On 2012/11/15 16:59, Jiri B wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 09:44:01AM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > Those of you following -current or running very recent snaps may have
> > noticed a lot of changes to dhclient in the last couple of weeks.
> >
> > Aside from some major clean up, these c
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 09:44:01AM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> Those of you following -current or running very recent snaps may have
> noticed a lot of changes to dhclient in the last couple of weeks.
>
> Aside from some major clean up, these changes revolve around the
> elimination of th
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 08:35:52AM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 03:14:40PM -0500, sven falempin wrote:
> > 2012/11/9 Kenneth R Westerback
> >
> > > Those of you following -current or running very recent snaps may have
> > > noticed a lot of changes to dhclient in t
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 03:14:40PM -0500, sven falempin wrote:
> 2012/11/9 Kenneth R Westerback
>
> > Those of you following -current or running very recent snaps may have
> > noticed a lot of changes to dhclient in the last couple of weeks.
> >
> > Aside from some major clean up, these changes r
2012/11/9 Kenneth R Westerback
> Those of you following -current or running very recent snaps may have
> noticed a lot of changes to dhclient in the last couple of weeks.
>
> Aside from some major clean up, these changes revolve around the
> elimination of the dhclient-script as both detrimental
Those of you following -current or running very recent snaps may have
noticed a lot of changes to dhclient in the last couple of weeks.
Aside from some major clean up, these changes revolve around the
elimination of the dhclient-script as both detrimental to sanity
and our ability to move forward
