Re: Unicode support?

2004-10-01 Thread Edvinas Matiuaitis
Hello Thorvald, On Friday, October 1, 2004, at 08:53 Lithuanian Time, you wrote: TN That's what they told me when 1.xx was around... ;) Exactly! -- Edvinas Using The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows 2000 Service Pack 4 Current version is

Re: Unicode support?

2004-10-01 Thread Kevin Amazon
Hi Thorvald Neumann - On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, at 07:53:03 [GMT +0200] (which was 10:53 PM where I live) you wrote: That's what they told me when 1.xx was around... ;) Exactly! -- Best Regards, Kevin PGP Keys: idap://keyserver.pgp.com

Re: Unicode support?

2004-10-01 Thread David M. Dickerson
Hello, Edvinas. On Thursday, 30 September 2004, you wrote: EM I am very pesimistic regarding unicode support. EM It was promised for years, but promises just EM left promises. I realize that TBUDL is not a forum for complaining, ;-) but, in all candor, I share your pessimism about The Bat! ever

Re: Unicode support?

2004-09-30 Thread Edvinas Matiuaitis
Hello Spam, On Thursday, September 30, 2004, at 16:51 Lithuanian Time, you wrote: S Will The Bat! support Unicode support? I am very pesimistic regarding unicode support. It was promised for years, but promises just left promises. -- Edvinas Using The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows 2000 Service Pack

Re: Unicode support?

2004-09-30 Thread Spam
Hello Spam, On Thursday, September 30, 2004, at 16:51 Lithuanian Time, you wrote: S Will The Bat! support Unicode support? I am very pesimistic regarding unicode support. It was promised for years, but promises just left promises. Why so? About all OS'es support Unicode. Windows has

Re: Unicode support?

2004-09-30 Thread Thorvald Neumann
Hæ! Thursday, September 30, 2004, 18:11, Edvinas Matiuðaitis wrote: I am very pesimistic regarding unicode support. It was promised for years, but promises just left promises. That's what I am waiting for, too. *bumpthetopicuptothetoponthefeaturelist* -- Kveðja! Thorvald Neumann |

Re: Unicode support?

2004-09-30 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 30 Sep 2004, @ @ at 19:11:50 +0300, when Edvinas Matiuaitis wrote: Hello Spam, On Thursday, September 30, 2004, at 16:51 Lithuanian Time, you wrote: S Will The Bat! support

Re: Unicode support?

2004-09-30 Thread Thorvald Neumann
Hæ! Please add your voice to the TB's bugtraq wishlist. Here is the wish for Unicode: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=234 -- Kveðja! Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/ --- The Bat! v3.0.1 RC1 PopFile v0.22.0 Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195)

Re: Unicode support? aka Eying Infinity

2004-09-30 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 30 Sep 2004, @ @ at 18:37:40 +0200, when Spam wrote to Edvinas: I do not agree with you at all that Unicode is just a empty promise. You just didn't wait enough. Watering

Re: Unicode support?

2004-09-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Spam, You got a name? On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:37:40 +0200 GMT (30/09/2004, 23:37 +0700 GMT), Spam wrote: S I do not agree with you at all that Unicode is just a empty promise. IMHO Unicode is the future. What Edvinas meant is that *Unicode in TB* has been promised for a long time and

Re: Unicode support?

2004-09-30 Thread Spam
Hello Spam, You got a name? On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:37:40 +0200 GMT (30/09/2004, 23:37 +0700 GMT), Spam wrote: S I do not agree with you at all that Unicode is just a empty promise. IMHO Unicode is the future. What Edvinas meant is that *Unicode in TB* has been promised for a long

Re: Unicode support?

2004-09-30 Thread WL
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 00:55:41 +0700, Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:37:40 +0200 GMT (30/09/2004, 23:37 +0700 GMT), Spam wrote: S I do not agree with you at all that Unicode is just a empty promise. IMHO Unicode is the future. What Edvinas meant is that

Re: Unicode support?

2004-09-30 Thread Thorvald Neumann
Hæ! Friday, October 1, 2004, 05:23, WL wrote: It will be added as soon as possible. That's what they told me when 1.xx was around... ;) -- Kveðja! Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/ --- The Bat! v3.0.1 RC1 PopFile v0.22.0 Windows 2000 SP4

Re: Unicode

2001-09-09 Thread SyP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Jernej Simonèiè, You wrote on 9/9/2001, 9:12 PM: Jernej Interesting, here Opera 5.12 doesn't seem to display the page Jernej correctly... (but it may be because I installed ISO-8859-2 Jernej unofficial patch) IE 5.5 shows it fine here...

Re: Unicode

2001-09-07 Thread SyP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Edvinas, You wrote on 9/7/2001, 3:04 PM: Edvinas As I understand, currently The Bat! does not support Unicode. Edvinas Am I right? There is already some (very limited) functionality present, so if you receive an UTF-7 or UTF-8 encoded

Re: Unicode

2001-09-07 Thread Thomas F
Hello SyP, On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 16:39:26 +0200 GMT (07/09/2001, 22:39 +0800 GMT), SyP wrote: S There is already some (very limited) functionality present, so if you S receive an UTF-7 or UTF-8 encoded email, TB! will try to display it - S but internally converts it first to some 8-bit

Re: Unicode

2001-09-07 Thread SyP
This message is HTML on purpose, sorry about that. :) Let's see how TB! deals with UTF-8! katakana letter ZI: ジ o with double acute: ő o with tilde: õ a with grave accent: à the Euro sign: € Thomas Do you have a way of sending me such a message? If it isThomas UTF-encoded, and you have

Fwd: Re: Unicode

2001-09-07 Thread SyP
Hi Sorry I think my last message didn't look the same on the list as before I sent it out... Here it is MIME-attached. SyP This message is HTML on purpose, sorry about that. :) Let's see how TB! deals with UTF-8! katakana letter ZI: ジ o with double acute: ő o with tilde: õ a with grave

Re: Unicode

2001-09-07 Thread Thomas F
Hello SyP, On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 19:08:13 +0200 GMT (08/09/2001, 01:08 +0800 GMT), SyP wrote: S Let's see how TB! deals with UTF-8! I couldn't find a Context-Type and charset= header in your message. Right clicking and choosing Charater Set on your message shows None. In plain text view, none

Re: Unicode

2001-09-07 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 19:08:13 +0200GMT (which was 19:08 +0200GMT where I live), SyP presented us with these thoughts about Unicode: S This message is HTML on purpose, sorry about that. :) S Let's see how TB! deals with UTF-8! Hi SyP, in The Bat! I

Re: Unicode

2001-09-07 Thread SyP
Hello Thomas, You wrote on 9/7/2001, 7:37 PM: Thomas I couldn't find a Context-Type and charset= header in your Thomas message. Thomas Right clicking and choosing Character Set on your message Thomas shows None. Sorry, this is my last try :) I think I know what happened: At first I saved

Re: Unicode

2001-09-07 Thread SyP
Hello Thomas, You wrote on 9/7/2001, 7:37 PM: Thomas I couldn't find a Context-Type and charset= header in your Thomas message. Thomas Right clicking and choosing Character Set on your message Thomas shows None. Sorry, this is my last try :) I think I know what happened: At first I saved

Re: Unicode

2001-09-07 Thread SyP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, I wrote on 9/7/2001, 8:11 PM: SyP Now I will try to send the message saved from Outlook attached as SyP file. It didn't exactly worked out... Now, sorry everyone for the torrent of HTML mail :) I just really liked TB! to properly

Re: Unicode

2001-09-07 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello SyP, On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 at 20:11:51 GMT +0200 (which was 9/8/2001 1:11 AM where you think I live) you told to the list : By the way, TBUDL now accepts attachments, sh! ;) Oops, try it now :-) -- Best regards, - Syafril - --

Re: Unicode ?

2001-01-26 Thread Lija
Hello NamNH, On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, at 06:47:47 [GMT +0700] (00:47 my local time), you wrote: N Pls let me know if The Bat supports character UTF-8 ? N I found that Becky 2.0 is suppoting this character set N so that I can send UNICODE fonts But, tell me, do you need to send it Unicode? Does

RE: Unicode ?

2001-01-24 Thread Gary Blakely
STOP SPAMING ME WITH THESE MESSAGES !! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of NamNH Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 3:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Unicode ? Pls let me know if The Bat supports character UTF-8 ? I found that Becky 2.0

Re: Unicode TB!'s Browser

2000-12-26 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Avenarius, On Tue, 26 Dec 2000 20:53:04 +0100GMT (27/12/2000, 03:53 +0800GMT), Avenarius wrote: A Perhaps Opera should advertise itself, A "The Best Browsing Experience That There Ever Was For Western A Europeans Who Never Bothered to Learn an Eastern European Language". LOL! And right you

Re: Unicode TB!'s Browser

2000-12-26 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Oleg, On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 10:51:00 +0400GMT (27/12/2000, 14:51 +0800GMT), OK3 wrote: O Isn't Russian an Eastern European Language? Still Opera is the best O browser experience for me. Sure is, but then, he could have made a list of the languages he means, which includes his. You know

Re: Unicode (was: Re: Digest (09/29/2000 04:51) Special Issue (#2000-368))

2000-09-30 Thread Ming-Li
On Saturday, September 30, 2000, 11:13:33 AM, Thomas wrote: I think that Unicode is the future, Agreed. and tracer said that in W2K, it's there as a standard. At least back to NT4, Unicode has been the internal system code, same with Office 97 (at least) and up. -- Best regards, Ming-Li