do everything related to Bat! on my own, but one
thing I
MG can't find info on is UTF-8 support.
That's because it's still a promise, not a feature.
--
Groetjes,
JM Why does the Bayesit plugin not work very well? It will pick up
JM an occasional spam but misses most. It will still fall for the
JM same messages even after I mark them as spam.
M3 Spammers have gotten hip to how Bayesian filtering works and have
M3 devised ways to get around it by
52 matches
Mail list logo
