While at it, please fold that svn commit list back into [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I'd like to propose shutting down [EMAIL PROTECTED] and move it all back under
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The traffic on [EMAIL PROTECTED] list doesn't justify a separate list, and the
Apache-Test co
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Any objections? If no one screams, I'll do it next week. -- justin
+1
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> I'd like to propose shutting down [EMAIL PROTECTED] and move it all back under
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The traffic on [EMAIL PROTECTED] list doesn't justify a separate list, and the
> Apache-Test code is now property of the Apache::Perl PMC, so discussions of
> that ar
Sounds good too me.
FY, the new perl list
test-dev (at) perl (dot) apache (dot) org
"Love is not the one you can picture yourself marrying,
but the one you can't picture the rest of your life without."
"It takes a minute
Filin A. wrote:
But after I read your question I made an experiment
whith my system httpd.conf and php.ini and checked
phpinfo() output.
I've set the extension_dir in php.ini to the wrong
directory and assigned correct value in the
httpd.conf. It's strange but though phpinfo()
acknowledges my ht
Chris Shiflett wrote:
> Hi Filin,
>
>> I've tride a lot of variants and I even think that
>>
>>
>> php_admin_value extension_dir /usr/lib/php4/
>>
>>
>> _should_ work - but it doesn't! I don't know why :(
>> (I tried both t/extra.conf.in and
>> t/conf/extra.conf.in)
>
>
> The latter is the
Hi Filin,
I've tride a lot of variants and I even think that
php_admin_value extension_dir /usr/lib/php4/
_should_ work - but it doesn't! I don't know why :(
(I tried both t/extra.conf.in and
t/conf/extra.conf.in)
The latter is the correct place.
You might try getting rid of the conditi
Hi. Sorry for not writing sooner and thanks for your
quick responce.
> > 1) Why it is necessary to have a special php.ini
for
> > testing?
>
> say you have code that works one system and doesn't
work on another.
> the problem turns out to be that your php.ini file
contains a crucial
> differenc
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 03:42:42PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> onsdagen den 23 november 2005 15.17 skrev Joe Orton:
> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 04:43:57PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > > Not so long ago I started packaging apache 2.1.x (rpm) and also run the
> > > perl-framework tests at build
Attaching the .t file after compressing.
--- "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> And that answers that
>
> Zubin, would you .gz compress your .t file to see if
> it comes through?
>
>
__
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple tr
cc'ing chris :)
> I think a line in the t/conf/php.ini:
>
> extension_dir = "./"
>
> means that php seeks libraries in the current
> directory, while those
> libraries are in the /usr/lib/php4/.
hmm, could be. chris would know better.
> Thereby I have 2
> questions:
> 1) Why it is nec
And that answers that
Zubin, would you .gz compress your .t file to see if it comes through?
ditors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
__
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
Re: Perl framework patch for Apache bug 37145.eml
Description: x-message-display
testrev_proxy.pl
Description: Perl program
On the mod_python side we got a 3.2.2 beta out and will try to get 3.2.?
final done before Apachecon (hopefully). The last release (not counting
security fix ones) was 20 months ago, so this is pretty significant.
Grisha
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Much to my surprise, I ap
"Roy T. Fielding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do we have any ASF issues that need reporting to the board,
Nothing new to report wrt apreq.
--
Joe Schaefer
Roy T.Fielding wrote:
Much to my surprise, I apparently have a board report due yesterday
for this Wednesday's board meeting. Do we have any ASF issues that
need reporting to the board, aside from what is in STATUS*?
Any choice commentary? Does anyone else feel like we have too many
dev lists f
Hi,
Thank you Joe for your suggestions.
I have incorporated the changes and attached two
files:
1)pr37145.t: This file is to be placed in
t/ssl/
2)testrev_proxy.pl: This file is to be placed
in t/htdocs/modules/cgi/
Please review.
With regards,
Zubin
--- Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: stas
Date: Wed Nov 2 12:44:13 2005
New Revision: 330356
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=330356&view=rev
Log:
tests requiring LWP when LWP is not available are now skipped
A note for the test developers. For the future when you finish changing
the test
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
httpd-test gives a really cryptic error message when LWP isn't
installed:
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
.../Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestHarness.pm line 121.
Be nice if we could fix that. It seems that $_ is trounced by
$self->run_t(). My
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
httpd-test gives a really cryptic error message when LWP isn't
installed:
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
.../Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestHarness.pm line 121.
Be nice if we could fix that. It seems that $_ is trounced by
$self->run_t(). My
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> httpd-test gives a really cryptic error message when LWP isn't
> installed:
>
> Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
> .../Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestHarness.pm line 121.
>
> Be nice if we could fix that. It seems that $_ is trounced by
> $sel
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 01:30:22AM -0700, Zubin Kika wrote:
> The patch is attached.
> It contains the following files:
> t/ssl/proxy_bug37145.t :The script file
> t/htdocs/test.txt :Test file of size 100Kb
> t/htdocs/test1.txt :Test file of size less than 8 Kb
> t/htdocs/test2.txt :Test file of si
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose the following change to make rolling release
candidates slightly easier.
Instead of removing the -dev in ./Changes, we could change it to rc1,
rc2, etc.
The version would then be 'mod_perl-2.0.x-rcn' and the tarball would be
mod_perl-2.
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
A release candidate for Apache-Test 1.27 is now available.
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/at/Apache-Test-1.27-RC2.tar.gz
+1
FreeBSD 7.0-current
perl 5.8.7 w/o ithreads
httpd 2.0.55 apr not threaded
Again, I've got a +1 from Randy. Two more and I'll release thi
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
A release candidate for Apache-Test 1.27 is now available.
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/at/Apache-Test-1.27-RC2.tar.gz
Please take the time to exercise the candidate through all your existing
applications that use Apache-Test and report ba
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> A release candidate for Apache-Test 1.27 is now available.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/at/Apache-Test-1.27-RC2.tar.gz
>
> Please take the time to exercise the candidate through all your existing
> applications that use Apache-Test and report back successe
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
I've noticed we include the RELEASE file in the release tarball. I
don't believe mod_perl or apreq do. Is this intentional ?
Appologies, this was not correct. Too many directories of this thing.
--
END
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
A release candidate for Apache-Test 1.27 is now available.
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/at/Apache-Test-1.27-dev.tar.gz
I've noticed we include the RELEASE file in the release tarball. I don't believe mod_perl or apreq do. Is this
intentional ?
--
END
-
> If $file does exist, then the
> if (! -e $file && -e $default_conf) {
> }
> is ignored, but the
> else {
> }
> will be followed; in my case, on Win32, it overwrote the correct,
> exisiting $file with
>$file = catfile $root, $default_conf;
blarg, sorry about that.
> which di
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:10:29AM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> > Is it vaguely right? And can I commit it?
>
> Some nits but otherwise go ahead, great!
>
> 1. use - the _default_: is not necessary AFAIK
> 2. use just "need 'cache', 'disk_cache'" for the requirements
Excellent, even simpler.
> Bu
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 10:55:17AM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
> I've done up a test for mod_cache + mod_dir brokenness;
>
> http://people.apache.org/~colm/cache-test.patch
>
> I've added a virtualhost for mod_cache, because caching can easily
> interfere with a lot of the other tests,
> So with 2.1.7 $r->ext_lookup("2.16.840.1.113730.1.13") should return
> "This Is A Comment" for any SSL vhost in the test suite if it works
> properly.
excellent!
thanks so much for the info.
--Geoff
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:39:22PM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
> > +#ifdef HAVE_SSL_EXT_LOOKUP
> > if (!ext_lookup) {
> > ap_rputs("ssl_ext_lookup not available", r);
> > return OK;
> > }
>
> hey, speaking of this ext_lookup, can you give me an example of what this
> +#ifdef HAVE_SSL_EXT_LOOKUP
> if (!ext_lookup) {
> ap_rputs("ssl_ext_lookup not available", r);
> return OK;
> }
hey, speaking of this ext_lookup, can you give me an example of what this
function does? in Apache::SSLLookup I've added perl glue for this method,
and r
Sander Temme wrote:
Finally, please make sure that you have permission from your company to
submit patches. Submitting material means that you give it, and its
copyright, to the Apache Software Foundation. Covalent has a long
history of contributing to the ASF, and I don't think you'll hav
Hey Zubin!
On Sep 13, 2005, at 5:04 AM, Zubin Kika wrote:
I am a member of the Covalent QA team, and would like
tocontribute to httpd-test.
Welcome, welcome. The way this works is as follows: when you have a
suggestion for improvement, or a test that you would like to submit
to httpd
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
If this point was reached, it would break Win32, plus
any other system which didn't have an ldd in the PATH.
Perhaps Apache::TestConfig::which() could be used to
see if an ldd() [or otool()] is present, and skip this
part if it's not found?
I gues
If this point was reached, it would break Win32, plus
any other system which didn't have an ldd in the PATH.
Perhaps Apache::TestConfig::which() could be used to
see if an ldd() [or otool()] is present, and skip this
part if it's not found?
I guess qx{} is different on win32 ?
Take from example
It's too risky to just check for Makefile.PL, since it's too generic.
What if someone decides to run mp2bug while residing in the source
directory of some other perl distro? How about:
use constant IS_MOD_PERL_BUILD => grep
{ -e "$_/Makefile.PL" && -e "$_/lib/mod_perl2.pm" } qw(. ..);
I
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Hi,
[Sorry for the cross post, but I'm not really sure who's issue it is]
Note 2 patches, which one is best... MP2 or A-T (see below)
Under several situations, I can cause mp2bug to not find httpd or any
installed modules. More on the modules later.
The reason bei
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
For both mp2bug and A-T
Question, why does A-T call it OSX and mp2 call it DARWIN ... should we sync
one way or the other ?
Index: lib/ModPerl/Config.pm
===
--- lib/ModPerl/Config.p
> -my ($self, $user, $uid, $gid) = @_;
> +my($self, $user, $uid, $gid) = @_;
eew, the mod_perl style guide doesn't really say that, does it? that's awful.
--Geoff
Joe Orton wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 05:24:06PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:10:11PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > > Now I also have in proxy.conf.in:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >BalancerMember http://proxy_http_bal1 loadfactor=1
>
Joe Orton wrote:
>
> Hmm - do you really need the special vhosts if they will just behave the
> same as the default server? You can use @SERVERNAME@:@PORT@ to get that
> vhost name out.
>
Well, to be as close to the usual use, yeah, we do.
--
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 05:24:06PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:10:11PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Now I also have in proxy.conf.in:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >BalancerMember http://proxy_http_bal1 loadfactor=1
> >BalancerMember http://proxy_
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:10:11PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I am trying to add a test for the proxy balancer stuff.
yay! :)
> In extra.conf.in I have:
>
>
>
> DocumentRoot @SERVERROOT@/htdocs/modules/proxy
>
>
>
> DocumentRoot @SERVERROOT@/htdocs/module
> I saw that.. The link of perl.apache.org is blank though right ?
I'm not quite with the program yet... what do you mean?
httpd.apache.org/test links to perl.apache.org/Apache-Test.
--Geoff
Geoffrey Young wrote:
I believe anyone that is an httpd committer can change it.
I think that's right.
speaking of which, the real Apache-Test homepage is here
http://perl.apache.org/Apache-Test/
anyone looking for something to contribute back might spend some time
sprucing it up - IIRC t
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Jim Martinez wrote:
>
>> Who maintains http://httpd.apache.org/test/ ?
>>
>> There's a image on it that reads "ApacheCon Europe 2005" that links to
>> the
>> ApacheCon US 2005 (via a redirect).
>>
>> ApacheCon Europe 2005 was, according to the web site, held around Ju
Jim Martinez wrote:
Who maintains http://httpd.apache.org/test/ ?
There's a image on it that reads "ApacheCon Europe 2005" that links to the
ApacheCon US 2005 (via a redirect).
ApacheCon Europe 2005 was, according to the web site, held around July
18th, 2005. Most likely the image should be ch
Well, you are already here :) This is the discussion list of the
test suite and results folks observe.
Whenever you catch a regression, you are welcome to direct the info
to dev@httpd.apache.org, noting the prior-good and new-errored flavors
of httpd.
Beyond that - please submit patches to the p
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 02:11:04AM -0700, Girish Muraly wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> I am running the tests on Fedora Core 3. My Apache
> (version 2.0.54) is configured as part of a LAMP stack
> and I am running tests on each of the components
> (Apache, Mysql and PHP,Perl,Python). I am quite new to
> the
Hi Joe,
I am running the tests on Fedora Core 3. My Apache
(version 2.0.54) is configured as part of a LAMP stack
and I am running tests on each of the components
(Apache, Mysql and PHP,Perl,Python). I am quite new to
the httpd-tests. Are these details enough? Would you
like to me provide any spec
--- Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 12:04:42AM -0700, Girish
> Muraly wrote:
> > I ran the httpd-tests and I got 21 test failures
> in
> > the perl-framework due to t/modules/cgi.t and 1
> error
> > due to t/modules/include.t. The errors are:
> > [just the snippet
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 12:04:42AM -0700, Girish Muraly wrote:
> I ran the httpd-tests and I got 21 test failures in
> the perl-framework due to t/modules/cgi.t and 1 error
> due to t/modules/include.t. The errors are:
> [just the snippet from running t/TEST]
>
> t/modules/cgi...NOK 14
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Well now; rm -rf t , and svn up, gives me the original
error attempting to create 'serial', a 'serial.old'
lingers during the config phase.
Just as a couple of checks:
- does
perl t/TEST -clean
clean out the t\conf\ssl\ca directory completel
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
On Win32...
Using openssl 0.9.8, httpd 2.1-dev (current) and perl-framework
(current)... and I end up in a loop between running t/TEST -clean
and t/TEST -apxs g:/path/to/apxs with this error, every time;
The Subject's Distinguished Name is as fo
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Well now; rm -rf t , and svn up, gives me the original error
> attempting to create 'serial', a 'serial.old' lingers during
> the config phase.
after nuking t/ make sure to nuke ~/.apache-test (or whatever it is on
win32) and run with APACHE_TEST_NO_STICKY_PREFERENC
Well now; rm -rf t , and svn up, gives me the original error
attempting to create 'serial', a 'serial.old' lingers during
the config phase.
Again, any help appreciated. Joe Orton would like me to try
to reproduce his segv, and perl-framework is not cooperating :)
Bill
At 05:33 PM 7/22/2005, Wil
At 05:20 PM 7/22/2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>On Win32...
>
>Using openssl 0.9.8, httpd 2.1-dev (current) and perl-framework
>(current)... and I end up in a loop between running t/TEST -clean
>and t/TEST -apxs g:/path/to/apxs with this error, every time;
Ok - I lie - now -clean ... -apxs ...
> Too late to run INIT block at C:/Perl/site/lib/Devel/Cover.pm line 153.
> Too late to run CHECK block at C:/Perl/site/lib/Devel/Cover.pm line 155.
don't worry about those.
> The only interesting line in t/logs/error_log is:
> [Mon Jul 18 14:32:40 2005] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] failed to
>
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any docs on getting A-T to place nice with a module that works
> under both mp1 and mp2.0.0+ ?
>
> The httpd.conf files written out load mod_perl.so instead of
> mod_perl2.so at the moment for me.
Are you using Apache::TestMM or Apache::TestMB?
When
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Now, this looks like a bug. The T::B->reset method expects an object,
Apache::Test calls it as a class method. I allow for the possibility that
I've completely misunderstood everything--or even just some things.
well, it's n
Stas Bekman wrote:
> Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
>>>Now, this looks like a bug. The T::B->reset method expects an object,
>>>Apache::Test calls it as a class method. I allow for the possibility that
>>>I've completely misunderstood everything--or even just some things.
>>
>>
>>well, it's not exactly
Geoffrey Young wrote:
>>Now, this looks like a bug. The T::B->reset method expects an object,
>>Apache::Test calls it as a class method. I allow for the possibility that
>>I've completely misunderstood everything--or even just some things.
>
>
> well, it's not exactly a bug - it looks like Test
> Now, this looks like a bug. The T::B->reset method expects an object,
> Apache::Test calls it as a class method. I allow for the possibility that
> I've completely misunderstood everything--or even just some things.
well, it's not exactly a bug - it looks like Test::Builder changed
reset() fr
I hope the new diff I am attaching (prepared using cvs diff -u)
will be more helpful.
Best regards,
Sergey Ten
SourceLabs
> -Original Message-
> From: Jacek Prucia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 3:22 PM
> To: test-dev@httpd.apache.org
&g
[...]
I wonder if someone has already implemented a custom verify_resp function
which checks if the return code equals to a given (can be different from
200)?
Nope. We have only 2 verify_resp functions, and basically they do the
same thing.
Currently flood treats any code returned by http request
What is the purpose of the following:
% cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic login
% cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic co
httpd-test/flood
% cd flood
% cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic co apr
% cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspubli
Does anyone know where I can find a prebuilt (i.e. ps/pdf) version of the
flood manual? Thanks
Right now you can only get HTML/XHTML flavour. This is because DocBook
requires decent XML:FO processor. ASF FOP is still missing few features
and it failed last time I tried to build flood manual as P
> Ok, there's one area where I've had trouble with Apache performance,
> and that's in serving very big files. If you've got a lot of people
> downloading 100 MB files via dialup connections, the process count can
> get uncomfortably high. I've tried a number of the 'single process' web
On Tue, 03 May 2005 13:51:55 -0700, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Sergey Ten wrote:
Hello all,
SourceLabs is developing a set of tests (and appropriate workload data)
to
perform stress testing of an Apache server using requests for static
HTML
pages only. We are interested in gettin
Sergey Ten wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> SourceLabs is developing a set of tests (and appropriate workload data) to
> perform stress testing of an Apache server using requests for static HTML
> pages only. We are interested in getting feedback on our plans from the
> Apache server community, which has a
Hello Paul.
Thank you very much for your time and suggestions.
My comments are inline.
Thanks,
Sergey
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Querna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 1:52 PM
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Serge
Puneet
-Original Message-
From: Wes Will [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 12:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: error installing flood
Redhat or Fedora Linux distribution by some chance? Or one of the other
canned distributions? Someone here will better be able to tell y
Redhat or Fedora Linux distribution by some chance? Or one of the other
canned distributions? Someone here will better be able to tell you where
flood is looking for OpenSSL headers, but yours are in some other place
than the ones flood config is looking. You might make a symlink from where
they
Stas Bekman wrote:
> Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
>> we are pleased to announce the latest Apache-Test release, 1.22.
>>
>> the important change to note for this release is that mod_perl support is
>> incompatible with mod_perl versions 1.999_21 and earlier.
>
>
> by earlier Geoff meant 1.99_xx ..
Geoffrey Young wrote:
we are pleased to announce the latest Apache-Test release, 1.22.
the important change to note for this release is that mod_perl support is
incompatible with mod_perl versions 1.999_21 and earlier.
by earlier Geoff meant 1.99_xx .. 1.999_20 (the mp2-tobe versions). It
doesn't
Stas Bekman wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Author: geoff
>> Date: Wed Mar 23 09:39:13 2005
>> New Revision: 158805
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=158805
>> Log:
>> official 1.21
>>
>> Added:
>> httpd/test/tags/APACHE_TEST_1_21/
>> - copied from r158803, p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: geoff
Date: Wed Mar 23 09:39:13 2005
New Revision: 158805
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=158805
Log:
official 1.21
Added:
httpd/test/tags/APACHE_TEST_1_21/
- copied from r158803, perl/Apache-Test/trunk/
httpd/test/tags/APACHE_TEST_1_21
Geoffrey Young wrote:
a release candidate for Apache-Test 1.21 is now available.
http://cvs.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-1.21-dev.tar.gz
I'm unable to download. I've tried at work and at home without success.
I just get a connection timeout error.
C:\Documents and Settings\claco>nslookup cvs.a
On Mar 21, 2005, at 9:57 AM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
a release candidate for Apache-Test 1.21 is now available.
http://cvs.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-1.21-dev.tar.gz
please take the time to excercise the candidate through all your
existing
applications that use Apache-Test and report back succe
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 07:37:54AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Wednesday, February 23, 2005 9:42 AM + Joe Orton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >But there is no way to differentiate between any different interfaces
> >for the address (without doing magic), so I would say that is a
--On Wednesday, February 23, 2005 9:42 AM + Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
But there is no way to differentiate between any different interfaces
for the address (without doing magic), so I would say that is a resolver
misfeature.
But, the resolver was explicitly told that the socket add
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 09:42:12AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 10:52:57PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > The issue with this is that wildcard IP addresses aren't really supposed to
> > be explicit in Listen statements. httpd has a bunch of logic for inferring
> > the r
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 10:52:57PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> No idea why I'm suddenly hitting this, but in preparation for 2.1.3, I
> spent another one of my patented hours searching for bugs in httpd that end
> up being bugs in the perl-framework tests. =(
>
> perl-framework generates
Geoffrey Young wrote:
It doesn't work for me.
% rm -rf Apache-Test/
% svn up Apache-Test
At revision 153479.
it doesn't fetch the new Apache-Test.
It seems that only a completely new checkout of the whole modperl-2.0
brings it in.
hmm, it worked for me. justin said something about needing to svn
> It doesn't work for me.
>
> % rm -rf Apache-Test/
> % svn up Apache-Test
> At revision 153479.
>
> it doesn't fetch the new Apache-Test.
>
> It seems that only a completely new checkout of the whole modperl-2.0
> brings it in.
hmm, it worked for me. justin said something about needing to sv
Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi all...
we (uh, I) kinda messed up during the first migration go-round and
Apache-Test has moved once again, this time to a more svn-compliant
directory structure. hopefully this will be the final resting place, at
least for a while :)
the Apache-Test/ subdirectory of the p
Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi all...
we (uh, I) kinda messed up during the first migration go-round and
Apache-Test has moved once again, this time to a more svn-compliant
directory structure. hopefully this will be the final resting place, at
least for a while :)
the Apache-Test/ subdirectory of the p
On Fre 11.02.2005 10:53, Norman Tuttle wrote:
Easy. You have an illegal character in your XML, the "&".
This needs to be changed to &
Oh sh... thx :-(
al ;-)
Easy. You have an illegal character in your XML, the "&".
This needs to be changed to &
-Norman Tuttle
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Alexander Lazic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i try to make some loadtests and need some vars from the respone.
>
> Please can anybody tell why i get these error:
>
> Error parsing X
>>I've approved joe as a poster.
>>
>>Geoff, why the moderation hits the modperl-cvs /at/ perl.apache.org list?
>
>
> I dunno. ask set these up.
pinging ask now :)
>
>
>>Also it looks that commits to A-T go to two lists:
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], modperl-cvs@perl.apache.org
>>any special rea
Stas Bekman wrote:
> Folks committing to A-T, please don't forget to subscribe to the new lists:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think I mentioned that before, but it never hurts :)
>
> I've approved joe as a poster.
>
> Geoff, why the moderation hits the modperl-cvs /at/ per
Hi
>
> >
> > This solution looks good to me, but should be mod_embperl.c
> instead of
> > Embperl.c.
>
> well, I went to the embperl site and added this to my httpd.conf
>
> LoadModule embperl_module /tmp/Embperl.so
>
> and things worked out as expected
>
> [ debug] /tmp/Embperl.so i
>
> This solution looks good to me, but should be mod_embperl.c instead of
> Embperl.c.
well, I went to the embperl site and added this to my httpd.conf
LoadModule embperl_module /tmp/Embperl.so
and things worked out as expected
[ debug] /tmp/Embperl.so is already absolute
[ debug]
Hi,
>
> > Index: TestRunPerl.pm
> > ===
> > --- TestRunPerl.pm (revision 153110)
> > +++ TestRunPerl.pm (working copy)
> > @@ -35,6 +35,9 @@
> >
> > # Apache::TestConfigPerl already configures mod_perl.so
> > Apache::Te
Geoffrey Young wrote:
[...]
cool. I'm going to spend some time over the next few days trying to get
this situated, then.
should there be Apache-Test/dist too? or should the CPAN distribution be
sufficient?
we can do that, although http://search.cpan.org/dist/Apache-Test/ is just as
good. but if
> yay, php docs at perl.apache.org :)
they may be more popular, but I think we still win when it comes to
open-source altruism :)
>> sure. but what I'm hoping to accomplish is a more coherent set of
>> documentation for Apache-Test that transcends what we've done (and
>> documented well) over i
Geoffrey Young wrote:
additionally I think we should have subdirectories for each of the supported
languages
/Apache-Test/perl
/Apache-Test/php
/Apache-Test/parrot (someday soon)
and so on. in fact, it was the need for a home for php-related docs and
whatnot that prompted this move in the first pl
1 - 100 of 2905 matches
Mail list logo
