Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2018/04/09 09:27, Matthias Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> On 08.04.2018 22:42, Christian Barthel wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > i am often sitting behind a very slow internet link and thought, it
>> > might be useful to show the current bandwidth while downloa
isn't standalone if __BSD_VISIBLE is defined (the default).
This has caused fallout earlier in the ports tree:
https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/net/samba/patches/patch-lib_replace_wscript.diff?r1=1.7&r2=1.8
https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/ports/net/dnsdi
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_and_only_if
As a non-native speaker, it took some years before I realized the use of
“iff” is not a typo.
Kind regards,
Job
On 2018/04/13 20:01, llgx...@gmail.com wrote:
> - * on the level: follow it iff it's a command line arg.
> + * on the level: follow it if it's a command line arg.
iff = "if and only if"
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Iff.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_and_only_if
> > Index: chmod.c
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/chmod/chmod.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.42
> > diff -u -p -u -p -r1.42 chmod.c
> > --- chmod.c 28 May 2017 08:03:36 - 1.42
> > +++ chmod.c 13 Apr 2018 17:46:36 -
> >
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 11:29:06AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Hello tech@,
>
> Playing with vmd I noticed that a vm process has vmm's socket to the
> parent process still open.
>
> Patch below works for me.
>
> OK?
>
> martijn@
>
> Index: vmm.c
>
>Index: chmod.c
>===
>RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/chmod/chmod.c,v
>retrieving revision 1.42
>diff -u -p -u -p -r1.42 chmod.c
>--- chmod.c28 May 2017 08:03:36 - 1.42
>+++ chmod.c13 Apr 2018 17:46:36 -
>@@ -253,10 +253,10
Index: chmod.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/chmod/chmod.c,v
retrieving revision 1.42
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.42 chmod.c
--- chmod.c 28 May 2017 08:03:36 - 1.42
+++ chmod.c 13 Apr 2018 17:46:36 -
@@ -253,10 +253,10 @@ do
On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 19:42:51 +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> The diff uses timespecsub:
Ah, OK. That's fine then.
- todd
On Fri, Apr 13 2018, "Todd C. Miller" wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 11:11:04 -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
>
>> So that $SECONDS advances uniformly, independent of the system clock.
>
> Why are you including sys/time.h? For struct timespect you only
> need time.h which is already included.
>
> In ge
On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 11:11:04 -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> So that $SECONDS advances uniformly, independent of the system clock.
Why are you including sys/time.h? For struct timespect you only
need time.h which is already included.
In general, you only need sys/time.h for struct timeval or for
On Fri, Apr 13 2018, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> So that $SECONDS advances uniformly, independent of the system clock.
>
> ok?
ok jca@
> --
> Scott Cheloha
>
> P.S. Similar change forthcoming for $MAILCHECK.
>
> Index: bin/ksh/var.c
> ==
So that $SECONDS advances uniformly, independent of the system clock.
ok?
--
Scott Cheloha
P.S. Similar change forthcoming for $MAILCHECK.
Index: bin/ksh/var.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/ksh/var.c,v
retrieving revision 1.67
diff -u
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 11:29:06AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Hello tech@,
>
> Playing with vmd I noticed that a vm process has vmm's socket to the
> parent process still open.
>
> Patch below works for me.
>
> OK?
>
> martijn@
Nice find.
Ok ccardenas@
+--+
Carlos
>
> Index: vmm.c
>
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 07:37:24AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> No. There are no patches yet, and it can't handle an empty directory.
>
> I am waiting for aja and robert to decide what to do about it. Otherwise
> we'll have thus fuss at the start of every new release.
>
> Come on guys, make a
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 07:04:23PM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
> Yes this also works for me.
>
Awesome, any OKs?
Diff again for convenience:
diff --git fileio.c fileio.c
index 0987f6f30de..339088f5e2d 100644
--- fileio.c
+++ fileio.c
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ expandtilde(const char *fn)
struct s
No. There are no patches yet, and it can't handle an empty directory.
I am waiting for aja and robert to decide what to do about it. Otherwise
we'll have thus fuss at the start of every new release.
Come on guys, make a decision!
>It looks like in OpenBSD 6.3-release, syspatch(8) changed exit
Hi!
It looks like in OpenBSD 6.3-release, syspatch(8) changed exit code and now
when running alone or with -c flag, it exit with status code 1.
On 6.2 exit code was 0
63# syspatch;echo $?
1
Is it correct ?
_
Zbyszek Żółkiewski
>On 2018/04/13 14:38, Klemens Nanni wrote:
>> I propose to use `rtable' exclusively to ease searching and improve
>> consistency as that's the wording already used across the majority of
>> manuals including rtabe(4) and pf.conf(5) for example.
>
>There's not a lot in it, but tableid is slightly mo
On 2018/04/13 14:38, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> I propose to use `rtable' exclusively to ease searching and improve
> consistency as that's the wording already used across the majority of
> manuals including rtabe(4) and pf.conf(5) for example.
There's not a lot in it, but tableid is slightly more com
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:07:58AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
> On 2018 Apr 11 (Wed) at 23:01:45 +0200 (+0200), Klemens Nanni wrote:
> :On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:28:03AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
> :> No, all of these uses are correct as-is.
> :`tableid' surely isn't wrong, but using the argume
Hello tech@,
Playing with vmd I noticed that a vm process has vmm's socket to the
parent process still open.
Patch below works for me.
OK?
martijn@
Index: vmm.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/vmd/vmm.c,v
retrieving revision 1.80
22 matches
Mail list logo
