Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de writes:
since no consensus could be found yet for a new command line option to
ifconfig, heck, not even about wether it is needed, I propose this for
now.
I didn't reply to your proposal but since you've just committed the
ifconfig part, I think I
j...@wxcvbn.org (Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas) writes:
Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de writes:
since no consensus could be found yet for a new command line option to
ifconfig, heck, not even about wether it is needed, I propose this for
now.
I didn't reply to your proposal but since
I'm volunteering for this job. I know that other people have already
expressed interest in such a task. Can we please postpone
ifp-if_xflags |= IFXF_NOINET6;
until the situation is more clear? I think 5.6 is a safe bet.
No. Apparently you are the only one who keeps postponing action,
Penned by Henning Brauer on 20140608 10:14.46, we have:
| since no consensus could be found yet for a new command line option to
| ifconfig, heck, not even about wether it is needed, I propose this for
| now.
|
| 1) make ifconfig if inet6 eui64 reset the NOINET6 flag
| unconditionally, so a
since no consensus could be found yet for a new command line option to
ifconfig, heck, not even about wether it is needed, I propose this for
now.
1) make ifconfig if inet6 eui64 reset the NOINET6 flag
unconditionally, so a link-local will be assigned if there isn't one
yet.
Index:
On 8 June 2014 11:14, Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de wrote:
since no consensus could be found yet for a new command line option to
ifconfig, heck, not even about wether it is needed, I propose this for
now.
1) make ifconfig if inet6 eui64 reset the NOINET6 flag
unconditionally, so
* Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl [2014-05-15 00:15]:
I don't think this is a good idea; didn't we establish the other day
that ifconfig if eui64 already did what your +inet6 does?
almost, it's ifconfig if inet6 eui64 - but that isn't all THAT
intuitive. I like +inet6 as the opposite
link-local addrs on every
| interface by default is stupid and a security risk.
|
| this diff fixes that. well, really two independent parts.
| one: set the NOINET6 flag by default on each and every interface.
| two: implement ifconfig if +inet6 to turn inet6 on and assign
* Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com [2014-05-16 08:06]:
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:43:52AM -0500, Todd T. Fries wrote:
When I travel between networks.. at home with rtsol capable networks ..
and at e.g. a library that does not have native IPv6 .. I find it invaluable
to 'zzz' then upon
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:29:20PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
so as discussed recently having the inet6 link-local addrs on every
interface by default is stupid and a security risk.
this diff fixes that. well, really two independent parts.
one: set the NOINET6 flag by default on each
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 05:48:16AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Reyk Flöter reyk.floe...@googlemail.com [2014-05-15 01:04]:
On 15.05.2014, at 00:46, Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de wrote:
* Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl [2014-05-15 00:15]:
I don't think this is a good
On 2014/05/15 09:41, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 05:48:16AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Reyk Flöter reyk.floe...@googlemail.com [2014-05-15 01:04]:
On 15.05.2014, at 00:46, Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de
wrote:
* Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 06:58:53AM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
Paul de Weerd we...@weirdnet.nl writes:
[...]
This makes a whole lot of sense to me. Please make OpenBSD the first
OS to do (this part of) v6 in a sensible way.
Actually that makes me laugh. Sensible, weeeh.
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:24:57AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 06:58:53AM +0200, J?r?mie Courr?ges-Anglas wrote:
Paul de Weerd we...@weirdnet.nl writes:
[...]
This makes a whole lot of sense to me. Please make OpenBSD the first
OS to do (this part of) v6
* Todd T. Fries t...@openbsd.org [2014-05-15 06:29]:
Penned by Henning Brauer on 20140514 22:48.16, we have:
| * Reyk Flöter reyk.floe...@googlemail.com [2014-05-15 01:04]:
| On 15.05.2014, at 00:46, Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de
wrote:
| * Mark Kettenis
* Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com [2014-05-15 09:42]:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 05:48:16AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Reyk Flöter reyk.floe...@googlemail.com [2014-05-15 01:04]:
On 15.05.2014, at 00:46, Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de
wrote:
* Mark Kettenis
independent parts.
one: set the NOINET6 flag by default on each and every interface.
two: implement ifconfig if +inet6 to turn inet6 on and assign
the link-local addr.
this should be transparent for almost all real use cases of inet6
since assigning any inet6 address also resets the flag
and a security risk.
|
| this diff fixes that. well, really two independent parts.
| one: set the NOINET6 flag by default on each and every interface.
| two: implement ifconfig if +inet6 to turn inet6 on and assign
| the link-local addr.
|
| this should be transparent for almost all real
so as discussed recently having the inet6 link-local addrs on every
interface by default is stupid and a security risk.
this diff fixes that. well, really two independent parts.
one: set the NOINET6 flag by default on each and every interface.
two: implement ifconfig if +inet6 to turn inet6
Hi Henning,
Thanks, I really like this.
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:29:20PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
| the only use case that needs config adoption: people ONLY using
| link-local, they will need to put +inet6 in the corresponding
| hostname.if file.
People that set
On 2014/05/15 00:02, Paul de Weerd wrote:
Hi Henning,
Thanks, I really like this.
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:29:20PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
| the only use case that needs config adoption: people ONLY using
| link-local, they will need to put +inet6 in the corresponding
|
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 23:29:20 +0200
From: Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de
this diff fixes that. well, really two independent parts.
one: set the NOINET6 flag by default on each and every interface.
ok on that bit
two: implement ifconfig if +inet6 to turn inet6 on and assign
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 00:14, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:29:20PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
so as discussed recently having the inet6 link-local addrs on every
interface by default is stupid and a security risk.
Connecting a computer to the internet is a security
On 14 May 2014 18:14, Alexander Bluhm alexander.bl...@gmx.net wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:29:20PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
so as discussed recently having the inet6 link-local addrs on every
interface by default is stupid and a security risk.
Connecting a computer to the internet is
* Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl [2014-05-15 00:15]:
I don't think this is a good idea; didn't we establish the other day
that ifconfig if eui64 already did what your +inet6 does?
almost, it's ifconfig if inet6 eui64 - but that isn't all THAT
intuitive. I like +inet6 as the opposite of
On 2014/05/15 00:13, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 23:29:20 +0200
From: Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de
this diff fixes that. well, really two independent parts.
one: set the NOINET6 flag by default on each and every interface.
ok on that bit
two: implement
* Alexander Bluhm alexander.bl...@gmx.net [2014-05-15 00:15]:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:29:20PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
so as discussed recently having the inet6 link-local addrs on every
interface by default is stupid and a security risk.
Connecting a computer to the internet is a
On 15.05.2014, at 00:46, Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de wrote:
* Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl [2014-05-15 00:15]:
I don't think this is a good idea; didn't we establish the other day
that ifconfig if eui64 already did what your +inet6 does?
almost, it's ifconfig if
On 05/15/14 00:48, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Alexander Bluhm alexander.bl...@gmx.net [2014-05-15 00:15]:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:29:20PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
so as discussed recently having the inet6 link-local addrs on every
interface by default is stupid and a security risk.
On 2014/05/14 23:47, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/05/15 00:13, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 23:29:20 +0200
From: Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de
this diff fixes that. well, really two independent parts.
one: set the NOINET6 flag by default on each
* Reyk Flöter reyk.floe...@googlemail.com [2014-05-15 01:04]:
On 15.05.2014, at 00:46, Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de wrote:
* Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl [2014-05-15 00:15]:
I don't think this is a good idea; didn't we establish the other day
that ifconfig if eui64
Penned by Henning Brauer on 20140514 22:48.16, we have:
| * Reyk Flöter reyk.floe...@googlemail.com [2014-05-15 01:04]:
| On 15.05.2014, at 00:46, Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de wrote:
| * Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl [2014-05-15 00:15]:
| I don't think this is a good
Paul de Weerd we...@weirdnet.nl writes:
[...]
This makes a whole lot of sense to me. Please make OpenBSD the first
OS to do (this part of) v6 in a sensible way.
Actually that makes me laugh. Sensible, weeeh. Let's protect our users
from the dangers of IPv6 link-local addresses! Wait, what
33 matches
Mail list logo
