Hmm, I would prefer a ’D’ + modifier for a somewhat secret project :-) . ’C’
would work as well, but is to tied to copy.
--
Joachim Mårtensson
On Saturday 24 January 2015 at 12:43, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2015-01-22 05:54, Steven Clukey wrote:
>
> > Aha, another conflict indeed. This
On 2015-01-22 05:54, Steven Clukey wrote:
Aha, another conflict indeed. This is getting tricky. I think (heavy on the
think) cmd+D is open, but many bundles use cmd+shift+D for an open command of
sorts.
What if we add ctrl or alt?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Currently, it seems that switching document keeps already created split views.
While an alternative model would be to keep split views per document. e.g. you
could switch from one document-tab with two split views to another document-tab
with three or more split views. Not sure why I brought up
On Jan 14, 2015, at 2:51 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> I noticed two things with the shortcuts:
>
> * The shortcut for splitting horizontally is the same as changing language.
> So it conflicts with selecting any language starting with a D :(. BTW is
> cmd+D and cmd+D+shift available?
Aha, ano
On Jan 21, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Joachim Mårtensson
wrote:
> What I liked about my attempt was separate split view state per document.
> This was inspired by Total Finder.
> And a close button in the statusbar, if I remember it was somewhat convoluted
> trying to figure out which view to close, si
On 2015-01-14 05:11, Steven Clukey wrote:
I realized that the look probably ought to match the style of the HTML Output
window so I used those colors for the border. I think this is pretty close to
what you said anyway, so hopefully it looks good to you now.
Yeah, it looks great :)
I also
On Jan 8, 2015, at 3:02 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> My initial thought is that the styling of the borders should look the same
> regardless if the split view is enabled or not. So I guess:
>
> * The left border of the gutter should have the same the color as right border
>
> * The bottom bord
On 2015-01-08 04:45, Steven Clukey wrote:
Truly I’m not the guy who should be making style decisions. It currently looks
fine to me, but if you think it doesn’t look good then I’d say you’re probably
right. If you can tell me what you want to see then I can try to make it happen.
My initial
On Jan 6, 2015, at 4:08 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> That's barley visible and I can't see a bottom border for the status bar.
> Also, the divider on the bottom status bar between "Line" and the red icon
> just looks weird.
Truly I’m not the guy who should be making style decisions. It current
On Jan 5, 2015, at 11:15 PM, Allan Odgaard wrote:
> Control-option + arrow keys could be used. They are bound to sub-word
> movement, which control + arrow keys are also bound to.
>
> Though users of Spaces may like control + arrow keys to be used to move
> between spaces, and that’s why TextM
On 2015-01-06 04:23, Steven Clukey wrote:
I believe that white line is the NSSplitView divider. That must be simply the
style in 10.10,
No, I don't think so. I just tried to create a sample application in
Xcode with a split view (with thin divider style). The divider has a
darker gray color
On 6 Jan 2015, at 10:23, Steven Clukey wrote:
I do believe all the arrow key combinations are taken, lest I missed
one.
Control-option + arrow keys could be used. They are bound to sub-word
movement, which control + arrow keys are also bound to.
Though users of Spaces may like control + arr
On Jan 3, 2015, at 4:24 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> Sure, here's how it looks when it's active [1] and here when it's inactive
> [2]. I highlighted the edges that are missing the border.
>
> I suspect that the left border of the gutter is usually handled by the window
> or file browser border
On 2015-01-03 06:54, Steven Clukey wrote:
I’m surprised I didn’t notice this, but I guess that goes to show just how
often I use the file browser. Fixed in new commit.
Cool, thanks.
I don’t quite know what you mean here. I don’t see anything change, but I
suppose I am just missing it. Coul
On 2015-01-02 14:48, Attila Györffy wrote:
Awesome effort, this something that I’d be very interested in checking out.
I’ve cloned your repo and tried building the app but the build unfortunately
failed. I don’t recall being able to successfully compile TextMate on my
current machine, but I st
On Jan 2, 2015, at 8:48 AM, Attila Györffy wrote:
> Awesome effort, this something that I’d be very interested in checking out.
> I’ve cloned your repo and tried building the app but the build unfortunately
> failed. I don’t recall being able to successfully compile TextMate on my
> current ma
On Jan 2, 2015, at 6:50 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> This is awesome :D.
>
> I few comments:
>
> * I noted there are some issues with synchronizing the tabs and the content.
> If I open a file from the file browser it will open a new tab, show the
> correct content but the previous tab is sel
Awesome effort, this something that I’d be very interested in checking out.
I’ve cloned your repo and tried building the app but the build unfortunately
failed. I don’t recall being able to successfully compile TextMate on my
current machine, but I still wonder: Is there a prebuilt version of Te
On 2014-12-31 21:21, Steven Clukey wrote:
I’ve created an implementation of split views in TextMate. It is basically
complete, except for one issue that I haven’t been able to fix and I am asking
for help on this. I am posting it here rather than creating a Pull Request for
several reasons. Fi
19 matches
Mail list logo
