Hello Thomas, TF> Hello Jack,
TF> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:40:39 -0500 GMT (20/Mar/09, 1:40 +0700 GMT), TF> Jack S. LaRosa wrote: JSL>>>> [...] As a consequence, my daughter is now receiving messages JSL>>>> from her cousin with whom she may or may not wish to maintain JSL>>>> correspondence. No biggie, but I wish TB would keep a closer JSL>>>> eye on me. TF>>> Sorry, TB! can't know that. I am sorry to hear that your daughter and TF>>> her cousin are now in touch. I am sorry, but what again is the TF>>> problem? JSL>> Probably none. In this case. TF> I'm so relieved to hear that. JSL>> It's just that in today's world where personal emails probably surpass JSL>> business emails in quantity, TF> OMG! I'm glad that my experience is different. 126 business email TF> today. Many of them I can answer with a short notice. Private emails I TF> answer with more personal concern for the people. I couldn't handle TF> 126 personal emails a day. JSL>> the etiquette of concealing other addresses I assume, would be JSL>> appreciated by many. TF> Yes, absolutely. I have been angered many times by people CC'ing me in TF> to a "funny" mail to a hundred people I don't know. As have I. Most annoying. JSL>> In which case, a trigger alerting the sender of multiple JSL>> addresses in the TO field might be appreciated. TF> And the CC field. And the warning will be ignored. I guarantee you TF> that people who put multiple addresses in TO or CC fields don;t even TF> think for a moment what they do, and they will click the warning away TF> without even reading it. Probably. But since most (some?, a few?) of us agree in this matter, a tickle in the ear of RIT Labs might be in order. JSL>> Personally, if person "A" asks me for the email address of person JSL>> "B", I never give it out without asking person "B" if it's ok to JSL>> do so. I wish only that TB made sure I adhered to this rule when JSL>> sending to multiple addresses. TF> TB! cannot do that, only education can. TB! cannot do that YET. Perhaps in a future version? -- Jack LaRosa mailto:jlar...@charter.net Sticking with with The Bat! ver: 3.99.3 for now. Operating? with Windows XP Pro ver 5 build 2600 Service Pack 3 ________________________________________________ Current version is 4.1.11 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html