On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 01:50:37AM -0800, Claus Assmann wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 03:41:25 -0800, Claus Assmann wrote:
>
> > > I use uniq for some log file analysis and it contained "duplicate"
> > > lines which only differ in lower/upper case
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 03:41:25 -0800, Claus Assmann wrote:
> > I use uniq for some log file analysis and it contained "duplicate"
> > lines which only differ in lower/upper case (user input). Hence I
> > added an -i flag which also exists on FreeBSD at
If no one objects, I will commit this tomorrow.
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:14:19PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently trying to fix dual-monitor support for Intel HD Graphics 520.
> The following fixes the build when DRM_DEBUG is enabled. OK?
>
> Paul
>
>
> Index:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 03:55:30PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here's a simple diff to tighten things up.
>
> check_sym output:
> /usr/lib/libsndio.so.6.1 --> obj/libsndio.so.7.0
> Dynamic export changes:
> removed:
> __bss_start
> __data_start
>
This appears to break the gcc DRMDEBUG build
$ make atombios_dp.o CC=gcc COMPILER_VERSION=gcc4
gcc -g -Werror -Wall -Wimplicit-function-declaration -Wno-uninitialized
-Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-address-of-packed-member -Wno-constant-conversion
-Wframe-larger-than=2047 -mcmodel=kernel
6.2-stable is NOT STABLE.
Backport, backport,backport.
6.2-stable is a beta release.
This is what its IS.
5.9 vs. 6.2 - last one is a major downwards.
I know a lot of stuff done in tcp/ip stack and this is a good job (abt time to
ack SMP), but
Keep those changes in beta, don’t tell ”we have
On 2017/12/21 23:20, Maxim Bourmistrov wrote:
>
> Fixed in HEAD?! - my ass. Whom puts HEAD into prod?! Not me any more, that's
> for sure.
> IS LIKE DROPPING A TURBO ENGINE INTO A CAR WITH NO WHEELS.
>
> I can dig into this as much as I want/like ON MY OWN TIME.
> But if MONEY are on the
> So i really don't feel like adding a BUGS section, but instead i
> think documenting that -i is intended as an ASCII-only feature is
> the way to go.
Yes, sounds reasonable.
> While here, profit from the opportunity to mention that uniq(1) is
> intended to work on the level of codepoints, not
Solved?1
What abt OPTIONS in relay_http.c ?
Solved?
Maybe in HEAD.(?)
I have to hand-rolle this in src for 6.2 to have it working.
—> toread=0;
You know.
//mxb
> 21 dec. 2017 kl. 22:40 skrev Janne Johansson :
>
> 2017-12-21 21:58 GMT+01:00 Maxim Bourmistrov
Fixed in HEAD?! - my ass. Whom puts HEAD into prod?! Not me any more, that's
for sure.
IS LIKE DROPPING A TURBO ENGINE INTO A CAR WITH NO WHEELS.
I can dig into this as much as I want/like ON MY OWN TIME.
But if MONEY are on the table…….
I think I’ll revert to 5.9 all of it.
//mxb
> 21 dec.
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 02:44:44PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 13:06:00 +0100
> > From: Martin Ziemer
> >
> > My system crashed regularly on usage of graphical Browsers. Other
> > people had the same issues:
> >
Hi Theo,
Theo Buehler wrote on Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:06:02AM +0100:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 01:50:37AM -0800, Claus Assmann wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017, Todd C. Miller wrote:
>>> On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 03:41:25 -0800, Claus Assmann wrote:
I use uniq for some log file analysis and it
My system crashed regularly on usage of graphical Browsers. Other
people had the same issues:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=150916174632762=2
After searching for the problem I found the solution in DragonflyBSD
and ported those changes to our inteldrm:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017, Theo Buehler wrote:
> I committed a minimally tweaked version of your diff:
Thanks for the fixes and the commit, I will try to do
better next time.
> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 13:06:00 +0100
> From: Martin Ziemer
>
> My system crashed regularly on usage of graphical Browsers. Other
> people had the same issues:
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=150916174632762=2
>
> After searching for the problem I found the solution in
On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:06:02 +0100 Theo Buehler wrote:
> I committed a minimally tweaked version of your diff...
Thanks everybody.
> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 13:01:31 +0200
> From: Paul Irofti
>
> If no one objects, I will commit this tomorrow.
Fix is wrong since it will break with gcc. Probably best to just use
%02x, just like we did for printing duids.
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:14:19PM +0200, Paul
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 02:25:41PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 13:01:31 +0200
> > From: Paul Irofti
> >
> > If no one objects, I will commit this tomorrow.
>
> Fix is wrong since it will break with gcc. Probably best to just use
> %02x, just like we
> Sorry. I want to test this myself before I commit it, but I keep
> getting distracted with other stuff.
No Sorry. I think its cool, you find the time to test everything
yourself. (Everybody knows the Problem of no time and too much things
to do)
I just repeated my mail, because there was no
> > The symbols in Symbols.map are ordered after decls in sndio.h. Diff
> > already discussed with ratchov@, who gave his ok and is confident that
> > nothing actually uses those symbols.
> >
> > Anyone else with a shared lib version crank?
> >
>
> Thanks; AFAICS, this could go in without the
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:54:50PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> This appears to break the gcc DRMDEBUG build
>
> $ make atombios_dp.o CC=gcc COMPILER_VERSION=gcc4
> gcc -g -Werror -Wall -Wimplicit-function-declaration -Wno-uninitialized
> -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-address-of-packed-member
21 matches
Mail list logo