Hello Kevin Amazon,
09-Aug-2004 00:53, you wrote:
Strangely enough, I see the reference headers in Gerard's message but not
In-Reply-To header and his messages do not thread on my system either.
Those messages do thread fine here at my end, too. I am using version
2.12.00 of TB, and those who
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Those messages do thread fine here at my end, too. I am using
version 2.12.00 of TB, and those who report threadings works just
fine are using, as far as the information is availabe, the 2.12.xx
version ,too.
You and Allie are using 2.13beta - and the messages do
Hello Allie Martin,
09-Aug-2004 17:56, you wrote:
You and Allie are using 2.13beta - and the messages do not thread.
HA! :-)
I thought you were on to something but I'm now here at work, using
v2.12.00, and Gerard's messages are still not threading.
OIC. Just looked at the first message
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
OIC. Just looked at the first message were you reported broken threading,
and in that signature I saw 2.13...
Yes. I use v2.13 beta/3 at home and I use v2.12.00 at work. :)
--
-=[ Allie ]=- :acm:
List Moderator and fellow end-user
PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com
Hello Jan Rifkinson,
08-Aug-2004 20:29, you wrote:
Hi Pete. I assume all msgs have been read.
Ungh, now this one doesn't thread at my end! :-/
Anybody else?
--
Best regards,
Alexander
I like pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as
equals. -- Winston Churchill
ON Sunday, August 8, 2004, 8:31:18 PM, you wrote:
AM I've noted that your messages are not threading. Upon checking, they
AM seem to lack the In-Reply-To: header which should contain the id of
AM the message that you're replying to.
AM I wonder where that header is disappearing to?
AM Are you
Hi Zonnet
-
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, at 19:34:16 [GMT +0200] (which was 10:34 AM where
I live) you wrote:
Hi Allie,
The answer is Xray. I remove everything that is not strictly needed. I am
slightly paranoid. I left the msg id in and TB uses that to
Alexander S. Kunz, [ASK] wrote:
Ungh, now this one doesn't thread at my end! :-/
Anybody else?
Yes. That one lacked both In-Reply-To and Reference headers.
--
Allie Martin [List Moderator and fellow end-user]
The Bat! v2.13 Lucky Beta/3 on WinXP Pro (SP1)
. And the only thing the Borg
Hallo Alexander,
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 17:15:44 +0200GMT (9-8-2004, 17:15 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
ASK You and Allie are using 2.13beta - and the messages do not thread. HA! :-)
So am I and here they threaf.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
The Bat! 2.13 Lucky Beta/4
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 15:41:19, Mike email (The Bat!) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Saturday, August 7, 2004, 9:27:58 AM, Bill McQuillan wrote:
BM I had to insert the Sender: header field manually (as X-Sender!) and
BM I had to save the message into the Outbox to get the Bat! to let me
BM put my
ON Saturday, August 7, 2004, 10:01:01 PM, you wrote:
PH Cool! Where do I put this? It doesn't seem to fit the point-and-click
PH filter creation in TB.
PH Thanks.
Pete,
Copy the filter with CTRL-C from BeginFilter to EndFilter
Go to sorting office and select read messages.
Press CTRL-V and
ON Saturday, August 7, 2004, 10:27:58 AM, you wrote:
BM I had to insert the Sender: header field manually (as X-Sender!) and
BM I had to save the message into the Outbox to get the Bat! to let me
BM put my address into the Sender: field.
Well Bill,
You have proven it to be technically possible
Zonnet, [Z] wrote:
You have proven it to be technically possible to do this but I do
not see the value of multiple addresses in the From: field.
I've noted that your messages are not threading. Upon checking, they
seem to lack the In-Reply-To: header which should contain the id of
the message
On Friday, August 06, 2004 it appears that Pete Holsberg
wrote the following in regards to Harvest Sender Email Addresses??:
JR I may not understand what you want either but have you looked @
JR filters | actions | Add address(es) to Address Book
PH I have a folder full of email messages.
On Saturday, August 07, 2004 it appears that Pete Holsberg
wrote the following in regards to Harvest Sender Email Addresses??:
PH Addressbook group did not get any additions.
PH Seems like it should work but nothing happens.
PH ???
Here's a copy of my filter which worked. except for one
Hallo Allie,
On Sun, 8 Aug 2004 13:31:18 -0500GMT (8-8-2004, 20:31 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
AM I've noted that your messages are not threading. Upon checking, they
AM seem to lack the In-Reply-To: header which should contain the id of
AM the message that you're replying to.
Gerard's
Hi Roelof Otten
-
On Sun, 8 Aug 2004, at 23:49:11 [GMT +0200] (which was 2:49 PM where I
live) you wrote:
AM I've noted that your messages are not threading. Upon checking, they
AM seem to lack the In-Reply-To: header which should contain the id of
AM
On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 12:32:38, Zonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have never seen a msg with multiple address in the From: field.
Maybe you could send one to demonstrate?
I had to insert the Sender: header field manually (as X-Sender!) and
I had to save the message into the Outbox to get the
On Sat, 2004-08-07 at 01:27:58, Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 12:32:38, Zonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have never seen a msg with multiple address in the From: field.
Maybe you could send one to demonstrate?
I had to insert the Sender: header field
Hallo Bill,
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 01:27:58 -0700GMT (7-8-2004, 10:27 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
I have never seen a msg with multiple address in the From: field.
Maybe you could send one to demonstrate?
BM I had to insert the Sender: header field manually (as X-Sender!) and
BM I had to
ON Friday, August 6, 2004, 1:04:38 AM, you wrote:
BM The question (IMHO) asks about multiple From addresses in a single message, not
BM multiple messages in a folder.
Hi Bill,
I assumed that the multiple From addresses was I typo.
Think about it. How can I child have multiple fathers? oops
--
On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 00:59:05, Zonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I assumed that the multiple From addresses was I typo.
Think about it. How can I child have multiple fathers? oops
It is quite easy for a message to have multiple authors. This is what the From:
header field is intended to show.
On Friday, August 06, 2004 it appears that Pete Holsberg wrote the
following in regards to Harvest Sender Email Addresses??:
One is to write a filter that add the name to an address book when they
arrive. YOu can export these later to a CSV file which you can read into a
spreadsheet or word
ON Friday, August 6, 2004, 5:27:55 PM, you wrote:
PH Sorry to be ambiguous. What I want is to harvest each From address from
PH a group of email messages.
Hi Pete,
I guessed as much, so all those options I gave you will work.
I have used them myself.
--
Best regards,
Gerard
ON Friday, August 6, 2004, 6:38:43 PM, you wrote:
BM It is quite easy for a message to have multiple authors. This is
BM what the From: header field is intended to show. In fact, one of the
BM uses of the Sender: header field is to show the actual, single
BM sender of the message when there are
ON Friday, August 6, 2004, 9:45:10 PM, you wrote:
PH I have a folder full of email messages.
PH I would like to -- automagically, extract from each message the email address of
PH the sender and append it to a text file in a specified directory.
Hi Pete,
Try this filter. It is set to manual
On Friday, August 06, 2004 it appears that Pete Holsberg
wrote the following in regards to Harvest Sender Email Addresses??:
JR I may not understand what you want either but have you looked @
JR filters | actions | Add address(es) to Address Book
PH I have a folder full of email messages.
Hallo Bill,
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:38:43 -0700GMT (6-8-2004, 18:38 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
BM It is quite easy for a message to have multiple authors. This is
BM what the From: header field is intended to show. In fact, one of
BM the uses of the Sender: header field is to show the
Dear Pete,
@5-Aug-2004, 11:56 -0400 (05-Aug 16:56 UK time) Pete Holsberg said
to tbudl:
In TheBat 2.10, is there away to harvest all sender email
addresses (i.e, the entire From: line) to an external file?
Yes, using a manual filter. You would export each message,
appending to a file, using
Dear Pete,
@5-Aug-2004, 12:06 -0400 (05-Aug 17:06 UK time) Pete Holsberg said
to Marck:
In TheBat 2.10, is there away to harvest all sender email
addresses (i.e, the entire From: line) to an external file?
MDP Yes, using a manual filter. You would export each message,
MDP appending to a file,
ON Thursday, August 5, 2004, 5:56:21 PM, you wrote:
PH In TheBat 2.10, is there away to harvest all sender email
PH addresses (i.e, the entire From: line)
PH to an external file?
Hi Pete,
There are a few ways to do this.
One is to write a filter that add the name to an address book when they
Thu, 5 Aug 2004 12:06:00 -0400 (12:06 PM EDT here) Pete Holsberg wrote:
Cool. Where do I learn about filters and macros?
TheBat! = Help
Help Topics
Index
[Filters]
Display
TheBat! = Help
Help Topics
On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 14:22:15, Zonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ON Thursday, August 5, 2004, 5:56:21 PM, you wrote:
PH In TheBat 2.10, is there away to harvest all sender email
PH addresses (i.e, the entire From: line)
PH to an external file?
Hi Pete,
There are a few ways to do this.
One
33 matches
Mail list logo
