Re: Can no longer submit kernel regression test results

On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 08:40:47AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2024-03-21 at 09:21 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 09:26:07PM +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 3:19 PM Ian Laurie wrote: > > > > > &

Re: Can no longer submit kernel regression test results

On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 09:26:07PM +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 3:19 PM Ian Laurie wrote: > > > > Performing kernel regression tests: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_kernel_regression > > > > I am getting errors submitting as follows: > > > > Your

Re: [Test-Announce] 2023-12-11 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

Could it be something like https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/registration-difficulties-on-chat-fedoraproject-org/39072/52 TLDR: matrix is supposed to show you a 'agreement' thing when you first login to accept, somehow for this other user it got in a weird state where they were not able to

Re: freeze exceptions for FTI bugs

On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 08:21:18AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > updates-testing is not enabled by default for the upgrade. > > The upgrade process uses whatever repos are enabled *in the current > configuration*. So in the "typical" case, you are upgrading from a > stable Fedora release

Re: new criterion proposal: toolbox functionality

On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 08:18:07AM +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Hello > > > This has been silent for a long time now but here's the update. > Debarshi and I decided to re-write the whole thing as a changeset[0]. > We DO care about not just the rpm but also the OCI image that we ship > with

Re: Xfce ~ Lost all menu icons in Rawhide and Beta Branch

On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 10:34:41AM +1100, Ian Laurie wrote: > On 2/17/23 09:20, Ian Laurie wrote: > > On 2/17/23 04:32, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > Can you file a xfce4-session bug? > > > > No problem, here it is: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show

Re: Xfce ~ Lost all menu icons in Rawhide and Beta Branch

On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:04:05AM +1100, Ian Laurie wrote: > In Rawhide (fc39) and the beta branch (fc38), with all updates applied, I'm > seeing all menu icons are gone in Xfce... both the system menu and > right-click context menus. > > Seems the Settings Tab in Settings->Appearance now has

Re: Unable to import public GPG keys in Fedora 38

On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 01:23:13PM -0800, Scott Beamer wrote: > > Yep. Lovely. Getting Microsoft and Google to fix this should be easy (ok, > not really). I read somewhere that google has already updated things internally, it's just going thru some process to publish. (I can't recall where off

Re: Unable to import public GPG keys in Fedora 38

On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 07:41:47AM -0800, Scott Beamer wrote: > Greetings, > > I've been unable to import public GPG keys in Fedora 38. Example attempts: > > $ sudo rpm --import https://dl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub > [sudo] password for scott: > error:

Re: criterion change proposal: macOS dual-boot

On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:55:33AM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > Our current macOS (still called OS X) dual boot criterion says: > > "The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an > existing OS X installation, install and configure a bootloader that will > boot Fedora." >

Re: Unable to install 3rd party rpm with current Rawhide DNF

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 12:17:22PM +1100, Ian Laurie wrote: > In testing and playing with Rawhide 20221217.n.0 I found I was unable to > install the 3rd party program bcompare (Beyond Compare) for which I am > licensed. > > With their repo installed "sudo dnf install bcompare" produces the error:

Re: Release criteria proposal: require GNOME Shell extension install/remove to work

On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 03:11:43PM -0700, Scott Beamer wrote: > > One thing I should mention, I checked and  only 14 of the 37 extensions that > can be installed from the Fedora repos are compatible with GNOME 43.  So if > Fedora 37 shipped today, I know of 23 packages that would be broken from

Re: Thoughts welcome: interface between automated test gating and the "critical path"

On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 03:50:02PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: ...snip... > > I can think of I guess four options: > > 1. Broaden the definition of the "critical path" somehow. We could just > write in that it includes FreeIPA functionality, I guess, though that > seems special purpose. We

Re: Plan / proposal: enable openQA update testing and potentially gating on Rawhide updates

On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 06:18:08PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2022-06-09 at 12:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hi folks! > ... > > I think doing this could really help us keep Rawhide solid and avoid > > introducing major compose-breaking bugs, at minimal cost. But it's a > >

Re: criterion update proposal: Keyboard layout configuration in the Initial setup

On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 03:22:38PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > This is related to bug 2003253 [1]. As reported in comment 1, our current > "Keyboard layout configuration" criterion [2] specifies where the > configured keyboard layout must be honored. It doesn't specify the initial > setup utility,

Re: Fedoraproject Wiki unaccessible

On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 05:35:29AM -, Ashish Kumar wrote: > Hi, > Certain pages on https://fedoraproject.org/ are not accessible today. > Eg. > Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ > Communicate - > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicating_and_getting_help?rd=Communicate > > I came

Re: GNOME on Wayland does not work on latest Rawhide

On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 08:08:36AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 1:49 AM Igor Raits > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Seems with some latest updates in Rawhide (tbh I haven't updated for a > > ~month) I can't get Wayland working on my laptop anymore. I've tried to > >

Re: post go upgrades (re)testing

On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 01:25:50AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > I had an idea and if instead of calling it stable, we call it RC1 > (release candidate 1) and only after adding all the updates in the base > version and (re) testing, we finally call it Fedora 34 stable ? Yeah, we could add a

Re: post go upgrades (re)testing

On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:47:39AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 11:39 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Hey folks. > > > > I wonder if we couldn't add in some (re)testing of upgrades after a > > release > > is 'go' but before it's actually relea

post go upgrades (re)testing

Hey folks. I wonder if we couldn't add in some (re)testing of upgrades after a release is 'go' but before it's actually released. We hit at least two issues I am aware of with f34 due to multilib. ;( first: pipewire.i686 is in the base x86_64 repo and users had/have it installed.

Re: All mirror systems for update will be rejected with code 404

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:08:15AM +0100, Joachim Backes wrote: > > > On 3/22/21 10:44 AM, Mark E. Fuller wrote: > > It's two hours later, but I am also in Germany and my full daily upgrade > > (sudo dnf upgrade --refresh) went through fine. > > > > Maybe try again and/or with "--refresh"? > Hi

Re: F34 problem reporting problem

On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 08:11:26PM +, Jan K wrote: > As far as I know there is some work being done on that server, so maintenance > by infra team Yeah, sorry, it would have been down for about 2 minutes. I was trying to fix something on it and had to stop the webserver. You must have

Re: Basic criterion proposal: g-i-s shouldn't take 2 minutes to launch

On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 11:13:45AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > In the wake of the BZ 1924808[1] discussion in Thursday's Go/No-Go > meeting[2], I am proposing an addition to the Basic Release > Criteria[3]. This would go into Post-Install Requirements -> Expected > installed system boot behavior ->

Re: Development repos accumulating prior daily builds

On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 01:53:34PM -0600, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via test wrote: > > Kevin, > > Thanks for submitting those PRs. Do you have a sense of when the > scripts will actually be updated and the older files flushed? The scripts are updated now, but rawhide compose failed today (due to

heads up: kernel-5.12-rc1 and swapfile corruption

Just a heads up for anyone running rawhide and using swapfiles: There's some nasty corruption in 5.12-rc1. ;( https://lwn.net/Articles/848265/ has details. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list --

Re: Development repos accumulating prior daily builds

On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 08:53:10PM -0600, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via test wrote: > Not sure if anyone here can address this minor problem, but here goes. > For more than a week The top-level Fedora development repository at > //dl.fedoraproject.org/fedora-linux-development/34 and /rawhide haven't

Re: newbie question

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 06:17:59PM -0600, David wrote: > At this present state of Fedora 34 and Rawhide, > > I see almost the same exact packages getting the same bumps in version > numbers, with only > the suffix "fc34" and fc35" being the difference. > > 1 )Does this just mean that the

Re: [External] Re: Respins for OEM preloads

On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 03:54:53PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 05:41:13PM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > The image has been synced to > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/official-respins/ and the future > > images will be available in the same location. If in case

Re: Proposal to modify: Working Sound Beta Release Criterion

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 02:10:47PM +0100, Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > > > > > > I think there's a misunderstanding in how all the "frameworks" and stacked > > on top of each other. I'm not very knowledgeable in this area, but I think > > the layers are more or less like this: > > > > 6. Totem | Firefox

Re: heads up: nss 3.59 breaks firefox add-ons

On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 07:33 -0700, James Szinger wrote: > > > On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:17:21 -0800 > > > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > > > If you upgrade in f33 or rawhide to nss 3.59, all your firefox add-ons > > > > will stop working. Worse the

rawhide headsup: glib2-2.67.1 causes gdm crash

Just another heads up for folks. The glib2-2.67.1 update (in the rawhide thats composing right now) seems to cause gdm to crash here. Downgrading to 2.67.0 everything is working again. I've filed: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2273 on it. Rawhide users may want to exclude it or

heads up: nss 3.59 breaks firefox add-ons

If you upgrade in f33 or rawhide to nss 3.59, all your firefox add-ons will stop working. Worse they will appear corrupted, so you will have to remove them and re-install them (after downgrading nss). For now, downgrade nss or avoid updating to it until things can get sorted out.

Re: Unable to login to FC34 x86_64 system.

On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:02:41AM +, George R Goffe via test wrote: > Hi, > > I just upgraded this system after running "dnf upgrade". At the invitation to > login screen I type in any userid and hit enter. I get a message about > "corefile" and "segfault" and "glib_2" which QUICKLY

Re: Rawhide users: don't update to 20201208.n.0 packages (fprintd 1.90.6), console login and su are broken

On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 12:53:05PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: ...snip... > > There were bug reports already that I hadn't found as I was looking for > glibc bugs: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905667 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905964 > > so, skip

Re: Blockerbugs discussion tickets feedback 

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:04:51PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: ...snip... > I'd much rather see something like: > > > Bug details: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875677 > > The bug seems to have been proposed as a blocker/freeze exception in > [comment

Re: Blockerbugs discussion tickets feedback 

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 08:29:52PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > Sometimes the ticket titles were not very informative, but thats more > > the fault of the bug really. > > > > Well, we can easily add e.g. the

Re: Blockerbugs discussion tickets feedback 

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 03:06:09PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > Hello, > some of you used the Blockerbugs discussion tickets during the F33 cycle. > I'd love to have your feedback on that functionality. > > As a refresher, those discussion tickets are available from the Blockerbugs > website [1]

Proposed updates to the FESCo updates policy document

Greetings. FESCo is looking to update the updates policy document that is here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ For the most part the updates are not changing any policy, but simply removing old/no longer accurate information (taskotron no longer exists, bodhi is

Re: various topics

On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 08:16:58PM -0500, David wrote: > My install of Rawhide went smoothly today. > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/yg08wi8f9abckg1/Photo%20Oct%2003%2C%208%2008%2045%20PM.jpg?dl=0 > > > I see a stable rpm 4.16 replaced the rc-version.Is that a major > milestone ? > Does that

Re: Proposal: drop extras-qa from all fedora bugs

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 07:03:29PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:30:45AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Since time began (Fedora 7), all fedora bugs in bugzilla have had their > > "QA Contact" field set to: extras...@fedoraproject.org. > &

Proposal: drop extras-qa from all fedora bugs

Since time began (Fedora 7), all fedora bugs in bugzilla have had their "QA Contact" field set to: extras...@fedoraproject.org. Bugzilla describes "QA Contact" as: "The person responsible for confirming this bug if it is unconfirmed, and for verifying the fix once the bug has been resolved."

Re: criteria clarification: HTTP vs HTTPS

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:05:09PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > I'd like to clarify some of our criteria which only refer to HTTP and don't > mention HTTPS. In particular: > > "When using a release-blocking dedicated installer image, the installer > must be able to use either HTTP or FTP

Re: [Test-Announce] RIP: Thomas Gilliard (satellit)

Sad news indeed. ;( He will be missed... kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: kernel-5.7.5-200.fc32

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 04:17:29PM +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > Hi guys, > > what about kernel-5.7.5-200.fc32 in Koji? Since yesterday, it seems to be in > building process. > Anybody knows when one can expect the building completion? It's done. It got stuck on a ppc64le builder that had it's

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Rawhide 20200620.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:17:27AM +0200, Jaap Bosman wrote: > Hello > > today servers are being moved? > > cannot read > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/creating-and-using-a-live-installation-image/index.html > and other docs. > > will wait until all is clear. It was an issue

Re: a question for Rawhide users ( Rawhiders ?? )

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:56:33AM -0500, David wrote: > It looks or appears to me that many if not all packages in Rawhide are > slightly > more recent versions that the ones available via flatpak.I know some > flatpaks > also offer a choice of a nightly version. > > I was just wondering or

Re: Testing impact of Red Hat office closure

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 06:52:05PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: ...snip... > * Testcase_dualboot_with_macOS -- Our old Mac Mini stayed in the office, so > we can't evaluate this one. OTOH, our tests decrease in value every cycle, > because our Mac is archaic and doesn't even contain the latest OS

Re: a personal usage report - Rawhide Xfce

On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 01:44:19PM -0500, David wrote: > Stan, > > I am just trying to become as familiar with possible and to try to > understand why Xfce fans still cling to Xfce. Why? I agree that Xfce is definitely not for everyone, but what works for some may not work for others. :)

Re: f32-backgrounds available for testing

> I can't find the ticket where I went nuts about this before any more, > but I've been saying it for a while :P https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435423 You can blame me, because I said I would work on fixing it, then never did. ;( kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Fedora 33 Xfce report

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 09:42:16AM -0500, David wrote: > Disclaimer: I am a novice, for the purposes of this > report. We all learn every day, if we are lucky. :) > > Today's Rawhide update went smoothly.I am now on the > third iteration of kernel 5.6.0-rc2. > > I explored the

Re: Closing bug reports

On Wed, Jan 01, 2020 at 12:28:41PM -0500, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: ...snip... > Question: Is this an okay thing to do? I asked this once before in the > context of a particular bug and the recommendation was that I should send an > e'mail to the assignee. I just want to determine if this is a

Re: Proposal: Asynchronous blocker review process (using Pagure)

On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 01:29:40PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > We've talked about replacing blocker bug review meetings with something > else for a long time. The meeting has an upside of a higher communication > bandwidth, but also a downside of requiring participants to be available at > the

Re: Fedora 32 Firefox and DNS over HTTPS

On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 06:05:34PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > In the upcoming Fedora 32, is Firefox defaulting to DNS over HTTPS (RFC > 8484)? No. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751410#c2 kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: proposal: move "image size" criterion from Beta to Final

On 9/19/19 12:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 11:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 11:11 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On 9/18/19 5:54 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> >>>> For the record, it makes me sa

Re: proposal: move "image size" criterion from Beta to Final

On 9/18/19 5:54 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > For the record, it makes me sad that we don't have a good way to know > whether we're in Beta or Final phase, and also that the canonical I was sad about this too, and we needed it in various places in ansible, so I made:

Re: FC31 (rawhide) networking problems.

Just a stabl in the dark: In the past, network-scripts (subpackage if initscripts) was getting pulled in by dependencies, and I think some of these got fixed this last week or so. So, if you were using network-scripts for your network, and it's not installed anymore, install that? Or switch to

Re: Xfce 4.12

On 4/12/19 8:18 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote: > Hi All, > > Would you guys please consider going back to Xfce 4.12 > in Fedora 30?  Xfce 4.13 is just too buggy! Well, this is likely a topic for the fedora xfce list, not the test list. That said, I don't really see that happening... there are some

Re: How do I get a change made to a getfedora.org web page?

On 4/8/19 3:25 PM, a...@clueserver.org wrote: > > The page https://getfedora.org/workstation/prerelease/ mentions using the > fedora media writer to write ISOs to USB drives. > > It says you can download it using dnf, but it does not give the package name. > > The package name is "mediawriter".

Re: Problem participating in the QA meetings

On 4/1/19 10:37 AM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > I have been lurking at the last few QA meetings, but I must still be > missing something. I followed all the reference pages people were kind > enough to send me. I have Hex Chat set up and I registered at the > website. In fact when I re-did the

Re: Rawhide

On 12/21/18 11:55 AM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > Recently I have been doing some testing on the Rawhide drops. I didn't > find any new problems to talk about so far. Just for note, I have not > tested any of the drops where the e'mail called out gating failures. > > Since this is my first

Re: F29-arm update failure

On 10/12/18 3:27 PM, Michael Erwin wrote: > Hi Robert, > > I Saw the same thing as well in every one of my F29 environments, however it > seems to be a script issue, if you rerun the upgrade, the problem for me > didn’t reappear. This is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1637496

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Final Freeze

On 10/9/18 2:46 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Am I the only one who's worried that the f29 buildroot is broken right > now, on the day of the final freeze? > > It looks like unbound was updated with an soname bump yesterday. This > buildroot override for f29 is breaking a lot of things right

Re: broken dnf...

On 07/09/2018 02:37 PM, George R Goffe wrote: > Hi, > > I just tried to use yum-deprecated but am getting a screwy message "Error: > Invalid version flag: or". > > > Somewhere in the bowels of yum-deprecated one of the python programs is > having trouble maybe? Can we get someone to fix that

Re: kernel update process (failure)

On 03/21/2018 05:25 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > I know this isn't strictly a "test" question.  But I think maybe more folks > with > greater insight my be lurking here. > > In troubleshooting a kernel update issue on the user's list it was finally > determined > that if one erased "grubby" the

Re: dracut and grub2-mkconfig hang indefinitely in rawhide, in uninterruptable sleep - 20180128

Hey stan. I ran into this same issue here. It seems it's caused by environment-modules. There's a bug on it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539856 kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ test mailing list --

Re: Missing DRPMs for F26

On 08/25/2017 09:41 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: > Hi, guys. > > I don't know if this is the correct forum for this, but over on the > users' list people have been talking about the fact there haven't been > any delta RPMs released for F26 updates. For those of us who don't have > download limits,

Re: Failed to import GPG keys for Fedora 28

On 08/19/2017 02:15 PM, Bowen Wang wrote: > Hi, > I am currently upgrade my rawhide, it seems I need to import a GPG key. I > looked > in the directory /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/, but I couldn't find keys for fedora 28, > where can I get GPG key for fedora 28? Thanks. It's in

Re: Is the rawhide repo broken?

On 07/29/2017 06:44 AM, George R Goffe wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to keep my Fedora 27 (Rawhide) system up to date by running "dnf > upgrade" at least daily. For the past week I have seen a list of packages > with broken dependencies. 165 in number. dnf --best reports 118 or so > "problems".

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Branched 20170617.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

On 06/19/2017 11:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2017-06-18 at 06:15 +0200, Alessio Ciregia wrote: >> Missing expected images: >> >> Workstation live i386 >> Kde live x86_64 >> Workstation live x86_64 >> Kde live i386 > > Indeed that's a problem, I'll look into it... Turns out to be a

Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

Greetings. Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide composes in a while (13 days as of today). This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now failing composes that don't have all required release blocking items. Here's a partial list:

Re: Last released kernel

On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 13:24:29 + Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Russel Winder > wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 12:10 +, Russel Winder wrote: > >> On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 11:07 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> > >

Re: Multiple packages installed

On Wed, 01 Mar 2017 08:40:05 + Russel Winder wrote: > Advice required… > > I have four installations of Rawhide. Three of them seem fine, > consistent, and as expected: all packages except the kernel installed > once and up to date – I keep multiple kernels for fairly

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20170227.n.0 compose check report

On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:24:20 -0500 Dusty Mabe wrote: > On 02/27/2017 09:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 17:25 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > >> Missing expected images: > >> > >> Atomic qcow2 x86_64 > > > > There seems to be some sort of

Re: Release validation testers: a question

On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 12:02:14 -0800 Adam Williamson wrote: ...snip... > Or this order: > > 1. Pick an image to test > 2. Pick a test to run on the image I do this. Usually because I am wanting to test a particular image I care about like the cloud base or Xfce live.

Re: Does the Rawhide stop rolling?

On Fri, 4 Nov 2016 14:37:46 -0500 Bowen Wang wrote: > Hi everyone, > I haven't seen updates from Rawhide since Monday, does it stop rolling > or frozen? Nope, it's just been broken the last few days. See

Re: Last bodhi-related activity

On Tue, 01 Nov 2016 12:10:58 - "Zdenek Chmelar" wrote: > Many thanks for your help. > Would you be so kind and check Anitya > (https://release-monitoring.org/) as well please? I added several > projects there yesterday but the Telegraphist badge >

Re: Last bodhi-related activity

On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 19:16:33 - "Zdenek Chmelar" wrote: > Hello all > > I would just like to kindly ask someone to check if my account > (zdenek) works correctly on bodhi. Even if I added some karma these > days, my bodhi profile page still says "Last bodhi-related

Re: How to upgrade the Rawhide correctly?

On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 14:14:36 -0500 Bowen Wang wrote: > Hi everyone, > I found the web page about how to upgrade the Rawhide to the newest > version: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade > > there are totally 4 commands > 1. dnf upgrade --refresh > 2. dnf

Re: QA group joining process: new members cannot subscribe to list until approved

On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 15:08:49 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > Hmm, sorry. Someone said this was the case on IRC, and I didn't > actually check - I should have. > > Still, we could probably clarify the join process in any case. I'll > come up with a separate proposal

Re: QA group joining process: new members cannot subscribe to list until approved

On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 12:48:39 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! In an IRC discussion with a new member this morning, we > became aware of an issue (possibly some folks knew about this already, > but I didn't!) in the joining process. This is mostly of interest

Re: Reset password error

On Sun, 3 Jul 2016 20:22:46 +0530 Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Hey , send a mail to accou...@fedoraproject.org . I will personally be > checking this as we are onbaording new contributors . We would expect > the system to not give out such errors which might make the

Re: Propose for onbaording session for new contributors

On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:21:55 -0700 Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 16:27 +0300, Pavlo Rudyi wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 16:58 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > Well the server is also open source, so sure,

Re: Propose for onbaording session for new contributors

On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 23:24:32 +0100 Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com> wrote: > On Ter, 2016-06-28 at 09:17 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Well, if you use https://meet.jit.si/ (Their hosted server) you > > can use any web browser, it doesn't need any kind of dedicated > >

Re: DRPMs

On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:26:38 -0500 Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "RW" == Russel Winder writes: > > RW> From what I can see DRPMs for Rawhide have not been picked up by > RW> the mirrors for quite a long time now. > > I don't believe drpms are

Re: Propose for onbaording session for new contributors

On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 13:17:22 +0300 Pavlo Rudyi wrote: > On Sun, 2016-06-26 at 03:16 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Sex, 2016-06-24 at 10:12 +0800, Dev wrote: > > > > > > I found opensource alternative -  https://jitsi.org > > > > I found 2 rpm spec to build it on

Re: everybody i686 Rawhide have broken DNF?

On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 02:48:34 -0400 Felix Miata wrote: > # rpm -qa | grep curl > curl-7.49.1-2.fc25.i686 2016-06-03 12:07 297K > libcurl-7.49.1-2.fc25.i6862016-06-03 12:07 273K > python3-pycurl-7.43.0-3.fc25.i686 2016-04-14 08:44 240K >

Re: Rawhide, Systemd, and Samba

On Thu, 26 May 2016 10:42:39 +0100 Russel Winder wrote: > Hi, > > Systemd is currently blocked from upgrading for me due to a problem > with a samba dependency. Trying to remove the Samba dependency so as > to do the upgrade indicates that gdm and much of GNOME Shell would

Re: ? wayland live image ?

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:27:29 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 18:08 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > On Friday, March 25, 2016 12:25:08 AM CDT cornel panceac wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > Is there a Wayland live image available? > > > If not, how

Re: Next push to F24?

On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 13:15:49 +0100 Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 20:54:30 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?page=22=F24 > > > > > > There are 22 pages of updates for F24 and push requests as old as > > > 11 days.

Re: Next push to F24?

On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 21:43:51 +0100 Michael Schwendt wrote: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?page=22=F24 > > There are 22 pages of updates for F24 and push requests as old as > 11 days. When will be the next push to "stable"? As soon as Fedora 24 Alpha is signed

Re: how to create grub rescue kernel entry?

On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:52:44 -0600 Michal Jaegermann wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:09:49AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > > I should be generated when you do a kernel install next. > > > > > though I do wonder how my resuce > > kernel from 2013 will do

Re: Fedora 24: i686 images no longer 'release blocking'

On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 10:49:06 -0800 Adam Williamson wrote: > i.e. they're actually marked 'i386' and are in a directory called > 'i386'. > > CCing Jan and nirik (who's shown as creating the page in the edit > log). Yeah, just missed/typo/mistake. I have changed

Re: Criteria proposal: applying 'post-install' criteria to live and appliance images

On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:21:33 -0800 Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, folks! I'm working through some criteria issues that came up > during F23 validation. ...snip... > Does this general approach sound good? If so, I'll post some drafts > later in the week. Thanks! Sounds

Re: off topic: mailing list management

On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:57:27 -0700 Chris Murphy wrote: > I don't know what other list to post this in, or if I should just file > an infrastructure ticket. Whatever works. ;) > > The problem is, I can't find mailing list management anymore. It used > to be possible to

Re: Bodhi downgrading packages in stable releases

On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 18:54:29 - "Andre Robatino" wrote: > I don't see which of those apply for any of the three packages in the > bug. Are you sure you're not talking about the old bodhi? -- Wed Nov 18 02:23:16 2015: libpng-1.6.17-3.fc23 tagged into

Re: Bodhi downgrading packages in stable releases

On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 16:51:15 - "Andre Robatino" wrote: > > Sorry on the qemu front, but I was under the impression that bodhi > > handles obsoleting old updates when a new version is submitted. Am > > I wrong, or is something busted on the bodhi side? It does,

Re: Bodhi downgrading packages in stable releases

On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 19:45:43 - "Andre Robatino" wrote: > I think you're looking at the wrong time period. I don't think so, but it's possible. :) > libpng-1.6.19-1.fc23 > went to stable on 2015-11-23 (see >

Re: Non-image blocker process change proposal

On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 06:42:09 -0500 (EST) Kamil Paral wrote: > If the update is pending stable and just not pushed, it might sense > to move it one day, yes (most probably skipping weekends, though). If > it needs more testing, we might decide to postpone it a several days. > If

Re: Non-image blocker process change proposal

On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 07:21:04 -0500 (EST) Kamil Paral wrote: > Taking all of this into account, would this be a reasonable idea? > 1. At Go/No-Go voting time, all updates which block F-N release but > belong to F-M (M is not

Re: Off Topic -- "X-BeenThere: " missing from list message headers.

On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 22:38:50 -0500 Fred Smith wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:42:53PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 11:35 -0800, Joshua Andrews wrote: > > > Suddenly my message filters stopped working. I've been using > > >

  1   2   3   4   >