Hi
On Saturday 28 May 2011 at 7:02:46 PM, in
mid:546171620.20110529010...@thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de, Thomas Fernandez
wrote:
If you send severasl messages at once, do you mean in
a queue, or simultaneously? TB! can do both:
Either way, messages going out consume bandwidth and slow everything
Hi
On Monday 30 May 2011 at 2:42:47 PM, in
mid:1196637279.20110530094...@for-him.net, Paul Van Noord wrote:
Based on my experiences with non-powerful local SMTP
server software the performance hits you experience are
part of the price of using the local SMTP software, and
not related to
Hi
On Saturday 28 May 2011 at 4:29:25 AM, in
mid:19210533848.20110528102...@thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de, Thomas
Fernandez wrote:
You can do that. I always put the messages in the
Outbox, because it looks like I have a wait for the
message being sent if I use send immediately. Maybe
my broadband
Hello MFPA,
On Sat, 28 May 2011 12:23:33 +0100 GMT (28/May/11, 18:23 PM +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
You can do that. I always put the messages in the Outbox, because
it looks like I have a wait for the message being sent if I use
send immediately. Maybe my broadband is slower than yours and you
Hello Ian,
On Fri, 27 May 2011 07:31:53 +1000 GMT (27/May/11, 4:31 AM +0700 GMT),
Ian A. White wrote:
DC 'Put message in outbox' has always resulted in the message being sent as
DC far back as I remember. If one wants to park a message in the outbox,
DC as opposed to queuing it for dispatch,
Hello Ian,
On Fri, 27 May 2011 07:33:19 +1000 GMT (27/May/11, 4:33 AM +0700 GMT),
Ian A. White wrote:
IAW In hindsight, I should have, but before postponed sending was
IAW introduced, if you Put message in Outbox it would stay there until
IAW you did a general Send from that account.
[...]
TF
Hi
On Friday 27 May 2011 at 2:57:11 PM, in
mid:278612832.20110527205...@thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de, Thomas Fernandez
wrote:
Yes. I wouldn't have imagined that people would disable
what I personally consider a basic feature. You have
widened my horizon.
I also do have TB! set to periodically
Hello Ian,
On Sat, 28 May 2011 08:17:55 +1000 GMT (28/May/11, 5:17 AM +0700 GMT),
Ian A. White wrote:
TF Yes. I wouldn't have imagined that people would disable what I
TF personally consider a basic feature. You have widened my horizon.
IAW I do check my mail periodically (automatically) but
Hello MFPA,
On Fri, 27 May 2011 23:16:00 +0100 GMT (28/May/11, 5:16 AM +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
Yes. I wouldn't have imagined that people would disable what I
personally consider a basic feature. You have widened my horizon.
M I also do have TB! set to periodically send or receive. Usually I
M
From: Ian A. White r...@thebat.net
Even so, the mere fact that a message is in an Outbox should not mean
that it is automatically sent unless it has been scheduled to be sent,
or because the user has done a send queued mail in that account.
I have had to
On Thursday, May 26, 2011, 8:15:11 AM, Ian A. White wrote:
Even so, the mere fact that a message is in an Outbox should not mean
that it is automatically sent unless it has been scheduled to be sent,
or because the user has done a send queued mail in that account.
'Put message in outbox'
Hello Ian,
On Thu, 26 May 2011 07:27:32 +1000 GMT (26/May/11, 4:27 AM +0700 GMT),
Ian A. White wrote:
RO You should have used 'save as draft'
IAW In hindsight, I should have, but before postponed sending was
IAW introduced, if you Put message in Outbox it would stay there until
IAW you did a
Hello Dwight,
On Thu, 26 May 2011 08:44:28 -0500 GMT (26/May/11, 20:44 PM +0700 GMT),
Dwight Corrin wrote:
Even so, the mere fact that a message is in an Outbox should not mean
that it is automatically sent unless it has been scheduled to be sent,
or because the user has done a send queued
On Thursday, May 26, 2011, 11:20:43 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
True. In fact, this is how I have been using TB! suceessfully since
v1.x.
yes. 1.60 for me it looks like.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at
On Thursday, May 26, 2011, 4:30:36 PM, Ian A. White wrote:
DC 'Put message in outbox' has always resulted in the message being sent as
DC far back as I remember.
Yes, but only if you had automatic timed sending of queued mail. I
have never had The Bat! set to automatically send queued mail.
Thursday, May 26, 2011, 5:30:36 PM, Ian wrote:
IAW On Thursday, May 26, 2011, at 11:44:28 PM, you (Dwight Corrin) wrote:
DC On Thursday, May 26, 2011, 8:15:11 AM, Ian A. White wrote:
DC
Even so, the mere fact that a message is in an Outbox should not mean
that it is automatically sent
Hallo Ian,
On Wed, 25 May 2011 14:58:00 +1000GMT (25-5-2011, 6:58 , where I
live), you wrote:
IAW I put the first few ones in my Outbox using the Put message in
IAW Outbox button.
You should have used 'save as draft'
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Appease the Moderator Monster. Send coffee!
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011, 9:13:57 AM, Roelof Otten wrote:
IAW I put the first few ones in my Outbox using the Put message in
IAW Outbox button.
You should have used 'save as draft'
once again lack of a draft folder causes confusion
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to
Now it seems that any message placed in the outbox will get sent
automatically. I have a postponed delay of 5 minutes, so picking the
Put message in Outbox appears to be the same as send with the
default postponed delay setting which is not how I believe the system
should work.
For the
On Wed, 25 May 2011 at 14:58:00 +1000,Ian wrote:
I put the first few ones in my Outbox using the Put message in
Outbox button. To my surprise, around5 minutes later, The Bat!
started sending them out. Now before the postponed sending option was
introduced, any message put in the outbox would
20 matches
Mail list logo
