Hello MAU,
On Saturday, September 14, 2013 you wrote:
M Hello Jack,
Is there a macro to generate a thread subject?
M Try this in your reply template:
M %SUBJ=%SUBJ=%OFULLSUBJ
Thank you Miguel, that works perfectly.
--
Best Regards,
Jack LaRosa
:usflag: Central Alabama
Using The Bat!
Hello Roelof,
On Friday, September 13, 2013 you wrote:
RO Hallo Jack,
RO On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:16:05 -0500GMT (12-9-2013, 16:16 , where I
RO live), you wrote:
JSL Ok, here's the NEW template:
RO Nothing in your templates that should empty the subject header.
RO Though I'd use %SetEditor=1%-
Hello Jack,
Is there a macro to generate a thread subject?
Try this in your reply template:
%SUBJ=%SUBJ=%OFULLSUBJ
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v5.4.8
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com
Hello Rick,
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 you wrote:
JSL Hello TBUD Listers,
JSL I just recently discovered that I could add the line %SetEditor=1 to
JSL my NEW and REPLY templates to guarantee that Plain Text would always be
used in
JSL those instances. I just noticed that when I reply to
Hallo Jack,
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:16:05 -0500GMT (12-9-2013, 16:16 , where I
live), you wrote:
JSL Ok, here's the NEW template:
Nothing in your templates that should empty the subject header.
Though I'd use %SetEditor=1%- in both templates.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Of course, you know that the
JSL Hello TBUD Listers,
JSL I just recently discovered that I could add the line %SetEditor=1 to
JSL my NEW and REPLY templates to guarantee that Plain Text would always be
used in
JSL those instances. I just noticed that when I reply to a list message, the
JSL subject line is empty when it
Hello Bill,
A reminder of what Bill McQuillan on TBUDL typed on:
17 December 2004 at 07:04:17 GMT +0100
BM My recommendation is to uncheck Use reply numbering in the subject line
in all reply templates.
%SINGLERE
In address book templates.
--
Best regards,Tony.
Hi
On Friday 17 December 2004 at 6:02:11 AM, Bill McQuillan wrote:
However, just about everyone agrees that any other notations
(like: Re(2):, 2Re:, Ant:, or many others) should NEVER be used
since email programs cannot be expected to figure out all of the
clever things that programmers
On Thu, 2004-12-16, Greg Strong wrote:
Hello TB Lists,
Just thought I'd let those of you who use counters in your subject with
a reply (i.e. Re[2]: GnuPG 1.4.0) that it messes up the threading in my
newsreader (i.e. Agent 1.93) when I pull from Gmane. Not that you really
care about my
9 matches
Mail list logo
