On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:30:47PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
Be more specific about the order of interpretation. Okay?
diff --git share/man/man5/hostname.if.5 share/man/man5/hostname.if.5
index b07459f..aa8446f 100644
--- share/man/man5/hostname.if.5
+++ share/man/man5/hostname.if.5
@@
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Andres Perera andre...@zoho.com wrote:
don't know about OP, but yesterday i was surprised when rtlabel had to
be specified after inet
just double checked; s/after/before
ifconfig(8) section on rtlabel bears no mention about the order
before rearranging, lines
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:26:12PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:30:47PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
Be more specific about the order of interpretation. Okay?
diff --git share/man/man5/hostname.if.5 share/man/man5/hostname.if.5
index b07459f..aa8446f 100644
---
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:26:12PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:30:47PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
Be more specific about the order of interpretation. Okay?
diff --git share/man/man5/hostname.if.5 share/man/man5/hostname.if.5
index b07459f..aa8446f 100644
---
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 07:19:23PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:26:12PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:30:47PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
Be more specific about the order of interpretation. Okay?
diff --git share/man/man5/hostname.if.5
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 05:40:06PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 07:19:23PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:26:12PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:30:47PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
Be more specific about the order of
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:58:45PM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
does dhcp nwid foo wpakey bar give you problems too? because
hostname.if(5) suggests it should not:
A DHCP-configured network interface setup consists of
dhcp options
There have been problems
Any thoughts?
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 02:18:35PM -0500, David Hill wrote:
Hello -
I originally asked mikeb if splnet was needed in net/pfkey.c. He added
onto my diff (which I have included below). I noticed route_usrreq from
net/rtsock.c calls raw_usrreq protected by splsoftnet.
I thought I'd
We've discussed this with claudio and while there are might
be some other related issues with pr_usrreq and spls, I think
this particular diff needs to be committed. OK?
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 14:18 -0500, David Hill wrote:
Hello -
I originally asked mikeb if splnet was needed in
Penned by Kenneth R. Westerback on 20121126 12:58.45, we have:
| On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 05:40:06PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
| On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 07:19:23PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
| On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:26:12PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
|On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:30
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:37:22 +0100
From: Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com
We've discussed this with claudio and while there are might
be some other related issues with pr_usrreq and spls, I think
this particular diff needs to be committed. OK?
Whenever a diff like this is proposed,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:37:22 +0100
From: Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com
We've discussed this with claudio and while there are might
be some other related issues with pr_usrreq and spls, I think
this
Jason McIntyre j...@kerhand.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 07:19:23PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:26:12PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:30:47PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
Be more specific about the order of interpretation. Okay?
Todd T. Fries t...@fries.net wrote:
If there are desires to improve this (I hear Naddy grumbling!) then the
stomach to break backwards compat must be present, or suggestions on how
to do it without breaking backwards compat must be suggested.
My suggestion is two-fold:
* Introduce a new
From: na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber)
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:44:45 + (UTC)
Todd T. Fries t...@fries.net wrote:
If there are desires to improve this (I hear Naddy grumbling!) then the
stomach to break backwards compat must be present, or suggestions on how
to do it
On 2012/11/26 17:40, Jason McIntyre wrote:
anyway...i still dislike the idea of just saying order matters. also,
could someone really expect the file to not be parsed top down
Yes, I think they might; people are used to config files being read
and parsed before being applied, and because this
Mark Kettenis:
I don't really see what this buys us. You still have to maintain the
backwards compat code. You'll end up with an inconsistent mess of
hostname.if and if.whatever files. And all of this to fix what exactly?
To preserve my sanity every time I need to figure out how to bring
If there are desires to improve this (I hear Naddy grumbling!) then the
stomach to break backwards compat must be present, or suggestions on how
to do it without breaking backwards compat must be suggested.
My suggestion is two-fold:
* Introduce a new format. This new format will ignore #
Le 23/11/2012 08:35, Kirill Bychkov a écrit :
Hi.
This patch adds fingerprint reader and ati video, found on my girlfriend's hp
pavillion dv6.
OK?
Index: pci/pcidevs
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/pcidevs,v
retrieving
Hi,
here's a 250k diff to update our base sqlite3 to the latest 3.7.14.1 :
http://rhaalovely.net/~landry/shared/sqlite-3.7.14.1.diff
I hope i got the diff right, iirc no local modifications were made to
the actual code.
Mozilla 18 branch depends on it (for no good reason as usual) so i'd
like to
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 05:36:20PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
If there are desires to improve this (I hear Naddy grumbling!) then the
stomach to break backwards compat must be present, or suggestions on how
to do it without breaking backwards compat must be suggested.
My suggestion is
21 matches
Mail list logo
