Re: Follow-up header (was: Common courtesy on threading!)

2004-07-03 Thread Greg Strong
Hello subscriber2list, Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 2:19:55 PM, subscriber2list wrote: s I s liked Greg's description of how-to and thought it a great function. s He didn't chime in when I asked the initial question, so either he s is/wa very busy and didn't see it or thought Hey, I don't want to s

Re: Follow-up header (was: Common courtesy on threading!)

2004-07-03 Thread Greg Strong
Hello subscriber2list, Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 2:19:55 PM, subscriber2list wrote: s I too am perfectly happy (within reason, that is s In time I will more than likely take the plunge, but I'm wondering s how does RIT price all these upgrades? What I mean is ... every time s there is a new

Re: Follow-up header (was: Common courtesy on threading!)

2004-07-03 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Terry, Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 1:30:26 PM, Terry G. Munson wrote: TGM I think follow up would be references in version 2.00. I think you are correct, so my earlier post was incorrect. Whatever! -- Best Regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.12 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600

Re: Follow-up header (was: Common courtesy on threading!)

2004-06-30 Thread subscriber2list
Hello Cyrille, Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 5:19:14 AM, you wrote: C Hello Subscriber2list, C Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 12:17:21 AM, you wrote: Then I displayed the View option menu of the message itself and no Follow-up menu selection was offered. Oh well ... not a biggy to me as I can

Re: Follow-up header (was: Common courtesy on threading!)

2004-06-30 Thread Mary Bull
Hello subscriber2list! On Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 12:54 PM, you wrote: S Then I displayed the View option menu of the message itself and no S Follow-up menu selection was offered Now that you've been through all the trial-and-error possibilities, I'll chime in with my experience. When I was

Re: Follow-up header (was: Common courtesy on threading!)

2004-06-30 Thread Cyrille
Hello Subscriber2list, Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 7:54:48 PM, you wrote: C 3) The context menu which opens gives you the possibilities to show C(and to hide) 12 different headers. Among them you find also the C'Follow-up' header. No Follow-up possibility was in the context menu of

Re: Follow-up header (was: Common courtesy on threading!)

2004-06-30 Thread Mary Bull
Hello subscriber2list! On Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 2:19 PM, you wrote: s In time I will more than likely take the plunge, but I'm wondering s how does RIT price all these upgrades? What I mean is ... every time s there is a new release, does one have to pay for the upgrade? It s would seem

Re: Follow-up header (was: Common courtesy on threading!)

2004-06-30 Thread Adam
Hello subscriber2list, Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 4:49:55 PM, you wrote: s Well, good for you! I too am perfectly happy (within reason, that is s In time I will more than likely take the plunge, but I'm wondering s how does RIT price all these upgrades? What I mean is ... every time s there is

Re: Follow-up header (was: Common courtesy on threading!)

2004-06-30 Thread Mary Bull
Hello subscriber2list! On Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 3:09 PM, you wrote: TGM Only if you were born before 1960. ;-) s LOL! Yup ... way back ... push 'em back ... well, may be not that far s back .. 1945 or there abouts ... You delightful young puppy! (Have you tried View Threads by References

Re: Follow-up header (was: Common courtesy on threading!)

2004-06-30 Thread Mary Bull
Hello subscriber2list! On Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 3:30 PM, you wrote: MB Sorry about the ambiguous construction ... s I don't think you were ambiguous ... I just always like to confirm s what I think I've read ... possibly a bad habit on my part. I myself regard it as a very *good* habit.

Re: Follow-up header (was: Common courtesy on threading!)

2004-06-30 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello subscriber2list, Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 3:16:06 PM, you wrote: subscriber2list Aaaah, gsh! Do you think Lief is gonna git me? subscriber2list My fast fat fingers misspelled his name ... shame on subscriber2list me, shame on me, shame on me. Sorry, Leif ... I hope subscriber2list this