Simple diff to print UniNorth's revision so it becomes easy to know
which AGP chipset people have without looking at the 'eeprom -p' output.
before:
memc0 at mainbus0: uni-n
after:
memc0 at mainbus0: uni-n rev 0xd2
Ok?
Index: dev/uni_n.c
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Martin Pieuchot
mpieuc...@nolizard.org wrote:
Simple diff to print UniNorth's revision so it becomes easy to know
which AGP chipset people have without looking at the 'eeprom -p' output.
before:
memc0 at mainbus0: uni-n
after:
memc0 at
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:18:06 +0100
From: Martin Pieuchot mpieuc...@nolizard.org
Simple diff to print UniNorth's revision so it becomes easy to know
which AGP chipset people have without looking at the 'eeprom -p' output.
before:
memc0 at mainbus0: uni-n
after:
memc0 at
Hi,
One of the things lacking in mg was support M-x make-directory, which comes
quite handy. This diff mimics the rather silent behaviour of Emacs: there's
basically no feedback in case creating the directory failed for whatever
reason. Should we be more verbose about it, or just stay in line
external people regularly ask but why you don't want to use GNU/m4 GNU/make
GNU/whatever ?
Well, latest one, turns out gnu-m4 has relly sloppy regexp handling.
Namely, stuff like
regexp(`n', `?')
*works* with gm4...
I know somewhat incredible... our regexpes obviously will not like ? like
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
external people regularly ask but why you don't want to use GNU/m4 GNU/make
GNU/whatever ?
External people seem to ask weird questions.
I just had to dig into autoconf/auto* because it seems to be a must
have for a portable
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Reyk Floeter r...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
external people regularly ask but why you don't want to use GNU/m4 GNU/make
GNU/whatever ?
External people seem to ask weird questions.
I just had to
On Nov 15, 2012, at 5:53 PM, Reyk Floeter r...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
external people regularly ask but why you don't want to use GNU/m4 GNU/make
GNU/whatever ?
External people seem to ask weird questions.
I just had to
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 05:53:52PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
External people seem to ask weird questions.
I just had to dig into autoconf/auto* because it seems to be a must
have for a portable project.
Here's a simple configure replacement you could use for such projects:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 08:35:52AM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 03:14:40PM -0500, sven falempin wrote:
2012/11/9 Kenneth R Westerback kwesterb...@rogers.com
Those of you following -current or running very recent snaps may have
noticed a lot of changes to
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 09:44:01AM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
Those of you following -current or running very recent snaps may have
noticed a lot of changes to dhclient in the last couple of weeks.
Aside from some major clean up, these changes revolve around the
elimination of the
On 2012/11/15 16:59, Jiri B wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 09:44:01AM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
Those of you following -current or running very recent snaps may have
noticed a lot of changes to dhclient in the last couple of weeks.
Aside from some major clean up, these changes
12 matches
Mail list logo
