Re: Multple addresses in TO field

2009-03-20 Thread Jens Franik
Donnerstag, 19. März 2009 at 18:25, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Now, this is funny. I guess the wife of the owner of your company owned a factory for green and yellow sheets of paper. No, it's been my job to transport raising agent and cheese to Spain and Portugal and get back paper from Portugal

Re: Multple addresses in TO field

2009-03-20 Thread MFPA
Hi On Thursday 19 March 2009 at 8:54:08 PM, in mid:9010130181.20090319215...@gmx.de, Jens Franik wrote: as an Option to configure like Empty Subject. How do you configure the Empty Subject pop-up? I have never found the option. -- Best regards, MFPA Don't

Re: Multple addresses in TO field

2009-03-20 Thread MAU
Hello MFPA, as an Option to configure like Empty Subject. How do you configure the Empty Subject pop-up? I have never found the option. Options/Preferences/Other options/Confirmations -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.1.11.8 See some of my photos at

Re: Multple addresses in TO field

2009-03-20 Thread Jens Franik
Freitag, 20. März 2009 at 15:39, MFPA wrote: mid:9010130181.20090319215...@gmx.de, Jens Franik wrote: as an Option to configure like Empty Subject. How do you configure the Empty Subject pop-up? I have never found the option. I am glad, i can help you out: There is a Checkbox in the

Re: Multple addresses in TO field

2009-03-20 Thread Jens Franik
Freitag, 20. März 2009 at 16:49, MAU wrote: as an Option to configure like Empty Subject. How do you configure the Empty Subject pop-up? I have never found the option. Options/Preferences/Other options/Confirmations Thank you for the Team-Play! I thought, there must be an equivalent

Re: Multple addresses in TO field

2009-03-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jens, On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:56:00 +0100 GMT (20/Mar/09, 16:56 +0700 GMT), Jens Franik wrote: Now, this is funny. I guess the wife of the owner of your company owned a factory for green and yellow sheets of paper. JF No, it's been my job to transport raising agent and cheese to Spain JF

Re: Multple addresses in TO field

2009-03-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jack, On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:40:39 -0500 GMT (20/Mar/09, 1:40 +0700 GMT), Jack S. LaRosa wrote: JSL [...] As a consequence, my daughter is now receiving messages JSL from her cousin with whom she may or may not wish to maintain JSL correspondence. No biggie, but I wish TB would keep a

Re: Multple addresses in TO field

2009-03-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello MFPA, On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:11:05 + GMT (20/Mar/09, 3:11 +0700 GMT), MFPA wrote: Personally, if person A asks me for the email address of person B, I never give it out without asking person B if it's ok to do so. I wish only that TB made sure I adhered to this rule when sending to

Re: Multple addresses in TO field

2009-03-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello MFPA, On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:20:56 + GMT (20/Mar/09, 3:20 +0700 GMT), MFPA wrote: Actually, I was taught that whenever sending a message to multiple recipients who may or may not know each other, it is considered prudent NOT to include everyone in the TO field. M Not just prudent -

Re: Multple addresses in TO field

2009-03-20 Thread Jens Franik
Freitag, 20. März 2009 at 17:54, Thomas Fernandez wrote: You are in the trucking business? I have been for some years and some X * 10 km (about 15-2 per month). -- With kind Regards Jens Franik mailto:je...@gmx.de Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat!

Re: Multple addresses in TO field

2009-03-20 Thread Jens Franik
Freitag, 20. März 2009 at 18:00, Thomas Fernandez wrote: And the CC field. And the warning will be ignored. I guarantee you that people who put multiple addresses in TO or CC fields don;t even think for a moment what they do, and they will click the warning away without even reading it. So,

Re: Multple addresses in TO field

2009-03-20 Thread Jens Franik
Freitag, 20. März 2009 at 18:03, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Unfortunately, it is not even considered bad manners over here, because cultures are different as well. Call me Don Quijote, these are my windmills. It is the same in Italy :-) -- With kind Regards Jens Franik mailto:je...@gmx.de

Re: Multple addresses in TO field

2009-03-20 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Friday, March 20, 2009, 20:12:44, Jens Franik wrote: So, maybe, they should have to type in I agree to THIS or simply YES They'll click [X] and then complain that the program doesn't work (and still won't read the message). I've seen it happen too many times. -- Jernej Simončič

Re: Multple addresses in TO field

2009-03-20 Thread MFPA
Hi On Friday 20 March 2009 at 3:49:31 PM, in mid:293118673.20090320164...@rancho-k.com, MAU wrote: Options/Preferences/Other options/Confirmations Thanks, MAU. Sorted. It had not occurred to me to try the box about /saving/ a message with an empty subject because I was looking for one that

Re: Multple addresses in TO field

2009-03-20 Thread Jens Franik
Freitag, 20. März 2009 at 22:57, MFPA wrote: Thanks, MAU. Sorted. It had not occurred to me to try the box about /saving/ a message with an empty subject because I was looking for one that said it was about /sending/ a message with empty subject. I always want a subject in a message I send

Re: Multple addresses in TO field

2009-03-20 Thread MFPA
Hi On Friday 20 March 2009 at 7:13:34 PM, in mid:1086246945.20090320201...@gmx.de, Jens Franik wrote: Freitag, 20. März 2009 at 18:03, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Unfortunately, it is not even considered bad manners over here, because cultures are different as well. Call me Don Quijote, these

Re: Multple addresses in TO field

2009-03-20 Thread MFPA
Hi On Friday 20 March 2009 at 5:03:34 PM, in mid:165292262.20090321000...@thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de, Thomas Fernandez wrote: M Or to a disposable address used for the purpose... You cannot use a disposal email address in busines. If you want to do any. I do not see how using a disposable

Re: Multple addresses in TO field

2009-03-20 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello Thomas, TF Hello Jack, TF On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:40:39 -0500 GMT (20/Mar/09, 1:40 +0700 GMT), TF Jack S. LaRosa wrote: JSL [...] As a consequence, my daughter is now receiving messages JSL from her cousin with whom she may or may not wish to maintain JSL correspondence. No biggie, but I