On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Dan Wickstrom wrote:
> > If you ask me, you time would be better spent getting the
> > current code into "shape" so that it can be dropped into
> > aolserver as is.
> >
> > The code on the branch is not really set in stone, so if
> > you can provide a reasonable way to add yo
> If you ask me, you time would be better spent getting the
> current code into "shape" so that it can be dropped into
> aolserver as is.
>
> The code on the branch is not really set in stone, so if
> you can provide a reasonable way to add your stuff with
> only a minimal change (like #ifdef AOLS
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Daniel Wickstrom wrote:
> > "Mo" == Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
> Mo> What do you mean by "The jvm attach is done at the start of
> Mo> the thread by a registered proc"? Are you not using:
>
> Mo> (*javaVM)->AttachCurrentThread()
>
> M
> "Mo" == Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mo> What do you mean by "The jvm attach is done at the start of
Mo> the thread by a registered proc"? Are you not using:
Mo> (*javaVM)->AttachCurrentThread()
Mo> In JavaInitEnv() to attach the Tcl thread to the JVM? This is
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Daniel Wickstrom wrote:
> > "Mo" == Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Mo> There are two cleanup cases.
>
> Mo> TclThreadCleanup is called when a Tcl thread (one that was not
> Mo> started inside a JVM) is terminated. TclThreadCleanup will
> Mo
> "Mo" == Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mo> There are two cleanup cases.
Mo> TclThreadCleanup is called when a Tcl thread (one that was not
Mo> started inside a JVM) is terminated. TclThreadCleanup will
Mo> just call DetachCurrentThread() to disconnect the Tcl thread
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Daniel Wickstrom wrote:
> > "Mo" == Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Mo> That does seem logical. It looks like the Class refs need to
> Mo> be cleaned up. What do you think of the patch below?
>
> The patch looks good. I'll have to wait until tonig
> "Mo" == Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mo> That does seem logical. It looks like the Class refs need to
Mo> be cleaned up. What do you think of the patch below?
The patch looks good. I'll have to wait until tonight to apply it, as
I can't seem to apply it to the version t
